Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline?

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Mount everest 1996 case study

06/01/2021 Client: saad24vbs Deadline: 24 Hours

1


Running head: Mt. Everest Tragedy Case Study


Mt. Everest Tragedy Case Study


2


The case study of Mount Everest in 1996 describes a tragic loss of lives as


expedition teams attempted to climb to the summit of Mt. Everest. Although multiple


teams were at Mt. Everest in May 1996, the case study focuses primarily on three


climbing expeditions and their endeavor to reach the summit. Adventure Consultants, led


by Rob Hall, Mountain Madness led by Scott Fischer and the IMAX team, led by David


Breashears. Climbing Mt. Everest is a dangerous and physically demanding experience


under the best conditions for even the most skilled climber, due to the treacherous


landscape, high altitude and dangerous weather conditions. In addition to the physical


conditions and complex logistics, the uniqueness of the individuals undertaking the climb


creates additional challenges. Analysis of the leadership styles and team dynamics


discussed in the case study demonstrate additional challenges faced by the expedition


teams climbing Mt. Everest. The leadership styles and group dynamics negatively


impacted communication among the team members.


In the case study of Mt. Everest, glimpses of the different styles of leadership


provide insight into various styles of leadership and how it impacted the climbing


expeditions. According to McShane and Von Glinow (2013), “leadership is about


influencing, motivating, and enabling others to contribute toward effectiveness and


success of the organizations of which they are members (p. 350). Although there are


competencies that are inherent with leadership such as skills, knowledge, and aptitudes,


the primary leadership competencies are related to “personality, self-concept, drive,


knowledge of the business and cognitive and practical intelligence” (McShane and


Glinow, 2013 p. 353). High levels of extroversion and conscientiousness are strong


predictors of successful leaders. Leaders also tend to have a consistent and confident


3


self-evaluation, including high self-esteem, self-efficacy and internal locus of control and


identify themselves as a leader (McShane and Von Glinow, 2013, p. 353). Drive is


described as the leaders‟ inner motivation to pursue goals and to encourage their team to


accomplish team and organizational goals. Leaders tend to have a strong inner


motivation, a high need to achieve and a desire for socialized power in order to achieve


organizational goals. In addition to leaders‟ personal qualities, a leader must have a


strong knowledge of the business. McShane and Von Glinow describe business


knowledge as a “tacit and explicit knowledge about the company‟s environment”, which


enables them to make more intuitive decisions. Cognitive and practical intelligence


enables the leader to process large amounts of complex information in order to solve


problems in their work environment by adapting to various situations or selecting


appropriate environments. Emotional intelligence is also important for a leader in order


to monitor his own emotions as well as others‟ emotions and to use the information to


guide his decisions and actions. Each of the team expedition leaders exhibited strong


leadership competencies but demonstrated different styles as well.


Rob Hall (Adventure Consultants), a thirty-five year old New Zealander, was


described as being the potential “Mayor of Base Camp” due to his commanding presence,


intensity and focus. Although he is described as having a sense of humor, his confidence


and climbing skills served him well in leading past expeditions. Hall had successfully


taken thirty –nine amateur climbers to the summit. According to the text, “could not be


in safer hands and was perceived as the best in the industry.” He was also noted for


being extremely organized in the way he ran his expeditions. His marketing material


describes his company as “the world leader in Everest climbing”.


4


Hall controls his team and directs their schedule of eating, sleeping and climbing. Hall is


described as meticulous in his planning and attention to detail. Because of Hall‟s


reputation, he hired seven well-respected Sherpas who also were loyal to him and


respected his abilities. According to the behavioral perspective of leadership, Hall‟s


leadership style would be considered task-oriented rather than people-oriented as his


focus was on setting goals and deadlines, clarifying procedures and planning activities.


He also is a charismatic leader with a sense of humor combined with “unmistakable


intensity and focus”. His group is instructed that „his word is law on the mountain‟. Hall


demonstrates both expert and referent power in his leadership role.


The American leader, Scott Fischer, (Mountain Madness), age forty-one is also an


excellent climber whose “credentials are impeccable” (Breashears, Hansen and Van der


Hayden, 2011, p.2). However, for his Mountain Madness guiding company, it will be the


first expedition to Mt. Everest. The case study describes him as „physically impressive‟


and also having a „magnetic personality‟. Fischer‟s demeanor is more easy-going and


less imposing than Rob Hall‟s, however, his colleagues state that he is also „charismatic‟.


