Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Multifactor leadership questionnaire rater form

20/10/2021 Client: muhammad11 Deadline: 2 Day

Leadership Self-Assessment

Leadership Self-Assessment Paper

Scan the Northouse text. You will note Chapters 2 through 16 explore multiple approaches to the study of leadership. Each chapter represents a leadership theory. Identify three theories of leadership from these chapters and complete the questionnaire at the end of your selected chapters. Develop your formal paper by using the elements of the Leadership Self-Assessment Outline as the headings for your paper (see grading rubric). The content within each of the headings should address all of the elements outlined in each section. The paper should be three pages in length, excluding the cover page and reference page (not to exceed 4 pages – maximum points will be deducted for exceeding 4 pages, refer to grading rubric). See the Course Schedule for the assignment deadline.

Leadership Self-Assessment Paper Outline

I. Introductory Paragraph

A. Identify three theories presented in the Northouse text (each chapter represents one leadership theory) that you decided to use to evaluate yourself.

B. Explain why you chose the three theories.

II. First Leadership Theory

A. Succinctly discuss the primary concepts of your first selected leadership theory.

B. Describe your results (be specific) from taking the test/questionnaire associated with your first selected theory. Share what the score interpretation reflects about your scores.

C. Discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement that you discovered in your leadership style based on taking the test/questionnaire associated with the first theory you chose to evaluate yourself.

III. Second Leadership Theory

A. Succinctly discuss the primary concepts of your second selected leadership theory.

B. Describe your results (be specific) from taking the test/questionnaire associated with your second selected theory. Share what the score interpretation reflects about your scores.

C. Discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement that you discovered in your leadership style based on taking the test/questionnaire associated with the second theory you chose to evaluate yourself.

IV. Third Leadership Theory

A. Succinctly discuss the primary concepts of your third selected leadership theory.

B. Describe your results (be specific) from taking the test/questionnaire associated with your third selected theory. Share what the score interpretation reflects about your scores.

C. Discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement that you discovered in your leadership style based on taking the test/questionnaire associated with the third theory you chose to evaluate yourself.

V. Conclusion - summarizing paragraph

VI. Reference Page

PLAGIARISM:

Plagiarism is considered cheating and is a violation of academic integrity as outlined in the Student Handbook. Any student who plagiarizes any portion of the assignment may receive a grade of zero on the assignment.

LATE ASSIGNMENTS:

Unless prior faculty notification and negotiation of an extended deadline, ten points will be deducted per day if submitted late. Assignment will not be accepted if submitted more than 3 days late and assigned grade will be 0 (zero).

4344 Leadership Self Assessment Grading Rubric.pdf Preview the document

Rubric

4344 Leadership Self-Assessment Grading Rubric

4344 Leadership Self-Assessment Grading Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: Introductory Paragraph

Identify what three theories (from the Northouse text) you decided to use to evaluate yourself. Explain why you chose these three theories.

5.0 pts

Exemplary

Introduction section exceeds meeting stated objectives as evidenced by: - three theories identified - explanation of why these theories were chosen

4.0 pts

Proficient

Introduction section meets stated objectives with accurate and relevant information related to: - three theories identified - explanation of why these three theories were chosen

3.0 pts

Competent

Introduction section minimally meets objectives as evidenced by three theories identified, but no explanation given for selecting theories.

2.0 pts

Substantial Areas for Improvement

Introduction section meets objectives with only one or two theories identified and explanation for choosing the selected theories.

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No introductory paragraph found in paper.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: Theory 1 Primary Concepts

Explain the primary concepts of your first selected theory

5.0 pts

Exemplary

Primary concepts of the first selected theory exceeds objectives with clear and concise explanation and description of the primary concepts.

4.0 pts

Proficient

Primary concepts of the first selected theory meet stated objectives.

3.0 pts

Competent

Primary concepts of the first selected theory minimally meet objectives. Concepts are partially defined and explained.

2.0 pts

Substantial Areas for Improvement

Primary concepts of the first selected theory do not meet objectives.

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Primary concepts of the first selected theory are not found in paper.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: Theory 1 Discussion of Results

Describe your results (be specific) from taking the test/questionnaire associated with your first selected theory. Share what the score interpretation reflects about your scores.

