Premise Report 1
Premise Report
Jane Doe
Mississippi College
Premise Report 2
Premise Report
Advertisements bombard consumers with a daily onslaught of persuasive messages. From
the Nike Swoosh to Aflac’s Duck, creativity and innovation continue to surprise and interest
consumers. Although images and characters used by different cultures throughout history vary,
the persuasive foundations of advertisements are rooted in philosophies and theories pioneered in
ancient Greece by Aristotle.
Millennia before Madison Avenue became a center of persuasive messaging, Aristotle’s
work “The Rhetoric” attempted to provide a comprehensive analysis of the process of
persuasion. “The Rhetoric” offered definitions of types of proof to use in support of a persuasive
message. Proof supports the intent of a message by providing evidence which is connected by
reasoning to the intended conclusion. Aristotle provided parameters for defining two primary
types of proof - artistic and inartistic. Artistic proofs are those that come within the control of the
persuader. Artistic proofs are particularly exemplified in the realm of advertising. Content
creation in advertising relies on facets of the message that can be controlled, and thus
advertisements offer clear examples of artistic proof in use.
Aristotle developed three categories of artistic proof - logos, pathos and ethos. Logos
refers to evidence rooted in logic and reasoning. This type of proof is supported by evidence in
direct, dramatic, and rational form. Direct evidence is experiential, in which a persuasive
message is effective due to the audience’s previous negative or positive experience with the same
object or idea. Dramatic evidence can be communicated in narrative, testimonial, anecdotal, and
participatory styles, all of which rely on the audience’s identification with an indirect, vicarious
experience. Rational evidence relies on the reasoning capabilities of the audience to draw the
Premise Report 3
proper conclusions based on information such as statistics. Evidence that is based in pathos
draws on the emotional and psychological aspects of an audience. Appeals to needs, emotions,
attitudes, and consistency, or the conformity to established patterns of behavior, are all types of
evidence employed in pathos-based proofs. Proofs that rely on ethos encompass evidence
stemming from a communicator’s credibility within their culture. This type of evidence affects
the resonance of a persuasive message based on characteristics that include the persuaders
nonverbal communication. Logos, pathos, and ethos are identifiable as proofs in persuasive
messages of all kinds.
Evidence is only half of proof. Reason must also be present. For evidence to be effective
the audience of consumers must be able to comprehend the reasoning presented, or accomplish
the reasoning themselves. Inductive reasoning proceeds from a specific statement to a conclusion
given in general terms. Inductive reasoning often takes the forms of example, analogy, and
causal correlation. Deductive reasoning proceeds in the opposite direction by starting with a
general statement and leading to a specific conclusion. This type of reasoning manifests itself in
causal generalizations and conclusions of existence. Inductive and deductive reasoning facilitate
the evaluation of evidence to lead an audience to the proper conclusion.
Regardless of the type of evidence and reasoning employed, persuaders base their
arguments on premises. Premises are statements from which the conclusion follows. Content
premises rely on logos, while process premises rely on pathos, and cultural and nonverbal
premises rely on ethos. Persuasive messages often include a major and minor premise that guide
the consumer to a conclusion that is either explicit or implicit. Allowing either the major or
minor premise or conclusion to remain implicit is a device that Aristotle referred to as an
enthymeme. Enthymemes invite cognitive participation from consumers as they allow them to
Premise Report 4
fill in the premises or conclusion that is left unstated. Premises and enthymemes together are the
structures that are crafted into powerful persuasive tools by communicators.
In the modern world of advertising, messages are crafted with a specific target in mind
and released into a malaise of media. Creativity is necessary as marketers seek innovative ways
to earn consumer’s attention and generate revenue. Despite the demand for creativity, the
premises and proofs are still present and put to work in persuasion. In this paper, examples of
advertisements will be examined for their use of evidence and reason in proof of their premise.
Content Premises
Advertising that is premised on content such as data or narrative evokes cognitive
participation from the audience. Whether the evidence is given in dramatic or rational form, it is
used to inspire the audience to think a particular way about a product or service.
