English Literature Homework
EBSCO Publishing Citation Format: MLA (Modern Language Assoc.):
NOTE: Review the instructions at
http://support.ebsco.com/help/?int=ehost&lang=en&feature_id=MLA and make any necessary
corrections before using. Pay special attention to personal names, capitalization, and
dates. Always consult your library resources for the exact formatting and punctuation
guidelines.
Works Cited Fong, Bobby. “Roethke’s `My Papa’s Waltz’.” College Literature, vol. 17, no. 1, Feb. 1990, p. 78.
EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lkh&AN=9609111563&site=lrc-
plus.
Section:
NOTES & DISCUSSION
ROETHKE'S "MY PAPA'S WALTZ"
Most recent critics of Theodore Roethke's work give "My Papa's Waltz" short shrift. If mentioned
at all, it is characterized as depicting the father's "mixture of tenderness and brutality" and the
child's "admiration and fear."[ 1] The waltz is at once a "happy and terrifying activity" that,
biographically, reflects "Roethke's vacillation toward his father, registering playful but poignant
tones in stanzas of iambic trimeter."[ 2]
Some of my students are able to perceive the poem as thus holding fear and joy in tension, but
mainly these are the ones who see the poem dispassionately, as a play of words on the page
where waltzing and romped are juxtaposed with battered and scraped and beat, where the child
is "waltzed off to bed" holding on "like death." The others, however, divide into two camps,
united by their common insistence that one emotion predominates, either fear or joy.
One party's interpretation accords with that of X. J. Kennedy, who argues:
Most readers find the speaker's attitude toward his father affectionate, and take this recollection
of childhood to be a happy one. But at least one reader, concentrating on certain details, once
wrote: "Roethke expresses his resentment for his father, a drunken brute with dirty hands and a
whiskey breath who carelessly hurt the child's ear and manhandled him." Although this reader
accurately noticed some of the events in the poem and perceived that in the son's hanging on to
the father "like death" there is something desperate, he missed the tone of the poem and so
misunderstood it altogether. Among other things, this reader didn't notice the rollicking rhythms
http://support.ebsco.com/help/?int=ehost&lang=en&feature_id=MLA
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lkh&AN=9609111563&site=lrc-plus
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lkh&AN=9609111563&site=lrc-plus
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lkh&AN=9609111563&site=lrc-plus
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lkh&AN=9609111563&site=lrc-plus
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_6866258545076574701_bib1
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_6866258545076574701_bib2
of the poem; the playfulness of a rime like dizzy and easy; the joyful suggestions of the words
waltz, waltzing, and romped. Probably the reader didn't stop to visualize this scene in all its
comedy, with kitchen pans falling and the father happily using his son's head for a drum. Nor did
he stop to feel the suggestions in the last line, with the boy still clinging with persistent love.[ 3]
Students espousing this reading have noted that their own fathers were reserved when sober,
and that some of their fondest moments were when "papa" became tipsy enough so that
exuberance and love could slip through. This "papa" wasn't the man they knew, so there was
some anxiety felt regarding the "stranger," but he was what these students as children wanted
more often from their fathers.
By contrast, the other side's response is captured by John Ciardi, who argues:
Despite its seeming lightness, "My Papa's Waltz" is a poem of terror, all the more terrible
because the boy is frightened and hurt by the father, even in play. "We romped," the poet says,
but the romp is a dizzying succession of painful glimpses; the house is shaking, the mother is
frowning, the father's hand is scarred by violence, every misstep in the dance scrapes the
father's belt buckle painfully across the boy's ear, and the boy's head is being pounded by that
huge, hard palm. It is a romp, but the boy must cling like death until he is finally dumped into
bed.[ 4]
For these students, alcohol is invariably associated with violence, and the mention of whiskey
on the breath calls to mind incidents when their fathers came home drunk and "romped" with the
family. What was "fun" for the father, however, was fearful for mother and children. These
readers see the waltz image and the rhythm of the poem as ironic counterpoints to the
stumbling brutality of a man who hurts even when he doesn't mean to. A more extreme reading
of the poem takes the waltz entirely as a euphemism for the father beating the child. The child
struggles to hold the father, to make him stop, and they lurch around the kitchen to the mother's
discountenance. This "waltzing was not easy," students have testified from hard experience.
