Read Case Study One in the text (All case studies for the course can be found in Appendix A at the end of the book).
Complete the University of Phoenix Material: Case Study One Worksheet. Use the worksheet, placing your name at the top, and then answer the questions. The word count noted on the worksheet is for your answers, and does not include the questions. Be sure to update the reference list at bottom of worksheet so it is applicable for your assignment. For questions concerning the Ethical Codes, describe why the mentioned code applies/does not apply rather than copy/pasting wording of the Code from the text. Spell-check and use appropriate grammar, sentence structure and punctuation.Case Study One Worksheet PSYCH/660 Version 3 University of Phoenix Material Case Study One Worksheet Respond to the following questions in 1,250 to 1,500 words. 1. Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the dilemma? 2. How might Dr. Romaro’s ambivalence toward the death penalty influence his decision to offer a forensic diagnosis of intellectual disability? How might John’s “confession” or his comment about the “boy waiting for the bus” influence the decision? To what extent should these factors play a role in Dr. Romaro’s report? 3. How are APA Ethical Standards 2.0f, 3.06, 4.04, 4.05, 5.01, 9.01a and 9.06 relevant to this case? Which other standards might apply? 4. What steps should Dr. Romaro take to ethically implement his decision and monitor its effect? Reference Fisher, C. B. (2013). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Copyright © 2018 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. 1 ...