Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Last year ford pinto was made

03/12/2021 Client: muhammad11 Deadline: 2 Day

Ford Pinto Case Study

On August 10, 1978, three teenage girls died horribly in an automobile accident. Driving a 1973 Ford Pinto to their church volleyball practice in Goshen, Indiana, they were struck from behind by a Chevrolet van. The Pinto’s fuel tank ruptured and the car exploded in flames. Two passengers, Lynn Marie Ulrich, 16, and her cousin, Donna Ulrich, 18, were trapped inside the inferno and burned to death. After three attempts, Lynn Marie’s sister, 18-year-old Judy Ann, was dragged out alive from the driver’s seat, but died in agony hours later in the hospital.

They were merely the latest in a long list of people to burn to death in accidents involving the Pinto, which Ford had begun selling in 1970. By the time of the accident, the car had been the subject of a great deal of public outcry and debate about its safety, especially its susceptibility to fire in low-speed rear-end collisions. This particular accident, however, resulted in more media attention than any other auto accident in U.S. history. Why? Because it led to an unprecedented court case in which the prosecution brought charges of reckless homicide against the Ford Motor Co.—the first time that a corporation had been charged with criminal conduct, and the charge was not negligence but murder. At stake was much more than the maximum penalty of $30,000 in fines. Of immediate concern, a guilty verdict could have affected 40 pending civil cases nationwide and resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in punitive damage awards. Of perhaps greater concern, however, were larger issues involving corporate social responsibility, ethical decision making by individuals within corporations, and ultimately, the proper conduct of business in the modern era. How did Ford get into this situation? The chronology begins in early 1968 when the decision was made to battle the foreign competition in the small car market, specifically the Germans, but also the growing threat from the Japanese. This decision came after a hard-fought, two-year internal struggle between then-president Semon “Bunkie” Knudsen and Lee Iacocca, who had risen quickly within the company because of his success with the Mustang. Iacocca strongly supported fighting the competition at their own game, while Knudsen argued instead for letting them have the small car market so Ford could concentrate on the more profitable medium and large models. The final decision ultimately was in the hands of then-CEO Henry Ford II, who not only agreed with Iacocca but also promoted him to president after Knudsen’s subsequent forced resignation. Iacocca wanted the Pinto in the showrooms by the 1971 model introductions, which would require the shortest production planning period in automotive history to that time. The typical time span from conception to production of a new car was more than three and a half years; Iacocca, however, wanted to launch the Pinto in just over two years. Under normal conditions, chassis design, styling, product planning, advance engineering, component testing, and so on were all either completed or nearly completed prior to tooling of the production factories. Yet, because tooling had a fixed time frame of about 18 months, some of these other processes were done more or less concurrently. As a consequence, when it was discovered through crash testing that the Pinto’s fuel tank often ruptured during a rear-end impact, it was too late (in other words, too costly) to do much about it in terms of redesign. A closer look at the crash-test reports reveals that Ford was aware of the faulty fuel tank design. Eleven Pintos were subjected to rear-end collisions with a barrier at average speeds of 31 miles per hour to determine whether any fuel would be lost after impact. All eight of the Pintos equipped with the standard fuel tank failed. The three remaining cars, however, survived the test because special measures had been taken to prevent tank rupture or fuel leakage. These measures included a plastic baffle placed between the axle housing and the gas tank, a steel plate between the tank and the rear bumper, and a rubber lining in the gas tank.

