Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Edld 5311 fundamentals of leadership

22/11/2021 Client: muhammad11 Deadline: 2 Day

EDLD 5311 Fundamentals Leadership – Week 3 Assignment

WORD-DOC-MAST-HEAD

Course Objectives

1. Demonstrate a fundamental understanding of leadership approaches and mindsets. (CLO1)

2. Identify personal professional leadership orientation and philosophy. (CLO2)

3. Analyze and synthesize leadership competencies. (CLO3)

4. Develop an initial practicum plan. (CLO4)

5. Exemplify requisite credentials and program requirements. (CLO5)

Week 3: Essential Competencies of Leadership (1-6)

Week 3 Learning Objectives

1. Apply Essential Competencies Leadership 1 – 6 to analyze level of leadership effectiveness. (W3LO1) (CLO3)

2. Conduct a root cause analysis. (W3LO2) (CLO3)

3. Formulate a solution to the problem using the Essential Competencies 1 – 6. (W3LO3) (CLO3)

4. Record evidence of requisite credentials for candidate and mentor. (W3LO4) (CLO5)

Resources

Readings: (W3LO1, W3LO3) (CLO3)

· School Leader Internship, 3.3 “Essential Competencies of Leadership: Theory into Practice,” pp. 126-135.

· School Leader Internship, Appendix G pp. 181-184.

· Case Study 1

Lectures: (W3LO1, W3LO2, W3LO3) (CLO3)

· Lecture – Essential Competencies

1. Developing Trusting Relationships

2. Leading in the Realization of the Vision

3. Making Shared Decisions

4. Communicating Effectively

5. Resolving Conflict and Issues

6. Motivating and Developing Others

· Root Cause Analysis

·

Week 3 Assignment Rubric:

Use the Rubric to guide your writing.

ALL evidence must be appropriately cited in APA format.

Tasks

Level 1: Does not meet the minimum criteria

Level 2: Approaches minimum criteria

Level 3: Meets minimum criteria

Level 4: Meets target criteria

Part 1A:

15 Points

Candidate reviews ALL aspects of the problem(s) he/she and his/her peers stated in the Discussion Board and identifies themes related to each of the Essential Competencies 1-6.

(W3LO1) (CLO3)

Candidate identifies a theme for 0 to 2 of the six essential competencies, emerged from peers’ initial posts, regarding how these themes relate to aspects of the problem in the case study. (K)

0 - 8 Points

Candidate identifies a theme for 3 to 5 of the six essential competencies, emerged from peers’ initial posts, regarding how these themes relate to aspects of the problem in the case study. (K)

9 Points

Candidate identifies a theme for each of the six of the essential competencies, emerged from peers’ initial posts, regarding how these themes relate to aspects of the problem in the case study. (K)

12 Points

Candidate identifies a theme for each of the six of the essential competencies, emerged from peers’ initial posts, and provides specificity and details regarding how these themes relate to aspects of the problem in the case study. (K)

15 Points

Part 1B:

30 Points

Candidate identifies the primary problem and root cause. Candidate formulates a solution to the problem using the Essential Competencies 1-6.

(W3LO2, W3LO3) (CLO3)

Candidate vaguely identifies the problem and provides no supporting evidence. (S)

Candidate vaguely identifies the root cause and provides no supporting evidence. (S)

Candidate vaguely formulates a solution to the problem that is not related to the root cause. (S)

0 - 20 Points

Candidate identifies the primary problem with little supporting evidence. (S)

Candidate identifies the root cause of the problem with little supporting evidence. (S)

Candidate formulates a solution to the problem that is not clearly related to the root cause. (S)

21 Points

Candidate identifies the primary problem and provides supporting evidence. (S)

Candidate identifies the root cause of the problem and provides supporting evidence. (S)

Candidate formulates a viable solution to the problem that generally addresses the root cause. Supporting evidence is provided. (S)

26 Points

Candidate identifies the primary problem with clarity and provides thorough, specific supporting evidence. (S)

Candidate identifies the root cause of the problem with clarity and provides thorough, specific supporting evidence. (S)

Candidate formulates a viable solution to the problem that clearly addresses the root cause. Supporting evidence is provided with clarity and specificity. (S)

30 Points

Part 2:

25 Points

Candidate reflects on his/her capacity to apply the Essential Competencies (1-6) and root cause analysis to reach solutions.

