TheThe DeDevviill iinn the the WWhithitee CityCity
This book has been optimized for viewing at a monitor setting of 1024 x 768 pixels.
Chicago, 1891.
Also by Erik Larson
Isaac’s Storm
Lethal Passage
The Naked Consumer
The The DeDevvil in theil in the WWhithite Citye City
Murder, Magic, and Madness at the Fair That Changed America
Erik Larson
Crown Publishers • New York
Illustration credits appear on page 433.
Copyright © 2003 by Erik Larson
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted
in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying,
recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without
permission in writing from the publisher.
Published by Crown Publishers, New York, New York.
Member of the Crown Publishing Group, a division of Random House, Inc.
www.vintagebooks.com
CROWN is a trademark and the Crown colophon is a registered trademark of
Random House, Inc.
Design by Leonard W. Henderson
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Larson, Erik.
The devil in the white city : murder, magic, and madness at the fair that changed
America / Erik Larson.—ed.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
1. Mudgett, Herman W., 1861–1896. 2. Serial murderers—Illinois—Chicago—
Biography. 3. Serial murders—Illinois—Chicago—Case studies. 4. World’s
Columbian Exposition (1893 : Chicago, Ill.) I. Title.
HV6248.M8 L37 2003
364.15'23'0977311—dc21
2002154046
eISBN 1-4000-7631-5
v1.0
http://www.vintagebooks.com
To Chris, Kristen, Lauren, and Erin,
for making it all worthwhile
—and to Molly, whose lust for socks
kept us all on our toes
Evils Imminent (A Note) /xi
Prologue: Aboard the Olympic /1
Part I: Frozen Music /9
Part II: An Awful Fight /111
Part III: In the White City /233
Part IV: Cruelty Revealed /337
Epilogue: The Last Crossing /371
Notes and Sources /391
Bibliography /425
Acknowledgments /431
Illustration Credits /433
Index /435
ContContentsents
EvEvils Imminentils Imminent (A NOTE)
In Chicago at the end of the nineteenth century amid the smoke of
industry and the clatter of trains there lived two men, both handsome,
both blue-eyed, and both unusually adept at their chosen skills. Each
embodied an element of the great dynamic that characterized the rush of
America toward the twentieth century. One was an architect, the builder
of many of America’s most important structures, among them the Flat-
iron Building in New York and Union Station in Washington, D.C.; the
other was a murderer, one of the most prolific in history and harbinger
of an American archetype, the urban serial killer. Although the two never
met, at least not formally, their fates were linked by a single, magical
event, one largely fallen from modern recollection but that in its time was
considered to possess a transformative power nearly equal to that of the
Civil War.
In the following pages I tell the story of these men and this event, but I
must insert here a notice: However strange or macabre some of the fol-
lowing incidents may seem, this is not a work of fiction. Anything between
quotation marks comes from a letter, memoir, or other written document.
The action takes place mostly in Chicago, but I beg readers to forgive me
for the occasional lurch across state lines, as when the staunch, grief-struck
Detective Geyer enters that last awful cellar. I beg forbearance, too, for the
occasional side journey demanded by the story, including excursions into
the medical acquisition of corpses and the correct use of Black Prince gera-
niums in an Olmstedian landscape.
Beneath the gore and smoke and loam, this book is about the evanes-
cence of life, and why some men choose to fill their brief allotment of
time engaging the impossible, others in the manufacture of sorrow. In the
end it is a story of the ineluctable conflict between good and evil, daylight
and darkness, the White City and the Black.
Erik Larson
Seattle
xi
Make no little plans; they have no magic to stir men’s blood.
Daniel H. Burnham
Director of Works
World’s Columbian Exposition, 1893
I was born with the devil in me. I could not help the fact that I was a
murderer, no more than the poet can help the inspiration to sing.
Dr. H. H. Holmes
Confession
1896
Prologue
Aboard the Olympic
1912
The architects (left to right): Daniel Burnham, George Post, M. B. Pickett, Henry Van Brunt, Francis Millet, Maitland Armstrong, Col. Edmund Rice,
Augustus St. Gaudens, Henry Sargent Codman, George W. Maynard, Charles McKim, Ernest Graham, Dion Geraldine.
The date was April 14, 1912, a sinister day in maritime history, but of
course the man in suite 63–65, shelter deck C, did not yet know it. What
he did know was that his foot hurt badly, more than he had expected. He
was sixty-five years old and had become a large man. His hair had turned
gray, his mustache nearly white, but his eyes were as blue as ever, bluer
at this instant by proximity to the sea. His foot had forced him to delay
the voyage, and now it kept him anchored in his suite while the other
first-class passengers, his wife among them, did what he would have
loved to do, which was to explore the ship’s more exotic precincts. The
man loved the opulence of the ship, just as he loved Pullman Palace cars
and giant fireplaces, but his foot problem tempered his enjoyment. He
recognized that the systemic malaise that caused it was a consequence in
part of his own refusal over the years to limit his courtship of the finest
wines, foods, and cigars. The pain reminded him daily that his time on
the planet was nearing its end. Just before the voyage he told a friend,
“This prolonging of a man’s life doesn’t interest me when he’s done his
work and has done it pretty well.”
The man was Daniel Hudson Burnham, and by now his name was
familiar throughout the world. He was an architect and had done his
work pretty well in Chicago, New York, Washington, San Francisco,
Manila, and many other cities. He and his wife, Margaret, were sailing
to Europe in the company of their daughter and her husband for a grand
tour that was to continue through the summer. Burnham had chosen this
ship, the R.M.S. Olympic of the White Star Line, because it was new and
glamorous and big. At the time he booked passage the Olympic was the
largest vessel in regular service, but just three days before his departure a
Aboard the Olympic
3
sister ship—a slightly longer twin—had stolen that rank when it set off
on its maiden voyage. The twin, Burnham knew, was at that moment car-
rying one of his closest friends, the painter Francis Millet, over the same
ocean but in the opposite direction.
As the last sunlight of the day entered Burnham’s suite, he and
Margaret set off for the first-class dining room on the deck below. They
took the elevator to spare his foot the torment of the grand stairway, but
he did so with reluctance, for he admired the artistry in the iron scroll-
work of its balustrades and the immense dome of iron and glass that
flushed the ship’s core with natural light. His sore foot had placed
increasing limitations on his mobility. Only a week earlier he had found
himself in the humiliating position of having to ride in a wheelchair
through Union Station in Washington, D.C., the station he had designed.
