Mcdonalds geographic area of operations

Case 2: McDonald’s Corp
The case is written from the perspective of McDonald’s CEO Steve Easterbrook. Dated approximately six months after Easterbrook assumed office in March 2015, it highlights the company’s recent and dramatic decline in performance amidst increasing competition. Easterbrook must confront several challenges if he is to return the company to its former glory. The company is amid its most serious turnaround situation, and needs to define a clear strategic position to deal with competitive challenges on several fronts.

1. Briefly summarize the problem(s). (Assume we’ve read the case). Think about the problem from McDonald’s perspective.

2. Which trends in McDonald’s external environment (PESTEL) are likely to have the greatest impact on the company’s ability to sustain a competitive advantage?

3. How is McDonald’s positioned vis-à-vis its major competitors? (hint: strategic groups)

4. What business-level strategy does McDonald’s employ? Is it effective? Has it changed over the last few decades, and if so, how?

5. What do you think are the most important strategic challenges facing McDonald’s? Explain. Discuss your recommendations to address the strategic challenges, given the external and industry environment, its core competencies and its current business level strategy.

· Your recommendations should flow logically from your analyses.

· What are the potential caveats (pitfalls) to your recommendations?

McDonald’s Corporation

September 1, 2017. Steve Easterbrook walked into his office in the McDonald’s corporate headquar-ters in Oak Brook, Illinois. Now two and a half years into the job of McDonald’s CEO, he is starting to see some of his early turnaround initiatives show results. His thoughts turned to Don Thompson, his predecessor and friend. Thompson was in the top job for less than three years, overseeing a more than four percent decline in customer traffic in 2014. In spring 2015, Thompson retired. Easterbrook hoped to avoid this fate. They had both started their careers at McDonald’s early in the 1990s and had climbed the corporate ladder together. Easterbrook had not taken personal joy in seeing either his friend and mentor, or the company they both loved, struggle. Rather, he had hoped to take the helm at the company at its peak and then take it to new heights—not inheriting the corporate giant in a turnaround situation. The company’s troubles had snowballed quickly. In 2011, McDonald’s had outperformed nearly all its competitors while benefitting from the fallout of the great recession (2008–2010) as more custom-ers flocked to its low-cost meal options. In fact, McDonald’s was the number-one performing stock in the Dow 30 with a 34.7 percent total shareholder return.1 But in 2012, McDonald’s dropped to number 30 in the Dow 30 with a –10.75 percent annual return. The company went from first to last in twelve brief months. In 2012, McDonald’s’ sales growth dropped by 1.8 percent, the first monthly decline since 2003.2 Annual system-wide sales growth in 2012 barely met the minimum three percent goal, while operating income growth was just one percent compared to a goal of six to seven percent.3 Things went from bad to worse. Sales continued to decline over the next two years. Net income in 2014 fell almost 15 percent to $4.76 billion, representing the company’s first annual drop in “like-for-like” sales since 2002.4 By early 2015, McDonald’s shares had dropped below their 2012 price point, while the overall market was up by 50 percent.5 Things were not much better overseas. The weak global economy was a further drain on domestic sales.6 When the dollar was relatively weak, it had been an asset for the company to generate almost 70 percent of its revenues from other countries, but the dollar’s current strength made McDonald’s trademark products even more expensive for its international consumers.7 Asian sales were still recov-ering from a 2014 scandal, where a major Chinese meat supplier had been accused of selling expired meat to McDonald’s restaurants. European sales were also soft due to political problems in Russia. Several McDonald’s outlets had “failed” inspection and been shut down in retaliation for U.S. sanctions against Russia.8

