COURSEWORK 2
“NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION LEADING TO PERCEPTION:
THE INTERSECTION OF RELIGION AND GENDER IN HOSPITALITY
INDUSTRY”
Date of submission:
8th of March, 2021
Words of count: 2,826
Written by:
Michelle Marvin (739615)
Victoria Trinanda Millenia (739849)
Ylva Louise Banelind (740522)
Submitted to:
Dr. Evelina Gillard
Social Psychology
PSY350
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2
INTRODUCTION 2
BODY OF CONTENT 3 NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION LEADING TO PERCEPTION 3 GUEST-EMPLOYEE’S PERCEPTION 5 GENDER 7 RELIGION 9
CONCLUSION 12
REFERENCES 14
INTRODUCTION
Existing in the hospitality field requires people to easily meet and connect with hundreds,
thousands, and even millions of people in a day. This industry predominantly uses verbal and
non-verbal communication to interact with their customers, clients, colleagues, and partners
(Sundaram and Webster, 2000). However, in this fast-paced world of the service, non-verbal
communication often creates different signals that intrigued people to build perceptions in their
minds especially in zero acquaintance cases or first encounter scenarios (Vinciarelli Et al., 2012).
Perception in hospitality also occurs a lot from the guest's side to the employee’s side and vice
versa.
Non-verbal communication often creates a perception especially when it intersects with religion
and gender (Islam and Kirillova, 2020). This paper will help people to understand better how
non-verbal communication could create a perception between employees and guests in
hospitality sectors especially when it intersects with gender and religion.
BODY OF CONTENT
NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION LEADING TO PERCEPTION
There are 4 common ways for people to communicate and build their connections (Sen, 2007).
Firstly, is verbal/spoken communication which allows people to talk face to face, calls, etc.
Secondly, it is non-verbal communication where people communicate through facial expression,
body language, etc. The third one is the written communication where people usually write
comments in social media, letters, books, etc. Lastly is the visualizations, it is communication
through charts, maps, logos, etc.
Several types of non-verbal communication are important to pay attention to in this industry.
Firstly, it is Kinesics which means movements that include body gestures, facial expression, and
eye contact (Islam and Kirillova, 2020). Secondly is Haptics, which represents touch by any
means. There are different types of touch in non-verbal communication including professional,
social manner, friendship, love-intimacy, and sexual-desire touch (Schutte et al., 2010). The third
one is paralinguistic, which represents the vocal communication that indicates how loud people
speak, intonation, pitch, etc. Lastly is gaze, which is an important non-verbal communication
skill that is needed in this industry (Mandal, 2014). By looking at the people it could reflect their
emotion, feelings, interest, and more.
People sometimes neglect the importance of non-verbal communication. Thus, non-verbal
communication is crucial to truly analyze one’s behavior. Non-verbal behavior can identify not
only people’s outer condition but also their inner condition (Kassin et al., n.d.). Therefore,
non-verbal communication means a lot more than it seems. In this industry, we are expected to
act and react by just analyzing the guest's gestures and cues. Sometimes, it added an extra point
for the hospitality industry workers that could know what the guest wants without them saying it
out loud (Gabbott and Hogg, 2000). That is why it is really important to have a good
understanding of non-verbal communication to be attentive and detailed in this industry.
Therefore, when people just analyze one’s behavior without exactly really knowing what they
want, who they are, and what their expectations are, sometimes it projects certain perceptions in
their minds. Perception is a process where people formed an impression towards others through
several stimuli (Vinciarelli Et al., 2012). Gender and religion are common factors that make
people build a perception in their mind without even communicating verbally. As an example,
according to the research that is conducted in Dhaka with 384 hotel guests' feedback, the effects
of religion with non-verbal communication perception depends also on its gender (Islam and
Kirillova, 2020). One of the reasons why people are easily made perceptions of these factors, is
because these factors are really visible from the eyes. After finding that gender and religion are
affecting the perception in a nutshell, it would be explained even further from guest employees'
perception in the hospitality industry.