The Burnhams dined by themselves in the Olympic’s first-class salon,
then retired to their suite and there, for no particular reason, Burnham’s
thoughts returned to Frank Millet. On impulse, he resolved to send
Millet a midsea greeting via the Olympic’s powerful Marconi wireless.
Burnham signaled for a steward. A middle-aged man in knife-edge
whites took his message up three decks to the Marconi room adjacent to
the officer’s promenade. He returned a few moments later, the message
still in his hand, and told Burnham the operator had refused to accept it.
Footsore and irritable, Burnham demanded that the steward return to
the wireless room for an explanation.
å
Millet was never far from Burnham’s mind, nor was the event that had
brought the two of them together: the great Chicago world’s fair of 1893.
Millet had been one of Burnham’s closest allies in the long, bittersweet
struggle to build the fair. Its official name was the World’s Columbian
Exposition, its official purpose to commemorate the four hundredth
anniversary of Columbus’s discovery of America, but under Burnham, its
chief builder, it had become something enchanting, known throughout
the world as the White City.
It had lasted just six months, yet during that time its gatekeepers
4 • Erik Larson
recorded 27.5 million visits, this when the country’s total population was
65 million. On its best day the fair drew more than 700,000 visitors. That
the fair had occurred at all, however, was something of a miracle. To build
it Burnham had confronted a legion of obstacles, any one of which could
have—should have—killed it long before Opening Day. Together he and
his architects had conjured a dream city whose grandeur and beauty
exceeded anything each singly could have imagined. Visitors wore their
best clothes and most somber expressions, as if entering a great cathedral.
Some wept at its beauty. They tasted a new snack called Cracker Jack and
a new breakfast food called Shredded Wheat. Whole villages had been
imported from Egypt, Algeria, Dahomey, and other far-flung locales,
along with their inhabitants. The Street in Cairo exhibit alone employed
nearly two hundred Egyptians and contained twenty-five distinct build-
ings, including a fifteen-hundred-seat theater that introduced America to
a new and scandalous form of entertainment. Everything about the fair
was exotic and, above all, immense. The fair occupied over one square
mile and filled more than two hundred buildings. A single exhibit hall had
enough interior volume to have housed the U.S. Capitol, the Great Pyra-
mid, Winchester Cathedral, Madison Square Garden, and St. Paul’s
Cathedral, all at the same time. One structure, rejected at first as a “mon-
strosity,” became the fair’s emblem, a machine so huge and terrifying that
it instantly eclipsed the tower of Alexandre Eiffel that had so wounded
America’s pride. Never before had so many of history’s brightest lights,
including Buffalo Bill, Theodore Dreiser, Susan B. Anthony, Jane Addams,
Clarence Darrow, George Westinghouse, Thomas Edison, Henry Adams,
Archduke Francis Ferdinand, Nikola Tesla, Ignace Paderewski, Philip
Armour, and Marshall Field, gathered in one place at one time. Richard
Harding Davis called the exposition “the greatest event in the history of
the country since the Civil War.”
That something magical had occurred in that summer of the world’s
fair was beyond doubt, but darkness too had touched the fair. Scores of
workers had been hurt or killed in building the dream, their families con-
signed to poverty. Fire had killed fifteen more, and an assassin had trans-
formed the closing ceremony from what was to have been the century’s
The Devil in the White City • 5
greatest celebration into a vast funeral. Worse had occurred too, although
these revelations emerged only slowly. A murderer had moved among the
beautiful things Burnham had created. Young women drawn to Chicago
by the fair and by the prospect of living on their own had disappeared,
last seen at the killer’s block-long mansion, a parody of everything archi-
tects held dear. Only after the exposition had Burnham and his colleagues
learned of the anguished letters describing daughters who had come to the
city and then fallen silent. The press speculated that scores of fairgoers
must have disappeared within the building. Even the street-hardened
members of the city’s Whitechapel Club, named for the London stalking
grounds of Jack the Ripper, were startled by what detectives eventually
found inside and by the fact that such grisly events could have gone undis-
covered for so long. The rational explanation laid blame on the forces of
change that during this time had convulsed Chicago. Amid so much tur-
moil it was understandable that the work of a young and handsome doc-
tor would go unnoticed. As time passed, however, even sober men and
women began to think of him in less-than-rational terms. He described
himself as the Devil and contended that his physical shape had begun to
alter. Enough strange things began happening to the men who brought
him to justice to make his claim seem almost plausible.
For the supernaturally inclined, the death of the jury foreman alone
offered sufficient proof.
å
Burnham’s foot ached. The deck thrummed. No matter where you
were on the ship, you felt the power of the Olympic’s twenty-nine boil-
ers transmitted upward through the strakes of the hull. It was the one
constant that told you—even in the staterooms and dining chambers and
smoking lounge, despite the lavish efforts to make these rooms look as
if they had been plucked from the Palace of Versailles or a Jacobean
mansion—that you were aboard a ship being propelled far into the bluest
reaches of the ocean.
Burnham and Millet were among the few builders of the fair still
alive. So many others had gone. Olmsted and Codman. McKim. Hunt.
6 • Erik Larson
Atwood—mysteriously. And that initial loss, which Burnham still found
difficult to comprehend. Soon no one would remain, and the fair would
cease to exist as a living memory in anyone’s brain.
Of the key men, who besides Millet was left? Only Louis Sullivan:
embittered, perfumed with alcohol, resenting who knew what, but not
above coming by Burnham’s office for a loan or to sell some painting or
sketch.
At least Frank Millet still seemed strong and healthy and full of the
earthy good humor that had so enlivened the long nights during the fair’s
construction.
The steward came back. The expression in his eyes had changed. He
apologized. He still could not send the message, he said, but at least now
he had an explanation. An accident had occurred involving Millet’s ship.
In fact, he said, the Olympic was at that moment speeding north at max-
imum velocity to come to her aid, with instructions to receive and care
for injured passengers. He knew nothing more.
Burnham shifted his leg, winced, and waited for more news. He hoped
that when the Olympic at last reached the site of the accident, he would
find Millet and hear him tell some outrageous story about the voyage. In
the peace of his stateroom, Burnham opened his diary.
That night the fair came back to him with extra clarity.
The Devil in the White City • 7
Part I
Frozen Music
Chicago, 1890–91
Chicago, circa 1889.
How easy it was to disappear:
A thousand trains a day entered or left Chicago. Many of these trains
brought single young women who had never even seen a city but now
hoped to make one of the biggest and toughest their home. Jane Addams,
the urban reformer who founded Chicago’s Hull House, wrote, “Never
before in civilization have such numbers of young girls been suddenly
released from the protection of the home and permitted to walk unat-
tended upon the city streets and to work under alien roofs.” The women
sought work as typewriters, stenographers, seamstresses, and weavers.