7.0 pts

Expemplary

Discussion of results exceeds objectives with clear and concise description of: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers

6.0 pts

Proficient

Discussion of results meets objectives with description of: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers

5.0 pts

Competent

Discussion of results meets objectives with minimal or absent description of: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers

4.0 pts

Substantial Areas for Improvement

Discussion of results does not meet objectives with minimal or absent description of: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Discussion of results of the following are missing from the paper: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers

7.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: Theory 1 Strengths, Weaknesses, and Opportunities for Improvement

Discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement that you discovered in your leadership style based on taking the test/questionnaire associated with the first theory you chose to evaluate yourself.

6.0 pts

Expemplary

Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section exceeds stated objectives with clear and concise discussion of: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style

5.0 pts

Proficient

Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section meets stated objectives with discussion of: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style

4.0 pts

Competent

Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section includes minimal or absent information in relation to 1 of the 3 areas: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style.

3.0 pts

Substantial Areas for Improvement

Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section does not meet objectives with minimal or absent information in 2 of the 3 areas: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in leadership style

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section not found in paper.

6.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: Theory 2 Primary Concepts

Explain the primary concepts of your first selected theory

5.0 pts

Exemplary

Primary concepts of the second selected theory exceeds objectives with clear and concise explanation and description of the primary concepts.

4.0 pts

Proficient

Primary concepts of the second selected theory meet stated objectives.

3.0 pts

Competent

Primary concepts of the second selected theory minimally meet objectives. Concepts are partially defined and explained.

2.0 pts

Substantial Areas for Improvement

Primary concepts of the second selected theory do not meet objectives.

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Primary concepts of the second selected theory are not found in paper.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: Theory 2 Discussion of Results

Describe your results (be specific) from taking the test/questionnaire associated with your second selected theory. Share what the score interpretation reflects about your scores.

7.0 pts

Exemplary

Discussion of results exceeds objectives with clear and concise description of: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers

6.0 pts

Proficient

Discussion of results meets objectives with description of: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers

5.0 pts

Competent

Discussion of results meets objectives with minimal or absent description of: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers

4.0 pts

Substantial Areas for Improvement

Discussion of results does not meet objectives with minimal or absent description of: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Discussion of results of the following are missing from the paper: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers

7.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: Theory 2 Strengths, Weaknesses, and Opportunities for Improvement

Discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement that you discovered in your leadership style based on taking the test/questionnaire associated with the second theory you chose to evaluate yourself.

6.0 pts

Exemplary

Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section exceeds stated objectives with clear and concise discussion of: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style

5.0 pts

Proficient

Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section meets stated objectives with discussion of: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style

4.0 pts

Competent

Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section includes minimal or absent information in relation to 1 of the 3 areas: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style.

3.0 pts

Substantial Areas for Improvement

Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section does not meet objectives with minimal or absent information in 2 of the 3 areas: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in leadership style

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section not found in paper.

6.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: Theory 3 Primary Concepts

Explain the primary concepts of your third selected theory

5.0 pts

Exemplary

Primary concepts of the third selected theory exceeds objectives with clear and concise explanation and description of the primary concepts.

4.0 pts

Proficient

Primary concepts of the third selected theory meet stated objectives.

3.0 pts

Competent

Primary concepts of the third selected theory minimally meet objectives. Concepts are partially defined and explained.

2.0 pts

Substantial Areas for Improvement

Primary concepts of the third selected theory do not meet objectives.

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Primary concepts of the third selected theory are not found in paper.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: Theory 3 Discussion of Results

Describe your results (be specific) from taking the test/questionnaire associated with your third selected theory. Share what the score interpretation reflects about your scores.

7.0 pts

Exemplary

Discussion of results exceeds objectives with clear and concise description of: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers

6.0 pts

Proficient

Discussion of results meets objectives with description of: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers

5.0 pts

Competent

Discussion of results meets objectives with minimal or absent description of: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers

4.0 pts

Substantial Areas for Improvement

Discussion of results does not meet objectives with minimal or absent description of: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Discussion of results of the following are missing from the paper: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers

7.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: Theory 3 Strengths, Weaknesses, and Opportunities for Improvement

Discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement that you discovered in your leadership style based on taking the test/questionnaire associated with the third theory you chose to evaluate yourself.

6.0 pts

Exemplary

Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section exceeds stated objectives with clear and concise discussion of: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style

5.0 pts

Proficient

Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section meets stated objectives with discussion of: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style

4.0 pts

Competent

Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section includes minimal or absent information in relation to 1 of the 3 areas: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style.