Thompson had already tried revitalizing the menu (e.g., with the McWrap), eliminating poorly selling items, increasing customization, and restructuring U.S. operations to give local franchises greater autonomy. Yet customers still seemed confused by the complex menu offerings, distrustful of the quality of ingredients, frustrated at how long it took to get their food, and angry at the company’s “exploitative” labor policies.9,10 According to analysts, “[Thompson] got fatally behind the last couple of years” and “wasn’t inspiring people the way he needed to be.”11 By the fall of 2017, there was surpris-ingly little mention of Easterbrook in Wall Street analyst reports, seemingly indicating that he was quietly, and effectively, creating change behind the scenes. As Steve Easterbrook took a sip from a can of a zero-calorie Monster energy drink, he looked at the screen of his laptop. He knew that early results from his strategic initiatives were promising. As of fall 2017, McDonald’s (normalized) share price had appreciated by more than 55 percent since his tenure as CEO started in March 2013, outperforming the S&P 500 index by almost 35 percentage points (Exhibits 1 and 2). But, he wondered how he could build upon these quick wins, and create continued superior performance in an ever more uncertain and competitive environment.

A Brief History of McDonald’s

McDonald’s was started by the McDonald brothers in 1940 in San Bernardino, California.12 By limiting the menu to burgers, fries, and drinks, Dick and Mac McDonald could emphasize qual-ity and streamline their operations. As a result, the popularity of the restaurant grew quickly, and the brothers started franchising McDonald’s to nearby locations. Alerted to their success when the McDonalds placed a large order for eight multi-mixers, Ray Kroc joined the brothers in 1954. Together, they founded the McDonald’s Corporation in 1955, with the vision of establishing McDonald’s fran-chises throughout the United States. Kroc bought out the brothers’ shares in 1961, the same year that he founded the Hamburger University (graduates receive a bachelor’s degree in Hamburgerology). He continued his plans for rapid expansion throughout the 1960s and 1970s, establishing more than 700 new McDonald’s restaurants. In 1965, the company held its first public offering, debuting at $22.50 per share. Kroc described his management philosophy as a three-legged stool: one leg was the parent corpora-tion, the second leg was the franchisees, and the third was McDonald’s suppliers. His motto became, “In business for yourself, but not by yourself,” as he built an ever-larger network of store owners and an integrated supply-chain management system. Many new menu items, such as the Big Mac and Egg McMuffin, were developed by the franchisees. Kroc encouraged his local owners to be entrepreneurial as long as they maintained the company’s four main principles: quality, service, cleanliness, and value. Because of the volume of McDonald’s business, Kroc found many supply partners willing to adhere to his high standards. McDonald’s both owns and operates its own restaurants, as well as, franchisees them to others. The large majority of restaurants are franchised (85 percent) and McDonald’s management has made it clear they expect that percentage to increase to 95 percent in the coming years. There are three primary franchise ownership structures: 1) conventional franchisee, 2) developmental license, and 3) affiliates. Under a conventional franchise agreement, the company typically owns the land and building, and leases the location to the franchisee. The franchisee pays for “equipment, signs, seating and décor.” As the equipment depreciates or new facilities or food preparation processes are required, the franchisee is expected to reinvest in the business. McDonald’s also co-invests into specific strategic initiatives to motivate franchisees to adopt changes. Franchisees pay rent and royalties based on a percentage of sales, with specific minimum rent payments and initial fees paid upon opening a new restaurant or acquiring a new franchise. The typical franchisee lease is 20 years. The specific conditions of the franchise agreement vary on the owner’s experience, credit capacity, and the local legal environment. Franchisees can vary significantly in size. The largest franchisee has a developmental license for 2,200 restaurants across Latin America and the Caribbean.13 On the other end of the spectrum, some franchisees own and operate a single location. The company opened its first international locations in 1967 in Canada. The first McDonald’s stores in Japan and Europe followed shortly thereafter in 1971. Meanwhile, Kroc continued to add new items to the restaurant’s menu. After the success of the Big Mac (1968), the quarter pounder debuted in 1973, and the Egg McMuffin in 1975. A full breakfast menu was available by 1977. The first Happy Meals—complete with a circus wagon theme—arrived in 1979. The company’s first drive-through opened in Sierra Vista, Arizona in 1975 to serve soldiers stationed at a nearby post, and the idea quickly spread to other locations. Competition heated up in the “burger wars” of the 1980s as Burger King and Wendy’s tried to steal market share from McDonald’s. Despite their advances, McDonald’s continued to expand globally into more than 30 countries. Even more new products were introduced, such as Chicken McNuggets in 1983 and fresh salads in 1987. At the same time, McDonald’s used efficiency and technological advances such as microwaves to gain operational advantages over its competitors. When Ray Kroc passed away on January 14, 1984, he left behind a sprawling McDonald’s empire with more than 7,500 restaurants worldwide. He stayed involved in corporate affairs up until the end, visiting the San Diego office almost daily in his wheelchair. Three years later, Fred Turner, his long-time colleague and successor as CEO, likewise stepped down and left the company in