GUEST-EMPLOYEE’S PERCEPTION
Communication is one of the key skills a hospitality employee should possess to be seen as
well-trained and experienced personnel. According to some researchers, hospitality employees
must be proficient in both verbal and non-verbal communication (Islam and Kirillova, 2020).
Furthermore, interpersonal skills and high-quality guest interaction are other skills that an
employer often looks for in an employee when considering recruitment. Unlike verbal
communication, non-verbal communication obtains specific indications that are recognized and
decoded by both guests and employees. When looking through the perspective of the employees,
non-verbal messages generated by the guests may consist of certain information that will be
valuable for the employee to use for reciprocity and the other way around. Moreover, one should
not forget about the non-verbal behavior amongst employees and guests’ perception of it. This
non-verbal aspect between employee and guest interaction is often forgotten and there has been
little academic research on this type of perception (Islam and Kirillova, 2020).
The research examined at a restaurant in Hong Kong has found that guests easily pick up on
non-verbal cues of the employees. During a dining experience, a guest is often greeted upon
arrival, they order from a menu, and are directed to the restroom. When discussing the best or
worst experience during a visit, guests usually acknowledge facial expression and eye contact
which are kinesics cues, when it comes to non-verbal behavior. Moreover, paralanguage cues
such as speaking with a relatively quiet voice and slowly, tended to be favorable for the guests.
Furthermore, restaurant staff examining unfavorable cues, even without any actual failure in the
service, were perceived as untrained personnel from the guests’ point of view (Islam and
Kirillova, 2020).
A study done in Hong Kong examined guest's and hospitality employee's non-verbal behavior
towards one another. One result was mutual recognition. The guest appreciated being
acknowledged, the employee smiled at them, was nodding, and kept eye contact. This was
favorable for the guest since they felt seen by the employee. On the other hand, when the guests
appreciate being acknowledged by the employees, the same situation also happens with the
employees (Kueh and Bagul, 2013). The employees also felt recognized and positive energy
towards the guests when they do the same thing. The employees practically felt needed and
appreciated by the guests when they finally can help the guests with their problems. This can be
described as a two-sided affirmation experienced by both parties. On the other hand, some
experts examined how multiple sequential behavioral shows by employees influence guests'
negative emotions in a formal situation using an experimental approach focused on video-based
stimuli. The outcome of this experiment indicated that higher levels of negative behavioral
displays by employees increased guest negative emotion during service outages (Kueh and
Bagul, 2013).
Another result was meaning exchange. The study also discovered that by observing one another's
body attitudes and movements, the guest and the employee will stimulate each other's
observations, allowing messages to become mutually dependent. Guests were noticing the body
language of the employees and if the staff was standing up straight and appearing to be alert, that
was appreciated by the guests. This gave an impression of a glad and satisfied employee. A third
result was trust-building. The findings say that exchanging kinesics cues appropriately would
start building trust between the guest and the employee. After exchanging warm-oriented cues
and reciprocating symbolically, hotel guests and employees were both pleased with one another.
They went on to say that mutual respect is a good place to start when it comes to building trust.
Also, the findings say trust is often developed by the sense of fairness, and distributing kinesics
cues could maintain trust and respect that is mutual (Islam and Kirillova, 2020).
Furthermore, the influence of service employees' non-verbal communication on customer
satisfaction has been examined in several aspects. While only a few scholars have clarified this
relationship in terms of emotional reaction or emotional contagion theory (Kueh and Bagul,
2013), it is commonly accepted that customer satisfaction in service interactions is often the
product of a positive feeling or perception of the service employee.
GENDER
As it is known, a face-to-face instance between guest and employee includes both verbal- and
non-verbal communication. Looking at it from a gender perspective, studies previously done
examine that non-verbal expressions between women and men are often related to the
stereotypes of genders. Research shows that women are more complex and descriptive in their
non-verbal behavior, they are as well finer at comprehending non-verbal cues than men.
