Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Sambeh

08/10/2020 Client: sarahhitz Deadline: 10 Days

 


In this assignment, you will review the interactive Upper Respiratory Case Study patient scenario and analyze the data to determine the health status of the patient. You will need a minimum of two evidence-based practice articles to include clinical practice guidelines, as well as the course textbook.



All papers must conform to the most recent APA standards.


RUBRIC:


 


Clinical Case Study Rubric


Note: Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.


Clinical Case Study Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary

Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced

Meets ExpectationsIntermediate

Needs ImprovementNovice

InadequateTotal PointsContent of Clinical Case StudyThe writer demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the case study subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner. The case study content and theories are well developed and linked to the course content, assignment requirements, and practical experience. The case study includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the assignment.


Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.


all instruction requirements noted


30 pointsThe writer demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter, and the components of the case study are accurately represented with evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role content. Course materials and scholarly resources are present to support required concepts. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the case study.


Cites two references.


Most instruction requirements are noted.


26 pointsThe writer demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter. as evidenced by components of the case study and use of evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development. Course content is present but missing depth and or development.


Cites one reference.


23 pointsAbsent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development.


Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.


Significant content of case study is vague, inaccurately portrayed, or missing.


No references cited.


Submits assignment late.


20 points30Analysis and Synthesis of Case Study Content and Meaning with Content Related to Preventative GuidelinesThrough critical analysis, the submitted case study provides an accurate, clear, concise, and complete summary of the scenario.


Information from scholarly resources is synthesized, providing new information or insight related to the context of the assignment by providing both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints


Includes all major and minor relevant risk factors based on standard preventative guidelines for age and gender and treatment/follow-up plans.


all instruction requirements noted.


30 pointsCase study is complete, providing evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources.


Information is synthesized to help fulfill the case study requirements. The content supports at least one viewpoint.


Submission provides clarification of the assignment by correctly answering all posed questions within the instructions.


Includes all major risk factors and most minor relevant risk factors based on standard preventative guidelines for age and gender (i.e.’ to two minor risk factors are missing and/or one incorrect treatment plan).


Most instruction requirements are noted.


26 pointsLacks clarification or new information. Scholarly reference supports the content without adding any new information or insight. Case study content may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete.


Risk factors are partially complete (i.e., missing one to two major risk factors or three to four minor risk factors, or two incorrect treatment plans).


Missing some instruction requirements.


23 pointsSubmission is primarily a summation of the assignment without further synthesis of course content or analysis of the scenario.


Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.


Multiple risk factors missing (e.g., three major risk or five to six minor risk factors or three incorrect treatment plans, or four or more major risk factors or seven or more minor risk factors or four or more incorrect treatment plans).


Scholarly reference(s) are incorrect or inappropriate for the topic case.


Missing several instruction requirements.


Submits assignment late.


20 points30Application of Knowledge To Clinical Aspect of Patient EncounterThe summary of the case study provides validated information via scholarly resources that offer a multidisciplinary approach to the scenario provided.


The student’s application in practice is accurate and plausible, and additional scholarly resources supporting the application are provided.


all questions posed within the assignment are answered correctly in a well-developed manner, applying knowledge with citations for validation.


Includes all relevant subjective and objective data; diagnostic testing; routine care to be provided; patient education; anticipatory guidance; review of previous diagnostics; and follow-up of acute concern and chronic health issues, etc.—based on assignment instructions.


all instruction requirements noted.


30 pointsA summary of the study, findings, and knowledge gained from the assignment is presented.


Student indicates how the information will be used within their professional practice.


all questions posed by the study are answered correctly.


Includes most of the routine content (subjective and objective data; diagnostic testing; routine care to be provided; education; anticipatory guidance; review of previous diagnostics; and follow-up) (is missing two minor details or one major detail).


Most instruction requirements are noted.


26 pointsComponents of the case study are summarized with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development, thus presenting a more superficial analysis of content between the assignment and the broader course content. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and or development.