the capable hands of Michael Quinlan. As the first McDonald’s CEO to have completed an MBA, Quinlan was a savvy businessperson who continued to grow the company aggressively both at home and abroad. Events in the 1990s finally slowed McDonald’s’ rapid pace of domestic expansion, though the com-pany’s international locations nearly doubled to 114 from 1991 to 1998. Several of the newer locations required unique adaptations, which McDonald’s proved increasingly willing to make: kosher menus in Israel, Halal menus in Arab countries, and lamb patties for non-beef-eating India.14, 15 At home, however, the company was plagued by multiple failed attempts to add new menu items such as pizza, fried chicken, fajitas, and pasta. The Arch Deluxe sandwich line, targeted to adults, was similarly short-lived. When Jack Greenberg became CEO in 1998, he quickly took corrective action, announcing a geographic reorganization, a new food preparation system (“Made for You”), and first job cuts ever at McDonald’s, all while scrapping plans for numerous store openings.16 Instead, he diversified the com-pany’s portfolio by buying different restaurant chains such as Chipotle Mexican Grill, Donatos Pizza, Boston Market, and Aroma Cafe coffee shops.17 These acquisitions were divested when McDonald’s strategy shifted yet again in the early 2000s. From 2003 to 2004, leadership at McDonald’s underwent a rapid string of successions that would have crippled a company with a less talented executive bench. Greenberg stepped down amidst financial woes in 2003, yielding the reins to Jim Cantalupo, who died suddenly of a heart attack the next year. The board immediately named Charlie Bell to the head position after Cantalupo’s death, only for Bell to be diagnosed with colorectal cancer and relinquish the post after just a few months in office. This left Jim Skinner, previously vice chairman, in charge of introducing and implementing the company’s “Plan to Win” starting in late 2004.18 The plan was based on the three pillars of “brand direction, freedom within a framework, and measurable milestones” and had four goals: to attract more customers, to convince customers to purchase more often, to increase brand loyalty, and to become more profitable. Skinner further distinguished five Ps—People, Product, Place, Price, and Promotion—as essential to efforts at McDonald’s in achieving these goals.19 In a saturated market, the main thrust of Skinner’s plan was to shift from acquiring expensive real estate to generating increased sales from existing restaurants.20 In the early 2000s, McDonald’s was opening a new store somewhere in the world every 4.5 hours; under Skinner’s watch, the pace slowed to just 50 to 100 new U.S. sites per year. To compensate, existing stores started to stay open longer, extending their hours into the late night and early morning. By 2007, roughly 40 percent of McDonald’s’ locations were open nonstop, and some even experimented with staying open on holidays.21, 22 Skinner used the money saved on fewer new openings to revamp existing restaurants. The “new” McDonald’s look utilized a gentler color scheme, replaced fiberglass and steel chairs with leather seating, eliminated fluorescent lighting, and added such amenities as flat-screen TVs, free Wi-Fi, live plants, piped-in music, and the occasional fireplace.23 Headquarters provided grants of up to $600,000 per site, with some projects costing as much as $1.5 million.24 By the time all of the renovations were completed, the company had invested over $1 billion in the belief that “nicer-looking stores attract more business.” At the same time, Skinner sent chefs at McDonald’s back to the drawing board to research new menu possibilities more in line with current health trends. The company had grown lax in its product development efforts, as evidenced by its $100 million Arch Deluxe mistake and other failures such as the McPizza, McHotDog, and McSalad Shaker.25 McDonald’s also lagged significantly behind its com-petitors in purging trans fats from its recipes.26 Under Skinner, the company took the time to conduct extensive market research and developed a new passion for numbers. Potential new menu items had to pass a series of tests before they could move on to the next stage of development, based on an analysis of their sales, margins, costs, and time and ease of production.27 This more rigorous approach led to the development of the “Oven Selects” sandwiches, a southern-style fried-chicken biscuit for breakfast, and of course, the McCafé line of coffees, smoothies, and other beverages.28, 29 The other half of the equation involved cost cutting by improving operational efficiency. Adamant that McDonald’s would not make its burgers smaller just to save money, Skinner directed his execu-tives to find more creative ways to increase margins. So, the company cut travel, held meetings at Hamburger University instead of expensive hotels, and increased personal usage fees on company vehicles. Meanwhile, the company continued to invest in time-and cost-saving technologies such as more efficient drive-through windows and computers. By the time Don Thompson became CEO in 2012, most of the low-hanging fruit had already been plucked. Thompson graduated from Purdue University in 1984 with a degree in electrical engineering, and he was recruited to McDonald’s four years later to design robotics for food transport and control circuits for cooking equipment. He soon changed his career focus from engineering to operations, working a wide range of jobs from fry cook to regional manager to understand the company’s day-to-day activities.30 Ascending to serve as Skinner’s COO, Thompson spearheaded the successful McCafé campaign and seemed a natural selection to produce the next “McHit.”31 McDonald’s struggled with weakening sales under Thompson’s reign (see Exhibit 2) despite his efforts to optimize the menu, improve the customer experience, and make McDonald’s more accessible to a broader market base.