Advertisements
Advil’s “Relief at the Site of Pain” advertisement offers a visual representation of the
drug’s efficacy in targeting specific sources of pain. The narrator informs the audience that it is a
fact that Advil targets and relieves pain no matter where it is in the body. The conclusion drawn
by the narrator is that “relief doesn’t get any better than this.”
Rational evidence is employed to support the process of reasoning that this advertisement
seeks to stimulate. The narrator uses inductive reasoning when he tells audiences that Advil
reaches the site of pain no matter where it is, and that therefore there is no better antihistamine
for pain relief; the reasoning moves from the specifics of Advil’s efficacy to a generalization
about antihistamines. The enthymeme that occurs within the body of the advertisement is that a
targeted pain reliever is better than one that is not targeted. This is never expressly stated, but
was implied from the explicit message that Advil targets pain and is therefore better.
Premise Report 5
Flonase is delivered as a nasal spray in this advertisement, titled “Six is Greater,” which
utilizes direct experience and rational evidence to convince consumers that Flonase is better than
the leading brand of allergy-related antihistamine. The narration of the advertisement uses the
plural pronoun “we” to inspire viewers to contemplate their own experiences with nasal
congestion. The rational evidence that follows is a numeric explanation of the number of
inflammatory substances released in an allergic reaction, which hinges on the explicit message
that “six is greater than one.” By claiming that Flonase targets all six substances that cause
allergic discomfort, the advertisement offers easily understandable data for viewers. This data
then invokes the messages’ enthymeme that Flonase is better than the leading brand of allergy
medication by claiming that the leading brand only targets one of the six substances.
Allegra’s TV commercial “Allegra Allergy” claims that the drug is fast and strong. The
advertisement promises that consumers will experience 24 hours of relief from their worst
symptoms within one hour of taking the medicine. This is claimed to be twice as fast as a
competitor’s product. The rational evidence to support this message’s content is obvious in the
use of numerical data to demonstrate the efficacy of the medication. In terms of enthymemes, the
advertisement compares Allegra and Claritin before claiming that nothing is faster or stronger for
treating allergies than Allegra - implying that Claritin is the only competitor.
Zyrtec’s advertisements consistently present the negative repercussions of allowing
allergies to run your nose and your life. This particular advertisement “Family Outing” creatively
demonstrates how a family’s vacation is altered by the mother’s struggle with allergies when she
sneezes into her ice cream cone. The narrator promises that Zyrtec will free consumers from
muddling through life events, and that it will do so more rapidly than their competitor, Claritin.
Narrative dramatic evidence is presented by the story that the narrator refers to as it plays on the
Premise Report 6
screen. This is followed by rational evidence in the claim that Zyrtec works faster than Claritin,
appealing to an assumed audience perspective that faster is better.
The Claritin advertisement “Real People Every Day” shows individuals having their days
upended because they are distracted by their allergies. A narrator then explains that doctors
recommend taking Claritin non-drowsy relief daily during allergy season. This is promised to
free you from distraction. That promise is given as people are shown accomplishing impressive
feats such as throwing a basketball into the hoop using their feet.
Dramatic evidence often takes the narrative form in television advertising. In the Claritin
advertisement, the individuals represented are very believable as everyday citizens which
increases the accessibility of the message. The reasoning offered by the advertisement is that
Claritin frees you to breath easier and accomplish more important things by being able to focus,
rather than be distracted by allergies.
Editorials
On November 13th, 2015, the New York Times Editorial Board published a piece
entitled “Abortion, Back at the Supreme Court.” The article discussed the Whole Woman’s
Health v. Cole case in which a Texas law that raised standards for abortion clinics’ facilities was
being challenged. In the article, the authors argue that the law was crafted to put abortion clinics
out of business under the pretense of concern for their health.
