Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Rogerian speech example

17/03/2021 Client: saad24vbs Deadline: 2 Day

This lesson introduces and explains the Rogerian strategy for writing essays, one

which attempts to persuade while stressing understanding and common ground. We often

think of debates in terms of pros and cons or like a court trial that emphasizes the

competition of two sides in the presentation of their arguments. The classical and Toulmin

argumentation strategies typically seek to win a debate through the presentation of a

persuasive argument.

However, many issues do not have a clear right or wrong side to them. Even if they

do, persuading an audience on the other side is difficult if not impossible if their side is

presented as the wrong one. Imagine, for instance, two spouses debating where to go for a

vacation. There is no right or wrong choice, and depicting one side or the other as such will

not be a very effective way to persuade the other spouse.

In 1951, Carl Rogers, a psychologist, put forth the theory that the primary reason

people had difficulty in resolving disputes is that the people were constantly evaluating each

other. The more deeply-held or emotional a belief, the more a person would be seeking to

judge and discredit another person's opposing statements, the result being a failure to truly

hear or understand those statements. Roger proposed as the solution first to try to

understand the other side and then to negotiate together to reach a consensus.

The Rogerian strategy of argumentation does not seek to win a debate but instead

seeks to find a win-win outcome. The purpose of Rogerian argumentation is to use common

ground to reach a consensus. Essentially, the Rogerian strategy is not arguing in support of

one side of an issue but acting as a mediator between two sides, seeking to negotiate to

find a common ground acceptable to both.

The Rogerian strategy is most effective for those issues that are highly emotional,

including many social and political problems, such as capital punishment, abortion, torture,

and many more. Such issues have few simple solutions to them, and asserting or implying

that the solution or answer is clear or obvious will actually make the argument seem biased

and less persuasive. Generally, people do not want to be told that a value or belief they hold

dear is just plain wrong.

The Rogerian strategy seeks to lessen the threatening aspect of the argument by

emphasizing the value of the opposition's side and motivations. People tend to respond

similarly to how they are treated, so if an argument doesn't seem to be attacking the other

side, the readers on the other side are less likely to be as critical in their attack on the

argument they are reading. The Rogerian strategy encourages the audience to be more open

to the argument being made because the writer has already demonstrated openness and

respect for the arguments on the other side of the issue.

The very idea that everyone is entitled to his or her own opinion demonstrates the

need for Rogerian strategies of argumentation. The Rogerian strategy forces the writer to

consider the possibility that his or her side may not be absolutely right. In other words,

knowing that the argument is only the writer's opinion, the writer asserts that this opinion is

a right one to have on the matter, if not the only right one, and seeks to persuade the

audience also to accept the possibility that the writer's opinion is a right one, if not the only

right one. The following sections will help you better understand the process of creating a

Rogerian argument.

Organization

The Rogerian strategy assumes that the audience will be highly critical if not outright

hostile to the argument being presented. Readers with differing opinions from what they are

reading tend to be contentious, immediately challenging each and every assertion that they

find objectionable. Of course, readers should be critical in this way, but they should also be

open to the possibility of changing their minds.

The Rogerian strategy seeks to lead the reader gently to the conclusion of the

argument. Thus, the thesis is typically not explicitly stated in the introduction paragraph

where the reader might see it and immediately become defensive while reading the

following paragraphs. Instead, the Rogerian strategy begins objectively by stating the

problem and then appeals to the audience further by showing the benefits of the opposing

side. Only then are the reasons in support of the argument described, but before the

audience can become defensive, the common ground and higher interest that benefit both

sides are emphasized.

The Rogerian strategy will typically follow this pattern:

1.􀀃 Describe the problem

2.􀀃 Show understanding and value of opposing views

3.􀀃 Assert position

4.􀀃 Demonstrate common ground or higher interest

For example, look at the table below. This illustrates a discussion between two spouses

deciding where to go on vacation. One spouse seeks to persuade the other that Galveston is

a better vacation destination than Denver. The Rogerian argument might be organized like

this:

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Professor Smith
Maths Master
Professional Coursework Help
Study Master
Custom Coursework Service
Quality Homework Helper
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Professor Smith

ONLINE

Professor Smith

Hello, I an ranked top 10 freelancers in academic and contents writing. I can write and updated your personal statement with great quality and free of plagiarism

$19 Chat With Writer
Maths Master

ONLINE

Maths Master

I am known as Unrivaled Quality, Written to Standard, providing Plagiarism-free woork, and Always on Time

$19 Chat With Writer
Professional Coursework Help

ONLINE

Professional Coursework Help

I have read your project details. I can do this within your deadline.