While Hall controls scheduling and training and is involved in every detail of the


expedition, Fischer is more laid back and is more flexible with his team members‟


schedule. Rather than coordinate group acclimation training, he allows everyone to


acclimate individually. Fischer tends to be more people-oriented than task-oriented.


Although his company is not as well known as Hall‟s company, he also demonstrates


expert and referent power.


The leader of the IMAX Expedition, David Breashears is also an American who


has climbing experience and had previously broadcast live television pictures from the


5


summit in 1983. Breashears describes himself as a micromanager. His assistant leader is


Ed Viesturs whose reputation for reliability and resourcefulness earned him the name


“Steady Ed”. On May 8, Breashears consults his senior leaders Viesturs and Schauer


because of the concerns regarding the strong winds and the number of people climbing.


Although it is tempting to proceed, their instincts and experience enable them to make a


difficult decision, but one that made among all three of the men based on their knowledge


and experience. Even though Breashears wonders if they made the right decision later


and is almost embarrassed to tell Rob Hall about the delay, his cautiousness and the


leadership team decision-making proved to be a wise decision. He also demonstrated


leadership in making the difficult decision that one of his clients could not continue the


climb, even though her climb to the summit would have increased the IMAX marketing


in Japan. Breashears realized he could lose publicity and financial profit, but he was


concerned about her physical condition and made an accurate assessment of her ability to


climb to the summit, even though she wanted to continue. Breashears describes himself


as a „micromanager‟ and from the case study description, appears to be detail-oriented


and goal-oriented. Although he is an experienced climber and cinematographer, he does


not stand out as dramatically as Hall and Fischer in their leadership roles. However,


Breashear assembled a team with diverse talents to accomplish the team goal of obtaining


IMAX footage from the summit, which will be a “technical and logistical feat”. He has


anticipated and planned for emergencies such as paying for extra oxygen bottles and


obtaining a second permit in case it was needed to accomplish their climb and ultimate


goal. Breashears also relied on his senior leaders such as Ed Viestears, who also


demonstrates expert power and knowledge. Breashears consults with his two other


6


leaders when he has to make tough decisions, recognizing the value of divergent thinking


and problem-solving. For each of the leaders, although reaching the summit was the


ultimate goal, developing an effective team may have had a positive impact on reaching


their goal.


The tragedy on Mount Everest clearly illustrates the many issues associated with


team dynamics that can negatively impact group processes and goal achievement.


McShane and Von Glinow define teams as „a group of two or more people who interact


and influence each other and who are mutually accountable for achieving common goals


associated with organizational objectives, and perceive themselves as a social entity


within the organization (McShane& Von Glinow, 2013, p 246). Even though the


expedition groups were referred to as „teams‟, they lacked many of the characteristics


typically related to teams and teamwork. Although the teams had the same goal of


reaching the summit, each individual within the expedition had their own personal


agendas for accomplishing their goal and were more focused on achieving their


individual goal rather than focusing on an overall team goal. For example, several of the


individuals in the Adventure Consultants Team such as Hansen and Weathers had


medical issues that complicated their chances of reaching the summit. Each was


determined to accomplish their goal even if it impacted the other team members and


caused additional risk for the group. Anatoli Boukreev was supposed to function as a


guide, but because his goal was to climb without the bottled oxygen, he had to head back


down the summit quickly and return to camp, rather than serve as a guide. However, the


IMAX team appeared to function more smoothly as a group, possibly because of their


7


common goal of producing the IMAX footage. Effective teams work towards a common


goal with the priority being the entire group and accomplishment of group goals.


“When developing a team, it helps a great deal to have some basic sense of the


stages that a typical team moves through when evolving into a high-performing team.


Awareness of each stage helps leaders to understand the reasons for members‟ behavior


during that stage, and to guide members to behavior required to evolve the team into the


next state “(http://managementhelp.org/grou/dynamics-theories.htm). As McShane and


Von Glinow (2013) state, teams typically proceed through several developmental phases


before evolving into a high functioning group (p. 235). Developing relationships with


each other and developing trust in each other is important in developing roles and


behaviors of the group. Working together over a longer period of time helps them to


develop mutual understanding and effective group behaviors. Particularly in the


Adventure Consultants team and Mountain Madness team, the team members barely


knew each other and had not spent time developing as a group before the Mt. Everest trip.