The foundational premise of this editorial seems to be that women should have unlimited
access to abortion. This premise is developed by the application of rational evidence, this time in
historical information regarding current abortion laws and the safety of abortive procedures. The
editorial ends with the use of pathos. By claiming that the law will hurt underprivileged women
most, the authors attempt to ignite attitudes and emotions related to social injustice, such as guilt.
Premise Report 7
The syllogism of the argument made is that the law restricts access to abortion, women have a
right to choose abortion, and therefore the law restricts women’s rights.
“End the Gun Epidemic in America,” published in the New York Times on December
4th, 2015, discusses the author's’ perception that America needs to ban the sale of certain kinds
of weapons and ammunition. The author acknowledges the philosophical and practical
challenges that affect such a change, but argues that America should follow in the footsteps of
countries that have made concerted efforts towards ending gun violence.
This article begins with a statement that invokes participatory evidence, stating that “all
decent people” feel a certain way. From the generalization that all people feel a certain way, the
author argues that America’s leaders have not done enough to prevent gun violence, and that
since all people feel negatively towards gun violence America needs to make changes in their
laws. This syllogism is representative of deductive reasoning, where the author has moved from
generalizations to specific recommendations. The anticipated consumer for this editorial would
likely be predisposed to agree with the author, regardless of their political affiliation, because the
argument is not that all guns should be banned, but that sensible steps should be taken to prevent
certain weapons from being easily accessible.
The New York Times editorial from January 16th, 2016, “The Death Penalty Endgame,”
tackles the question of how a nation decides to end its practice of implementing the death
penalty. The author describes the case of Shonda Walter, who sat on death row and asked the
Supreme Court to consider all death penalties unconstitutional. The body of the article is full of
statistics and numbers, as well as references to global attitudes and practices of the death penalty.
Encapsulated by dramatic evidence that uses the narrative form, the rational evidence
makes up the main body of this argument. The author gives an overview of developments in
Premise Report 8
public and judicial treatment of the death penalty. The article is premised on the idea that
America is part of the civilized world. Although this premise is never stated, it is implied, giving
the argument an enthymematic aspect. The premises that are explicitly stated are that the
civilized world no longer accepts the death penalty as an appropriate form of punishment, and
that therefore America needs to follow suit and end the practice of the death penalty.
Process Premises
Process premises address needs, emotions, attitudes, and consistency. An advertisement
crafted on a process premise will offer audiences the opportunity to become affectively involved
with a product.
Product Category Advertisements
The importance of persuading drivers to use cellphones while they are operating a vehicle
has been highlighted in several advertising campaigns. One of the earliest Public Service
Announcement messages on the subject of texting while driving was created by Tredegar
Comprehensive School and Gwent Police in the United Kingdom. A group of friends are riding
together while the driver types out a text message. Distracted, she veers into oncoming traffic.
The collision is violent, and viewers watch glass and blood across the screen. When the cars
come to a rest they are hit by a third vehicle. All of this action occurs in the first 45 seconds of
the video. For three minutes and thirty seconds the ramifications are shown. Two of the girls, a
couple and a baby all appear to be dead. A child asks “when will mommy and daddy wake up?”
This advertisement prompts the audience to feel their need for emotional security and
physiological safety by demonstrating the physical and emotional ramifications felt by the driver
who sent the text message and survives the accident. The emotions correlated with this message
are primarily fear and guilt, both of which are a form of psychological discomfort. By showing
Premise Report 9
everyday characters driving before the accident, the advertisement communicates that the threat
of such a thing happening to the viewer is real. The implicit conclusion of this Public Service
Announcement is that people must alter their behavior to not text while driving.
Like the previously discussed PSA, AT&T’s “Close to Home” introduces the audience to
cast of characters - a mother and daughter, a young boy, a workman, a caretaker and her charge.
The mother receives a notification of her phone and looks down at it. The workman’s truck
collides with the mother’s car, glass shatters in slow motion as the characters react. The film then
moves backwards to right before the text message came through. The advertisement ends with a
voiceover saying “AT&T reminds you. It can wait.”
