Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Eng 121 week 4 discussion 2

15/10/2021 Client: muhammad11 Deadline: 2 Day

Prepare: As you prepare to write your first discussion for this week: •Review Chapter 1 of Essentials of College Writing. •Identify two writing tasks listed in Chapter 1 as your strengths and two tasks as your weaknesses. •Review your Grammar Assessment. writting hand.png Write: In your initial post for this discussion •Describe at least one writing task that you believe you did well on when writing the Practice Essay in Week One. •Describe one writing task that you believe you need to work on based on your experience writing the Practice Essay. •Describe three grammatical errors that you had the most difficulty with on the Grammar Assessment. To do so, go into the Gradebook and click on your quiz score. When you see a question with a red “X” next to it, this signals that it was answered incorrectly. •Share what you plan to do to further maximize your strengths and resolve your weaknesses. •Use specific examples. •Ask a question about this week’s assigned reading. Your initial post must be 200 to 300 words in length and posted by Day 3. Support your claims with examples from the required material(s) and/or other scholarly sources, and properly cite any references as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. IN THIS DISCUSSION PLEASE REVIEW MY GRAMMER ASSESSMENT TEST THAT I HAVE ALREADY TAKEN Describe three grammatical errors that I had the most difficulty with on the Grammar Assessment. PLEAS AT THE END OF THE DISCUSSION ASK A QUESTION ABOUT THIS WEEKS READING.

Discussion Rubric - 3 points

You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.

Discussion Rubric - 3 points

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome General Content/Subject Knowledge _3873

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

0.9 to >0.79 pts

Distinguished - Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates in-depth knowledge of the discussion topic.

blank

Edit rating Delete rating

0.79 to >0.68 pts

Proficient - Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates knowledge of the discussion topic.

_6191

Edit rating Delete rating

0.68 to >0.58 pts

Basic - Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates basic knowledge of the discussion topic.

_3505

Edit rating Delete rating

0.58 to >0.0 pts

Below Expectations - Addresses all or most aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates limited knowledge of the discussion topic.

_4833

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Non-Performance - There is no initial discussion post, or the post does not address the discussion prompt at all.

blank_2

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 0.9 pts

--

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking _8749

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

0.9 to >0.79 pts

Distinguished - Comprehensively explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates all of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.

_1288

Edit rating Delete rating

0.79 to >0.68 pts

Proficient - Explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates most of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.

_358

Edit rating Delete rating

0.68 to >0.58 pts

Basic - Explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates some of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, and use of information, and logic.

_6819

Edit rating Delete rating

0.58 to >0.0 pts

Below Expectations - Attempts to explore the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provide relevant evidence and information, but demonstrates few of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.

_3037

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Non-Performance - There is no attempt to explore the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provide relevant evidence and information in either the original post or subsequent response posts within the discussion, or no post is present.

_8665

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 0.9 pts

--

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Engagement/ Participation _8825

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

0.9 to >0.79 pts

Distinguished - Contributes to classroom conversations with at least the minimum number of replies, all of which were thoughtful, relevant, and contributed meaningfully to the conversation. Fully engages in the conversation with appropriate topic-based responses.

_6735

Edit rating Delete rating

0.79 to >0.68 pts

Proficient - Contributes to classroom conversations with the minimum number of replies that are somewhat thoughtful, relevant, and contributed meaningfully to the conversation. Attempts to fully engage in the conversation with appropriate topic-based responses.

_8503

Edit rating Delete rating

0.68 to >0.58 pts

Basic - Contributes to the classroom conversations with the minimum number of replies. Attempts to fully engage in the conversation, but the responses are not relevant or fully aligned with the discussion topic.

_2122

Edit rating Delete rating

0.58 to >0.0 pts

Below Expectations - Attempts to contribute to the classroom conversations with fewer than the minimum number of replies; however, the replies are not thoughtful and relevant, or they do not contribute meaningfully to the conversation.

_957

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Non-Performance - There is no contribution to the discussion.

_3992

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 0.9 pts

--

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication _7280

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

0.3 to >0.26 pts

Distinguished - Displays clear control of syntax and mechanics. The organization of the work shows appropriate transitions and flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

_3163

Edit rating Delete rating

0.26 to >0.23 pts

Proficient - Displays control of syntax and mechanics. The organization of the work shows transitions and/or flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains only a few errors and is mostly easy to understand.

_6655

Edit rating Delete rating

0.23 to >0.19 pts

Basic - Displays basic control of syntax and mechanics. The work is not organized with appropriate transitions and flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains several errors, making it difficult to fully understand.

_4166

Edit rating Delete rating

0.19 to >0.0 pts

Below Expectations - Displays limited control of syntax or mechanics. The work does not include any transitions and does not flow easily between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains major errors.

_5671

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Non-Performance - Fails to display control of syntax or mechanics, within the original post and/or responses. Organization is also not present.

