Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Eng 121 week 4 discussion 2

15/10/2021 Client: muhammad11 Deadline: 2 Day

Prepare: As you prepare to write your first discussion for this week: •Review Chapter 1 of Essentials of College Writing. •Identify two writing tasks listed in Chapter 1 as your strengths and two tasks as your weaknesses. •Review your Grammar Assessment. writting hand.png Write: In your initial post for this discussion •Describe at least one writing task that you believe you did well on when writing the Practice Essay in Week One. •Describe one writing task that you believe you need to work on based on your experience writing the Practice Essay. •Describe three grammatical errors that you had the most difficulty with on the Grammar Assessment. To do so, go into the Gradebook and click on your quiz score. When you see a question with a red “X” next to it, this signals that it was answered incorrectly. •Share what you plan to do to further maximize your strengths and resolve your weaknesses. •Use specific examples. •Ask a question about this week’s assigned reading. Your initial post must be 200 to 300 words in length and posted by Day 3. Support your claims with examples from the required material(s) and/or other scholarly sources, and properly cite any references as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. IN THIS DISCUSSION PLEASE REVIEW MY GRAMMER ASSESSMENT TEST THAT I HAVE ALREADY TAKEN Describe three grammatical errors that I had the most difficulty with on the Grammar Assessment. PLEAS AT THE END OF THE DISCUSSION ASK A QUESTION ABOUT THIS WEEKS READING.

Discussion Rubric - 3 points

You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.

Discussion Rubric - 3 points

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome General Content/Subject Knowledge _3873

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

0.9 to >0.79 pts

Distinguished - Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates in-depth knowledge of the discussion topic.

blank

Edit rating Delete rating

0.79 to >0.68 pts

Proficient - Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates knowledge of the discussion topic.

_6191

Edit rating Delete rating

0.68 to >0.58 pts

Basic - Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates basic knowledge of the discussion topic.

_3505

Edit rating Delete rating

0.58 to >0.0 pts

Below Expectations - Addresses all or most aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates limited knowledge of the discussion topic.

_4833

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Non-Performance - There is no initial discussion post, or the post does not address the discussion prompt at all.

blank_2

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 0.9 pts

--

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking _8749

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

0.9 to >0.79 pts

Distinguished - Comprehensively explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates all of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.

_1288

Edit rating Delete rating

0.79 to >0.68 pts

Proficient - Explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates most of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.

_358

Edit rating Delete rating

0.68 to >0.58 pts

Basic - Explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates some of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, and use of information, and logic.

_6819

Edit rating Delete rating

0.58 to >0.0 pts

Below Expectations - Attempts to explore the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provide relevant evidence and information, but demonstrates few of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.

_3037

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Non-Performance - There is no attempt to explore the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provide relevant evidence and information in either the original post or subsequent response posts within the discussion, or no post is present.

_8665

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 0.9 pts

--

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Engagement/ Participation _8825

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

0.9 to >0.79 pts

Distinguished - Contributes to classroom conversations with at least the minimum number of replies, all of which were thoughtful, relevant, and contributed meaningfully to the conversation. Fully engages in the conversation with appropriate topic-based responses.

_6735

Edit rating Delete rating

0.79 to >0.68 pts

Proficient - Contributes to classroom conversations with the minimum number of replies that are somewhat thoughtful, relevant, and contributed meaningfully to the conversation. Attempts to fully engage in the conversation with appropriate topic-based responses.

_8503

Edit rating Delete rating

0.68 to >0.58 pts

Basic - Contributes to the classroom conversations with the minimum number of replies. Attempts to fully engage in the conversation, but the responses are not relevant or fully aligned with the discussion topic.

_2122

Edit rating Delete rating

0.58 to >0.0 pts

Below Expectations - Attempts to contribute to the classroom conversations with fewer than the minimum number of replies; however, the replies are not thoughtful and relevant, or they do not contribute meaningfully to the conversation.

_957

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Non-Performance - There is no contribution to the discussion.

_3992

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 0.9 pts

--

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication _7280

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

0.3 to >0.26 pts

Distinguished - Displays clear control of syntax and mechanics. The organization of the work shows appropriate transitions and flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

_3163

Edit rating Delete rating

0.26 to >0.23 pts

Proficient - Displays control of syntax and mechanics. The organization of the work shows transitions and/or flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains only a few errors and is mostly easy to understand.

_6655

Edit rating Delete rating

0.23 to >0.19 pts

Basic - Displays basic control of syntax and mechanics. The work is not organized with appropriate transitions and flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains several errors, making it difficult to fully understand.

_4166

Edit rating Delete rating

0.19 to >0.0 pts

Below Expectations - Displays limited control of syntax or mechanics. The work does not include any transitions and does not flow easily between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains major errors.

_5671

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Non-Performance - Fails to display control of syntax or mechanics, within the original post and/or responses. Organization is also not present.

