John Berger's book Ways of Seeing does not explicitly refer to the "canon," but many of the works of art that he discusses in Chapters 1, 3, and 5 are, in fact, recognizable as canonical in the sense that they are by recognized "masters" in the history of western art. Explain In a paragraph in what way(s) Berger attempts to make his readers question the validity of the canon of western art by the general observations he makes about these masterpieces in these three chapters. Or, to ask the question another way, how does Berger try to make his readers come to their own opinion about what is good art or bad art, rather than simply accept what they are told? AS PART OF YOUR RESPONSE YOU MUST INCLUDE AT LEAST ONE RELEVANT QUOTATION (INSIDE QUOTES) FROM THE READING, CITING PAGE NUMBER.