Use the work you completed for Parts, I, II, and III with your CLC group to inform your analysis for this assignment. Write a 500-750-word analysis of the significance of these three matrices regarding their relevance for strategic planning. Describe the key information for each and how information from each will influence recommendations for strategy selection, planning, and implementation. Without prematurely determining and formalizing strategic goals and objectives, begin thinking about possible strategies to capitalize and add value to the organization based on the analysis of this information. Be sure to cite three to five relevant and credible sources in support of your content. Use only sources found at the GCU Library, corporate websites, or those provided in Topic Materials. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. running head: CLC-SPACE MATRIX, GRAND MATRIX, AND QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIC PLANNING MATRIX CLC-Space Matrix, Grand Matrix, and Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix The Walt Disney Company Anne Pauline Quilantang, Said Adoi, Austin White, and Peter Rice Grand Canyon University Course: MGT 660-050 Strategic Management May 20, 2020 Instructor: Dr. Joseph Kennedy 1 running head: CLC-SPACE MATRIX, GRAND MATRIX, AND QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIC PLANNING MATRIX 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………... 3 1. SPACE Matrix….…………………………………………………………………………….3 2. GRAND Matrix…….……………………… ...…………………….……………………......5 3. QSP Matrix…….……………………….…………………….…………………………........6 4. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………….18 running head: CLC-SPACE MATRIX, GRAND MATRIX, AND QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIC PLANNING MATRIX 3 Space Matrix, Grand Matrix, and Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix The Walt Disney Company Introduction: Disney maintains its success by applying strategical analysis. Presenting its compare and contrast with Disney’s competitors, matrices present its advantage and what Disney needed to develop. The techniques listed are under the strategy-formulation analytical framework, which includes SPACE Matrix, Grand Matrix, and QSPM matrix. These are under the matching stage that conducts a legitimate basis or reliable sources. 1. Strategic Position and Action Evaluation Matrix (SPACE) Legend: 1. Blue: The CBS Company 2. Red: The Walt Disney Company 3. Green: Viacom running head: CLC-SPACE MATRIX, GRAND MATRIX, AND QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIC PLANNING MATRIX 4 Note: Disney only hits the aggressive quarter in the Space Matrix. When viewing Disney as a company in the space Matrix they show attractive and relatively stable in the market they represent. Having a competitive advantage over other companies that they can protect with what they offer shows the versatility of Disney. Disney Popular and strong brand is recognizable throughout the world. Being family oriented and suitable for all customer allows them to have a competitive advantage. Aggressive strategies: Strong competitive position, Market creates rapid growth, internal strengths and avoids new competitors as threats. Disney has their strengths, and the company has its advantages, mainly in the market by rapid growth that makes them stronger by being so competitive. Using the strengths in order to improve weaknesses like running head: CLC-SPACE MATRIX, GRAND MATRIX, AND QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIC PLANNING MATRIX 5 limited diversification to create better synergy throughout the company. By doing this it allows internal strategic factors to be the aim of synergy.