The men who hired them were for the most part moral citizens intent on
efficiency and profit. But not always. On March 30, 1890, an officer of
the First National Bank placed a warning in the help-wanted section of
the Chicago Tribune, to inform female stenographers of “our growing
conviction that no thoroughly honorable business-man who is this side
of dotage ever advertises for a lady stenographer who is a blonde, is
good-looking, is quite alone in the city, or will transmit her photograph.
All such advertisements upon their face bear the marks of vulgarity, nor
do we regard it safe for any lady to answer such unseemly utterances.”
The women walked to work on streets that angled past bars, gambling
houses, and bordellos. Vice thrived, with official indulgence. “The par-
lors and bedrooms in which honest folk lived were (as now) rather dull
places,” wrote Ben Hecht, late in his life, trying to explain this persistent
trait of old Chicago. “It was pleasant, in a way, to know that outside
their windows, the devil was still capering in a flare of brimstone.” In an
analogy that would prove all too apt, Max Weber likened the city to “a
human being with his skin removed.”
The Black City
11
Anonymous death came early and often. Each of the thousand trains
that entered and left the city did so at grade level. You could step from a
curb and be killed by the Chicago Limited. Every day on average two peo-
ple were destroyed at the city’s rail crossings. Their injuries were
grotesque. Pedestrians retrieved severed heads. There were other hazards.
Streetcars fell from drawbridges. Horses bolted and dragged carriages into
crowds. Fires took a dozen lives a day. In describing the fire dead, the term
the newspapers most liked to use was “roasted.” There was diphtheria,
typhus, cholera, influenza. And there was murder. In the time of the fair
the rate at which men and women killed one another rose sharply
throughout the nation but especially in Chicago, where police found them-
selves without the manpower or expertise to manage the volume. In the
first six months of 1892 the city experienced nearly eight hundred violent
deaths. Four a day. Most were prosaic, arising from robbery, argument, or
sexual jealousy. Men shot women, women shot men, and children shot
one another by accident. But all this could be understood. Nothing like the
Whitechapel killings had occurred. Jack the Ripper’s five-murder spree in
1888 had defied explanation and captivated readers throughout America,
who believed such a thing could not happen in their own hometowns.
But things were changing. Everywhere one looked the boundary
between the moral and the wicked seemed to be degrading. Elizabeth
Cady Stanton argued in favor of divorce. Clarence Darrow advocated
free love. A young woman named Borden killed her parents.
And in Chicago a young handsome doctor stepped from a train, his
surgical valise in hand. He entered a world of clamor, smoke, and steam,
refulgent with the scents of murdered cattle and pigs. He found it to his
liking.
The letters came later, from the Cigrands, Williamses, Smythes, and
untold others, addressed to that strange gloomy castle at Sixty-third
and Wallace, pleading for the whereabouts of daughters and daughters’
children.
It was so easy to disappear, so easy to deny knowledge, so very easy in
the smoke and din to mask that something dark had taken root.
This was Chicago, on the eve of the greatest fair in history.
12 • Erik Larson
On the afternoon of Monday, February 24, 1890, two thousand peo-
ple gathered on the sidewalk and street outside the offices of the Chicago
Tribune, as similar crowds collected at each of the city’s twenty-eight
other daily newspapers, and in hotel lobbies, in bars, and at the offices of
Western Union and the Postal Telegraph Company. The gathering outside
the Tribune included businessmen, clerks, traveling salesmen, stenogra-
phers, police officers, and at least one barber. Messenger boys stood
ready to bolt as soon as there was news worth reporting. The air was
cold. Smoke filled the caverns between buildings and reduced lateral vis-
ibility to a few blocks. Now and then police officers cleared a path for
one of the city’s bright yellow streetcars, called grip-cars for the way their
operators attached them to an ever-running cable under the street. Drays
full of wholesale goods rumbled over the pavers, led by immense horses
gusting steam into the murk above.
The wait was electric, for Chicago was a prideful place. In every cor-
ner of the city people looked into the faces of shopkeepers, cab drivers,
waiters and bellboys to see whether the news already had come and
whether it was good or bad. So far the year had been a fine one.
Chicago’s population had topped one million for the first time, making
the city the second most populous in the nation after New York,
although disgruntled residents of Philadelphia, previously in second
place, were quick to point out that Chicago had cheated by annexing
large expanses of land just in time for the 1890 decadal census. Chicago
shrugged the sniping off. Big was big. Success today would dispel at last
the eastern perception that Chicago was nothing more than a greedy,
hog-slaughtering backwater; failure would bring humiliation from which
“The Trouble Is Just Begun”
13
the city would not soon recover, given how heartily its leading men had
boasted that Chicago would prevail. It was this big talk, not the persist-
ent southwesterly breeze, that had prompted New York editor Charles
Anderson Dana to nickname Chicago “the Windy City.”
In their offices in the top floor of the Rookery, Daniel Burnham, forty-
three, and his partner, John Root, newly forty, felt the electricity more
keenly than most. They had participated in secret conversations, received
certain assurances, and gone so far as to make reconnaissance forays to
outlying parts of the city. They were Chicago’s leading architects: They
had pioneered the erection of tall structures and designed the first build-
ing in the country ever to be called a skyscraper; every year, it seemed,
some new building of theirs became the tallest in the world. When they
moved into the Rookery at La Salle and Adams, a gorgeous light-filled
structure of Root’s design, they saw views of the lake and city that no one
but construction workers had seen before. They knew, however, that
today’s event had the potential to make their success so far seem meager.
The news would come by telegraph from Washington. The Tribune
would get it from one of its own reporters. Its editors, rewrite men, and
typesetters would compose “extra” editions as firemen shoveled coal into
the boilers of the paper’s steam-driven presses. A clerk would paste each
incoming bulletin to a window, face out, for pedestrians to read.
Shortly after four o’clock, Chicago standard railroad time, the Tribune
received its first cable.
å
Even Burnham could not say for sure who had been first to propose
the idea. It had seemed to rise in many minds at once, the initial intent
simply to celebrate the four hundredth anniversary of Columbus’s dis-
covery of the New World by hosting a world’s fair. At first the idea gained
little momentum. Consumed by the great drive toward wealth and power
that had begun after the end of the Civil War, America seemed to have
scant interest in celebrating its distant past. In 1889, however, the French
did something that startled everyone.