(W3LO1, W3LO2, W3LO3) (CLO3)

Candidate demonstrates little or no self-reflection regarding level of openness of the candidate to explore others’ perspectives of the problem. Candidate provides no supporting evidence from the six essential competencies. (M)

Candidate demonstrates little or no self-reflection regarding the candidate’s capacity to identify the root cause of the problem. Candidate provides no supporting evidence from the six essential competencies. (M)

Candidate demonstrates little or superficial self-reflection regarding the candidate’s capacity to formulate a viable solution to the problem. Candidate provides no supporting evidence from the six essential competencies. (M)

0 - 16 Points

Candidate demonstrates superficial depth of self-reflection regarding level of openness of the candidate to explore others’ perspectives of the problem. Candidate provides little supporting evidence from the six essential competencies. (M)

Candidate demonstrates superficial self-reflection regarding the candidate’s capacity to identify the root cause of the problem. Candidate provides little supporting evidence from the six essential competencies. (M)

Candidate demonstrates superficial self-reflection regarding the candidate’s capacity to formulate a viable solution to the problem. Candidate provides little supporting evidence from the six essential competencies. (M)

17 Points

Candidate demonstrates an emerging depth of self-reflection regarding level of openness of the candidate to explore others’ perspectives of the problem. Candidate provides adequate supporting evidence from the six essential competencies. (M)

Candidate demonstrates an emerging depth of self-reflection regarding the candidate’s capacity to identify the root cause of the problem. Candidate provides supporting adequate evidence from the six essential competencies. (M)

Candidate demonstrates an emerging depth of self-reflection regarding the candidate’s capacity to formulate a viable solution to the problem. Candidate provides adequate supporting evidence from the six essential competencies. (M)

21 Points

Candidate articulates depth of candid self-reflection regarding level of openness of the candidate to explore others’ perspectives of the problem. Candidate provides clear and specific supporting evidence from the six essential competencies. (M)

Candidate articulates depth of candid self-reflection regarding the candidate’s capacity to identify the root cause of the problem. Candidate provides clear and specific supporting evidence from the six essential competencies. (M)

Candidate articulates depth of candid self-reflection regarding the candidate’s capacity to formulate a viable solution to the problem. Candidate provides clear and specific supporting evidence from the six essential competencies. (M)

25 Points

Writing Quality:

5 Points

Grammar, Mechanics, Spelling, Citations

Narrative has glaring and unacceptable grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling errors.

And/Or, published and public sources are inadequately cited or not cited at all. (S)

0 - 2 points

Narrative has frequent grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling errors.

And/Or, most published and public sources are cited, but with many APA formatting errors. (S)

3 points

Narrative has several grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling errors.

And/Or, all published and public sources are cited with several APA formatting errors. (S)

4 points

Narrative has few or no grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling errors.

And, all published and public sources are properly cited with APA formatting. (S)

5 points

Part 1: Case Study 1 – Root Cause Analysis

(W3LO1, W3LO2) (CLO3)

Overview: Though the Root Cause model may seem to be a simple process, problems and their root causes are usually very complex. The purpose of this week’s and week 4’s assignment is to give you opportunities to practice the process and begin to learn how to apply it in real-world situations. There is no one correct answer to the problems in these case studies. As long as you provide a logical, viable solution that is supported by evidence, you will be successful in these assignments.

Directions:

Part 1A (W3LO1) (CLO3): Read this week’s initial discussion posts of at least 5 of your peers. Review ALL the aspects of the problem identified by you and your peers (according to their posts in the discussion board) for each Essential Competency. List 1 theme (the aspects listed most frequently) identified from your and your peers’ posts for each of the Essential Competencies 1 – 6 in the table below.

