Rmit easycite

Work in Global Society -Assignment 1 Rubric

Criteria

High Distinction (HD)

80-100%

Distinction (DI)

70-79%

Credit (C)

60-69%

Pass (P)

50-59%

Fail (NN)

0-49%

(5/20 marks)

Micro credential

Micro credential completed

CLO 1

(5 marks)

PA Evidence of completing badge presented in reflection on readings

(0 marks)

NN No evidence of badge presented in reflection on readings

( 5/20 marks)

Organise + Communicate

Logical structure of information

Evidence of academic standards - RMIT Harvard EasyCite guide

CLO 1

(5-4 marks)

Main ideas clearly outlined and presented in an engaging manner. PPT and discussion organised coherently and logically. Cohesive presentation consistently encourages engagement with the content.

Uses refined academic research skills to present current, credible, accurate and authoritative data/information. Uses RMIT Harvard referencing style and in text citations with minimal errors.

Provides a clear, concise and logical structure and applies high academic standards.

(3 marks)

Main ideas clearly outlined. PPT and discussion organised logically. Presentation engages with the content.

Uses academic research skills to present current, credible, accurate and authoritative data/information. Uses RMIT Harvard referencing style and in text citations with some errors.

Provides a logical structure and applies academic standards.

(2 marks)

Main ideas are outlined. PPT and discussion organised but require more description or explanation. Some logical order in the structure but there is limited linking between ideas and information.

Academic research skills not well presented in the use of current, credible, accurate and authoritative data/information. The use of RMIT Harvard referencing style and in text citations is limited.

Provides a logical structure and applies academic standards.

(1 mark)

Main ideas not clearly defined. Information randomly presented. No sense of cohesion between ideas. Inappropriate structure and organisation and information not always coherent nor integrated.

The required articles and resources are not properly cited and referenced.

The presentation is not well organised and does not apply good academic standards.

(0 marks)

The presentation is unclear and/or off topic. Information is randomly presented. No sense of cohesion between ideas. Information is not coherent nor integrated.

The required articles and resources are not cited and referenced.

The presentation is poorly organised and communicated, and/or does not engage with the topic and/or does not apply good academic standards.

(10/20 marks)

Evaluate + Reflect

Ability to apply different perspectives and arguments to your own job experiences or future job expectations

CLOs: 1, 3

(8-10 marks)

Information selected relates strongly to the purpose of the task and meets the academic standard required. Clarified type of occupation they wanted to pursue and provided a strong reflection on the arguments and evidence presented in the readings and resource materials including micro credential.

Provides insightful reflection on the readings and how changes in the world of work may impact on their future occupation and career.

(7.9-7 marks)

Information selected relates to the purpose of the task and meets the academic standard required. Clarified type of occupation they wanted to pursue and provided a reflection on the arguments and evidence presented in the readings and resource materials including micro credential.

Provides reflection on the readings and how changes in the world of work may impact on their future occupation and career.

(6.9-6 marks)

Information selected generally relates to the purpose of the task and meets the academic standard required. Outlined their chosen occupation and provided some reflection on the arguments and evidence presented in the readings and resource materials including micro credential.

Some reflection on the readings and how changes in the world of work may impact on their future occupation and career.

(5.9-5 marks)

Information selected generally relates to the purpose of the task but may not fully meet the academic standard required. Identified a chosen occupation but reflection on the arguments and evidence presented in the readings and resource materials including micro credential is limited.

Limited reflection on the readings and how changes in the world of work may impact on their future occupation and career.

(0-4.9 marks)

Information selected has a connection to their chosen occupation but does not meet the academic standard required and/or does not demonstrate engagement with the readings and other resources including micro credential.

Evidence of chosen occupation is presented but no attempt at reflection on the readings and other resources is eviden