In Paris on the Champ de Mars, France opened the Exposition
14 • Erik Larson
Universelle, a world’s fair so big and glamorous and so exotic that visi-
tors came away believing no exposition could surpass it. At the heart of
the exposition stood a tower of iron that rose one thousand feet into the
sky, higher by far than any man-made structure on earth. The tower not
only assured the eternal fame of its designer, Alexandre Gustave Eiffel,
but also offered graphic proof that France had edged out the United
States for dominance in the realm of iron and steel, despite the Brooklyn
Bridge, the Horseshoe Curve, and other undeniable accomplishments of
American engineers.
The United States had only itself to blame for this perception. In Paris
America had made a half-hearted effort to show off its artistic, industrial,
and scientific talent. “We shall be ranked among those nations who have
shown themselves careless of appearances,” wrote the Chicago Tribune’s
Paris correspondent on May 13, 1889. Other nations, he wrote, had
mounted exhibits of dignity and style, while American exhibitors erected
a mélange of pavilions and kiosks with no artistic guidance and no uni-
form plan. “The result is a sad jumble of shops, booths, and bazaars often
unpleasing in themselves and incongruous when taken together.” In con-
trast, France had done everything it could to ensure that its glory over-
whelmed everyone. “Other nations are not rivals,” the correspondent
wrote, “they are foils to France, and the poverty of their displays sets off,
as it was meant to do, the fullness of France, its richness and its splendor.”
Even Eiffel’s tower, forecast by wishful Americans to be a monstrosity
that would disfigure forever the comely landscape of Paris, turned out to
possess unexpected élan, with a sweeping base and tapered shaft that
evoked the trail of a skyrocket. This humiliation could not be allowed to
stand. America’s pride in its growing power and international stature had
fanned patriotism to a new intensity. The nation needed an opportunity
to top the French, in particular to “out-Eiffel Eiffel.” Suddenly the idea
of hosting a great exposition to commemorate Columbus’s discovery of
the New World became irresistible.
At first, most Americans believed that if an exposition honoring the
deepest roots of the nation were to be held anywhere, the site should be
Washington, the capital. Initially even Chicago’s editors agreed. As the
The Devil in the White City • 15
notion of an exposition gained shape, however, other cities began to see
it as a prize to be coveted, mainly for the stature it would confer, stature
being a powerful lure in this age when pride of place ranked second only
to pride of blood. Suddenly New York and St. Louis wanted the fair.
Washington laid claim to the honor on grounds it was the center of gov-
ernment, New York because it was the center of everything. No one
cared what St. Louis thought, although the city got a wink for pluck.
Nowhere was civic pride a more powerful force than in Chicago,
where men spoke of the “Chicago spirit” as if it were a tangible force and
prided themselves on the speed with which they had rebuilt the city after
the Great Fire of 1871. They had not merely restored it; they had turned
it into the nation’s leader in commerce, manufacturing, and architecture.
All the city’s wealth, however, had failed to shake the widespread per-
ception that Chicago was a secondary city that preferred butchered hogs
to Beethoven. New York was the nation’s capital of cultural and social
refinement, and its leading citizens and newspapers never let Chicago for-
get it. The exposition, if built right—if it topped Paris—might dispel that
sentiment once and for all. The editors of Chicago’s daily newspapers,
upon seeing New York enter the contest, began to ask, why not Chicago?
The Tribune warned that “the hawks, buzzards, vultures, and other
unclean beasts, creeping, crawling, and flying, of New York are reaching
out to get control of the fair.”
On June 29, 1889, Chicago’s mayor, DeWitt C. Cregier, announced
the appointment of a citizens committee consisting of 250 of the city’s
most prominent men. The committee met and passed a resolution whose
closing passage read: “The men who have helped build Chicago want the
fair, and, having a just and well-sustained claim, they intend to have it.”
Congress had the final say, however, and now the time for the big vote
had come.
å
A Tribune clerk stepped to the window and pasted the first bulletin.
The initial ballot put Chicago ahead by a big margin, with 115 votes to
New York’s 72. St. Louis came next, followed by Washington. One con-
16 • Erik Larson
gressman opposed having a fair at all and out of sheer cussedness voted
for Cumberland Gap. When the crowd outside the Tribune saw that
Chicago led New York by 43 votes, it exploded with cheers, whistles, and
applause. Everyone knew, however, that Chicago was still 38 votes shy of
the simple majority needed to win the fair.
Other ballots followed. Daylight faded to thin broth. The sidewalks
filled with men and women leaving work. Typewriters—the women who
operated the latest business machines—streamed from the Rookery, the
Montauk, and other skyscrapers wearing under their coats the custom-
ary white blouse and long black skirt that so evoked the keys of their
Remingtons. Cab drivers cursed and gentled their horses. A lamplighter
scuttled along the edges of the crowd igniting the gas jets atop cast-iron
poles. Abruptly there was color everywhere: the yellow streetcars and the
sudden blues of telegraph boys jolting past with satchels full of joy and
gloom; cab drivers lighting the red night-lamps at the backs of their han-
soms; a large gilded lion crouching before the hat store across the street.
In the high buildings above, gas and electric lights bloomed in the dusk
like moonflowers.
The Tribune clerk again appeared in the newspaper’s window, this
time with the results of the fifth ballot. “The gloom that fell upon the
crowd was heavy and chill,” a reporter observed. New York had gained
fifteen votes, Chicago only six. The gap between them had narrowed.
The barber in the crowd pointed out to everyone in his vicinity that New
York’s additional votes must have come from congressmen who previ-
ously had favored St. Louis. This revelation caused an army lieutenant,
Alexander Ross, to proclaim, “Gentlemen. I am prepared to state that
any person from St. Louis would rob a church.” Another man shouted,
“Or poison his wife’s dog.” This last drew wide agreement.
In Washington the New York contingent, including Chauncey Depew,
president of the New York Central and one of the most celebrated ora-
tors of the day, sensed a tide change and asked for a recess until the next
day. On learning of this request the crowd outside the Tribune booed and
hissed, correctly interpreting the move as an attempt to gain time to
lobby for more votes.
The Devil in the White City • 17
The motion was overruled, but the House voted for a brief adjourn-
ment. The crowd remained in place.
After the seventh ballot Chicago was only one vote short of a major-
ity. New York had actually lost ground. A stillness settled on the street.
Cabs halted. Police ignored the ever-longer chains of grip-cars that
stretched left and right in a great cadmium gash. Passengers disembarked
and watched the Tribune window, waiting for the next announcement.
The cables thrumming beneath the pavement struck a minor chord of
suspense, and held it.