Once again, to persuade viewers to alter their behavior or maintain the same behavioral
patterns they currently follow, the advertisement creates an emotionally engaging narrative. The
need for security and the emotional complex of fear and guilt are all activated by this message.
The process premise of attitude is also aroused as the final words of the message directly
contradicts any attitudes that lead to texting while driving.
Blood is captured flying through the air and spattering across a man’s face as it bursts
from the cellphone in his hand. The words “Don’t talk while she drives” are printed in red ink.
This advertisement effectively uses the process premise by combining the need for love objects
and security with fear.
The body copy of the National Safety Council’s advertisement “Don’t Text and Drive”
presents rational evidence regarding the number of automobile accidents attributed to text-
message distraction. First, however, the advertisement claims consumers’ attention by showing a
small child in the road, seen through someone’s cell phone that is raised. Children are a naturally
emotion-inspiring object in advertisement. Fear and guilt work in concert to accomplish the
Premise Report 10
advertisement’s goal. If texting while driving endangers the life of a child, drivers should be
afraid that they will cause the death of a child, and feel guilt for past text messaging and
imagined guilt.
“Stop the violence. Don’t text and drive” by Ecovia depicts a man in profile as a punch
forces his head backwards. A truck is drawn on his face, and the fist punching him has a car
drawn on it, representing a collision. The persuaders creating this message connected the idea of
a painful, recognizable experience (a punch) to a painless, often unrecognized choice. The image
can evoke memories of the audience’s experiences with physical pain. This effectively activates
attitudes towards physical violence in general, and connects those attitudes to the behavior that
the persuasive message is intended to change.
Same Brand Advertisements
The cosmetic industry is notorious for advertising that manipulates the psychological and
emotional needs of women and their attitudes towards their appearance. The French company
L’Oréal is the largest cosmetics company in the world. Their brand includes hair and skin
products.
In 2014 the company introduced a new shampoo intended to thicken hair. The
advertisement utilized a credible spokesperson, actress Blake Lively, and rational evidence that
the shampoo was scientifically revolutionary, but the process premise at work was clearly
articulated at the end of the commercial. “Thicker, Fuller Hair Like Blake Lively” ends with the
spokeswoman reminding the audience “you’re worth it.” This directly addresses one of Vance
Packard’s eight hidden needs, the need for reassurance of worth. The advertisement also
addresses the self-actualization of Maslow’s pyramid of needs by asking the audience if they
Premise Report 11
have always dreamed of having thicker hair and claiming that L’Oréal can make that dream a
reality.
The rational premise that this advertisement includes is that L’Oréal has invented a new
molecule that will actually thicken hair by moving inside it and increasing its diameter. Whether
or not it is possible remains a mystery. The association of Lively with the shampoo implies that
her hair is thick because she uses the product. This creates the enthymeme that consumers can
have hair like hers if they use the product, although there is no evidence given that Lively
actually uses the product.
L’Oréal’s hair-care products are not limited to shampoo and conditioners. The company
also creates and markets dyes. Their overall strategy includes having spokeswomen from pop
culture represent their products. Gwen Stefani modeled their Superior Preference hair dye in
print advertisement. This advertisement confronts consumers with an image of Stefani with
perfectly styled, golden hair, promising that Superior Preference leaves hair “luminous,
luxurious, and legendary” for eight weeks. Once again, L’Oréal’s advertisers target their
message at one of Packard’s hidden needs, this time the need for ego gratification. Because
L’Oréal’s prices are set within a range that is affordable, this advertisement caters to the
aspirations of consumers in search of gratification of their ego through appearance.
The message’s primary persuasive power comes from the image shown. Rational
evidence claims are made in this advertisement, but no data are presented in support of those
claims. Once again, the imagery and the process premise it plays on are the dominant factors.
L’Oréal’s Colour Riche line of lipstick is represented by Beyoncé Knowles. The color red
grabs consumers’ attention and the text of the advertisement once again focuses on ego
Premise Report 12
gratification, this time with “richest indulgence.” This advertisement does include rational
evidence, as it claims that L’Oréal’s is the number one lipstick in the world.