Unable to produce the desired turnaround, Thompson retired in January 2015 to make room for new leadership.32 Hailing from the U.K., Steve Easterbrook was appointed as the CEO of McDonald’s on March 1, 2015. Easterbrook came to the top spot having turned around the McDonald’s UK and European opera-tions, which were now among the best performing in the company. He had worked his way up to McDonald’s top brand officer by 2010, then left to head two British restaurants (PizzaExpress Ltd. and Wagamama Ltd.), before returning to his former position in June 2013. Under Thompson, he subse-quently assumed responsibility for corporate strategy and the restaurant solutions group. While some questioned whether another inside succession could provide the shake-up that McDonald’s needed, others argued that Easterbrook had the right expertise in branding and media and willingness to focus on the menu, the areas with the greatest need of improvement.33 In his first press conference as CEO, Easterbrook had presented himself as an “internal activist” who was “comfortable making the big deci-sions that were required to get the turnaround going.”34 Now it was time to deliver on his promise to turn McDonald’s into a “modern, progressive burger company.”35 Exhibit 3 shows McDonald’s’ rev-enues by regions and market segments, (2013–2016). Given his low-key profile, observers were surprised when Steve Easterbrook also announced that McDonald’s would move its headquarters from Oak Brook, where it resided in a custom-built campus for some four decades, to Chicago’s West Town neighborhood in 2018. Easterbrook is moving the McDonald’s HQ to this swanky area of Chicago full of restaurants and bars, to be closer to the mil-lennials they want as employees and as customers.36 By 2017, McDonald’s was pursuing an aggressive technology upgrade to allow Starbucks-like interactivity to both smooth out operational waiting times and improve the customer experience. Franchisees were hesitant to invest the hundreds of thousands of dollars required to upgrade with stand-alone kiosks, but they were bound by stringent franchising contracts and pressure from corpo-rate headquarters.

Trends in the Quick-Service Restaurant Industry

The U.S. quick-service restaurant industry is expected to reach $224 billion in 2020 (see Exhibit 4). Yet despite expectations for some growth, several environmental trends suggest challenges ahead.