Use 12 pt. black font: Times New Roman, single spaced. The table cells will expand to fit your text.

1. Developing Trusting Relationships

2. Leading in the Realization of the Vision

3. Making Shared Decisions

4. Communicating Effectively

5. Resolving Conflict & Issues

6. Motivating and Developing Others

List 1 theme (frequently referenced comments) from the aspects of the problem, regarding behaviors from the Case Study, for each Essential Competency below. Be specific in your comments as they relate to the case study.

State a behavior (or lack of behavior) that interferes with building trust.

Provide evidence and/or an example from the case study.

State a behavior (or lack of behavior) that interferes with the realization of the vision.

Provide evidence and/or an example from the case study.

State a behavior (or lack of behavior) that interferes with shared decision making.

Provide evidence and/or an example from the case study.

State a behavior (or lack of behavior) that interferes with effective communication.

Provide evidence and/or an example from the case study.

State a behavior (or lack of behavior) that interferes with conflict/issues resolution.

Provide evidence and/or an example from the case study.

State a behavior (or lack of behavior) that interferes with motivating/developing others.

Provide evidence and/or an example from the case study.

Part 1B (W3LO2, W3LO3) (CLO3): Write two – three paragraphs (400-words minimum) explaining the following:

· Overarching primary problem

· Questions & information/data that led to discovering the root cause

· Additional information/data you would like to have to find the root cause

· The root cause for the identified problem

· The solution to the problem

· The viability of the solution for the problem

Include evidence from the case study and/or rationale to support ALL of your statements. Use the Basic Writing Elements and Root Cause Analysis models located in the course Resources.

ALL evidence must be appropriately cited in APA format.

Use 12 pt. black font: Times New Roman, single spaced. The text box will expand to fit the narrative.

Wise leaders understand the need to analyze the beliefs, dispositions, traditions, and experiences that form their personal theories of reality to guide their practice (Martin, Danzig, Wright, Flanary, & Orr, 2016). For that to occur, they must first take a deeper look at themselves to get the information they need to solve the issues. Martin et al. (2016) describes in the literature how people “tend to focus on the immediate crisis” and can find themselves in a situation where the root cause is not found and the situation continues throughout. There are 12 essential competencies that leaders use to incorporate for initiative developments. Six of those will be applied into Case Study #1 to find the root cause and use the problem as part of the solution.

Mr. Rogers, the principal at Landon High School (LHS) was confronting a troublesome stiuation at his school. He had met with an advisor from a neighborhood college, King Community College (KCC), in which he discovered that there was an overall issue the students were not prepared for college. Subsequent to getting this data numerous inquiries can happen to oneself attempting to get why. For what reason are these students leaving secondary school ill-equipped? Is it because the students are coming from homes where college isn’t encouraged due to the lack of college education in the family? Do the students not have access to rigorous materials prior to leaving high school? Are the students not ready to have the best possible assets in secondary school to permit them to learn at a more elevated level? These questions are legitimate so we can validate Case Study #1 in getting to the main cause to find where the absence of readiness is originating from.

We must first look we must look at why the students are not prepared for the college learning experience. The principal Mr. Rogers has not set clear and precise expectations for his staff so that they are able to prepare students to move on to college and be successful. He did not set any goals or visions for the staff or the students to follow. Martin et al., (2016) discussed in competency two, leading in the realization of the vision, that “leaders look for greater effectiveness with new policies, procedures, and systems”. The next question that we can look at is the staff not having a trusting relationship with Mr. Rogers and the lack of communication. Competency two and four are great ways to describe this analysis to get to the main problem. When a new principal comes along with a staff with as much tenure Early College High School, he had very little data to support the idea and the feedback was not what he was expecting. He just accepted their responses and moved along, he could have tried different ways of communicating so their voices could be heard. He could have sent out a survey for them to fill out, used suggestion boxes, or held meetings with smaller groups to engage communication with his staff members. So why does he lack trust amongst his staff? He has not self reflected on himself or the staff members so therefore there is no growth. The staff is not motivated and he does not include them to help with problems.

To start the solution process, he needs to set clear and precise expectations with his vision for the school so that it can be implemented. After he sets the expectations the staff members will be able to create a measurable goal to improve the growth of the school. The communication has to have a variety ways for the staff to use so that the trust can be built. Mr. Rogers needs to use the resources he has and learn to communicate effectively with his staff.

References

Martin, G. E., Danzig, A. B., Wright, W. F., Flanary, R. A., & Orr, M. T. (2017). School leader internship: Developing, monitoring, and evaluating your leadership experience, 4th ed. New York, NY: Routledge, pg. 126-135.

Part 2: Essential Competencies and Root Cause Analysis – Reflective Response

(W3LO1, W3LO2, W3LO3) (CLO3):

Directions: Submit a 300-word minimum reflective response. Use the Basic Writing Elements and Reflection models located in the course Resources to reflect on your capacity to apply the Essential Competencies (1-6) and root cause analysis to reach solutions. Consider the following:

· Your agreement and disagreement of your peers’ posts regarding the aspects of the problem.

· Were you open to differing perspectives from your peers?

· Did your peers’ comments influence your ability to identify the primary problem? If so, in what ways?

· How well were you able to find the root cause to the problem? Was it difficult?

· How confident do you feel about your recommended solution to the problem?

Include evidence and/or rationale to support ALL of your statements.

ALL evidence must be appropriately cited in APA format.

Use 12 pt. black font: Times New Roman, single spaced. The text box will expand to fit the narrative.

Looking back at what I read about the first six competencies, I feel that I have grown in the comprehension of every one on a more profound level. I accept that when I previously read through the conversations, I should concede I was somewhat doubtful of a portion of the reactions. I have learned through this course a pioneer must stay liberal to every circumstance that you are placed in, along these lines, I left the PC for some time and cleared my considerations, at that point sat down to assess. I saw an incredibly extraordinary comprehension to each on as I read it for greater clearness. I have seen that every single one of us has a remarkably extraordinary point of view toward genuine situations and we as a whole convey in an unexpected way. I found that the greater part of their reactions, despite the fact that worded in an unexpected way, are lined up with my perspective on the issue from Case Study #1.

The competencies that were generally lined up with myself to others were: Competency 1, Developing relationships, Competency 2, Leading in the realization of the vision, and Competency 4, Communicating effectively. Looking at this case study, I had to look deeper to find the conflict in it, after reading some of my peers responses it helped me truly identify what the problem and solution was from their point of view.

The root cause analysis really assisted me in finding the problem within the case study. To find the root cause, asking the right questions that were aligned to the competencies played a big part in helping me find the root cause of the problem. Examples being: has trust been established? Is there a clear vision of the organization? Was there an appropriate decision making model? Are needs being met among the staff? (Martin, Danzig, Wright, Flanary, & Orr, 2016). After I got all the information, finding the solution was easier for me. The why questions made me find the answers and formulate a solution.

References

Martin, G. E., Danzig, A. B., Wright, W. F., Flanary, R. A., & Orr, M. T. (2017). School leader internship: Developing, monitoring, and evaluating your leadership experience, 4th ed. New York, NY: Routledge, pg. 131.

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Smart Homework Helper
Calculation Guru
WRITING LAND
Homework Tutor
Financial Solutions Provider
Premium Solutions
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Smart Homework Helper

ONLINE

Smart Homework Helper

I am a PhD writer with 10 years of experience. I will be delivering high-quality, plagiarism-free work to you in the minimum amount of time. Waiting for your message.

$40 Chat With Writer
Calculation Guru

ONLINE

Calculation Guru

I am a professional and experienced writer and I have written research reports, proposals, essays, thesis and dissertations on a variety of topics.

