Ethical decision making paper scenario 1

I’m stuck on a Social Science question and need an explanation.

16 to 17 points

Facts are identified but may not be relevant or misinterpreted. Central issues are identified but not clearly explained. Peripheral issues are identified but explanation lacks clarity. Identifies the problem as ethical, legal, professional or clinical in nature. Identifies the problem as related to self, client, institution or agency.

16 to 17 points

Identifies the most prominent ACA code that applies but missing peripheral codes that may also apply. Cites code sections and numbers.

16 to 17 points

Correctly applies all the moral principles but explanation is somewhat unclear. If two or more principles conflict, can correctly determine which takes priority. Only brings in 1 outside source of relevant professional literature that applies to scenario. Lists most outside professional colleague, agencies, associations and/or supervisors that should be consulted.

16 to 17 points

Lists some possible courses of action but missing more creative solutions.

16 to 17 points

Evaluates each option and assesses the potential consequences for some of the parties involved, but not all. Eliminates the options that clearly do not give the desired results or cause even more problematic consequences. Reviews the remaining options but does not clearly explain why the chosen option best fits the situation.

16 to 17 points

Reviews the selected course of action and clearly discusses if it presents any new ethical considerations. Does not explain how the three tests apply to the selected course of action to ensure that it is appropriate.

16 to 17 points

Describes what steps will be taken to implement the course of action. Describes how anticipated effect and consequences will be assessed but description somewhat lacks clarity.