$23 Chat With Writer
Study Master

ONLINE

Study Master

I have read your project details. I can do this within your deadline.

$16 Chat With Writer
Custom Coursework Service

ONLINE

Custom Coursework Service

I will cover all the points which you have mentioned in your project details.

$24 Chat With Writer
Quality Homework Helper

ONLINE

Quality Homework Helper

I will cover all the points which you have mentioned in your project details.

$21 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

Activities of anti progressives - Advanced diploma of conveyancing nsw - Mybiz lab - Your investment club has only two stocks in its portfolio - Lockwood assa abloy 334b45 - Prudential optimum return with profits - Trends & issues in executive management for health care administrators - Beth r jordan lives at 2322 - Omicron test universe tutorial - Sc1040 week 1 assignment worksheet - Supply chain challenges at leapfrog case study - Probability statistical inference hogg pdf - Ponytail palm freeze damage - Verse using short long crossword - Heritage assessment tool definition - Forest hill uct residence - First hand data and second hand data - 1 in a centralized organization decision making authority is - Chattanooga ice cream case study - Ethical decision making paper - Test for carbohydrates lab report conclusion - How many walnuts per pound - Trimyristin extraction from nutmeg lab - Vocabulary - Star ocean till the end of time norton password - Research Capstone - Withdraw without academic penalty uts - Org and beha - Iron iii chloride and potassium thiocyanate equilibrium - Diego velazquez surrender of breda analysis - Measurement diagram for sewing - Freak the mighty chapter 16 summary - Social group analysis paper - Can informatics be used to gain wisdom - Heart of darkness heads on sticks - Are psychopaths more likely to exhibit criminal behavior - Divinely inspired moral law - Teratogens are _____ that can cause birth defects - Calvary bereavement counselling service - Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition meaning - Jennifer blackwell dentist padbury - Multiple choice questions on interpersonal communication - Cons of lowering the drinking age - Research article - Hum2210 - Narrative essay - Accu chek performa e 4 - Starbucks loyalty reigns case study - Empowering leadership and effective collaboration in geographically dispersed teams - Capstone component 1 executive summary - Four types of action queries used in database - Water rocket launcher designs - Why is grant writing underutilized in criminal justice - 4.1 compute gross profit for april - A1 page size powerpoint - Isotopic abundance practice problems with answers - Week 4 discussion cloud computing - Fill the room with some juice - Oracle public cloud appliance - One page - Which of the following could be possible vector directions - Planet fitness swot analysis - Net Neutrality Discussion Board - Discussion on visualizations/infographics - Hw - Validating node self description database riverbed - How to write a media essay on representation - Difference between profession and occupation example - 2016 vcaa specialist exam 1 - How to do a speech outline - H2o extreme water sports - Bricklaying method statement free download - Crude mortality rate - Empowering leadership and effective collaboration - Greg doucette cookbook 2.0 - As the elevator approaches its destination - CV writing services Dubai - How to improve sentence fluency - Quinonoid theory of acid base indicator - Communicable disease article hcs 457 - How many isomeric forms can chloroethylene c2h3cl have - Saibt student portal login - He paid the debt lyrics paul williams - St johns rowlands castle - Martin luther king jr cause and effect essay - Selby district council planning - Alex and eve full movie download - Inca survey - Colemans stockfeeds charters towers - Northwestern states pharmacy conference 2019 - Turner 2011 social work treatment - 6.1 - Backpack simulation - Engineering - English Composition II - Sigma marketing case study - 2021 weekly tax tables - Government communications plan template - Best buys in shanghai china - Calculate protein concentration using extinction coefficient