This is a case that needs to be analyzed in details. Complete the following1) Read the case critically; 2) Read the helpful tips contained in the file "Midland Case_computations; 3) Analyze the case making sure to answer the questions listed in the file "Midland Energy_questions" (attached). Two major deleverables are needed- I) A factsheet - word document, 2) a Powerpoint presentation for the assigned case. The Power Point presentation should be at least 10 slides which provides analysis of the case and the team's recommendation. The fact sheet should follow the following guidelines below:FIN 620 – PowerPoint Presentation Rubric Guidelines: One PowerPoint Presentation is submitted for each group (typically submitted by the group leader) Additional points (up to 5 points) for additional presentation methods – video, audio of team, etc. Standard/Points 10 Points 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Format/Style Requirements Ten or more slides are submitted Grammatical structure of bulleted lists are parallel Bullet points are short and specific Bulleted lists are short (no more than 3-4 items) Visuals/graphics used when appropriate Text limited on the slide (headings no more than 4 words; bullets no more than 7 words per line) 7. Capitalize the important words in the slide title and the first word in the bulleted list 8. Omit punctuation at the end of the bulleted list 9. Fonts used consistently (same font for all titles, bullets, etc.) 10.Color used effectively (good contrast, complementary accent colors) 1. 2. 3. 4. Clarity, Concreteness, and Conciseness 5. 6. 7. 8. Standard/Points Less than 10 slides submitted Grammatical structure not parallel on more than one slide Bullet points are not short and specific on more than one slide Bulleted lists are not short (more than 3-4 items) No visuals/graphics used or used when inappropriate Too much text on the slide - more than 4 words; bullets no more than 7 words per line (on more than one slide) 7. The important words in the slide title or the first words in the bulleted list are not capitalized (more than 3 errors) 8. Inconsistent punctuation used at the end of the bulleted list on more than one item 9. Fonts not used consistently (same font for all titles, etc.) 10. Color not used effectively (poor contrast, non-complementary accent colors) 1. Multiple errors in concepts, argument, text and graphics hinder reader’s understanding 2. Some missing content (summary, assumptions, alternatives, recommendations, and “what if” analysis), not included 3. Ineffective use of data to support argument 4. Content inappropriate level of detail for audience – either too much detail; or not enough detail; no adjustments made for assumed audience 5.