Soon a different man appeared in the Tribune window. He was tall,
thin, and young and wore a black beard. He looked at the crowd with-
out expression. In one hand he held a paste pot, in the other a brush and
a bulletin sheet. He took his time. He set the bulletin on a table, out of
sight, but everyone in the crowd could tell what he was doing by the
motion of his shoulders. He took his time unscrewing the paste pot.
There was something somber in his face, as if he were looking down
upon a casket. Methodically he painted paste onto the bulletin. It took
him a good long while to raise it to the window.
His expression did not change. He fastened the bulletin to the glass.
å
Burnham waited. His office faced south, as did Root’s, to satisfy their
craving for natural light, a universal hunger throughout Chicago, where
gas jets, still the primary source of artificial illumination, did little to
pierce the city’s perpetual coal-smoke dusk. Electric bulbs, often in fix-
tures that combined gas and electricity, were just beginning to light the
newest buildings, but these in a sense added to the problem, for they
required basement dynamos driven by coal-fired boilers. As the light
faded, gaslights on the streets and in the buildings below caused the
smoke to glow a dull yellow. Burnham heard only the hiss of gas from
the lamps in his office.
That he should be there now, a man of such exalted professional
stature in an office so high above the city, would have come as a great
and satisfying surprise to his late father.
18 • Erik Larson
Daniel Hudson Burnham was born in Henderson, New York, on Sep-
tember 4, 1846, into a family devoted to Swedenborgian principles of
obedience, self-subordination, and public service. In 1855, when he was
nine, the family moved to Chicago, where his father established a suc-
cessful wholesale drug business. Burnham was a lackluster student: “the
records of the Old Central show his average scholarship to be frequently
as low as 55 percent,” a reporter discovered, “and 81 percent seems the
highest he ever reached.” He excelled, however, at drawing and sketched
constantly. He was eighteen when his father sent him east to study with
private tutors to prepare him for the entrance exams for Harvard and
Yale. The boy proved to have a severe case of test anxiety. “I went to
Harvard for examination with two men not as well prepared as I,” he
said. “Both passed easily, and I flunked, having sat through two or three
examinations without being able to write a word.” The same happened
at Yale. Both schools turned him down. He never forgot it.
In the fall of 1867, at twenty-one, Burnham returned to Chicago. He
sought work in a field where he might be successful and took a job as a
draftsman with the architectural firm of Loring & Jenney. He had found
his calling, he wrote in 1868, and told his parents he wanted to become
the “greatest architect in the city or country.” The next year, however, he
bolted for Nevada with friends to try his hand at mining gold. He failed.
He ran for the Nevada legislature and failed again. He returned to
Chicago broke, in a cattle car, and joined the firm of an architect named
L. G. Laurean. Then came October 1871: a cow, a lantern, confusion,
and wind. The Great Chicago Fire took nearly eighteen thousand build-
ings and left more than a hundred thousand people homeless. The
destruction promised endless work for the city’s architects. But Burnham
quit. He sold plate glass, failed. He became a druggist, quit. “There is,”
he wrote, “a family tendency to get tired of doing the same thing very
long.”
Exasperated and worried, Burnham’s father in 1872 introduced his
son to an architect named Peter Wight, who admired the young man’s
skill at drawing and hired him as a draftsman. Burnham was twenty-five.
He liked Wight and liked the work; he liked especially one of Wight’s
The Devil in the White City • 19
other draftsmen, a southerner named John Wellborn Root, who was four
years younger. Born in Lumpkin, Georgia, on January 10, 1850, Root
was a musical prodigy who could sing before he could talk. During the
Civil War, as Atlanta smoldered, Root’s father had smuggled him to
Liverpool, England, aboard a Confederate blockade-runner. Root won
acceptance into Oxford, but before he could matriculate, the war ended
and his father summoned him back to America, to his new home in New
York City, where Root studied civil engineering at New York University
and became a draftsman for the architect who later designed St. Patrick’s
Cathedral.
Burnham took to Root immediately. He admired Root’s white skin
and muscular arms, his stance at the drafting table. They became friends,
then partners. They recorded their first income three months before the
Panic of 1873 snuffed the nation’s economy. But this time Burnham stuck
with it. Something about the partnership with Root bolstered him. It
filled an absence and played to both men’s strengths. They struggled for
their own commissions and in the meantime hired themselves out to
other more established firms.
One day in 1874 a man walked into their office and in a single gal-
vanic moment changed their lives. He wore black and looked ordinary,
but in his past there was blood, death, and profit in staggering quantity.
He came looking for Root, but Root was out of town. He introduced
himself instead to Burnham and gave his name as John B. Sherman.
There was no need to amplify the introduction. As superintendent of
the Union Stock Yards, Sherman ruled an empire of blood that employed
25,000 men, women, and children and each year slaughtered fourteen
million animals. Directly and indirectly nearly one-fifth of Chicago’s
population depended on the yards for its economic survival.
Sherman liked Burnham. He liked his strength, his steady blue gaze,
and the confidence with which he conducted the conversation. Sherman
commissioned the firm to build him a mansion on Prairie Avenue at
Twenty-first Street among homes owned by other Chicago barons and
where now and then Marshall Field, George Pullman, and Philip Armour
20 • Erik Larson
could be seen walking to work together, a titanic threesome in black.
Root drew a house of three stories with gables and a peaked roof, in red
brick, buff sandstone, blue granite, and black slate; Burnham refined the
drawings and guided construction. Burnham happened to be standing in
the entrance to the house, considering the work, when a young man with
a mildly haughty air and an odd strut—not ego, here, but a congenital
fault—walked up to him and introduced himself as Louis Sullivan. The
name meant nothing to Burnham. Not yet. Sullivan and Burnham talked.
Sullivan was eighteen, Burnham twenty-eight. He told Sullivan, in confi-
dence, that he did not expect to remain satisfied doing just houses. “My
idea,” he said, “is to work up a big business, to handle big things, deal
with big business men, and to build up a big organization, for you can’t
handle big things unless you have an organization.”
John Sherman’s daughter, Margaret, also visited the construction site.
She was young, pretty, and blond and visited often, using as her excuse
the fact that her friend Della Otis lived across the street. Margaret did
think the house very fine, but what she admired most was the architect
who seemed so at ease among the cairns of sandstone and timber. It took
a while, but Burnham got the point. He asked her to marry him. She said
yes; the courtship went smoothly. Then scandal broke. Burnham’s older
brother had forged checks and wounded their father’s wholesale drug
business. Burnham immediately went to Margaret’s father to break the
engagement, on grounds the courtship could not continue in the shadow
of scandal. Sherman told him he respected Burnham’s sense of honor but
rejected his withdrawal. He said quietly, “There is a black sheep in every
family.”
