Revelations perfume and cosmetics inc. v. prince rogers nelson

Case1:

Legal issue:

1. What legal issue(s) does this case illustrate (i.e. why is this case in the chapter)?

· Counter offer.

· Promissory estoppel

· Offer rejection

1. What are all of the elements of the main legal rule that this case illustrates? For instance, if the case is about undue influence, list ALL of the elements that the court in this case said had to be proven by the plaintiff.

· Counter offer. an offer made in response to a previous offer by the other party during negotiations for a final contract,

· Promissory estoppel, Promisor made a promise significant enough to cause the promise to act on it, Promise relied upon the promise, Promise suffered a significant detriment, Relief can only come in the form of the promisor fulfilling the promise

· Offer rejection. The rejection of an offer terminates the offeree's power of acceptance

Repeat 2. For each issue raised. (For example, a case may discuss 1. Whether there is an implied-in-fact contract, and II. Whether the UCC or common law applied. If so, you will repeat 2. For each of these two issues.)

For Giannotti V. Cornelly the counter offer given persists as a rejection to original offer and terminates the power resulting from the counter offer.

1. Expand Perspective, Gain Interpersonal Understanding, and Critically Assess Implications. Judgement was for the defendant. This is because his clause in the mortgage was only an offer. This was unilateral until accepted by the offeree.

2. Prevailing party’s point of view:

The addition to the subject under the offer were not in the first offer. Hence the mortgage addition did not form a binding contract as the offer stands as a one party affair without consent of the offeree.

1. What legal arguments were made by the prevailing party?

There was reluctant agreement to the offer. There also was information missing on the part of the offer.

1. What facts, legal reasoning, social policy, and ethical principles would support a ruling for the prevailing party?

Contract is complete when the subject stands in the original state without any material damages or alteration to the object.

The offeree should only be liable to contracts entered without any alteration. The alterations renders the offer unilateral.

1. What were the probable motivations behind the prevailing party’s actions leading up to the dispute? After the dispute?

The mortgage value added from used 124,000 TO used 128,000 was not in the subject contract and therefore stands as addition to the contract and damages the contract enforceability.

4. Losing party’s point of view:

5. What legal arguments were made by the losing party?

That there was a counter offer a second time, this could imply the furniture additions were material subject to the changes in the offer made.

1. What facts, legal reasoning, social policy, and ethical principles would support a ruling for the losing party?

The losing party did not disclose the material alteration to the furniture items. This could be expressly specified in the offer.

1. What were the probable motivations behind the losing party’s actions leading up to the dispute? After the dispute?

The addition in the furniture equipment could contribute to the inflation to the value of the mortgage.

5. Judge’s point of view:

6. How did the court rule on each argument?

The contract was not binding. The adjustment to the property was rendered material hence the contract could not be enforceable.

1. What facts, legal reasoning, social policy, and ethical principles did the court use to support its ruling?

The offer did not include the clause to input the costing on the adjustments to the furniture equipment’s.

1. What were the probable motivations behind the judge’s decision?

The adjustments to the property which the offeree was not privy to was material and could vitiate the contract.

1. Find Recent Developments and Diverse Theories, Synthesize, and Compare

The recent developments are that the contract is a legal binding only when the offeror and the offeree enter into a contract that they share equal information.

6. Different Rules: Pose the question “What if the court adopted a different legal rule?”

The different legal approach was practical only if the both party to the contract shared similar information to the contract on the property adjustments.

1. Search the web for other articles to refer to in your article or call an attorney or business professional who may have experience with this type of issue. Write a brief one-paragraph summary of this case or article:

Harvey v Face [1893] AC 552 Privy Council

Harvey sent a Telegram to face which stated: -"Will you sell us Bumper Hall Pen? Telegraph lowest cash price-answer paid; “Face replied by telegram:-"Lowest price for Bumper Hall Pen £900."Harvey then replied:-"We agree to buy Bumper Hall Pen for the sum of nine hundred pounds asked by you. Please send us your title deed in order that we may get early possession."

