Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Physical assessment school age child

23/11/2021 Client: muhammad11 Deadline: 2 Day

Developmental Assessment And The School-Aged Child

The needs of the pediatric patient differ depending on age, as do the stages of development and the expected assessment findings for each stage. In a 500-750-word paper, examine the needs of a school-aged child between the ages of 5 and 12 years old and discuss the following:

Compare the physical assessments among school-aged children. Describe how you would modify assessment techniques to match the age and developmental stage of the child.
Choose a child between the ages of 5 and 12 years old. Identify the age of the child and describe the typical developmental stages of children that age.
Applying developmental theory based on Erickson, Piaget, or Kohlberg, explain how you would developmentally assess the child. Include how you would offer explanations during the assessment, strategies you would use to gain cooperation, and potential findings from the assessment.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Developmental Assessment and the School-Aged Child
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%3
Satisfactory
79.00%4
Good
89.00%5
Excellent
100.00%80.0 %Content 25.0 %Comparison of Physical Assessment Among School-Aged ChildrenA comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is omitted.An incomplete comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is summarized. How assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is omitted or contains significant inaccuracies.A general comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is summarized. How assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is generally described. More information or support is needed for clarity or accuracy.A comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is presented. How assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is described. Some information is needed for clarity.A detailed comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is presented. How assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is thoroughly described. Insight is demonstrated into the physical assessment of school age children.25.0 %Typical Assessment for a Child of a Specific AgeThe typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is not described. The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is summarized. The summary contains significant inaccuracies for the age of the child. The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is generally described. The description contains some inaccuracies for the age of the child.The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is described. The overall description is accurate. Some information is needed for clarity.The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is accurately and thoroughly described. 30.0 %Developmental Assessment of a Child Using a Developmental Theory (Erickson, Piaget, Kohlberg)A child assessment based on a developmental theory is omitted.A child assessment based on a developmental theory is partially summarized. Partial strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are omitted or are incorrect. There are significant inaccuracies.A child assessment based on a developmental theory is generally described. General strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are summarized. There are minor inaccuracies.A child assessment based on a developmental theory is described. Appropriate strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are described. Some information is needed for clarity.A child assessment based on a developmental theory is thoroughly described. Well-developed strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are all accurate and described in detail.15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 5.0 %Thesis Development and PurposePaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 5.0 %Argument Logic and ConstructionStatement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.5.0 %Format 2.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct. 5.0 %Format 3.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.100 %Total Weightage

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Calculation Master
Coursework Helper
Solution Provider
Peter O.
Helping Hand
Solutions Store
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Calculation Master

ONLINE

Calculation Master

I will be delighted to work on your project. As an experienced writer, I can provide you top quality, well researched, concise and error-free work within your provided deadline at very reasonable prices.

$28 Chat With Writer
Coursework Helper

ONLINE

Coursework Helper

I have read your project details and I can provide you QUALITY WORK within your given timeline and budget.

$50 Chat With Writer
Solution Provider

ONLINE

Solution Provider

I have read your project description carefully and you will get plagiarism free writing according to your requirements. Thank You

$36 Chat With Writer
Peter O.

ONLINE

Peter O.

I will be delighted to work on your project. As an experienced writer, I can provide you top quality, well researched, concise and error-free work within your provided deadline at very reasonable prices.

$45 Chat With Writer
Helping Hand

ONLINE

Helping Hand

I have done dissertations, thesis, reports related to these topics, and I cover all the CHAPTERS accordingly and provide proper updates on the project.

$19 Chat With Writer
Solutions Store

ONLINE

Solutions Store

I have written research reports, assignments, thesis, research proposals, and dissertations for different level students and on different subjects.

$30 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

Cloud Computing - Approaches to connecting public health and the healthcare system - 12mm bolt torque nm - Model and role modeling theory - Larkrise boarding cattery trowbridge - Should everyone go to college rhetorical analysis - Westpac discharge authority form 2021 - Project with 4 papers - Prentice hall world history chapter 18 - Aged care police checks requirements - Pr 13 1a dividends on preferred and common stock - Wileyplus infinity symbol - Aasb ppe - Articles with ethos pathos and logos - Emerging threats and countermeasures - Adelaide university football club results - What was net operating working capital for 2015 and 2016 - Villanova six sigma certification - Shaping psych - Anthony murphy periodontist dee why - Compare and contrast mission and vision statements - Why is dell's darker deep blue color trademarked - Struck by lightning by gretel ehrlich summary - Dithered vs no dither gif - What is the difference between composition and improvisation - ESSAY - Saffron walden netball club - Colonial first state super - Average weather over a long period of time - Operations and process management nigel slack pdf - In a denial of service ddos attack the perpetrator ____ - Data analysis for quality improvement - Vals segmentation examples - Suppose the baseball hall of fame in cooperstown - British geological survey boreholes - Travel and tourism exam questions and answers - Attention getter for introduction speech - Security architecture 3 - Res 724 Week 3 Analysis Exercise - Launching a business jcf health and fitness - Makeup consultation form template - For some similar Earth Hour events that have been held - Of marriage and single life summary - Healthcare management resources - Circuit breaker ka rating - Biomanbio photosynthesis and respiration game - The story of an hour literary analysis - Sociology questions! - Everything begins and ends at the kentucky club summary - Costco porter cable triple head led work light - Diversity - Das welt auto uk - Case Study - Source Intergration - I know you love her but let her go - How to determine percent recovery - Bed number ten questions - Lección 1 lesson test answers - Self reflection essay - Essay - Health components of fitness - Discussion Board Chapter 5 Nursing Leadership & Management - Www mcspam dot net - Public policy proposal for nuclear waste - Skill deficiency is often acknowledged as a barrier to implementing evidence at the bedside. What skills will you hone to increase the translation of evidence in your practice? What resources do you need to hone these skills? - Music appreciation final exam questions - Sugu oishii sugoku oishii - Carol ann duffy childhood - Aws direct connect user guide - Fin 571 week 1 financial ratio analysis - Change verbs into nouns examples - International business management - 1. calculate the theoretical yield of the solid precipitate. show your work. - Hw 2.2 1 complex roots visualization - Www ncsthechallenge org dates - OPS/350 WK2 Parts Emporium Case Study - If a firm has a 100 percent dividend payout ratio - Colloidal silver bladder irrigation - Bunsen burner parts labeled - The threats from genetically modified foods robin mather - What are derivatives used for in the real world - Fun home alison bechdel pdf - Cite your sources using apa format week 5 assignment - Vpuml - Nomenclature activity type i binary ionic compounds - Japanese model of corporate governance - PHYS - Mutually exclusive and exhaustive events - The boy in the striped pyjamas summary - Aon care ghs claim form download - Compare online and traditional transactions in terms of richness - Pamela painter the new year - Fombrun tichy and devanna 1984 - Week 1 Discussion - MKT-301 D.1 - 521 Board Discussion week 6 - According to the four-d model, appreciative inquiry begins by: - Health - Supply chain challenges at leapfrog case study - Purdue owl semicolon exercises