It should be noted that these tests were done under guidelines established by Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 301, which was proposed in 1968 by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), but not officially adopted until the 1977 model year. Therefore, at the time of the tests, the Pinto met the required standards. Standard 301 had been strenuously opposed by the auto industry, and specifically Ford Motor Co. In fact, the lobbying efforts were so strong that negotiations continued until 1976, despite studies showing that hundreds of thousands of cars burned every year, taking 3,000 lives annually; the adoption of the standard was projected to reduce the death rate by 40 percent. Upon approval of Standard 301 in 1977, all Pintos were provided with a rupture-proof fuel tank design. But for the Pinto’s 1971 debut, Ford decided to go with its original gas tank design despite the crash-test results. Because the typical Pinto buyer was assumed to be extremely price conscious, Iacocca set an important goal known as “the limits of 2,000”: the Pinto could not cost more than $2,000 and could not weigh more than 2,000 pounds. Thus, to be competitive with foreign manufacturers, Ford felt it could not spend any money on improving the gas tank. Besides, during the late 1960s and early 1970s, American consumers demonstrated little concern for safety, so it was not considered good business sense to promote it. Iacocca echoed these sentiments when he said time and time again “Safety doesn’t sell,” a lesson he had learned after a failed attempt to add costly safety features to 1950s Fords. Ford had experimented with placing the gas tank in different locations, but all alternatives reduced usable trunk space. A design similar to that of the Ford Capri was successful in many crash tests at speeds over 50 miles per hour, but Ford felt that lost trunk space would hurt sales too much. One Ford engineer, when asked about the dangerous gas tank said, “Safety isn’t the issue, trunk space is. You have no idea how stiff the competition is over trunk space. Do you realize that if we put a Capri-type tank in the Pinto, you could only get one set of golf clubs in the trunk?” The last of Ford’s reasons for not making adjustments to the fuel tank design, however, was unquestionably the most controversial. After strong lobbying efforts, Ford and the auto industry in general convinced NHTSA regulators that a cost-benefit analysis would be an appropriate basis for determining the feasibility of safety design standards. Such an analysis, however, required the assignment of a value for a human life. A prior study had concluded that every time someone died in an auto accident there was an estimated “cost to society” of $200,725 (detailed in Table 2.1: What’s Your Life Worth?). 27 Having this value in hand, Ford calculated the cost of adding an $11 gas tank improvement versus the benefits of the projected 180 lives that would be saved (via an internal memo entitled “Fatalities Associated with Crash-Induced Fuel Leakage and Fires”). This is presented in Table 2.2: The Cost of Dying in a Pinto. 28 As is demonstrated, the costs outweigh the benefits by almost three times. Thus, the cost-benefit analysis indicated that no improvements to the gas tanks were warranted. Ford decided to go ahead with normal production plans, but the Pinto’s problems soon surfaced. By early 1973, Ford’s recall coordinator received field reports suggesting that Pintos were susceptible to “exploding” in rear-end collisions at very low speeds (under 25 miles per hour). Reports continued to indicate a similar trend in subsequent years, but no recall was initiated despite the mounting evidence. At every internal review, those responsible decided not to recall the Pinto. Prior to the Indiana accident, the most publicized case concerning the Pinto’s gas tank was that of Richard Grimshaw. In 1972, Richard, then 13, was riding with a decide? neighbor on a road near San Bernardino, California, when they were hit from the rear. The Pinto’s gas tank ruptured, causing the car to burst into flames. The neighbor was burned to death in a crash that would have been survivable if there had been no fire. Richard suffered third-degree burns over 90 percent of his body and subsequently underwent more than 60 operations, with only limited success. A civil suit was settled in February 1978, when a jury awarded a judgment of over $125 million against Ford, most of which consisted of punitive damages (later reduced to $6 million by a judge who nonetheless accused Ford of “callous indifference to human life”). This judgment was based on convincing evidence that Ford chose not to spend the $11 per car to correct the faults in the Pinto gas tanks that its own crash testing had revealed. The Pinto sold well until the media called special attention to the Pinto fuel tank story. As a consequence, in June 1978, in the face of pressure from the media, the government, pending court cases, and the potential loss of future sales, Ford ordered a complete recall of all 1.5 million Pintos built between 1970 and 1976. During the 1980 Indiana trial that resulted from the fatal accident of 1978, differing views continued to be expressed about the Pinto fires case. Ford representatives argued that companies must make cost-benefit decisions all the time. They claimed that it is an essential part of business, and even though everyone knows that some people will die in auto accidents, buyers want costs held down; therefore, people implicitly accept risks when buying cars. In a scathing article accusing Ford of criminally mismanaging the Pinto problem, investigative reporter Mark Dowie framed the case in a different and rather more sensational way, with this often-quoted speculation: “One wonders how long the Ford Motor Company would continue to market lethal cars were Henry Ford II and Lee Iacocca serving twenty-year terms in Leavenworth for consumer homicide.” 29

Case Questions 1. Put yourself in the role of the recall coordinator for Ford Motor Co. It is 1973, and field reports have been coming in about rear-end collisions, fires, and fatalities. You must decide whether to recall the automobile.

a. Identify the relevant facts.

b. Identify the pertinent ethical issues and points of ethical conflict.

c. Identify the relevant affected parties.

d. Identify the possible consequences of alternative courses of action.

e. Identify relevant obligations.

f. Identify your relevant community standards that should guide you as a person of integrity. g. Check your gut. What will you decide?

Level of Achievement

General Presentation

Reasoning, Argumentation

Exemplary (10 pts)

· Provides a clear and thorough introduction

· Addresses the questions

· Presents information in a logical order

· Uses acceptable communication style and grammar (no errors)

· Demonstrates an accurate and complete understanding of the questions

· Uses appropriate information and examples to support answers

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Study Master
Write My Coursework
Academic Mentor
Chartered Accountant
Homework Guru
Financial Assignments
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Study Master

ONLINE

Study Master

As an experienced writer, I have extensive experience in business writing, report writing, business profile writing, writing business reports and business plans for my clients.

$46 Chat With Writer
Write My Coursework

ONLINE

Write My Coursework

I have done dissertations, thesis, reports related to these topics, and I cover all the CHAPTERS accordingly and provide proper updates on the project.

$19 Chat With Writer
Academic Mentor

ONLINE

Academic Mentor

I am an experienced researcher here with master education. After reading your posting, I feel, you need an expert research writer to complete your project.Thank You

$45 Chat With Writer
Chartered Accountant

ONLINE

Chartered Accountant

I have worked on wide variety of research papers including; Analytical research paper, Argumentative research paper, Interpretative research, experimental research etc.

$28 Chat With Writer
Homework Guru

ONLINE

Homework Guru

I am a PhD writer with 10 years of experience. I will be delivering high-quality, plagiarism-free work to you in the minimum amount of time. Waiting for your message.

$46 Chat With Writer
Financial Assignments

ONLINE

Financial Assignments

I reckon that I can perfectly carry this project for you! I am a research writer and have been writing academic papers, business reports, plans, literature review, reports and others for the past 1 decade.

$41 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

1x1 rib vs 2x2 rib - Ids 100 project 2 kwl chart template - Westgate bridge collapse deaths - WATCH A VIDEO - The private history of a campaign that failed sparknotes - Summary of the loneliness beyond poem - How to get system date in c++ - Public Administrator Generated Information on Economic Developement - The best manufacturing company is considering a new investment - 13th reflection questions answer key - Lab 6 pressure temperature and volume of gases - Innovative entrepreneurs walker and ford - Telstra shared data plans - Johns hopkins nursing evidence based practice model and guidelines 2007 - Cardwell marine weather forecast - The four i's of transformational leadership pdf - What animals eat both producers and consumers - Masjid al tawfiq bolton - Stained glass window lesson - International Trade - WK4DISCUSSION091720 - Sandia medical devices case study answers - Substitution table for tenses - Learning curve in project management - The crusades seen through arab eyes - Discussion - Prosectus Draft - A single cash flow is also known as a - Clipsal phone mech wiring - 2009 dodge nitro spark plug wire order - 34 fisher street gisborne - Betty parris personality traits - Artwork Analysis - What effect does the piper's music cause - Gamma phi gamma school daze - Essays guru only - Katherine c intervention follow up - Mcafee foundstone vulnerability scanner - Given sin θ 0.8660 hypotenuse 0.25 find θ - The cruel country questions on meaning - Business growth overview dataset - Heil farid european dunfermline - Condensed cost of goods manufactured schedule example - ^786^ Love Marriage sPECIALIST +91-8529590991 Molvi ji - Applying Theories to Regional-Level Challenges - Utilitarianism is a form of what broader ethical theory - Kite runner chapter 6 - Feedback mechanism in animals - Disadvantages of centralised database - Following are transactions of danica company - Principles of incident response and disaster recovery 2014 pdf - APA FORMATED PAPER GLOBAL HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT - Short story outline - Self-Analysis 8352 - Melbourne airport asic approvals - Fluke vr1710 software download - Competitive profile matrix disney - Why are there fewer top carnivores than herbivores - Civilize them with a stick summary - Eastern region womens football - Filtek supreme ultra shade guide - Computation - Matthews (2013) said, "the research study results were inconclusive" (para. 4). - Case study series on work life balance in large organizations - The control of tropisms is unique to - Country phone code 211 - Which common mineral is composed entirely of silicon and oxygen - Change Management Principles and the Impact on the Management of Global Human Capital (8-10 ppt slides w/title and references)200-250 words per slide - Full time teacher hours - Chapter 7 test b accounting answers - Starbucks franchise cost in indian rupees - Example of preschool observation documentation and analysis - Dormy way care home - The most crucial aspect of __________ is demobilizing and disarming militias. - Abnormal psychology 17th edition study guide - Advantages of cars essay - Hacked among us apk - Firm protective structure gives cell its shape - Org Leadership & Decision Making Written Assignment - Climate change essay - On a baseball field the pitcher's mound is - G force auto gate manual - Punishment on Trial - 3 2x 5 27 - Hypothesis, P-Value, and Type I Errors - General motors swot analysis - Does benzaldehyde give fehling test - Developing policies and procedures for implementation - Lección 7 | grammar quiz - Peripheral route to persuasion advertising - Health and safety risk register template - Program Reflection 5 - Catholic education office townsville - Pdhpe sample units of work - Big skinny case analysis - Cr equation in polar form - History of California Exam 2 - Onion elodea and cheek cell lab answers - Methods of risk analysis in capital budgeting - Bulky waste collection canberra