Held: The Privy Council held that there was no contract concluded between the parties. Face had not directly answered the first question as to whether they would sell and the lowest price stated was merely responding to a request for information not an offer. There was thus no evidence of an intention that the telegram sent by Face was to be an offer. b. Ponder and reflect to compare this case to recent news and cases. This is the really cool part. You will be thinking like a legally astute manager, owner, or professional as you read, analyse and compare cases to draw your conclusions. Some neat ideas to help with your analysis: If the outcomes of the recent cases you found are different, can you make sense of the different outcomes? Are there different legal standards that make for different outcomes? Is there a trend leaning more in favour of a plaintiff or defendant’s position? Are the outcomes the same or different simply because the facts are similar or dissimilar? What accounts for the same or different results? Write your thoughts here:

In the most recent world, the legal standards have been fair to both plaintiff and defendant. The legal outcome on contract cases has been relying on the terms of the engagement in the offer property status.

What accounts for the similar result is the rule of law that has been do elaborate and precise.

1. Creative, Application and Critical Thinking Questions

2. Your point of view of the case in the book:

3. Do you agree or disagree with the actual outcome? Why or why not?

I agree with the outcome: the contract was not enforceable because all the terms stated in the offer were not all met.

1. Change it up: Pose the question “What if the facts were different?” Create changes to the facts that would probably result in a different outcome of the case and, using critical thinking and legal reasoning, tell why your change in facts would make a difference.

The offer should have been adjusted to reflect the material adjustment to the property subjected to the offer and acceptance.

1. Relate the case to your own experience, if applicable, or to the experience someone else has shared with you. My uncle was involved in a contract where the offeror altered the property in subject. He won the case subject to lack of material alteration information access.

How will you apply the lessons from this case to your future career?

All times I shall ensure all the offers I make have the necessary terms clarified and made aware to the privy parties.

1. Write recommendations to avoid future legal problems and that best suit the objectives of a firm or company in your chosen career field.

Any offer alteration made should be put into consideration and made to the both party aware in terms of the information available and accessible in all cases.

Case2:

Legal issue:

1. What legal issue(s) does this case illustrate (i.e. why is this case in the chapter)?

· Offer and acceptance. Offer is enforceable and acceptable once the parties in participant are in agreement on the terms.

· Communication can either be in writing, words or even message and is assumed information has been passed once either of this has been passed.

· A contract exists as a legal binding. When a proposal has been made and the other party accepts the proposal, then the contract is binding.

1. What are all of the elements of the main legal rule that this case illustrates? For instance, if the case is about undue influence, list ALL of the elements that the court in this case said had to be proven by the plaintiff.

Contract. Plaintiff should prove that there was; offer; acceptance; consideration; mutuality of obligation; competency and capacity; and, in certain circumstances, a written instrument.

Offer and acceptance: the expression of an offer to contract on certain terms by one person and an indication by the offeree of its acceptance of those terms.

Repeat 2. For each issue raised. (For example, a case may discuss 1. Whether there is an implied-in-fact contract, and II. Whether the UCC or common law applied. If so, you will repeat 2. For each of these two issues.)

For Lefkowitz V. Great Minneapolis surplus store, Inc. there was contract in the case because it constitutes an element of acceptance to the advertisement.

1. Expand Perspective, Gain Interpersonal Understanding, and Critically Assess Implications. The plaintiff won the case because they had twice been deceived. They then got to understand the house rules. The first advert was specific but the second one was not specific in facts that the sale was to be both men and women.

2. Prevailing party’s point of view:

The house rules were now known by the plaintiff during the second advert. As a result, being the first to arrive meant that the contract was complete and the denial of sales to the plaintiff was a breach of a contract.

1. What legal arguments were made by the prevailing party?

The contract is complete depending on the term in the contract. In the case, being the first to arrive meant that, the contract was complete.

1. What facts, legal reasoning, social policy, and ethical principles would support a ruling for the prevailing party?

Contract is complete when one of the parties as an offered does anything likely to imply acceptance to the terms.

The advertisement in the newspaper meant that the public and everyone is aware and hence the offer was valid for acceptance.

1. What were the probable motivations behind the prevailing party’s actions leading up to the dispute? After the dispute?

The probable motivation was to trick the offeree for not understanding the house rules.

After the dispute, the advertisement was construed to be legally an enforceable offer to the interested parties of the public.

4. Losing party’s point of view:

5. What legal arguments were made by the losing party?

The offeror may revoke the offer any time before the offer has been accepted.

Before the offeror accept the offeree offer, they have a right to revoke the offer.

1. What facts, legal reasoning, social policy, and ethical principles would support a ruling for the losing party?

The losing party did not indicate the terms of its ability to revoke the offer.

1. What were the probable motivations behind the losing party’s actions leading up to the dispute? After the dispute?

There was no clause to guide on whether the offeror could revoke. They did not surpass the terms of the contract to be binding and enforceable.