_157

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 0.3 pts

--

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion

view longer description

Range

threshold: 5 pts

Edit rating Delete rating

5 to >0 pts

Full Marks

blank

Edit rating Delete rating

0 to >0 pts

No Marks

blank_2

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 5 pts

--

Additional Comments

Total Points

0.9

0.9

0.9

0.3

5

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Chartered Accountant
Engineering Guru
High Quality Assignments
Top Writing Guru
Quick N Quality
Pro Writer
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Chartered Accountant

ONLINE

Chartered Accountant

I have read your project details and I can provide you QUALITY WORK within your given timeline and budget.

$42 Chat With Writer
Engineering Guru

ONLINE

Engineering Guru

I will provide you with the well organized and well research papers from different primary and secondary sources will write the content that will support your points.

$40 Chat With Writer
High Quality Assignments

ONLINE

High Quality Assignments

As per my knowledge I can assist you in writing a perfect Planning, Marketing Research, Business Pitches, Business Proposals, Business Feasibility Reports and Content within your given deadline and budget.

$30 Chat With Writer
Top Writing Guru

ONLINE

Top Writing Guru

I will provide you with the well organized and well research papers from different primary and secondary sources will write the content that will support your points.

$32 Chat With Writer
Quick N Quality

ONLINE

Quick N Quality

I have read your project details and I can provide you QUALITY WORK within your given timeline and budget.

$28 Chat With Writer
Pro Writer

ONLINE

Pro Writer

I have read your project description carefully and you will get plagiarism free writing according to your requirements. Thank You

$42 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

NEED DISCUSSION IN 18 HOURS or LESS - Assignment 2: Part A & B (Only for Kim Woods) Due in 3 days - Physical Security - Alaska fly fishing expedition case study - HRM671 LEARNING THEORIES AND TECHNOLOGY - 51 windermere crescent brighton - Excavation hazards and control measures ppt - Stephenson real estate recapitalization case answers - Hayman reese dual cam sway control - Amoeba sisters video recap alleles and genes answer key pdf - Loftus and palmer 1974 - Confronting inequality paul krugman analysis - 21/1000 as a decimal - Kuba masquerade 1909 kasai congo - My choice school arundel - Which gas is easily liquefied - American pharoah stallion register - Focus pdca performance improvement model - Catholic education office wollongong ess - Amsa sea service log book - Office 365 sign in ucl - Pediatric soap note - Determine the interest payment for the following three bonds. (assume a $1,000 par value.) - Msbi certification 70 448 dumps - Heat of solution lab report answers - Design your own periodic table project ideas - Strategies to ensure responsible accounting practices - How to find energy content - Cost to store $50 markup 10 - Call of the wild questions and answers chapter 1 - Why are duplicate tuples not allowed in a relation - Careys new homes high wycombe - What specific steps does montresor take to ensure - What is the square root of 512 - How to code a brute force password cracker c++ - Exercise for your pet - Maquilapolis film analysis - History - Eclipse Project Javascript - Psychclassics yorku ca maslow motivation htm - Effective team work - MGT312T Week. 2 Apply Self-Assessment Reflection - Given attribution 7 little words - Nursing - Cryptic christmas food and drink quiz - Writing a literary analysis through the lens of a quotation - The electron configuration of potassium - Cfitrainer net test answers - Reading plus answers level e the shrinking penny - Nursing - Delivering business value with it at hefty hardware - Honest tea business model canvas - Help with post - The edge of us veronica larsen epub - Boston children's hospital measuring patient costs - Costa coffee mission statement - The traditional income statement focuses on - Specific purpose statement persuasive speech examples - Global beauty and personal care market size - Plant cell model 2d - E portfolio format rasmussen - Phoenicians competed with minoans for control of - English 102 research paper - Discussion 7 erm - Sonnet to an american painter departing for europe - The book mcdonaldization of society was written by - Sampling distribution of the mean worksheet with answers - Willem de kooning's woman and bicycle is controversial for its - A particle is confined to a one dimensional box - Term paper Week 1 - Intro to Health Care - Writing Help - Physical Assessment Reflection - Martindale rub test scale - Lync 2010 attendee client - Kiama tree top walk - Working principle of hdtv with block diagram - Communication5 - I need 1200 words on Young woman just got chosen to save a doomed fantasy world. - 30/5 gillott way st ives - Government Intervention Analysis - Literature Review - History - International Trade - As 2601 demolition checklist - Descriptive paragraph topic ideas - The writing process part 2 - Blue sky thinking meaning - Business management dissertation - Skill based assessment packet tracer - BI - Devry econ 312 week 3 quiz - Durden junior joiner parts - Airline business continuity plan - Pope innocent iv and the mongols - A weakness of nonconsequentialists is that they try to avoid - Relational messages are usually expressed nonverbally - Vertex42 gantt chart pro password - Chinese dragon pearl story - Workplace Environment Assessment - What is a bailey in a motte and bailey castle