Student’s explanation of how the information will be used within their professional practice is vague or incomplete.


One of the questions posed is not answered and/or one of the questions is answered incorrectly.


Includes some of the routine content (subjective and objective data; diagnostic testing; routine care to be provided; education; anticipatory guidance; review of previous diagnostics; and follow-up) (is missing three minor details or two major details).


Cited one reference.


Missing some instruction requirements.


23 pointsAbsent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.


Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.


Content of case study is inaccurately portrayed or missing.


Student’s explanation of how the information will be used within their professional practice is not feasible or appropriate, or student fails to explain how the information will be used within their personal practice.


Omits routine content (subjective and objective data; diagnostic testing; routine care to be provided; education; anticipatory guidance; review of previous diagnostics; and follow-up) (is missing four to five minor details or three major details or six or more minor details or four or more major details.


Two or more questions are not answered and/or are answered incorrectly.


No references cited.


Missing several instruction requirements.


Submits post late.


20 points30OrganizationWell-organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument. Writing is concise, with a logical flow of ideas.


5 pointsOrganized content with an informative purpose statement, supportive content, and summary statement. Argument content is developed, with minimal issues in content flow.


4 pointsPoor organization and flow of ideas distract from content. Narrative is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work.


Purpose statement is noted.


3 pointsIllogical flow of ideas. Prose rambles. Purpose statement is unclear or missing.


Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.


No purpose statement.


Submits assignment late.


2 points5APA, Grammar, and SpellingCorrect APA formatting with no errors.


The writer correctly identifies reading audience, as demonstrated by appropriate language (avoids jargon and simplifies complex concepts appropriately).


Writing is concise, in active voice, and avoids awkward transitions and overuse of conjunctions.


There are no spelling, punctuation, or word-usage errors.


5 pointsCorrect and consistent APA formatting of references and cites all references used.


No more than two unique APA errors.


The writer demonstrates correct usage of formal English language in sentence construction. Variation in sentence structure and word usage promotes readability.


There are minimal to no grammar, punctuation, or word-usage errors.


4 pointsThree to four unique APA formatting errors.


The writer occasionally uses awkward sentence construction or overuses/inappropriately uses complex sentence structure. Problems with word usage (evidence of incorrect use of thesaurus) and punctuation persist, often causing some difficulties with grammar. Some words, transitional phrases, and conjunctions are overused.


Multiple grammar, punctuation, or word usage errors.


3 pointsFive or more unique formatting errors, or no attempt to format in APA.


The writer demonstrates limited understanding of formal written language use; writing is colloquial (conforms to spoken language).


The writer struggles with limited vocabulary and has difficulty conveying meaning such that only the broadest, most general messages are presented.


Grammar and punctuation are consistently incorrect. Spelling errors are numerous.


2 points5Total Points100 

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Essay Writing Help
Top Grade Essay
Top Writing Guru
Online Assignment Help
Instant Assignments
Financial Hub
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Essay Writing Help

ONLINE

Essay Writing Help

I am a qualified and experienced Writer, Researcher, Tutor, analyst and Consultant. I hold MBA (Strategic Management) (Finance and Marketing) & CPA.K (Accounting and Finance.)

$232 Chat With Writer
Top Grade Essay

ONLINE

Top Grade Essay

Working on this platform from a couple of time with exposure of dynamic writing skills gathered with years experience on different other websites.

$232 Chat With Writer
Top Writing Guru

ONLINE

Top Writing Guru

I am an Academic writer with 10 years of experience. As an Academic writer, my aim is to generate unique content without Plagiarism as per the client’s requirements.

$230 Chat With Writer
Online Assignment Help

ONLINE

Online Assignment Help

Hi dear, I am ready to do your homework in a reasonable price.

$225 Chat With Writer
Instant Assignments

ONLINE

Instant Assignments

Good day dear client, I am a full-time freelance writer with years of experience. My strongest strengths are strong dedication to duty, reliability, quality and excellence. I am going to do an outstanding job for you, kindly PM me and let us commence. Thank you so much in anticipation of your positive response. Thank you very much.