5. Judge’s point of view:

6. How did the court rule on each argument?

The contract was binding after the slated time lapsed hence the offeror couldn’t revoke the offer.

1. What facts, legal reasoning, social policy, and ethical principles did the court use to support its ruling?

The offeror did not put a clause to be able to revoke when they so desire.

1. What were the probable motivations behind the judge’s decision?

The offer did not include all the necessary terms. Hence the offer was binding and enforceable.

1. Find Recent Developments and Diverse Theories, Synthesize, and Compare

The recent developments are that the contract is a legal binding only when the offeror and the offeree enter into a contract through writing.

6. Different Rules: Pose the question “What if the court adopted a different legal rule?”

The different legal rule would only be adopted if the contract was to be requisite to be documented and signed against.

1. Search the web for other articles to refer to in your article or call an attorney or business professional who may have experience with this type of issue. Write a brief one-paragraph summary of this case or article:

Case: Revelations Perfume and Cosmetics Inc. v. Prince Rogers Nelson

In 2008, the Revelations Perfume and Cosmetics Company sued the famous musician “Prince” and his music label, seeking $100,000 in damages for reneging on an agreement to help market their perfumes. The flamboyant pop star had promised to personally promote the company’s new perfume named after his 2006 album “3121,” and to allow his name and likeness to be used in the perfume’s packaging. Prince then refused to grant interviews related to the project, and refused to provide a current photograph for a press release.

1. Ponder and reflect to compare this case to recent news and cases. This is the really cool part. You will be thinking like a legally astute manager, owner, or professional as you read, analyse and compare cases to draw your conclusions. Some neat ideas to help with your analysis: If the outcomes of the recent cases you found are different, can you make sense of the different outcomes? Are there different legal standards that make for different outcomes? Is there a trend leaning more in favour of a plaintiff or defendant’s position? Are the outcomes the same or different simply because the facts are similar or dissimilar? What accounts for the same or different results? Write your thoughts here:

In the most recent world, the legal standards have been fair to both plaintiff and defendant. The legal outcome on contract cases has been relying on the terms of the engagement in the contract.

What accounts for the similar result is the rule of law that has been do elaborate and precise.

1. Creative, Application and Critical Thinking Questions

2. Your point of view of the case in the book:

3. Do you agree or disagree with the actual outcome? Why or why not?

I agree with the outcome: the contract was enforceable because all the terms stated in the offer were all met.

1. Change it up: Pose the question “What if the facts were different?” Create changes to the facts that would probably result in a different outcome of the case and, using critical thinking and legal reasoning, tell why your change in facts would make a difference.

The advert should have stated that the contract is agreeable only upon signing. This would lead to the ruling based on existence of a signed document.

The clarification that the offeror can revoke their offer at their disposal. This could lead to the offeror revoking earlier decision.

1. Relate the case to your own experience, if applicable, or to the experience someone else has shared with you. A friend of mine had his father taken to court of law over auctioning their household on the terms of first come first served. The father oust the case.

How will you apply the lessons from this case to your future career?

Every offer I shall be making I shall be clarifying that am the person able to change the terms of the contract.

1. Write recommendations to avoid future legal problems and that best suit the objectives of a firm or company in your chosen career field.

The offeror should include relevant clauses in their offer to ensure the contract is enforceable and within the law.

Case3:

Facts:

Reed family owned a quarry while Sheldon owned a neighbouring property. Since 1997 the parties have been in dispute regarding the right of Reed to operate the quarry and access road to the quarry. In 2000 the parties agreed to settle the dispute through mediation. The mediation outcome required Reed to be paying Sheldon $250 for their right to use the access road. There was also another series of agreements that were put down in two documents-lease agreement and settlement agreement. Two days after mediation Reeds lawyer received a letter outlining the terms of agreement. Within a week reeds lawyer send a letter to the Sheldon lawyer concurring with some issues and expressing reservations to some of them. On 1st October the Reeds began payment of $250 but the money was being maintained by Sheldon lawyer because the agreement on the settlement was not final. While the drafts were being prepared, in 2001 Christine Stannard a daughter to Reeds saw a map of the road and realized it was not owned by the Sheldon but rather owned by town highway. The Reeds refused to any further negotiation to the settlement.

For this case that are important to the case are the discovery of the fact that the road did not indeed belong to the Sheldon. The fact that the documents were never signed.