$15 Chat With Writer
WRITING LAND

ONLINE

WRITING LAND

I have done dissertations, thesis, reports related to these topics, and I cover all the CHAPTERS accordingly and provide proper updates on the project.

$35 Chat With Writer
Homework Tutor

ONLINE

Homework Tutor

I will provide you with the well organized and well research papers from different primary and secondary sources will write the content that will support your points.

$36 Chat With Writer
Financial Solutions Provider

ONLINE

Financial Solutions Provider

I can assist you in plagiarism free writing as I have already done several related projects of writing. I have a master qualification with 5 years’ experience in; Essay Writing, Case Study Writing, Report Writing.

$44 Chat With Writer
Premium Solutions

ONLINE

Premium Solutions

I am an academic and research writer with having an MBA degree in business and finance. I have written many business reports on several topics and am well aware of all academic referencing styles.

$32 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

Who dies in hamlet in order - Irs po box 1214 charlotte nc - How much water did 15.000 g of iron displace - ¿le interesa el trabajo del periodista a fernando león? - List of distributed databases - Acara year 3 maths - Al capone cell number - TAE10 to TAE16 Up grade - Please find the attached file - Gloucester drop in centre - Progect Memo - David hume moral distinctions not derived from reason - Betel nut leaf plate - Focused vs diffused thinking - Cereal box marketing project - Ib biology ia rubric - Red house surgery cambridge - Week one measurments - WK 7 Assignment SOCW 6443: Malingering and Addiction in the Treatment of Sleep Disorders - 2 replies - Tim hawkins ageing rockers - Europe natural vegetation map - Gobblecakes is a bakery that specializes in cupcakes - Dozier company produced and sold units - NS-10 -P - Adeline yen mah siblings now - Test of language competence level 2 - What is a reporting application name five basic reporting operations - Heart rate practical report - Annam brahma raso vishnu - A bond will sell at a discount when - Answer questions - Electronics - How much water does bounty paper towels absorb - Project management for hris implementation - Buy one get one free qdoba 2016 - Business Case for Diversity in the Workplace - Mindfulness in everyday life black dog - Job Description and Justification - Tom stewart harvard business review - Session 1 - American shamans journeys with traditional healers jack g montgomery - Comodo endpoint security ended prematurely - Research - Multiple mini interview monash - Depth of field refers to - Case study healing and autonomy - Q10 the temperature coefficient worksheet answers - Blade runner corporate power - Fall Assignment 2 - E eyes com bank just issued - What is a clincher sentence - Southwest airlines tangible and intangible resources - What gas is produced when a metal reacts with water - Advantages of synchronous transmission - What is 12 hrs from now - Suncorp life & superannuation limited - Oh my love metallic accordion pleat off the shoulder set - Bruce lee fighting spirit pdf - Order 2420519: Maximize Instruction through PD - Case study of hrm with answer - Canon 430ex ii manual - Safe job procedure template - Niagara 4 certification cost - Permutations and combinations in excel - My guinness your choice - Can sohcahtoa be used on non right triangles - Analysis - What is cartage inwards - Vinegar contains acetic acid the formula - Warby ovens national park - Busi 561 liberty university - Which of the following best defines what a provider referral is? - The wonderful world of human resources at disney - Seido karate kata list - Watch Documentary Activity: African American Women and Birth Outcomes in the U.S. - Conductometric titration pre lab answers - Trimalchio's Dinner Party Response Paper - Whats in a glow stick - Juice plus compensation plan 2021 - Doctrine of part performance - The yellow ribbon story by pete hamill summary - Recruit select and induct staff assessment answers - 36 essential multiplication facts - Discussion And Reflections(Essary)- W7 - D1 - Horrid henry pe teacher - Regina harrison is a partner in pressed for time - Who discovered the stroop effect - Analysis of florida water lab procedure - Research Topic - Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics - Bolman and deal four frames - Anecdotal records examples for toddlers - Evaluate the upper and lower sums for - Neal st medical centre gisborne - Week-4 - Phet magnet and compass - The hoist supports the kg engine - Framfield house medical centre