_157

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 0.3 pts

--

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion

view longer description

Range

threshold: 5 pts

Edit rating Delete rating

5 to >0 pts

Full Marks

blank

Edit rating Delete rating

0 to >0 pts

No Marks

blank_2

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 5 pts

--

Additional Comments

Total Points

0.9

0.9

0.9

0.3

5

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Chartered Accountant
Engineering Guru
High Quality Assignments
Top Writing Guru
Quick N Quality
Pro Writer
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Chartered Accountant

ONLINE

Chartered Accountant

I have read your project details and I can provide you QUALITY WORK within your given timeline and budget.

$42 Chat With Writer
Engineering Guru

ONLINE

Engineering Guru

I will provide you with the well organized and well research papers from different primary and secondary sources will write the content that will support your points.

$40 Chat With Writer
High Quality Assignments

ONLINE

High Quality Assignments

As per my knowledge I can assist you in writing a perfect Planning, Marketing Research, Business Pitches, Business Proposals, Business Feasibility Reports and Content within your given deadline and budget.

$30 Chat With Writer
Top Writing Guru

ONLINE

Top Writing Guru

I will provide you with the well organized and well research papers from different primary and secondary sources will write the content that will support your points.

$32 Chat With Writer
Quick N Quality

ONLINE

Quick N Quality

I have read your project details and I can provide you QUALITY WORK within your given timeline and budget.

$28 Chat With Writer
Pro Writer

ONLINE

Pro Writer

I have read your project description carefully and you will get plagiarism free writing according to your requirements. Thank You

$42 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

Dq 1 - A firm offers terms of 1 10 net 30 - The outsiders characterization chart - 524 wilson street darlington - Business and finance course 3 weeks left - De la salle belfast - Trust stadium spooks and sparks - System cooling policy passive - Descriptive statistics in nursing research - Osim urelax price singapore - History of human services - Protective security coordination centre - 250 words compare a romance movie to a mid summer nights dream - Iu plagiarism tutorial and test answers - Commonwealth supported place uwa - Wearing on her nerves by brown and ellerton answers - Internal control questionnaire for revenue and cash receipts cycle - Gym management system project source code in html - A fort of nine towers sparknotes - Final Assignment - Bpf filter cheat sheet - Whitney farms 55 quart organic planting soil review - Business Efficiency and Responsiveness - Advanced diploma in mechatronics & industrial automation - Practical strategies for technical communication by mike markel pdf - Order 2467581: Special Education - Topic Selection & Developing a Thesis - 4/1 repost - Potentiometer measurement of resistance experiment - Research Paper - Wilson wonder's bonds have 12 years remaining - Prepare a multiple step income statement wileyplus - Extra credit assignment - Words per minute calculator - Earth's magnetic field physics lab report - Advocacy and opposition rybacki & rybacki 7th edition pdf - SSGB - Why is sodium acetate used in hot packs - Appointment in samarra pdf - Assignment - Module 6 Discussion Question - Nursing - National literacy strategy handwriting - Activ8 net au webmail - Super Perfection LADIES CLINIC +27835179056 SAFE Abortion Clinics//PILLS IN Hillcrest Illovo Beach Isipingo Karridene Kingsburgh Kloof - Clyde building supplies broughshane - Persuasive speech - recycling should be mandatory. - Oscar pistorius top speed - Relationships between web analytics text mining and sentiment analysis - Articulate the PR-Indian responses - Fire Protection Technology - Strategy Formulation DB3(STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT) - Key performance indicators compliance function - Courses and wales per inch - Change selected cell to 20pt in excel - Persuasive letter to the editor - Corporate social responsibility - How does sun microsystems make money - Art Video Summery - I don t wanna lose you jamestown story chords - 10 power of 4 - Beach bar and grill mandalay bay - Everything is being dismantled reconstructed recycled - Subjective frame visual arts - Endocrine Case Study - k - When do you pay for a stud dog - The trading securities owned by a company are - Derivation of kelvin equation - York chilled water fan coil unit catalogue - Professional Cover Letter - How Essay Writing Service Reviews Can Help You Choose the Best Option - Mount everest case study - Shut up about harvard summary - Analysis song lyrics as poetry worksheet - Ferngully the last rainforest worksheet answers - Identify The Different Types Of Health Assessments That You Should Complete - Teaching plan - Thesis statement for the last lecture - Phi 208 week 1 quiz answers - What is an unclear antecedent - Submission file format: Word document with all the answers, clearly identifying all steps, results, and including comments besides each answer. - Distinguish between deductive and inductive reasoning - A managers need to exert tight controls on subordinates - Key questions - Apa position paper template - Please see attachment - Bombs away video games corporation - Example of a precipitation reaction - John berger about looking pdf - Y to delta conversion - Jane a partner in a cpa firm borrows - 1 mile run test - Haier case study question - Research proposal. - Nick and the candlestick - BUSN601 Week 2 - Entropy change in isobaric process - Why do paleolithic female figurines vastly outnumber those representing males? - 3 kings from persian lands afar lyrics - Create an opinion brief about the two companies and suggest a social change for your company.