Legal issues

The legal issue under consideration in this case is whether oral agreement is enough to constitute an enforceable agreement

Whether the unexecuted documents in an agreement can make the agreement enforceable and binding

The main legal rule for this case is whether oral agreement constitutes an enforceable and binding agreement. The main elements of the rule under consideration in this case are

1. Whether there as an expression of an intention not to be bound if there was no written agreement

2. Whether there has been partial performance of the contract

3. Whether the terms of the said contract had been agreed by the parties involved

4. Whether the issue at the centre of agreement are usually done in written agreements

Prevailing party’s point of view

The Sheldon argued that they owned the road and that they believed that the Reeds were bound by the agreement because it was binding.

Loosing party’s point of view

Initially, Reeds family initially believed that the road belonged to the Sheldon and as such they agreed to payment before disbursement even though they were not bound by the contract

Judges point of view

The judges reversed the earlier ruling and remanded the case for further proceedings

Different rules

What if the rule in this case was guided by the rules of misrepresentation? In this case the case will not change in a great way because the same arguments about the case will be advanced if the rules were misrepresentation.

My point of view of the case

Well in my considered opinion from the word go this case had a misrepresentation because the Sheldon knew that the road did not belong to them yet they continued to demand that the Reeds family should compensate them. Therefore the agreement should have been vacated when this act became clear to everyone. A mistake is enough to warrant rendering of a contract null and void.

Case4:

2. Legal issue:

3. What legal issue(s) does this case illustrate (i.e. why is this case in the chapter)?

· Lapse of time

· Duration of offer

· Estoppel

1. What are all of the elements of the main legal rule that this case illustrates? For instance, if the case is about undue influence, list ALL of the elements that the court in this case said had to be proven by the plaintiff.

· Lapse of time: time has an impact on whether statements made during the contract negotiation phase may be taken as contractual terms or representations.

· Duration of offer: The offer must be reasonable under the circumstances and the recipient of the offer must understand the terms. There are many complicated rules, which dictate whether an offer is legally binding on a party, including the length that an offer will stay open before acceptance

· Estoppel: Some form of legal relationship either exists or is anticipated between the parties. A representation or promise by one party. Reliance by the other party on the promise or representation. Detriment. Unconscionability.

Repeat 2. For each issue raised. (For example, a case may discuss 1. Whether there is an implied-in-fact contract, and II. Whether the UCC or common law applied. If so, you will repeat 2. For each of these two issues.)

For Sherrod V. Kidd: the contract was not clear on the matters of the reasonable time. How much is the reasonable time. Hence the contract was not enforceable.

1. Expand Perspective, Gain Interpersonal Understanding, and Critically Assess Implications. The judgement was reversed. This is because by how much is the reasonable time was not clear and neither of the party was privy to this.

2. Prevailing party’s point of view:

The offer was properly accepted because there lacked clarity on how much is reasonable time meaning.

1. What legal arguments were made by the prevailing party?

The contract was properly done in acceptance part of the offeree. As a result, the offeree had done all within the law to accept the offer.

1. What facts, legal reasoning, social policy, and ethical principles would support a ruling for the prevailing party?

The offeree needed to decide to clearly justify if they wanted to make a counter proposal or terminate the original offer granted.

1. What were the probable motivations behind the prevailing party’s actions leading up to the dispute? After the dispute?

There was no clarity which offer was in contestation.

4. Losing party’s point of view:

5. What legal arguments were made by the losing party?

That the first offer was not accepted before the arbitration.

Possibly, the GAL should have the lower amount ruled after refuting the highest offer made in damages settlement.

1. What facts, legal reasoning, social policy, and ethical principles would support a ruling for the losing party?

The offer was within the reasonable time. The reasonable time was not very clear to either the party.

1. What were the probable motivations behind the losing party’s actions leading up to the dispute? After the dispute?

The losing party was motivated that the arbitration would disclose their settlement effort. The losing party thought of reasonable time as not yet lapsed which was contrary as it had already lapsed.

5. Judge’s point of view:

6. How did the court rule on each argument?

Reasonable time of offer is only terminated by either death, revocation which was not evident in both the cases and counteroffer which was inexistence by the time of the ruling.

1. What facts, legal reasoning, social policy, and ethical principles did the court use to support its ruling?

There was no death on either the party to terminate the offer. The counter offer was not yet given a shot by the time of litigation. And there was no material damage to the subject counteroffer in the contention.

