Evidenced base

 Developing a Culture of Evidence-Based Practice 

Discussion: Developing a Culture of Evidence-Based Practice

As your EBP skills grow, you may be called upon to share your expertise with others. While EBP practice is often conducted with unique outcomes in mind, EBP practitioners who share their results can both add to the general body of knowledge and serve as an advocate for the application of EBP.

In this Discussion, you will explore strategies for disseminating EBP within your organization, community, or industry.

To Prepare:

· Review the Resources and reflect on the various strategies presented throughout the course that may be helpful in disseminating effective and widely cited EBP.

o This may include: unit-level or organizational-level presentations, poster presentations, and podium presentations at organizational, local, regional, state, and national levels, as well as publication in peer-reviewed journals.

· Reflect on which type of dissemination strategy you might use to communicate EBP.

Post at least two dissemination strategies you would be most inclined to use and explain why. Explain which dissemination strategies you would be least inclined to use and explain why. Identify at least two barriers you might encounter when using the dissemination strategies you are most inclined to use. Be specific and provide examples. Explain how you might overcome the barriers you identified.

Assignment: Evidence-Based Capstone Project, Part 6: Disseminating Results

The dissemination of EBP results serves multiple important roles. Sharing results makes the case for your decisions. It also adds to the body of knowledge, which creates opportunities for future practitioners. By presenting results, you also become an advocate for EBP, creating a culture within your organization or beyond that informs, educates, and promotes the effective use of EBP.

To Prepare:

· Review the final PowerPoint presentation you submitted in Module 5, and make any necessary changes based on the feedback you have received and on lessons you have learned throughout the course.

· Consider the best method of disseminating the results of your presentation to an audience.

To Complete:

Create a 5-minute, 5- to 6-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based Project.

· Be sure to incorporate any feedback or changes from your presentation submission in Module 5.

· Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Name: NURS_6052_Module06_Week11_Assignment_Rubric

· Grid View

· List View

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Part   6: Disseminating Results

 

Create   a 5-minute, 5- to 6-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based   Project:

 

·     Be sure to incorporate any feedback or changes from your presentation   submission in Module 5.

·     Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience.   Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.

81 (81%) - 90 (90%)

The   narrated presentation accurately and completely summarizes the evidence-based   project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and thoroughly   addresses all components of the evidence-based project.

 

  The narrated presentation accurately and clearly explains in detail how to   disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing specific and   relevant examples.

 

  The narrated presentation accurately and clearly provides a justification   that details the selection of this dissemination strategy that is fully   supported by specific and relevant examples.

 

  The narrated presentation provides a complete, detailed, and specific   synthesis of two outside resources related to the dissemination strategy   explained. The narrated presentation fully integrates at least two outside   resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the   presentation.

72 (72%) - 80 (80%)

The   narrated presentation adequately summarizes the evidence-based project. The   narrated presentation is professional in nature and adequately addresses the   components of the evidence-based project.

 

  The narrated presentation accurately explains how to disseminate the results   of the project to an audience; some specific examples may be provided.

 

  The narrated presentation accurately provides a justification for the   selection of this dissemination strategy and may be supported by specific   examples.

 

  The narrated presentation provides an accurate synthesis of at least one   outside resource related to the dissemination strategy explained. The   narrated presentation integrates at least one outside resource and two or   three course-specific resources that may support the presentation.

63 (63%) - 71 (71%)

The   narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely summarizes the   evidence-based project. The narrated presentation may be professional in   nature and somewhat addresses the components of the evidence-based project.

 

  The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely explains how to disseminate   the results of the project to an audience; inaccurate or vague examples may   be provided.

 

  The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely provides a justification   for the selection of this dissemination strategy and may be supported by   inaccurate or vague examples.

 

  The narrated presentation provides a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside   resources reviewed related to the dissemination strategy explained. The   response minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation.

0 (0%) - 62 (62%)

The   narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately summarizes the evidence-based   project or is missing. The narrated presentation is not professional in   nature and inaccurately and incompletely addresses the components of the   evidence-based project or is missing.

 

  The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately explains how to   disseminate the results of the project to an audience, no examples are   provided, or it is missing.

 

  The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately provides a justification   for the selection of this dissemination strategy, no examples are provided,   or it is missing.

 

  The narrated presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of   outside resources reviewed related to the dissemination strategy explained or   is missing. The presentation fails to integrate any resources to support the   presentation.

Written   Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:

 

Paragraphs   make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and   demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long   and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive   purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required   criteria.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Paragraphs   and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

 

  A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is   provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Paragraphs   and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80%   of the time.

 

  Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is   brief and not descriptive.

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs   and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity   60–79% of the time.

 

  Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off   topic.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Paragraphs   and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less   than 60% of the time.

 

  No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written   Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:

 

Correct   grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Uses   correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Contains   a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains   several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Contains   many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere   with the reader’s understanding.

Total   Points: 100