Later Sherman, a married man, would run off to Europe with the
daughter of a friend.
Burnham and Margaret married on January 20, 1876. Sherman
bought them a house at Forty-third Street and Michigan Avenue, near the
lake but more importantly near the stockyards. He wanted proximity. He
liked Burnham and approved of the marriage, but he did not entirely
trust the young architect. He thought Burnham drank too much.
The Devil in the White City • 21
Sherman’s doubts about Burnham’s character did not color his respect
for his skill as an architect. He commissioned other structures. In his
greatest vote of confidence, he asked Burnham & Root to build an entry
portal for the Union Stock Yards that would reflect the yards’ growing
importance. The result was the Stone Gate, three arches of Lemont lime-
stone roofed in copper and displaying over the central arch the carved
bust—Root’s touch, no doubt—of John Sherman’s favorite bull,
Sherman. The gate became a landmark that endured into the twenty-first
century, long after the last hog crossed to eternity over the great wooden
ramp called the Bridge of Sighs.
Root also married a daughter of the stockyards, but his experience
was darker. He designed a house for John Walker, president of the yards,
and met Walker’s daughter, Mary. During their courtship she became ill
with tuberculosis. The disease rapidly gained ground, but Root remained
committed to the engagement, even though it was clear to everyone he
was marrying a dead woman. The ceremony was held in the house Root
had designed. A friend, the poet Harriet Monroe, waited with the other
guests for the bride to appear on the stairway. Monroe’s sister, Dora, was
the sole bridesmaid. “A long wait frightened us,” Harriet Monroe said,
“but at last the bride, on her father’s arm, appeared like a white ghost at
the halfway landing, and slowly oh, so hesitatingly dragging her heavy
satin train, stepped down the wide stairway and across the floor to the
bay window which was gay with flowers and vines. The effect was
weirdly sad.” Root’s bride was thin and pale and could only whisper her
vows. “Her gayety,” Harriet Monroe wrote, “seemed like jewels on a
skull.”
Within six weeks Mary Walker Root was dead. Two years later Root
married the bridesmaid, Dora Monroe, and very likely broke her poet-
sister’s heart. That Harriet Monroe also loved Root seems beyond dis-
pute. She lived nearby and often visited the couple in their Astor Place
home. In 1896 she published a biography of Root that would have made
an angel blush. Later, in her memoir, A Poet’s Life, she described Root’s
marriage to her sister as being “so completely happy that my own
22 • Erik Larson
dreams of happiness, confirmed by that example, demanded as fortunate
a fulfillment, and could accept nothing less.” But Harriet never found
its equal and devoted her life instead to poetry, eventually founding
Poetry magazine, where she helped launch Ezra Pound toward national
prominence.
Root and Burnham prospered. A cascade of work flowed to their firm,
partly because Root managed to solve a puzzle that had bedeviled
Chicago builders ever since the city’s founding. By solving it, he helped
the city become the birthplace of skyscrapers despite terrain that could
not have been less suited to the role.
In the 1880s Chicago was experiencing explosive growth that pro-
pelled land values to levels no one could have imagined, especially within
the downtown “Loop,” named for the turn-around loops of streetcar
lines. As land values rose, landowners sought ways of improving the
return on their investments. The sky beckoned.
The most fundamental obstacle to height was man’s capacity to walk
stairs, especially after the kinds of meals men ate in the nineteenth cen-
tury, but this obstacle had been removed by the advent of the elevator
and, equally important, by Elisha Graves Otis’s invention of a safety
mechanism for halting an elevator in free-fall. Other barriers remained,
however, the most elemental of which was the bedeviling character of
Chicago’s soil, which prompted one engineer to describe the challenge of
laying foundations in Chicago as “probably not equaled for perverseness
anywhere in the world.” Bedrock lay 125 feet below grade, too deep for
workers to reach with any degree of economy or safety using the con-
struction methods available in the 1880s. Between this level and the
surface was a mixture of sand and clay so saturated with water that
engineers called it gumbo. It compressed under the weight of even
modest structures and drove architects, as a matter of routine, to design
their buildings with sidewalks that intersected the first story four inches
above grade, in the hope that when the building settled and dragged the
sidewalks down with it, the walks would be level.
There were only two known ways to resolve the soil problem: Build
The Devil in the White City • 23
short and avoid the issue, or drive caissons down to bedrock. The latter
technique required that workers excavate deep shafts, shore the walls,
and pump each so full of air that the resulting high pressure held water
at bay, a process that was notorious for causing deadly cases of the bends
and used mainly by bridge builders who had no other choice. John
Augustus Roebling had used caissons, famously, in building the Brooklyn
Bridge, but their first use in the United States had occurred earlier, from
1869 through 1874, when James B. Eads built a bridge over the
Mississippi at St. Louis. Eads discovered that workers began experienc-
ing the bends at sixty feet below ground, roughly half the depth to which
a Chicago caisson would have to descend. Of the 352 men who worked
on the bridge’s notorious east caisson, pressure-related illness killed
twelve, left two crippled for life, and injured sixty-six others, a casualty
rate of over 20 percent.
But Chicago’s landowners wanted profit, and at the city’s center,
profit meant height. In 1881 a Massachusetts investor, Peter Chardon
Brooks III, commissioned Burnham & Root to build the tallest office
building yet constructed in Chicago, which he planned to call the Mon-
tauk. Previously he had brought them their first big downtown commis-
sion, the seven-story Grannis Block. In that structure, Burnham said, “our
originality began to show. . . . It was a wonder. Everybody went to see it,
and the town was proud of it.” They moved their offices into its top floor
(a potentially fatal move, as it happens, but no one knew it at the time).
Brooks wanted the new building to be 50 percent taller “if,” he said, “the
earth can support it.”
The partners quickly grew frustrated with Brooks. He was picky and
frugal and seemed not to care how the building looked as long as it was
functional. He issued instructions that anticipated by many years Louis
Sullivan’s famous admonition that form must follow function. “The
building throughout is to be for use and not for ornament,” Brooks
wrote. “Its beauty will be in its all-adaptation to its use.” Nothing was to
project from its face, no gargoyles, no pedimenta, for projections col-
lected dirt. He wanted all pipes left in the open. “This covering up of pipes
is all a mistake, they should be exposed everywhere, if necessary painted
24 • Erik Larson
well and handsomely.” His frugal glare extended to the building’s bath-
rooms. Root’s design called for cabinets under sinks. Brooks objected: A
cabinet made “a good receptacle for dirt, mice too.”