Nevertheless, women are associated with being more discerning to the requirements of others.
On the other hand, women seem to expect likely behavior from their conversational partners. For
instance, studies have shown that women initiate eye contact longer and more often than men,
while on the contrary men can have less eye contact but still pay full attention and listen (Islam
and Kirillova, 2020).
Gender differences additionally exist at the degree of non-verbal correspondence all in all.
Contrasted with men, females are by and large more expressive in their showcase of non-verbal
behavior and are additionally more exact in disentangling others' enthusiastic articulations,
especially when the articulations are negative or unpretentious (Katsumi et al., 2017).
In addition, studies also show that men are twice as much probable to commence physical touch
with women than the opposite way around in social and business relationships. Although, a
woman’s touch is often comprehended as a sort of sensual invitation (Islam and Kirillova, 2020).
Another form of non-verbal behavior is handshaking, which can influence dramatically the
perception and evaluation of involvement that is social. The precise origin of the handshake is
still unclear, although historically it has been seen as a form of hospitality, friendliness, trust, and
formality. Moreover, there are characteristics of a handshake, such as frequency and intensity,
that have impacts on individual discernment and assessment appear to differ as a component of
individual contrasts, like ethnicity and gender (Katsumi et al., 2017).
Furthermore, the handshake is more frequently used by the male gender and is therefore
expected to be used more by males than females. Reliable with the assumption mentioned , are
men bound to frame impressions that are positive of the others by following up with a handshake
amongst them than females. Besides, regardless of if handshaking is done with a female or male
individual, it appears to impact the examination of the perceiver of social connection. However,
this might likewise rely upon a setting in particular. For instance, a handshake with female
individuals expands an apparent suspicion that all is well and good when making hazardous
monetary choices contrasted with handshakes with male focuses, in both male and female
members. Nonetheless, with regards to interviews in the business, the nature of handshakes with
male individuals was evaluated with greater emphasis than that with female individuals,
however, the poorer handshakes by females did not affect the interviews as much. Also, a
handshake was most often seen in male to male duos, and an improvement in the precision of
deciding others' characteristics (i.e., honesty) because a handshake seems altogether larger in
male–male collaborations contrasted with blended gender or female-female communications.
Considering the evidence presented above, looking at the strong relationship involving the
handshake and masculinity, it is believed that the outcome of the handshake consideration in
social instances is less positive with females than with male participants, and as well that the
positive outcome would be greatest in a male dual social instance (Katsumi et al., 2017).
These non-verbal behaviors are not only present from a gender point of view but also from a
religion point of view.
RELIGION
Religion is one of the culture's most fundamental components for some individuals. It is
considered to have an effect on guest's actions and the relationship between the employees and
the guests. When talking about communication, whether verbal or non-verbal, it is the form by
which people communicate with one another. There is just a limited amount of direct contact
between guests and employees. Non-verbal communication, on the other hand, occurs during
guests' spiritual encounters, resulting in an emotional connection between them. Non-verbal
communication and some variables in daily life affected one and another in some ways. Religion
is one of the variables that are influenced by non-verbal communication. The study examined
whether individuals' interpretations of non-verbal communication shared between them can be
related to different religious norms whether it is Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism, or Christianity
since religious views can have a direct influence on non-verbal or emotional gestures exchanged
face to face (Islam and Kirillova, 2020).
When looking at the point of view from the perspective of religion, studies examined that
pro-religious service practices take part in the growth of guests' consumption motivation. When
guests interpret service experiences, religious differences come into play, indicating the
successful service participation of guests in service delivery. Experts believed that individual
preferences are related to the essence of emotional expressions along the lines of non-verbal
communication during real-life interaction (Vukonic, 2002). As one result, the world at this
present time wishes to acquire emotional expressions from their religious colleagues. However,
there are still some misperceptions that occur throughout religious beliefs. These misperceptions
and perceptions could lead to unreliable and incoherent judgments among the individuals
(Croucher & Cronn-Mills, 2011).