1. What were the probable motivations behind the judge’s decision?

The reasonable time factor had not been exhausted. Resultantly, the offer to restore the damage was hence enforceable even during the litigation process.

1. Find Recent Developments and Diverse Theories, Synthesize, and Compare

The recent developments are that the offer is binding within reasonable time is a legal binding only when There was no death and no material damage to the subject counteroffer in the contention., .

6. Different Rules: Pose the question “What if the court adopted a different legal rule?”

The different legal rule could be based on an existence of material damage to the offer. If the GAL made a counter offer which was rejected by the kid, a different rule could be reached.

1. Search the web for other articles to refer to in your article or call an attorney or business professional who may have experience with this type of issue. Write a brief one-paragraph summary of this case or article:

Per Lord Watson in Hick v Raymond [1893] AC 22 at p.32:

When the language of the contract does not expressly, or by necessary implication, fix any time for the performance of a contractual obligation, the law implied that it shall be performed within a reasonable time. The rule is of general application, and is not confined to contracts for the carriage of goods by sea. In the case of other contracts the condition of reasonable time has been frequently interpreted; and has invariably been held to mean that the party upon whom it is incumbent duly fulfils his obligations notwithstanding protracted delay, so long as such delay is attributable to causes beyond his control, and he has neither acted negligently nor unreasonably.

1. Ponder and reflect to compare this case to recent news and cases. This is the really cool part. You will be thinking like a legally astute manager, owner, or professional as you read, analyse and compare cases to draw your conclusions. Some neat ideas to help with your analysis: If the outcomes of the recent cases you found are different, can you make sense of the different outcomes? Are there different legal standards that make for different outcomes? Is there a trend leaning more in favour of a plaintiff or defendant’s position? Are the outcomes the same or different simply because the facts are similar or dissimilar? What accounts for the same or different results? Write your thoughts here:

In the most recent world, the legal standards have been fair to both plaintiff and defendant. The legal outcome on contract cases has been relying on the terms of the engagement in the offer and acceptances within the slated reasonable timings.

What accounts for the similar result is the rule of law that has been do elaborate and precise.

1. Creative, Application and Critical Thinking Questions

2. Your point of view of the case in the book:

3. Do you agree or disagree with the actual outcome? Why or why not?

I agree with the outcome: the reasonable time element was not exhausted in the case law stated.

1. Change it up: Pose the question “What if the facts were different?” Create changes to the facts that would probably result in a different outcome of the case and, using critical thinking and legal reasoning, tell why your change in facts would make a difference.

The facts should have been clear on the reasonable time that the offer was subject to have been withdrawn from the contract in the subject.

1. Relate the case to your own experience, if applicable, or to the experience someone else has shared with you. A friend of mine had his won a case in court of law after they presented an offer to the offeror within the case of ambiguous reasonable timing.

1. How will you apply the lessons from this case to your future career?

Reasonable time shall be very critical in all my dealings. I shall prosper to ensure all are well slated in any offer I make.

1. Write recommendations to avoid future legal problems and that best suit the objectives of a firm or company in your chosen career field.

The offeror should include specifics on what is contained in the reasonable time argument.

Case5:

CASE NAME: LEFKOWITZ v. GREAT MINNEAPOLIS SURPLUS STORE, INC.

1. Legal Cognizance

2. Facts:

3. Briefly describe the facts.

The defendant gave an offer for someone to buy his products at a specified price. The defendant owed the customers the fur process since he had made advertisements on the newspaper.

1. Which facts were key to the outcome?

The fact that the judges used was that the defendant made an offer publically to sell his fur products. Therefore, whoever came first was supposed to get the products after paying for them. In this case, the defendant broke the law when failed to sell his fur products to the customers.

2. Legal issue:

3. What legal issue(s) does this case illustrate (i.e. why is this case in the chapter)?

The legal issue is the breach of contract between the buyer and the seller. The defendant fails to sell the fur products to the first person with a reason that he could only sell to women.

1. What are all of the elements of the main legal rule that this case illustrates? For instance, if the case is about undue influence, list ALL of the elements that the court in this case said had to be proven by the plaintiff.

There are the elements of the offers and the acceptance in the case. The two parties involved had a role on an individual basis. The defendant ought to have given the fur products to the first customer. Also, the customer should have complied with the conditions that were to meet for anyone to own the products.

1. Expand Perspective, Gain Interpersonal Understanding, and Critically Assess Implications

2. Prevailing party’s point of view:

3. What legal arguments were made by the prevailing party?

The prevailing party made an argument that on both occasions, he was the first to arrive at the store and was willing to pay the full amount of the fur product.