The trickiest part of the Montauk was its foundation. Initially Root
planned to employ a technique that Chicago architects had used since
1873 to support buildings of ordinary stature. Workers would erect pyr-
amids of stone on the basement slab. The broad bottom of each pyramid
spread the load and reduced settlement; the narrow top supported load-
bearing columns. To hold up ten stories of stone and brick, however, the
pyramids would have to be immense, the basement transformed into a
Giza of stone. Brooks objected. He wanted the basement free for the boil-
ers and dynamo.
The solution, when Root first struck it, must have seemed too simple
to be real. He envisioned digging down to the first reasonably firm layer
of clay, known as hard-pan, and there spreading a pad of concrete nearly
two feet thick. On top of this workers would set down a layer of steel
rails stretching from one end of the pad to the other, and over this a sec-
ond layer at right angles. Succeeding layers would be arranged the same
way. Once complete, this grillage of steel would be filled and covered
with Portland cement to produce a broad, rigid raft that Root called a
floating foundation. What he was proposing, in effect, was a stratum of
artificial bedrock that would also serve as the floor of the basement.
Brooks liked it.
Once built, the Montauk was so novel, so tall, it defied description by
conventional means. No one knows who coined the term, but it fit, and
the Montauk became the first building to be called a skyscraper. “What
Chartres was to the Gothic cathedral,” wrote Thomas Talmadge, a
Chicago architect and critic, “the Montauk Block was to the high com-
mercial building.”
This was the heyday of architectural invention. Elevators got faster
and safer. Glassmakers became adept at turning out ever larger sheets of
plate glass. William Jenney, of the firm Loring & Jenney, where Burnham
started his architectural career, designed the first building to have a load-
bearing metal frame, in which the burden of supporting the structure was
The Devil in the White City • 25
shifted from the exterior walls to a skeleton of iron and steel. Burnham
and Root realized that Jenney’s innovation freed builders from the last
physical constraints on altitude. They employed it to build taller and
taller buildings, cities in the sky inhabited by a new race of businessmen,
whom some called “cliff-dwellers.” These were men, wrote Lincoln
Steffens, “who will not have an office unless it is up where the air is cool
and fresh, the outlook broad and beautiful, and where there is silence in
the heart of business.”
Burnham and Root became rich men. Not Pullman rich, not rich
enough to be counted among the first rank of society alongside Potter
Palmer and Philip Armour, or to have their wives’ gowns described in the
city’s newspapers, but rich beyond anything either man had expected,
enough so that each year Burnham bought a barrel of fine Madeira and
aged it by shipping it twice around the world on slow freighters.
As their firm prospered, the character of each partner began to emerge
and clarify. Burnham was a talented artist and architect in his own right,
but his greatest strength lay in his ability to win clients and execute
Root’s elegant designs. Burnham was handsome, tall, and strong, with
vivid blue eyes, all of which drew clients and friends to him the way a
lens gathers light. “Daniel Hudson Burnham was one of the handsomest
men I ever saw,” said Paul Starrett, later to lead construction of the
Empire State Building; he joined Burnham & Root in 1888 as an all-
purpose helper. “It was easy to see how he got commissions. His very
bearing and looks were half the battle. He had only to assert the most
commonplace thing and it sounded important and convincing.” Starrett
recalled being moved by Burnham’s frequent admonition: “Make no lit-
tle plans; they have no magic to stir men’s blood.”
Burnham understood that Root was the firm’s artistic engine. He
believed Root possessed a genius for envisioning a structure quickly, in
its entirety. “I’ve never seen anyone like him in this respect,” Burnham
said. “He would grow abstracted and silent, and a faraway look would
come into his eyes, and the building was there before him—every stone.”
At the same time he knew Root had little interest in the business side of
26 • Erik Larson
architecture and in sowing the relationships at the Chicago Club and
Union League that eventually led to commissions.
Root played the organ every Sunday morning at the First Presbyterian
Church. He wrote opera critiques for the Chicago Tribune. He read
broadly in philosophy, science, art, and religion and was known through-
out Chicago’s upper echelon for his ability to converse on almost any sub-
ject and to do so with great wit. “His conversational powers were
extraordinary,” a friend said. “There seemed to be no subject which he
had not investigated and in which he was not profoundly learned.” He
had a sly sense of humor. One Sunday morning he played the organ with
particular gravity. It was a while before anyone noticed he was playing
“Shoo, Fly.” When Burnham and Root were together, one woman said, “I
used always to think of some big strong tree with lightning playing
around it.”
Each man recognized and respected the other’s skills. The resultant
harmony was reflected in the operation of their office, which, according
to one historian, functioned with the mechanical precision of a
“slaughterhouse,” an apt allusion, given Burnham’s close professional
and personal association with the stockyards. But Burnham also created
an office culture that anticipated that of businesses that would not appear
for another century. He installed a gym. During lunch hour employees
played handball. Burnham gave fencing lessons. Root played impromptu
recitals on a rented piano. “The office was full of a rush of work,”
Starrett said, “but the spirit of the place was delightfully free and easy
and human in comparison with other offices I had worked in.”
Burnham knew that together he and Root had reached a level of suc-
cess that neither could have achieved on his own. The synchrony with
which they worked allowed them to take on ever more challenging and
daring projects, at a time when so much that an architect did was new
and when dramatic increases in the height and weight of buildings ampli-
fied the risk of catastrophic failure. Harriet Monroe wrote, “The work of
each man became constantly more necessary to the other.”
As the firm grew, so did the city. It got bigger, taller, and richer; but it
The Devil in the White City • 27
also grew dirtier, darker, and more dangerous. A miasma of cinder-
flecked smoke blackened its streets and at times reduced visibility to the
distance of a single block, especially in winter, when coal furnaces were
in full roar. The ceaseless passage of trains, grip-cars, trolleys, carriages—
surreys, landaus, victorias, broughams, phaetons, and hearses, all with
iron-clad wheels that struck the pavement like rolling hammers—
produced a constant thunder that did not recede until after midnight and
made the open-window nights of summer unbearable. In poor neighbor-
hoods garbage mounded in alleys and overflowed giant trash boxes that
became banquet halls for rats and bluebottle flies. Billions of flies. The
corpses of dogs, cats, and horses often remained where they fell. In
January they froze into disheartening poses; in August they ballooned
and ruptured. Many ended up in the Chicago River, the city’s main com-
mercial artery. During heavy rains, river water flowed in a greasy plume
far out into Lake Michigan, to the towers that marked the intake pipes
for the city’s drinking water. In rain any street not paved with macadam
oozed a fragrant muck of horse manure, mud, and garbage that swelled
between granite blocks like pus from a wound. Chicago awed visitors
and terrified them. French editor Octave Uzanne called it “that Gordian
city, so excessive, so satanic.” Paul Lindau, an author and publisher,
described it as “a gigantic peepshow of utter horror, but extraordinarily
to the point.”