Non-verbal messages that are permissible in one religion may be unacceptable in another,
according to the latest research. Respect and dignity may involve not touching anyone of the
opposite sex for some Muslims, even when exchanging a handshake. Another example, for
instance, waving "come over here" with an upward hand or gesturing at an individual is
considered impolite in some Muslim countries (Islam and Kirillova, 2020). The head should not
be touched by other individuals in some Muslim communities in some Muslim countries such as
Malaysia as this act is considered shameful, but Muslims in Arab countries have no such
constraints (Eaves and Leathers, 2017). Some individuals even regard head rubbing as an act of
religion and reverence.
In addition, the non-verbal greeting of Buddhists is defined in existing literature as a novel when
compared to other religions, but it is identical to Hindus. Their hands are pressed together in a
small bow, palms and fingers reaching forward, fingertips near to the chest. As a show of
gratitude, they use a gentle bow (Andersen et al., 2003). As a sign of admiration and reverence,
in Hinduism’s point of view, the younger individual may welcome the elderly by touching his or
her feet. Gender-based interaction or contact actions such as male and female touching behavior,
including such handshaking, may be offensive to religious Buddhists and Muslims, whereas
shows of non-verbal displays of affection are usually acts within Christians (Islam and Kirillova,
2020).
Nonverbal attitudes are perceived differently in Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism, and Christianity.
When analyzing hospitality employees' nonverbal communication, Muslim and Christian guests
had different physical appearances and gestures. Muslim and Buddhist guests reacted differently
to the presence of employees than Christian guests.
Substantial variations in perceptions of hotel employees' paralanguage were found within
Muslim and Buddhist guests, as well as Christian guests. This happened possibly because they
selected specific voice sounds. A certain explanation is possible given that Muslims and
Buddhists use self-cultured sounds as part of religious practices (Islam and Kirillova, 2020).
In general, current research indicates that non-verbal messages are transmitted and interpreted
differently throughout religions. It's still uncertain how these discrepancies would express
themselves in the hospitality service experience.
CONCLUSION
To conclude this paper, it is true that the presence of communication is really important in any
industry. However, non-verbal communication is especially important in the hospitality industry
as the workers are required to be attentive and reactive towards its customer without asking too
many things (Kassin et al.,n.d.). Therefore, non-verbal communication is one of the skills that
need to be acquired in this field.
Firstly, looking at the perception of the employees, by using non-verbal communication they
already could actually sense whether the customers are satisfied with their services or not. Since
everything about this industry is about paying attention to details. On the other hand, from the
perspective of the guest, if they feel appreciated or satisfied with the services, they share their
positive vibes. This mutual respectful behavior will grow their relationship (Islam and Kirillova,
2020).
Lastly, gender and religion that easily creates a perception in people’s mind. Starting with
gender, the research mentioned men are more comfortable with sharing physical touch compared
to women in business relationships. As for women sometimes it could be interpreted as a sensual
invitation (Islam and Kirillova, 2020). Next is religion, sometimes non-verbal communication is
allowed in one religion but not in another religion. However, in the hospitality industry, people
usually do physical touches like handshakes or even share hugs. Therefore, it could create
misjudgments for people that don't truly understand the reasons why people with certain beliefs
do those actions thus, this is often misinterpreted in non-verbal behavior. Until now, people are
still struggling to reduce the discrepancies about the perception in gender and religion with
non-verbal communication. Therefore, one thing to keep in mind is to always respect everyone,
because everyone holds different values, beliefs, and conditions in their lives. This is one of the
ways to reduce the misperception and misjudgments in every industry.
REFERENCES
Andersen, P.A., Hecht, M.L., Hoobler, G.D., Smallwood, M., 2003. Nonverbal communication
across cultures. Cross-cultural and intercultural communication. Pp. 73-90.
Eaves, M., Leathers, D.G., 2017. Successful nonverbal communication: Principles and
applications. Routledge.