ECONOMIC TRENDS The

U.S. economy continues to bounce back from the 2008–2010 great economic recession. The unemployment rate has been cut in half from its 2009 peak at 10.0 percent to just 5.1 percent in 2015, and per capita real disposable income is near record highs.37 These data present both good and bad news for the fast food industry. On the one hand, more customers are working and have more money to eat out; on the other hand, customers with more disposable income are likely to “trade up” to higher quality and higher priced food options. Recent data on dining trends bear this out: For the first time ever, American spending on dining out exceeded grocery sales in April 2015. A closer look, however, reveals key differences among market segments. Older consumers (51 to 69 year olds) reported spend-ing more on groceries and less on restaurant dining compared to recent years. The overall upward trend is due to the vast number of millennials who view dining out as a social event and are more willing to pay for food outside of home. According to the Restaurant Association, millennials tend to favor quick service, deli, and pizza joints over more traditional casual and high-end dining; ethnic foods are also viewed as new and interesting.38 Since the end of 2016, the economy has picked up further with the U.S. stock markets reaching all-time highs in 2017. By fall of 2017, the U.S. unemployment rate had further declined to 4.3 percent. Around four percent unemployment is a level that many economists consider “structural unemploy-ment,” under which unemployment is unlikely to fall unless more structural factors in the economy such as a mismatch between open jobs and skills of labor force are brought into balance.

HEALTH CONCERNS

The McKinsey Global Institute estimates that the global obesity epidemic costs $2 trillion per year in health care costs, a figure roughly equivalent to Russia’s gross domestic product.40 Approximately one-third of the world population (~ 2.1 billion people) is considered overweight, making obesity the third largest human-caused economic burden. Obesity-related health care expenses in the United States total $663 billion annually.41 Beef still comprises the highest proportion (58 percent) of meat con-sumed in the United States, but health-conscious consumers are increasingly shifting toward poultry and other lean meats.42 In 2010, to support healthier food choices, The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act stipulated that calorie counts must be displayed on all food service menus of chains with at least 20 units and that restaurants must provide additional nutritional information upon request. These trends place considerable pressure on a fast food company that depends on hamburgers for the main portion of its income. McDonald’s has been sued (unsuccessfully) for making its customers fat and was featured in an unflattering documentary (Super Size Me), in which Morgan Spurlock grew increasingly ill and gained 25 pounds after eating only McDonald’s food for one month.43 Meanwhile, concerns over the increase in antibiotic-resistant bacteria have led to calls for the elimination of subtherapeutic antibiotic use in meat animals. Though banned in the EU and Canada, the United States still permits farmers to administer small doses of antibiotics to livestock to increase weight gain (a three percent increase). McDonald’s recently followed in the footsteps of several of its competitors and announced its intent to stop selling chicken products from birds treated with antibiotics important to human health (non-human antibiotics are still permitted). Given that McDonald’s claims to be the largest restaurant seller of chicken in the United States, this move is likely to reverberate throughout the poultry industry. Changes in cattle production are likely to move much more slowly due to higher beef prices, the lon-ger life span of cattle, and the fragmented nature of the beef industry.44 Moreover, besides ending the use of antibiotics in the chickens used, Easterbrook also decided to remove high-fructose corn syrup from McDonald’s hamburger buns. He also laid out a 10-year plan to only use suppliers that keep chickens cage free. These moves could be potentially transformative for McDonald’s, as chicken and eggs account now for roughly 50 percent of the menu items.45 One reason for the high percentage level is Easterbrook’s early decision to offer all-day breakfast, which was well-received in the U.S. market.

NCREASING SUPPLY COSTS

Healthier menu items mean increased supply costs for restaurants, even as customers remain price sensitive. Beef prices began to rise sharply in late 2012 due to a severe drought in Texas. Without rain, farmers were forced to turn to more expensive forms of feed such as hay and corn, to ship cattle to greener pastures in the north, or to cull their herds through sales or sending heifers to the butcher instead of breeding them. By January 2014, the number of cattle in the United States totaled just 87.7 million, the lowest since 1951. Even though the Texas drought ended in the spring of 2015, it takes years to rebuild a herd, and California (the nation’s fourth largest cattle-producing state) experienced extreme drought conditions during 2015. At the same time, demand for hamburger meat has soared due to high beef prices (“hamburger is the new steak”) and the popularity of new burger chains like Five Guys and Shake Shack.46 Drought conditions in recent years have also made it more expensive to raise agricultural products. Not only is corn one of the main products used to feed both cattle and chickens, but corn oil, meal, and other by-products are a significant component of many grocery items. Soybean meal is a main ingredient of animal feed, while the oil is used in cooking, salad dressing, mayonnaise, and baked goods. Wheat, of course, is the main ingredient in hamburger buns. In addition, egg prices soared in 2015 due to an outbreak of the avian flu (broilers or chickens raised for meat were not affected and remain in good supply). The resulting price increases for supplies ranging from bread to eggs to meat are squeezing already tight operating margins.