Burnham loved Chicago for the opportunity it afforded, but he grew
wary of the city itself. By 1886 he and Margaret were the parents of five
children: two daughters and three sons, the last, a boy named Daniel,
born in February. That year Burnham bought an old farmhouse on the
lake in the quiet village of Evanston, called by some “the Athens of sub-
urbs.” The house had sixteen rooms on two floors, was surrounded by
“superb old trees,” and occupied a long rectangle of land that stretched
to the lake. He bought it despite initial opposition from his wife and her
father, and did not tell his own mother of his planned move until the pur-
chase was complete. Later he wrote her an apology. “I did it,” he
explained, “because I can no longer bear to have my children in the
streets of Chicago. . . .”
28 • Erik Larson
Success came easily to Burnham and Root, but the partners did have
their trials. In 1885 a fire destroyed the Grannis Block, their flagship
structure. At least one of them was in the office at the time and made his
escape down a burning stairway. They moved next to the top floor of the
Rookery. Three years later a hotel they had designed in Kansas City col-
lapsed during construction, injuring several men and killing one.
Burnham was heartbroken. The city convened a coroner’s inquest, which
focused its attention on the building’s design. For the first time in his
career Burnham found himself facing public attack. He wrote to his wife,
“You must not worry over the affair, no matter what the papers say.
There will no doubt be censure, and much trouble before we get through,
all of which we will shoulder in a simple, straightforward, manly way; so
much as in us lies.”
The experience cut him deeply, in particular the fact his competence
lay exposed to the review of a bureaucrat over whom he had no influ-
ence. “The coroner,” he wrote Margaret three days after the collapse, “is
a disagreeable little doctor, a political hack, without brains, who dis-
tresses me.” Burnham was sad and lonesome and wanted to go home. “I
do so long to be there, and be at peace again, with you.”
A third blow came in this period, but of a different character.
Although Chicago was rapidly achieving recognition as an industrial and
mercantile dynamo, its leading men felt keenly the slander from New
York that their city had few cultural assets. To help address this lack, one
prominent Chicagoan, Ferdinand W. Peck, proposed to build an audito-
rium so big, so acoustically perfect, as to silence all the carping from the
East and to make a profit to boot. Peck envisioned enclosing this gigan-
tic theater within a still larger shell that would contain a hotel, banquet
room, and offices. The many architects who dined at Kinsley’s
Restaurant, which had a stature in Chicago equal to that of Delmonico’s
in New York, agreed this would be the single most important architec-
tural assignment in the city’s history and that most likely it would go to
Burnham & Root. Burnham believed likewise.
Peck chose Chicago architect Dankmar Adler. If acoustically flawed,
Peck knew, the building would be a failure no matter how imposing the
The Devil in the White City • 29
finished structure proved to be. Only Adler had previously demonstrated
a clear grasp of the principles of acoustical design. “Burnham was not
pleased,” wrote Louis Sullivan, by now Adler’s partner, “nor was John
Root precisely entranced.” When Root saw early drawings of the
Auditorium, he said it appeared as if Sullivan were about to “smear
another façade with ornament.”
From the start there was tension between the two firms, although no
one could have known it would erupt years later in a caustic attack by
Sullivan on Burnham’s greatest achievements, this after Sullivan’s own
career had dissolved in a mist of alcohol and regret. For now, the tension
was subtle, a vibration, like the inaudible cry of overstressed steel. It
arose from discordant beliefs about the nature and purpose of architec-
ture. Sullivan saw himself as an artist first, an idealist. In his autobiogra-
phy, in which he always referred to himself in the third person, he
described himself as “an innocent with his heart wrapped up in the arts,
in the philosophies, in the religions, in the beatitudes of nature’s loveli-
ness, in his search for the reality of man, in his profound faith in the
beneficence of power.” He called Burnham a “colossal merchandiser”
fixated on building the biggest, tallest, costliest structures. “He was ele-
phantine, tactless, and blurting.”
Workers began building the Auditorium on June 1, 1887. The result
was an opulent structure that, for the moment, was the biggest private
building in America. Its theater contained more than four thousand seats,
twelve hundred more than New York’s Metropolitan Opera House. And
it was air-conditioned, through a system that blew air over ice. The sur-
rounding building had commercial offices, an immense banquet hall, and
a hotel with four hundred luxurious rooms. A traveler from Germany
recalled that simply by turning an electric dial on the wall by his bed, he
could request towels, stationery, ice water, newspapers, whiskey, or a shoe
shine. It became the most celebrated building in Chicago. The president
of the United States, Benjamin Harrison, attended its grand opening.
Ultimately these setbacks proved to be minor ones for Burnham and
Root. Far worse was to occur, and soon, but as of February 14, 1890, the
30 • Erik Larson
day of the great fair vote, the partners seemed destined for a lifetime of
success.
å
Outside the Tribune building there was silence. The crowd needed a
few moments to process the news. A man in a long beard was one of the
first to react. He had sworn not to shave until Chicago got the fair. Now
he climbed the steps of the adjacent Union Trust Company Bank. On the
top step he let out a shriek that one witness likened to the scream of a
skyrocket. Others in the crowd echoed his cry, and soon two thousand
men and women and a few children—mostly telegraph boys and hired
messengers—cut loose with a cheer that tore through the canyon of
brick, stone, and glass like a flash flood. The messenger boys raced off
with the news, while throughout the city telegraph boys sprinted from
the offices of the Postal Telegraph Company and Western Union or
leaped aboard their Pope “safety” bikes, one bound for the Grand Pacific
Hotel, another the Palmer House, others to the Richelieu, Auditorium,
Wellington, the gorgeous homes on Michigan and Prairie, the clubs—
Chicago, Century, Union League—and the expensive brothels, in partic-
ular Carrie Watson’s place with its lovely young women and cascades of
champagne.
One telegraph boy made his way through the dark to an unlit alley
that smelled of rotted fruit and was silent save for the receding hiss of
gaslights on the street he had left behind. He found a door, knocked, and
entered a room full of men, some young, some old, all seeming to speak
at once, a few quite drunk. A coffin at the center of the room served as a
bar. The light was dim and came from gas jets hidden behind skulls
mounted on the walls. Other skulls lay scattered about the room. A hang-
man’s noose dangled from the wall, as did assorted weapons and a blan-
ket caked with blood.