The poem is like a seesaw, where the elements of joy (the figure of the waltz, the playful
rhymes, the rhythm), are balanced against the elements of fear (predominantly the effects of
diction such as whiskey, dizzy, death, unfrown, battered, knuckle, scraped, buckle, beat, hard,
dirt, clinging). The ambivalence of feeling extends to the narrative stance of the speaker. As a
student recently noted, the speaker is remembering an incident of childhood, and if the child
shared in the father's joy, the adult has learned to understand the mother's disapproval, for the
adult stands with the mother, observing.
The "preferred reading" among these interpretations is not a simple matter of appealing to the
text. The New Criticism, with its focus on ambiguity, figurative language, and irony, has not
resulted in the narrowing of interpretive possibilities, but rather has provided tools to account for
a poem's elements in a variety of ways and has proliferated interpretations. In the present case,
those who maintain a balance between joy and fear in the poem give equal weight to both
emotions. Those who see the joy in the poem 8 the diction of violence. And those who see the
fear treat the figure and rhythm of the waltz ironically. A seesaw tips easily, and "My Papa's
Waltz" is susceptible to the pressure of personal experience.
This is not to say that one's personal experience must always be privileged in reading a poem.
Following the lead of H. R. Swardson in "The Use of the Word Mistake in the Teaching of
Poetry," there are no hippopotamuses in "My Papa's Waltz." As Swardson puts it, "the student
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_6866258545076574701_bib3
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_6866258545076574701_bib4
who sees a hippopotamus there has made a mistake. I will say that interpretive communities
who see a hippopotamus there have, en masse, made a mistake."[ 5] What I have reported of
my students is recurring patterns of interpretation that, in my estimation, account for the various
elements of the poem in coherent but different ways. The words of a poem create a series of
filters that eliminate possible meanings. In the universe of possible readings, comparatively few
precipitate through all the filters. But in a poem like "My Papa's Waltz," several different
readings do succeed in making their way through. At that point, the "preferred reading" is not
found in the text, but in the interaction of reader and text. Students are not disembodied
intelligences; rather, they bring to the text distinctive pasts that comprise additional filters
screening out possible readings. This essay is a field report on that last set of filters.
At a recent conference, I learned that the poem is used in Jungian psychotherapy to treat
alcoholics. W. D. Snodgrass writes that in The Lost Son and Other Poems, of which "My Papa's
Waltz" was one, Roethke "regressed into areas of the psyche where the powerful thoughts and
feelings of the child---the raw materials and driving power of our later lives--remain under the
layers of rationale and of civilized purpose."[ 6] The achievement of "My Papa's Waltz" is that it
permits readers to access such potent memories in their own lives in ways consistent with the
words and construction of the poem.
NOTES
[1] Karl Malkoff, Theodore Roethke: An Introduction to the Poetry (New York: Columbia
University Press, 1966) 3, 57.
[2] See William V. Davis, "Fishing An Old Wound: Theodore Roethke's Search for Sonship,"
Antigonish Review 20 (1974): 33; and Walter B. Kalaidjian, Understanding Theodore Roethke
(Columbia University of South Carolina Press, 1987) 51.
[3] X. J. Kennedy, Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama, 4th ed. (Boston:
Little, Brown, 1987) 421.
[4] John Ciardi and Miller Williams, How Does a Poem Mean? 2nd ed. (Boston: Houghton
Mifflin, 1975) 369.
[5] H. R. Swardson, "The Use of the Word Mistake in the Teaching of Poetry." ADE Bulletin 91
(Winter 1988): 4-5.
[6] W. D. Snodgrass, "That Anguish of Concreteness--Theodore Roethke's Career," Theodore
Roethke: Essays on the Poetry, ed. Arnold Stein (Seattle: University of Washington Press,
1965) 81.
~~~~~~~~
by Bobby Fong
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_6866258545076574701_bib5
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_6866258545076574701_bib6
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_6866258545076574701_toc
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_6866258545076574701_bib1up
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_6866258545076574701_bib2up
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_6866258545076574701_bib3up
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_6866258545076574701_bib4up
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_6866258545076574701_bib5up
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_6866258545076574701_bib6up
Works Cited