Current Competitors

Traditionally, main competition for McDonald’s has come from other quick-service restaurants such as Wendy’s, Burger King, and Yum! Brands’ Taco Bell. McDonald’s is roughly twice the size of its next largest global competitor (all three Yum! Brands combined), but has slightly fewer outlets.47 It controls almost half of the U.S. hamburger market, which is more than three times larger than the market share held by either Wendy’s or Burger King.

BURGER KING

On August 26, 2014, Burger King merged with the Canadian restaurant chain Tim Hortons to form the world’s third-largest quick-service restaurant chain (second largest in the United States). The combined company has annual sales of $23 billion, with over 18,000 restaurants in approximately 100 countries. Because it is headquartered in Canada, the new parent firm (Restaurant Brands International, or RBI), benefits from a significantly lower corporate tax rate than its American competitors.48 The firm denies that tax inversion was the primary motive for the merger, but tax savings could total $1.2 billion through 2018. The private equity firm 3G Capital, which took Burger King private in 2010, continues to hold 51 percent of the shares.

Changes made by the new ownership appear to be positive, as the company has recently out-per-formed both McDonald’s and Wendy’s. Analysts attribute Burger King’s success to its simplicity: add-ing sauces, cheese, or bacon to its core burger line to create new menu items from the same list of ingredients. Coupled with successful limited time offers and attractive promotions, Burger King has been able to innovate without slowing service.49 In 2015, Burger King launched an aggressive attack against its larger competitor, using strategic price increases to cover the costs of aggressive promotions on popular products such as chicken nuggets. The company has gained further recognition with clever advertising, such as its letter to McDonald’s offering a temporary ceasefire in the burger wars, suggesting that they jointly make “McWhoppers” for international peace day, with all proceeds going to the Peace One Day organization. McDonald’s spurned the proposal, earning headlines accusing them of throwing “their ‘love-themed’ brand idea out the window” and choosing “pride over peace.” In 2017, revenues for Burger King’s parent company, Restaurant Brands International, were $4.3 bil-lion. Burger King contributes most of sales. Besides Tim Hortons and Burger King, RBI also acquired Popeyes in 2017 for $1.6 billion.50

WENDY’S

Wendy’s is the third largest U.S. burger chain, with more than 6,500 locations in 28 countries. Wendy’s strives to differentiate itself as “a cut above” its competitors, with higher-quality food that is made fresh-to-order. It successfully employs a “barbell” approach to products and pricing, luring cost-sensitive customers in with value-based burgers while offering higher-end, premium items like the Pretzel Bacon Cheeseburger or Bacon Portabella Melt to attract more affluent clientele. Analysts offer several reasons as to why Wendy’s has succeeded with this strategy while McDonald’s has struggled. Not only is it easier for the smaller chain to implement short-term menu changes, but it has long specialized in custom-building sandwiches without compromising quick service. Wendy’s also seems to have a better pulse on its customers and bets big on just a few hit products, such as its pretzel buns.51 Wendy’s continues to invest in long-term brand development by redesigning its stores, offering an expanded menu including breakfast, and a new advertising campaign. At a price tag of up to $700,000 per store, the remodeling cost the company $225 million in capital expenditures in 2012 alone, the first year of its renovation program. The good news for Wendy’s is that the physical upgrades appear to be associated with an increase in same-store sales of five to 25 percent (i.e., the stores are gener-ally recouping their expenses). Recent additions to Wendy’s menu such as its sea-salt French fries, a new line of salads, and organic Honest Tea, have proven quite popular, helping to generate several consecutive quarterly sales increases for the corporation. At the same time, Wendy’s continues to cut costs by refranchising company-owned stores, with the goal of decreasing its ownership from 15 to five percent of the total. In 2017, Wendy’s revenues were $1.3 billion, down from $2.5 billion in 2013.