The group had not had the opportunity to gather over periods of time to develop the


organization and team cohesion needed to cope with the extreme conditions of the climb.


One model describes team development as moving systematically through stages called


forming, storming, norming and performing. The stages describe a team getting to know


each other and developing expectations and boundaries of behavior in the forming phase.


Establishing norms and experiencing interpersonal conflict occur in the storming stage.


In the norming stage, teams establish roles, agree on team goals, form team mental


models and develop cohesion (McShane and Von Glinow, 2013, p. 237).


http://managementhelp.org/grou/dynamics-theories.htm

8


Without having the opportunity to develop as a team , Hall and Fischer‟s expeditions


appeared to lack team cohesion. Team size may have been a contributing factor in


developing a cohesive team. Smaller teams tend to be more cohesive than teams with


larger numbers of members since it is easier to agree on goals and coordinate work


activities (McShane and Glinow, p. 246). Highly cohesive teams develop better


relationships and are sensitive to others‟ needs in addition to sharing information more


frequently, committing to team goals and providing social support in stressful situations.


In addition, highly cohesive teams are comfortable addressing conflict, raising questions


and offering different opinions. When conflict arises, the team resolves their differences


effectively and respects divergent thinking of other team members. Hall had made it


clear that his “word was law on the mountain” and he would not tolerate dissension.


Both Hall and Fischer had stated that the turnaround time was a definite, unbreakable rule


however, when the turnaround time arrived, no one spoke up to question Hall or Fischer


or recommend that for the safety of the group, they needed to descend to camp.


Breashears‟ team leaders had a difficult decision to make when they altered their


climbing schedule. However, Breashears consulted with his two other leaders, discussed


options and although they hated delaying the climb, they relied on their experience,


knowledge and instincts to make the decision and discussed their decision with their


team. The IMAX team focused on the team goal of achieving the climb and obtaining


the best results for the IMAX footage.


Any relationship, including the relationship among team members depends on a


certain degree of team trust. Trust refers to positive expectations one person has toward


another person in situations involving risks (McShane & Von Glinow, 2013, p. 242). The


9


group members trusted their own leaders immensely but had not developed trust in each


other or in their own ability to speak up when questioning a decision. The teams did not


have open communication that encouraged discussing problems and concerns that may


have determined a revision in plans as the conditions changed. Although Fischer had


hired Boukreev to serve as a guide and work with the team members, his aloofness and


poor English contributed to his lack of interaction with the other team members. Fischer


confronted him that he had hired him to “mingle with the team – not just to work hard


high on the mountain”. The expedition members trusted their leaders and were very


dependent on the leaders, but had not developed the team cohesiveness needed to


function and communicate as a high performing team.


Cohesive teams are able to communicate openly with each other, even while


expressing concerns or questioning behaviors. The ability to communicate openly and to


address potential conflicts are valuable characteristics in achieving team goals.


Recognizing the value in divergent thinking helps leaders and their teams evaluate


situations and potential alternatives for problem-solving. Cohesive teams are able to


address conflicts effectively. Although conflicts can have a negative impact, conflicts


can also lead to better decision-making, by testing the logic of arguments and questioning


assumptions (McShane & Von Glinow, 2013, p. 318). Conflict can also lead to


additional responsiveness in changing environments and stronger team cohesion.


Constructive conflict exists when the discussion is centered on the issue while showing


respect for various opinions offered by individuals. The Mt. Everest teams would have


benefited from open communication regarding their plans and alternatives. For example,


since Hall had reinforced that his „word was law‟ and that discussion was not an option,


10


team members were not encouraged to express opinions. In both Fischer and Hall‟s


team, the group had not developed the team trust or cohesiveness needed to encourage


open communication and conflict resolution. Strong team cohesion promotes trust and


open communication and the ability to address conflict constructively in a respectful


manner, while honoring the opinions of others. Supportive team norms also encourage


openness and honest discussion in order to resolve conflict, address problems and


communicate concerns.


McShane and Von Glinow (2013) state that “communication is the lifeblood of all


organizations…” (p. 260). Teams rely on open communication, team cohesiveness and


trust in order to work effectively towards their goal. Achieving the ambitious goal of


climbing Mt. Everest brought together a group of individuals led by experienced and


competent leaders. Each leader demonstrated his own unique leadership style which


impacted the formations of the teams and the communication among the team members.