$225 Chat With Writer
Financial Hub

ONLINE

Financial Hub

Hey, I have gone through your job posting and become very much interested in working with you.I can deliver professional content as per your requirements. I am a multi-skilled person with sound proficiency in the English language for being a native writer who worked on several similar projects of content writing and can deliver quality content to tight deadlines. I am available for both online and offline writing jobs with the promise of offering an incredibly responsive and supreme level of customer service. Thanks!

$225 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

561 week 7 - Essay - 31 gresham street ec2v 7qa - Payment transfer receipt commonwealth bank - What is the difference between a need and a want? How do marketers create wants? Provide several examples. - Exponential functions multiple choice questions - Teacher standards evidence 2014 - Xxio non conforming drivers - Salah is the coolness of my eyes hadith - Sex offender register nsw - Introduction to sociology seagull 10th edition pdf - Obedience to society's rules crossword clue - Big data means big potential challenges for nurse execs - How to do a quantitative research critique - What happens to plant cells in distilled water - Sports illustrated media kit demographics - Reba worksheet excel - Kingsgate student lock in - Simpson cast in place anchors - How many protons and neutrons does aluminum have - Balance Sheet Analysis and Recommendation - Dom mazzetti workout routine - Order 2621613: Rogerian Argument - Cheap seating area in a theatre crossword - Baby sitters club books pdf - Assignment-10 - Information systems infrastructure evolution and trends articles - 1 2 4 8 16 sequence name - How to calculate isbn 10 check digit - Information System - College bursar job description - Purple heart patricia mccormick sparknotes - Habits of grace growing in christ david mathis - Power point - Pageruler broad range unstained protein ladder - Schroders real return fund - Any five parts of computer - 5.1 Please write a Devotional Reflection on Diversity - Excel chapter 9 grader project school of information sciences - Module 1_DisasterRecovery - Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining - Duties of a class captain - NURS 6003/NURS 6003A/NURS 6003F/NRSE 6003C/NURS 6003N/NURS 6003C: Transition to Graduate Study for Nursing - Lionel wynter - Salvadore inc., a local retailer, has provided the following data for the month of september: - L need 4000 words on Aerodynamics report - Silly putty experiment write up - Man4723 - Iinet net au voipsetup - Week 5 Project: Program or Policy Initiation Plan - Spo model - a case of ethical concern related to technology - Devin in the lab height - Jack hayford new wife valerie lemire - Abp a4 70 bolt - Www leedsth nhs cancellations - Monash uni library online - Reasoning that sounds plausible but is flawed - Uniform gradient present worth excel - 1.7777 as a fraction - Keithrn - Hackman and oldham 1974 - The hard side of change management - C# catch multiple exception types - Informative speech on how to change your car oil - NEED THIS ASSIGNMENT DONE ASAP!!!! - Houhreviews birmingham gov uk - Coca cola vs pepsi financial analysis - Skyward family access edmonds - Structured External Assignment 2 - Imbree v mcneilly case summary - Gopro be a hero marketing campaign - Texting and driving persuasive speech examples - Music Article Analysis Prompt - Words with the root pend - Graduate Education Help - Discussion - When adding a randomly chosen new stock - Hotel Paris - The least used communication channel in an organization is usually - Brave new world questions - Explain the technical technique for forecasting exchange rates - Elements of a research study - Example of a rationale - Australia 1900 living conditions - Polypipe dial room thermostat pbrs manual - Ice vending machine australia - Strayer eco 550 assignment 1 - City of arlington citation - Capital project fund journal entries examples - TWO PAGES ESSAY - Ucl accommodation portal login - Importance of matching concept in accounting - Exam Africana Studies - Coke vs pepsi case study analysis - Sea of monsters comprehension questions - Paper doll a view from the bridge - Week 3: The onset of data analysis - Iso 9001 2015 management review example pdf - Requirement collection and analysis in database design