1. What facts, legal reasoning, social policy, and ethical principles would support a ruling for the prevailing party?

The customer deserved to be given the product. He had ensured that he was the first customer on the counter, and also he had all the money.

1. What were the probable motivations behind the prevailing party’s actions leading up to the dispute? After the dispute?

The customer was interested in the fur product, and that is why on both occasions, he was the first to appear at the counters. Additionally, the pain of being unable to get the product prompted him to press charges against the owner of the fur products.

4. Losing party’s point of view:

5. What legal arguments were made by the losing party?

The defendant argued that any advertisements on a newspaper could be pulled out without giving notice to the potential customers

1. What facts, legal reasoning, social policy, and ethical principles would support a ruling for the losing party?

As the owner of the product, the defendants had a right to do what he wished with it. He was at liberty to offer it for sale at one moment but decide not to sell later.

1. What were the probable motivations behind the losing party’s actions leading up to the dispute? After the dispute?

Possibly, the defendant had come to realize that he still valued the fur products, and he was not ready to let go. Besides, he could have realized that he quoted a lower price than the prevailing market price. However, he could not have increased the price after he had issued the advertisement.

5. Judge’s point of view:

6. How did the court rule on each argument?

According to the ruling of the judge, the plaintiff deserved the fur products. He had met all the conditions a, so the defendant should meet his edge of the baggage.

1. What facts, legal reasoning, social policy, and ethical principles did the court use to support its ruling?

The legal reasoning was the there was a breach of contract. The defendant had withdrawn the offer, yet the plaintiff had already presented himself at the counter.

1. What were the probable motivations behind the judge’s decision?

The judge realized that the defendant failed to honour his performance to the plaintiff. Again, the customer had already done according to the requirements of the advertisements.

1. Find Recent Developments and Diverse Theories, Synthesize, and Compare

2. Different Rules: Pose the question “What if the court adopted a different legal rule?”

3. Search the web for other articles to refer to in your article or call an attorney or business professional who may have experience with this type of issue. Write a brief one-paragraph summary of this case or article:

The case revolves around a person who places an advertisement in a local newspaper that he would want to sell some fur products. The sale would be made to the first person to arrive at the counter. The plaintiff meets the all the conditions, but the defendant fails to give him the product, arguing that he had withdrawn the offer. The customer wins the case, and the defendant is required to pay him some money for the breach of contract.

1. Ponder and reflect to compare this case to recent news and cases. This is the really cool part. You will be thinking like a legally astute manager, owner, or professional as you read, analyze and compare cases to draw your conclusions. Some neat ideas to help with your analysis: If the outcomes of the recent cases you found are different, can you make sense of the different outcomes? Are there different legal standards that make for different outcomes? Is there a trend leaning more in favor of a plaintiff or defendant’s position? Are the outcomes the same or different simply because the facts are similar or dissimilar? What accounts for the same or different results? Write your thoughts here:

The results of the cases depend on the type of legal issue, the parties and the jury involved. The jury has an influence on the results depending on whether they want to remain true to the case, or they want to represent selfish gains.

1. Creative, Application and Critical Thinking Questions

2. Your point of view of the case in the book:

3. Do you agree or disagree with the actual outcome? Why or why not?

I agree with the outcome of the case. The jury made use of logical legal reasoning and justice prevailed to the plaintiff. It is a lesson for those people who rejoice in breaching the contracts.

1. Change it up: Pose the question “What if the facts were different?” Create changes to the facts that would probably result in a different outcome of the case and, using critical thinking and legal reasoning, tell why your change in facts would make a difference.

I would create a situation whereby the plaintiff failed to be the first customer on the counter. Besides, he did not have all the money required to buy the fur products. In this case, the plaintiff would have lost the case.

1. Relate the case to your own experience, if applicable, or to the experience someone else has shared with you.

My grandmother once read an advertisement about a house in countryside; she got interested in buying it. She had the money and all the documents that were required. On the day that she was going to purchase the house, the owner called and argued that he no longer sold property to women. She took the owner of the house to court, and she won the case.

1. How will you apply the lessons from this case to your future career?

I will ensure that anyone who breaks the breach of contract learns a lesson in court.

1. Write recommendations to avoid future legal problems and that best suit the objectives of a firm or company in your chosen career field.

The judge should understand the legal issue, before giving the final judgment.