Salmon v atkinson case brief

Need help with my Business Law question - I’m studying for my class.

Need a case brief done on "Salmon v. Atkinson" and make the case brief look like the example on the sample I sent.Case Brief STUDENT NAME Introduction to Law and the Legal System POL-123-CL03 Instructor: Beth Vivaldi Case Brief Case Title and Citation People v. Shaughnessy 319 N.Y.S. 2D 626 District Court, Nassua County, Third District March 16, 1971 Procedural History The defendant motioned for a mistrial on the grounds that the statute she was arrested under is unconstitutional. Since the court would find the statute Malum Prohibitum, Actus Reus was used as a basis for dismissal. Facts The defendant was a backseat passenger of a vehicle that was stopped by a watchman after proceeding onto the private property of the St. Ignatius Retreat Home. The defendant was under the understanding that the driver of the vehicle was headed for Christopher Morely Park, not the Retreat Home. The defendant was charged with trespassing on private property of the Incorporated Village of North Hills. The defendant motioned for a dismissal stating the statute she was arrested under is unconstitutional. The court decided the ordinance Malum Prohibitum and pursued Actus Reus as a basis for dismissal. The court ruled the defendant not guilty due to the inability to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendant committed an overt voluntary act or omission to act. Issue Can the defendant be found guilty of a criminal offense if the court can not establish the four basic criminal offense components beyond a reasonable doubt? Ruling and Reasoning District Court Judge Lockman ruled in favor of the defendant and found her not guilty of the criminal offense.