Fatik Baran Mandal (2014) Nonverbal Communication in Humans, Journal of Human Behavior in
the Social Environment, 24:4, 417-421, DOI: 10.1080/10911359.2013.831288
Gabbott, Mark & Hogg, Gillian. (2000). An empirical investigation of the impact of non-verbal
communication on service evaluation. European Journal of Marketing. 34. 384-398.
10.1108/03090560010311911.
Islam, M. and Kirillova, K., 2020. Guests’ Perceptions of Hospitality Employees’ Non-Verbal
Behavior: Insights from a Restaurant Sector. EasyChair,.
Islam, M. and Kirillova, K., 2020. Non-verbal communication in hospitality: At the intersection of
religion and gender. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 84, p.102326.
Islam, M. and Kirillova, K., 2020. Non-verbal behaviour as driver of reciprocity in a hospitality
encounter: A video elicitation study. EasyChair,.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2013.831288
Jung, H.S., Yoon, H.H., 2011. The effects of nonverbal communication of employees in the family
restaurant upon customers’ emotional responses and customer satisfaction. International Journal of
Hospitality Management 30 (3), 542–550.
Kassin, S., Fein, S. and Markus, H., n.d. Social psychology.
Kueh, S. and Bagul, A., 2013. The Effects of Nonverbal Communication of Hotel Employees upon
Emotional Responses of Hotel Guests. International Journal of Research in Management &
Technology (IJRMT), 3(4), p.126-135.
Schutte, N., Malouff, J. and Adams, C., 2010. A Self-Report Measure of Touching Behavior. The
Journal of Social Psychology, 128(5), pp.597-604.
Sen, L., 2007. Communication skills. New Delhi: PHP Learning.
Sundaram, D.S. and Webster, C. (2000), "The role of nonverbal communication in service
encounters", Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 378-391.
Jiang, X., Paulmann, S., Robin, J., Pell, M.D., 2015. More than accuracy: Nonverbal dialects
modulate the time course of vocal emotion recognition across cultures. Journal of experimental
psychology: human perception and performance 41 (3), 597.
Katsumi, Y., Kim, S., Sung, K., Dolcos, F. and Dolcos, S., 2017. When Nonverbal Greetings
“Make It or Break It”: The Role of Ethnicity and Gender in the Effect of Handshake on Social
Appraisals. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 41(4), pp.345-365.
Vinciarelli A., Salamin H., Polychroniou A., Mohammadi G., Origlia A. (2012) From Nonverbal
Cues to Perception: Personality and Social Attractiveness. In: Esposito A., Esposito A.M.,
Vukonic, B., 2002. Religion, tourism and economics: A convenient symbiosis. Tourism Recreation
Research 27 (2), 59–64.
MICHELLE MARVIN (739615) ; VICTORIA MILLENIA (739849) ; YLVA BANELIND (740522)
NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION LEADING TO PERCEPTION: THE
INTERSECTION OF RELIGION AND GENDER
PSY350 COURSEWORK 2
TABLE OF CONTENT
RELIGION & GENDER 03.
CONCLUSION
INTRODUCTION01.
GUEST-EMPLOYEE’S PERCEPTION02. 04.
INTRODUCTION01.
WHAT IS NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION & TYPES
KINESICS
HAPTICS
PARALINGUISTIC
GAZE
1
2
3
4
HOW NON VERBAL COMMUNICATION CREATES A PERCEPTION
STAGE 1
First Meeting
STAGE 2
Non verbal communication interaction
STAGE 3
Perception are being made
GUEST- EMPLOYEE’S PERCEPTION
02.
GUEST-EMPLOYEE’S PERCEPTION
Hospitality employees must be proficient in both
verbal and non-verbal communication.
