November 2006
Enterprise Architecture Overview
November 2006 3
Our Areas of Interest
• Business – HE Functional Reference Models
• Platform Standards – Taxonomy
• Architecture Governance
• What other Universities are doing in this space
• Methods/Tools being used to achieve goals of EA
November 2006 4
Where we have come from
• Organisational change – 2005 restructure
• Legacy Technology unable to support the business going
forward
• Little or No standards / methodology
• No one overseeing the “bigger picture” across the organisation
• Decentralised IT
November 2006 5
Enterprise Architecture and UoN
• Very early stages
• Major business and systems change
▪ Organisation Restructure completed early 2006
▪ Centralised IT
▪ Program of Works (EPMO) within IT
▪ Formation of roles/groups (AAG, CAB, PoW, Change Office, IT Governance Committee)
• Introduction of Groups and Processes
▪ Start of ITIL implementation, Change Office (PMO), “formalised” Project Methodology and SDLC,
Architecture Governance, Standards
• Enterprise Architecture Consultant – “EA in a box”
▪ Light inventory across Business, Information, Applications, Technology
▪ Provided principals, some mapping between inventories, gap analysis
▪ Current Activities/Changes/Lack of Ownership made this difficult – “hitting a moving target”
▪ Tool - System Architect
November 2006 6
Enterprise Architecture and UoN
• 2006 Program of Works
▪ 50+ Projects with IT underpinning them
▪ Infrastructure (network, server consolidation, etc)
▪ Information Management (BI, ECMS)
▪ Business (HR, Finance, Research, Students, Facilities, etc)
▪ Teaching / Learning (Blackboard/LOMS, Academic Support)
▪ Operational (ID Mngt, Integration,adopt mainstream technology)
▪ Client Services (“17000” Centralised Service Desk, MOE, ITIL rollout)
▪ NUWays: Focussed on Business Process Improvement and EPMO
• Formed
▪ Change Office
▪ AAG – Architecture Advisory Group
▪ CAB – Change Advisory Board
▪ Project Portfolio’s – Program of Works
November 2006 7
Enterprise Architecture and UoN
• Currently only used by IT
▪ Covers PoW and operations
▪ Reaction to the amount of project work being undertaken, realisation for EA out of PoW
• AAG Membership
▪ Enterprise Applications
▪ Solutions Architect
▪ Infrastructure
▪ Security
▪ Data Services
▪ Client Services
▪ Web Group
▪ (Note: No Business Representation)
• Bottom up approach to EA – driven by IT
November 2006 8
Challenges Experienced
• Current IT Inventory = 100+ Main Applications
▪ ~65% in-house developed – mainly “gap fillers” around the enterprise applications
▪ Current upgrades will supersede some but still expected to be significant
▪ Mixed blend of technology: