- Introduction
- Describe the overall topic that you have been investigating,
- why it is important to the field,
- why you are interested in the topic,
- Identify themes and trends in research questions, methodology, and findings.
- Give a “big picture” of the literature.
- Topic A
- Overview of characteristics of the theme (commonalities, differences, nuances)
- Sub-theme – narrow but grouped findings related to the theme
i. Study (Research question(s), Methods/Participants, Related Findings)
ii. Study (Research question(s), Methods/Participants, Related Findings)
iii. Study (Research question(s), Methods/Participants, Related Findings)
- Sub-theme – narrow but grouped findings related to the theme
i. Study (Research question(s), Methods/Participants, Related Findings)
ii. Study (Research question(s), Methods/Participants, Related Findings)
iii. Study (Research question(s), Methods/Participants, Related Findings)
- Etc., etc., etc. with other findings that fit Topic A; studies can be repeated if there are multiple findings that fit under more than one topic. However, no need to re-write methods/participants in detail (just enough to remind the reader about the study).
- Topic B
follow a, b, c, and so on from above
- Topic C
follow a, b, c, and so on from above.
Repeat as needed.
- Conclusion
An evaluation/critique of the existing literature. Write several paragraphs.
- What are the contributions of this literature to the field?
- What are the overall strengths?
- What are the overall weaknesses?
- What might be missing?
- What are some next steps for research? The next steps should explicitly address how to “correct” for strengths, weaknesses, and gaps.