3.0 pts

Substantial Areas for Improvement

Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section does not meet objectives with minimal or absent information in 2 of the 3 areas: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in leadership style

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section not found in paper.

6.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: Conclusion

Summarizing paragraph.

6.0 pts

Exemplary

Conclusion summary exceeds objectives with clear and concise information related to leadership self-assessments. Conclusion demonstrates critical thinking.

5.0 pts

Proficient

Conclusion summary meets objectives with accurate and relevant information related to leadership self- assessments. Conclusion demonstrates critical thinking.

4.0 pts

Competent

Conclusion summary meets objectives with minimal information related to leadership self-assessments.

3.0 pts

Substantial Areas for Improvement

Conclusion summary does not meet objectives - no information related to leadership self- assessments found.

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Conclusion not found in paper.

6.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence

Minimum of three references for paper. (One reference should be the Northouse text) References should be peer-reviewed, scholarly, and professional. References should not be older than 5 years.

5.0 pts

Exemplary

Provides four or more references, one of which is the Northouse Text. All references peer-reviewed, scholarly, and professional. Current within 5 years.

4.0 pts

Proficient

Provides three references, one of which is the Northouse text. All references peer-reviewed, scholarly, and professional. Current within 5 years.

3.0 pts

Competent

Provides two references, one of which is the Northouse text. Some references are not peer-reviewed, scholarly, professional and/or current within 5 years.

2.0 pts

Substantial Areas for Improvement

Provides one reference which is the Northouse text. And/or One reference provided and is not peer-reviewed or current within last 5 years.

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No references provided.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Presentation

Scholarly Presentation Key concepts of scholarly presentation include communication and professionalism. Writing style allows for clear communication of thoughts through logical presentation of ideas with correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Paper meets stated minimum/maximum word requirement. ***Note: Maximum points will be deducted for papers that exceed 4 pages

15.0 pts

Exemplary

Thoughts are logically organized at the paragraph level without errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Paper meets stated minimum/maximum length

13.0 pts

Proficient

Thoughts are logically organized at the paragraph level with no more than three errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Paper meets stated minimum/ maximum length.

12.0 pts

Competent

Thoughts are logically organized at the paragraph level with no more than six errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Paper meets stated minimum/maximum length.

8.0 pts

Substantial Areas for Improvement

Thoughts show minimal organization at the paragraph level with no more than nine errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Paper meets stated minimum/maximum length.

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Thoughts show no logical organization at the paragraph level. Contains more than ten errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation Paper does not meet the stated minimum (3 pages) or maximum length (4 pages).

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style

APA formatting – includes cover page, heading, running head, double spaced, explanation of abbreviations given, in-text citations, and reference page.

15.0 pts

Exemplary

APA format used with no errors in: - cover page - headings - running head - double spacing - explanation of abbreviations - in-text citations - references list

13.0 pts

Proficient

No more than 2 APA formatting errors noted in: - cover page - headings - running head - double spacing - explanation of abbreviations - in-text citations - references list

12.0 pts

Competent

No more than 4 APA formatting errors noted in: - cover page - headings - running head - double spacing - explanation of abbreviations - in-text citations - references list

8.0 pts

Substantial Areas for Improvement

No more than six APA formatting errors noted in: - cover page - headings - running head - double spacing - explanation of abbreviations - in-text citations - reference list

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Seven or more APA formatting errors noted in: - cover page - headings - running head - double spacing - explanation of abbreviations - in-text citations - reference list

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Solutions Store
Academic Master
Supreme Essay Writer
Top Writing Guru
Write My Coursework
Writing Factory
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Solutions Store

ONLINE

Solutions Store

As an experienced writer, I have extensive experience in business writing, report writing, business profile writing, writing business reports and business plans for my clients.

$29 Chat With Writer
Academic Master

ONLINE

Academic Master

I have assisted scholars, business persons, startups, entrepreneurs, marketers, managers etc in their, pitches, presentations, market research, business plans etc.

$43 Chat With Writer
Supreme Essay Writer

ONLINE

Supreme Essay Writer

I can assist you in plagiarism free writing as I have already done several related projects of writing. I have a master qualification with 5 years’ experience in; Essay Writing, Case Study Writing, Report Writing.