Cultural and Nonverbal Premises
Cultural Premises
Cancer Research of the United Kingdom created an upbeat message with their “Together
We Can Do Something” advertisement, which pictures a fist covering the final three letters of the
word “cancer” so that it becomes “can.” The cultural premise at work in the advertisement is the
Western cultural myth of the possibility of success.
The Wall Street Journal recently featured a Cadillac advertisement that refers to the value
of challenge premise. “Only those who dare drive the world forward” the advertisement states,
and immediately connects the idea of forward motion to “the first-ever Cadillac ctg.” The tagline
is perhaps the most telling portion of the advertisement in identifying the cultural premise at
work - “dare greatly.” American culture is saturated with encouragement to overcome any
obstacles that stand between an individual and their objectives. This advertisement caters directly
to that mindset over pursuing and attaining goals.
Kenneth Cole’s advertisement featuring Shaun Ross represents an appeal to the
triumphant individual premise. The text of the advertisement claims that Ross overcame
society’s ideas of beauty in spite of his albinism. Once rejected from society, he has overcome
the perceived limitation to triumph and become a successful figure in the fashion industry.
“Chance to Live Longer” by Opdivo appeals to the cultural premise of immortality.
Although it does not promise everlasting life, it caters to the desire that is deeply ingrained in
American culture to avoid pain and death as much as possible.
Premise Report 13
American cultural myths include the return of a Messiah. This “Legends of tomorrow”
appeals to that myth by presenting seven basketball players from previous Jordan Brand Classics
as legendary figures in an advertisement for that event. In a nation that takes stadiums as
seriously as ancient people took temple-building, these NBA players are far more than athletes in
the culture’s perspective. They are the hope of aspiring players, the representation of masculinity
to millions of males in America.
Nonverbal Premise
This advertisement for Kraft macaroni and cheese demonstrates the nonverbal signal of
position for readiness. The fork is poised and ready to be eaten off of, loaded with macaroni.
Miu Miu’s advertisement in Marie Claire Magazine uses nonverbal communication to
show viewers what to look at. The model’s eyes are focused right where the audience should
focus their eyes - on the perfume bottle, which is the key visual in the image.
Rachael Ray’s “Nutrish” cat food advertisement uses nonverbal communication to
present consumers with the idea behind the food - that it is so good it is the same as if the cat
were eating a fresh-caught fish.
Conclusion
Modern advertising often seeks to short-circuit the logical faculties of consumers with
humor and visual attractiveness. Despite this, the foundations of persuasive messaging still
reflect the theories that Aristotle pioneered millennia ago. Content, process, cultural and
nonverbal premises act in concert together across advertising mediums. The media malaise in
which modern consumers operate makes the advertiser’s job much more challenging, but the
tools described by Aristotle provide the foundations for effective messaging.
Premise Report 14
References
Advil. (2014). Relief at the Site of Pain. Retrieved from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ji4i61wm7oU
Flonase. (2015). Six is Greater. Retrieved from http://www.ispot.tv/ad/7J6U/flonase-allergy-
relief-nasal-spray-six-is-greater
Allegra. (2015). Allegra Allergy. Retrieved from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MK0jXPppUzs
Zyrtec. (2016). Family Outing. Retrieved from http://www.ispot.tv/ad/Aqzy/zyrtec-family-outing
Claritin. (2014). Claritin Clear. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/pSmC2YI2Gek
Abortion, Back at the Supreme Court. [Editorial]. (2015, November 13). The New York Times.
Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/14/opinion/abortion-back-at-the-
supreme-court.html?_r=0
End the Gun Epidemic in America. [Editorial]. (2015, December 4). The New York Times.
Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/opinion/end-the-gun-epidemic-in-
america.html
The Death Penalty Endgame. [Editorial]. (2016, January 16). The New York Times. Retrieved
from http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/17/opinion/sunday/the-death-penalty-
endgame.html
L’Oréal. (2014). Thicker, Fuller Hair Like Blake Lively. Retrieved from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkGltowkNw8
L’Oréal.(2012). Superior Preference Dye. Retrieved from http://everythingintime.com/wp-
content/uploads/2012/03/AowVf5mCQAESE0b.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ji4i61wm7oU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ji4i61wm7oU
http://www.ispot.tv/ad/7J6U/flonase-allergy-relief-nasal-spray-six-is-greater
http://www.ispot.tv/ad/7J6U/flonase-allergy-relief-nasal-spray-six-is-greater
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MK0jXPppUzs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MK0jXPppUzs
http://www.ispot.tv/ad/Aqzy/zyrtec-family-outing
http://www.ispot.tv/ad/Aqzy/zyrtec-family-outing
https://youtu.be/pSmC2YI2Gek
https://youtu.be/pSmC2YI2Gek
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/14/opinion/abortion-back-at-the-supreme-court.html?_r=0
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/14/opinion/abortion-back-at-the-supreme-court.html?_r=0
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/opinion/end-the-gun-epidemic-in-america.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/opinion/end-the-gun-epidemic-in-america.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/17/opinion/sunday/the-death-penalty-endgame.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/17/opinion/sunday/the-death-penalty-endgame.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkGltowkNw8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkGltowkNw8
http://everythingintime.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/AowVf5mCQAESE0b.jpg
http://everythingintime.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/AowVf5mCQAESE0b.jpg
Premise Report 15
L’Oréal. (2010). Color Riche Lipstick. Retrieved from http://thatgrapejuice.net/wp-
content/uploads/2010/12/beyonce-loreal.jpg
Gwent Police. (2009). PSA Texting while Driving U.K. Ad [HD]. Retrieved from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0LCmStIw9E
AT&T. (2015). Close to Home - It Can Wait. Retrieved from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVnRcIXEqaU
Bangalore Traffic Police. (2010). Don’t Text While She Drives. Retrieved from https://s-media-
cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/96/c9/9d/96c99dbbababc6322a6e48c822ac4cbd.jpg
BMW. (2011). Don’t Text and Drive. Retrieved from
http://www.blogcdn.com/autos.aol.com/media/2011/06/20110629bmw-text-
drive612mz.jpg
EcoVIA. (2012). Stop the violence. Don’t text and drive. Retrieved from
https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-static/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/4/12/8/enhanced-buzz-
31483-1365769407-2.jpg
Cancer Research UK. (2016). Together We Can Do Something. Retrieved from
http://www.inma.org/blogs/print-innovations/assets/content/Samson-CharityCampaigns1.jpg
General Motors. (2016, February). Dare Greatly. The Wall Street Journal, pp. 28.
Kenneth Cole. (2016, February). Kenneth Cole. The Wall Street Journal.
Opdivo. (2016, February). A Chance to Live Longer. The Wall Street Journal.
Kraft. (2016, March). New and improved and you can’t even tell. Southern Living Magazine.
Miu Miu. (2016, March). Marie Claire Magazine.
Rachael Ray. (2016, March). Southern Living Magazine. Pp. 135.
http://thatgrapejuice.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/beyonce-loreal.jpg
http://thatgrapejuice.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/beyonce-loreal.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0LCmStIw9E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVnRcIXEqaU
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/96/c9/9d/96c99dbbababc6322a6e48c822ac4cbd.jpg
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/96/c9/9d/96c99dbbababc6322a6e48c822ac4cbd.jpg
http://www.blogcdn.com/autos.aol.com/media/2011/06/20110629bmw-text-drive612mz.jpg
http://www.blogcdn.com/autos.aol.com/media/2011/06/20110629bmw-text-drive612mz.jpg
https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-static/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/4/12/8/enhanced-buzz-31483-1365769407-2.jpg
https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-static/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/4/12/8/enhanced-buzz-31483-1365769407-2.jpg
http://www.inma.org/blogs/print-innovations/assets/content/Samson-CharityCampaigns1.jpg