Listen to the narrated PowerPoint for the Chapter 6 Mini-Case: Mrs. Wantanabe and the Japanese Yen Carry Trade.Preview the document This case discusses the mechanics and profitability of the carry trade and how, when global economic conditions are right, profits are possible. However, these investment strategy is not without its risks.
Please provide at least 1 (one) well- written and well-reasoned answer to the following discussion questions
Discussion Questions:
Why are interest rates so low in the traditional core markets of USD and EUR?
What makes this “emerging market carry trade” so different from traditional forms of uncovered interest arbitrage?
Why are many investors shorting the dollar and the euro?
Submission Instructions:
All responses in this discussion forum must be professional, well-reasoned, well-written, and free from profanity. This discussion assignment should reflect the fact that this is a written product for a graduate professional program. All responses should be professional, and if you disagree with a submission, keep it professional. Make any criticisms constructive. If ideas are not your own, please reference them with the appropriate internet link or written resource link.
Case Discussion Rubric
Page 1 of 2
Outstanding
100 points
Good
85 points
Average
75 points
Limited
65 points
Flawed
55 points
Demonstrates
Careful Reading
and Inquiry into
Subject
Discussion Post
• Shows serious contemplation of
readings.
• Shows original thought that goes
far beyond the
obvious.
Discussion Post
• Indicates reading was
completed.
• Addresses some of the questions
obvious answers.
Discussion Post
• Relies primarily on case summary
Discussion Post
• Suggests case scanned but not
read carefully
• Rehashes ideas from other posts
Discussion post
• Gives little indication that the
case was read and
assignment
completed.
• The Post was not relevant to the case
questions or current
discussion.
Responsibly cited
and provides
examples
Quotes used: • support writer’s
point (“proves”
it) • are original
(unexpected
quote choices
and/or uses
quotes from
multiple
places of the
text) • properly
integrated into
the discussion
• Properly
punctuated
Quotes used: • support writer’s
point (“proves” it) • are somewhat
predictable • are not well
integrated into
discussion
• some mechanical and/or
documentation
errors
Some quotes are
used, but: • There are too
few examples;
relies mostly on
generalization s • Some quotes do
not effectively
support writer’s
point • quotes are poorly
integrated
• citation errors • Diction is
ordinary
Some quotes are
used, but: • Paraphrase
dominates • quotes used are
not integrated • Quotes do not
make sense as
support • Quoted
material is out
of context
• Fails to use
capital letters or
punctuation
No quotes are used;
textual evidence
(even paraphrased
evidence) is flimsy
and/or
inappropriate • Citations are
missing
Case Discussion Rubric
Page 2 of 2
• Quotes are
properly cited.
• Contains multiple
documentation errors
Outstanding
100 points
Good
85 points
Average
75 points
Limited
65 points
Flawed
55 points
Engagement with
Others • Shows concerted
and honest effort
to engage
with others • Responds to
ideas in a way
that advances
discussion
beyond the
obvious • Interacts
easily &
accurately
with other
posts in the
thread
Responds in the
way highlighted
above at least 5
times.
• Shows attention
to other posts in
the thread • Incorporate s and
acknowledges
ideas
of others in
attempt to
advance the
discussion
(perhaps
in predictable ways)
Responds the way
described above 3-4
times.
• Offers little
interaction
with other
posts in the
thread • Mostly
summarizes
what others
have said
without adding
to discussion
Responds in the
way described
above 1-2 times.
• Does not
acknowledge
other posts • Misrepresents
content of other
posts
• Ignores other
posts in thread • Does not engage
with others