JMP Task 1 (0318)
Not Evident
Approaching Competence
Competent
A. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002&
A submission is not provided using the Web Folio Builder in Taskstream.
Not applicable.
The documents are submitted through the Web Folio Builder in Taskstream using the portfolio created in the Professional Roles and Values course.
A1. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002&
A professional mission statement is not provided, or the statement contains none of the required elements.
The professional mission statement ineffectively addresses the required elements, or the statement is disorganized or illogical.
The professional mission statement effectively addresses the required elements, and the statement is well organized and logical.
A1a. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002&
A reflection is not provided, or it makes no reference to how a professional mission statement will help guide the candidate’s nursing career.
The reflection ineffectively addresses how a professional mission statement will help guide the candidate’s nursing career, or the reflection is poorly reasoned or vague.
The reflection effectively addresses how a professional mission statement will help guide the candidate’s nursing career, and the reflection is well reasoned and sufficiently detailed.
A2a. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002&
The submission does not include an explanation, or the explanation makes no reference to the representation of the portfolio.
The submission includes an inadequate explanation of how either specific artifacts or completed work or both in the portfolio represent the candidate as a learner and a healthcare professional, or the explanation is illogical or poorly supported.
The submission includes an adequate explanation of how either specific artifacts or completed work or both in the portfolio represent the candidate as a learner and a healthcare professional, and the explanation is logical and well supported.
A2b. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002&
A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the specific artifacts in the portfolio represent professional strengths.
The discussion illogically addresses how the specific artifacts in the portfolio represent professional strengths, or the discussion is vague.
The discussion logically addresses how the specific artifacts in the portfolio represent professional strengths, and the discussion is sufficiently detailed.
A2c. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002&
The submission does not include a discussion, or the discussion makes no references to the challenges encountered during the progression of the program.
The submission includes an inadequate discussion of the challenges encountered during the progression of the program, or the discussion is illogical or poorly supported.
The submission includes an adequate discussion of the challenges encountered during the progression of the program, and the discussion is logical and well supported.
A2ci. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002&
An explanation was not provided, or it makes no reference to how the given challenges were overcome.
The explanation ineffectively addresses how the given challenges were overcome, or the explanation is poorly reasoned, poorly supported, or vague.
The explanation effectively addresses how the given challenges were overcome, and the explanation is well reasoned, well supported, and sufficiently detailed.
A2d. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002&
An explanation was not provided, or it makes no reference to how the coursework helped the candidate meet each of the 9 nursing program outcomes.
The explanation ineffectively addresses how the coursework helped the candidate meet each of the 9 nursing program outcomes, or the explanation is poorly reasoned, poorly supported, or vague.
The explanation successfully addresses how the coursework helped the candidate meet each of the 9 nursing program outcomes, and the explanation is well reasoned, well supported, and sufficiently detailed.
A2e. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002&
An analysis is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the given roles were fulfilled during the program.
The analysis for how the given roles were fulfilled during the program is illogical, unconvincing, or ineffective.
The analysis for how the given roles were fulfilled during the program is logical, convincing, and effec