$48 Chat With Writer
Top Writing Guru

ONLINE

Top Writing Guru

I find your project quite stimulating and related to my profession. I can surely contribute you with your project.

$42 Chat With Writer
Write My Coursework

ONLINE

Write My Coursework

I have read your project details and I can provide you QUALITY WORK within your given timeline and budget.

$21 Chat With Writer
Writing Factory

ONLINE

Writing Factory

This project is my strength and I can fulfill your requirements properly within your given deadline. I always give plagiarism-free work to my clients at very competitive prices.

$24 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

Why is war horse rated pg 13 - Robert kennedy speech mlk text - Easy coat of arms symbols - How to integrate hyperbolic functions - Managing organizational change 3rd edition - HRM 635-Training and Development - Chapter 8 web server hardware and software - Does glucose pass through the cell membrane - Oedipus the king research paper topics - IT217: Programming Language - FINAL RE FLEXION ATTITUDE DEV & UNIV ADAPTATION - Assignment 3a: Presentation on Threats to the Global Environment - Sponge plowed guitar lesson - Uts insearch pathway scholarship - Arabic alphabet with pictures - Hassoun coffee roxburgh park - Humphreys collecting data for the tearoom - Community windshield survey paper - Discuss in 500 words, how much redaction is necessary to anonymize an electronic health record. Is it enough to redact the name? The name and address? Is a medical record like a finger print? - Are you anorexic quiz - Qin shi huangdi song poker face - Marketing - The base dissociation constant of ethylamine - Durban's finest??(((((0835179056))??$$abortion pills for sale in durban north mkondeni Ashdown chesterville NAMIBIA Botswana kwazulu_natal - English Critical Essay - Research paper - Baker mfg inc wishes to compare - Parts of a voltaic cell - Sustainability in construction unsw - Open data unlocking innovation and performance with liquid information - What did sir henry cole invent - Paypal in 2015 reshaping the financial services landscape - Ancient egypt hierarchy ks2 - What size is a0 in cm - Siemens 7sd61 relay manual - ETCM-Research-4 - Chapter 3 jekyll and hyde - Hula hoop personal space activity - Nursing informatics scope and standards of practice 2nd ed - Moving control volume fluid mechanics - Rams direct debit form - 1000 words 10 hrs - Planet retail net group - Mrp calculation formula in excel - What was offred's job before gilead - When was the poem she walks in beauty written - The effects of coyote removal in texas answers - Atraumatic care in pediatric nursing - 01.07 accuracy and precision virtual lab - 1/5 - Questions for finding forrester answers - Learning target 4.6 biology answer key - Breaking down a topic brainstorming - PPT urgent-shareholder analysis - Suppose that there are 10 million workers in canada - Module Assignment - Civil 3d sanitary sewer analysis - Supply chain network design decisions - Michael jordan and the new global capitalism sparknotes - Latin test year 7 - Change management simulation power and influence scenario 1 - 1998 dbq ap us history - Misologues - Marketing an introduction edition armstrong and kotler - Dyeing pine cones with red food coloring - Bass center stanford gsb - Collapse of barings bank - Taylormade r580 xd driver illegal - Professional Standards - Conformity and conflict readings in cultural anthropology 15th edition pdf - Visual basic chapter 3 review answers - Sum of arithmetic sequence worksheet - Multicultural education in a pluralistic society 10th edition - Handsomest drowned man in the world analysis - Burning dreams on the sun - Vsocial control through mass media - Assignment on leadership 2 copies ( 2200 words each) - Introduction to logarithms worksheet - Applied behavior analysis for teachers 9th ed - South east water corporation - Walk the Talk - Research Customer Service Policies - Assignment #5 - Nd66 drain cleaner msds - When purchasing bulk orders of batteries a toy manufacturer - WAR DB - HCP 6710 Week 2 Assignment - Which one of the following compounds is most acidic - Assignment 4 The Value of Fair Treatment in the Workplace - Yellow fog in prufrock - Mk k545whi data socket module rj45 - Faithful one so unchanging chords - Examples of business rules and requirements - Who is to blame for the boston massacre essay - Daz dillinger wife maria watkins - Essential Leadership Competencies - Fireworks from china suppliers - The time machine hg wells sparknotes - Compare and contrast the hippocratic oath and the nightingale pledge - Counseling case study analysis example - Career Development