Although each individual team member as well as the leaders focused on the goal of


reaching the summit of Mt. Everest, the team members did not question decisions which


affected the safety of the entire team. In retrospect, the leadership styles and the team


dynamics impacted open communication which may have affected the outcome of the


tragedy on Mt. Everest.


11


References


Breashears, D., Hansen, M., Van der Hayden, L., (2011). Tragedy on Everest, INSEAD –


The Business School for the World., 1-15.

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Guarantee Your Academic Success!

Hire Professional Writers And Get Best Homework Writing Services In Any Subject

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Helping Hand
University Coursework Help
Top Essay Tutor
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Helping Hand

ONLINE

Helping Hand

I am an Academic writer with 10 years of experience. As an Academic writer, my aim is to generate unique content without Plagiarism as per the client’s requirements.

$60 Chat With Writer
University Coursework Help

ONLINE

University Coursework Help

Hi dear, I am ready to do your homework in a reasonable price.

$62 Chat With Writer
Top Essay Tutor

ONLINE

Top Essay Tutor

I have more than 12 years of experience in managing online classes, exams, and quizzes on different websites like; Connect, McGraw-Hill, and Blackboard. I always provide a guarantee to my clients for their grades.

$65 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

Abu hassan alshari bin yahaya - Thought Paper - The saints and the roughnecks summary - Need Saturday 9/19/20 by 8:30pm EST Brainstorming & Research Framework - Blue sky fostering hampshire - Tlc and column chromatography lab report - Event id 3036 mapi cannot be accessed - Business - Summary and personal reflection(due on Sep 15th) - Inventory information for part 311 - Paradise of bachelors and tartarus of maids analysis - 112/73 blood pressure female - Apply marketing lemonade part 1 - Relational database proposal example - Practical Connection - 27 riemann sums homework answers - Art production manager job description - Direct and indirect interviews - Nursing Leadership DB#6 (Chapter 8) - Advertising part 4 - Maximum megahertz project case study - Windows server 2016 disable unnecessary services - Legal aspects of Nursing practice - 4-4 project part one - Pap smear soap note - Actwin lite 2.8 user manual - Basic unit of dna - Dr andrew dennis mcbride - Marketing discussion responses - Case Study Marketing - M&l manufacturing case study solution - Shockwave flash object powerpoint 2010 missing - James stirling architecture style - Marble launcher lab physics answers - Medical tourism examples in the philippines - TLDQ3-1 - Shankill wellbeing and treatment centre belfast bt13 1pd - Threshold and distinctive capabilities model - Disability resource centre cambridge - Maryland institute college of art animation - Sandlands vineyards strategic analysis - Express your answer as a chemical formula - What rhymes with cool - Responding - Nursing Essay - Insert nose radius chart - WORK-12 - Death of a salesman monologue female - Literature - Nur512-Reply to this discussion Farah - Qualitative analysis of group 1 cations pre lab - What factors might lead a person to select gender atypical activities and life roles? - Sheet molding compound disadvantages - Haydn c major cello - Is bravery an abstract noun - Coventry university solar portal - Brave new world chapter 1 - Why did ray kroc's restaurants switch to frozen french fries - Collective bargaining in nursing ppt - Social structure status and role - Coefficient of performance heat pump calculator - Biflex ultra lo odour - FINAL PROJECT 1 - Delineate or portray crossword clue - Airline management system er diagram - Sr flip flop characteristic table - Discussion #2 - Just how useful is information were are provided - Dora the explorer racist - Netflix disruptive technology - Mary t barra disney board of directors - How to make xmr chart in excel - Responses - How have electronic media and their convergence transformed journalism - Case study on effective communication with questions - How old was fred hollows when he died - Conductivity of solutions lab report - Aquarium industries stock list - Triumph t150 electronic ignition - 180 ft lbs to nm - Emerging threats and countermeasures - Post threshold standards examples of evidence - Assignment - Psychographics is the segmentation method that delves into how consumers - My choice children's homes - Red goat disposer parts - Electron configuration quiz answers - Comic Strip or Political Cartoon Analysis - Dance essay questions - Statement on auditing standards sas - Back lever muscles worked - Outlook web access newcastle - Marches medical practice buckley - The classical management viewpoint emphasized - Chapman university campus map - 5 logan st battery point - Factorytalk view me alarm history - Carlisle folk and blues club - Condensed income statement wileyplus - 1 gross is equal to how many dozens - SOCW 6103 Post Responses