GUEST-EMPLOYEE’S PERCEPTION
A study done at a restaurant in Hong Kong
● Guests greeted upon arrival → order from a
menu → directed to the restroom
● Best and worst experience → kinesics cues
● Paralanguage cues, also favorable
● Unfavorable cues → untrained staff
G U
E ST-E
M P
LO YE
E ’S
P E
R C
E P
T IO
N Another study done in Hong Kong
● Mutual recognition
● Meaning exchange
● Trust building
GENDER & RELIGION03.
GENDER
● Often related to the stereotypes of genders
● Women are more expressive and complex in non-verbal behavior
● Women also seems to expect likely behavior from their conversational partner
● Men are twice as much probable to commence physical touch
● Handshaking
○ Characteristics
○ More frequently used by themale gender
○ Business interviews
RELIGION
● One of culture's most fundamental components
● Religious views can have a direct influence on non-verbal gestures exchanged face to face
● Takes part in the growing of guests' consumption motivation
● Misperceptions that occur throughout religious beliefs
● Nonverbal attitudes are perceived differently in Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism, and Christianity.
→ E.g Gender-based interaction for Buddhists, Muslims, and Christians
● Still uncertain how these discrepancies would express themselves in the hospitality service
experience.
CONCLUSION04.
THANK YOU! DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
REFERENCES Andersen, P.A., Hecht, M.L., Hoobler, G.D., Smallwood, M., 2003. Nonverbal communication across cultures. Cross-cultural and intercultural communication. Pp. 73-90.
Eaves, M., Leathers, D.G., 2017. Successful nonverbal communication: Principles and applications. Routledge.
Fatik Baran Mandal (2014) Nonverbal Communication in Humans, Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 24:4, 417-421, DOI: 10.1080/10911359.2013.831288
Gabbott, Mark & Hogg, Gillian. (2000). An empirical investigation of the impact of non-verbal communication on service evaluation. European Journal of Marketing. 34. 384-398. 10.1108/03090560010311911.
Islam, M. and Kirillova, K., 2020. Guests’ Perceptions of Hospitality Employees’ Non-Verbal Behavior: Insights from a Restaurant Sector. EasyChair,.
Islam, M. and Kirillova, K., 2020. Non-verbal communication in hospitality: At the intersection of religion and gender. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 84, p.102326.
Islam, M. and Kirillova, K., 2020. Non-verbal behaviour as driver of reciprocity in a hospitality encounter: A video elicitation study. EasyChair,.
Jung, H.S., Yoon, H.H., 2011. The effects of nonverbal communication of employees in the family restaurant upon customers’ emotional responses and customer satisfaction. International Journal of Hospitality Management 30 (3), 542–550.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2013.831288
REFERENCES Kassin, S., Fein, S. and Markus, H., n.d. Social psychology.
Kueh, S. and Bagul, A., 2013. The Effects of Nonverbal Communication of Hotel Employees upon Emotional Responses of Hotel Guests. International Journal of Research in Management & Technology (IJRMT), 3(4), p.126-135.
Schutte, N., Malouff, J. and Adams, C., 2010. A Self-Report Measure of Touching Behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128(5), pp.597-604.
Sen, L., 2007. Communication skills. New Delhi: PHP Learning.
Sundaram, D.S. and Webster, C. (2000), "The role of nonverbal communication in service encounters", Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 378-391.
Jiang, X., Paulmann, S., Robin, J., Pell, M.D., 2015. More than accuracy: Nonverbal dialects modulate the time course of vocal emotion recognition across cultures. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance 41 (3), 597.
Katsumi, Y., Kim, S., Sung, K., Dolcos, F. and Dolcos, S., 2017. When Nonverbal Greetings “Make It or Break It”: The Role of Ethnicity and Gender in the Effect of Handshake on Social Appraisals. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 41(4), pp.345-365.
Vinciarelli A., Salamin H., Polychroniou A., Mohammadi G., Origlia A. (2012) From Nonverbal Cues to Perception: Personality and Social Attractiveness. In: Esposito A., Esposito A.M.,
Vukonic, B., 2002. Religion, tourism and economics: A convenient symbiosis. Tourism Recreation Research 27 (2), 59–64.