Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Sample irb application completed walden university

08/01/2021 Client: saad24vbs Deadline: 10 Days

ETHICS SELF-CHECK APPLICATION FOR IRB APPROVAL


INSTRUCTIONS:


Section 1: The researcher must complete the brown column A of the table below to document how the research procedures comply with the university’s 40 ethical standards. Mark “Not Applicable” only when there is no possible way to address that ethical issue.


Section 2: Attach enclosures as indicated in section II (yellow section).


Section 3: Provide electronic signature.


Section 4 (students only): Have your faculty supervisor review the entire form and then provide an electronic signature.


IRB approval will be issued when the IRB confirms that there is adequate evidence that the university’s ethical standards have been met, based on this form and the attachments listed in Section II of this form. Within 10 business days of receiving a researcher’s submission, the IRB will notify the researcher of one of the following outcomes:


(a) that the IRB has provided ethics approval based on the submitted documents; or


(b) that the IRB requires revisions and/or additional documentation (will be specified in Column B).


Questions can be sent to IRB@waldenu.edu . Click here to view IRB policies, forms, samples, and FAQs about conducting research in specialized contexts such as international, educational, or clinical/intervention settings.


The remaining questions only apply to studies that involve recruiting participants to collect new data.


14. Is participant recruitment coordinated in a manner that is non-coercive[endnoteRef:1]? Describe. Coercive elements include: leveraging an existing relationship to “encourage” participation, recruiting in a group[endnoteRef:2] setting, extravagant compensation, recruiting individuals in a school/work[endnoteRef:3] setting, involving a service/aid provider[endnoteRef:4] in the recruitment process, etc. A researcher must disclose here whether/how the researcher may already be known to the participants and explain how perceptions of coerced research participation will be minimized[endnoteRef:5]. [1: For example, anonymous surveys and/or low-pressure communications such as email invitations permit potential participants to opt out with minimal fear of retaliation or other negative consequences.] [2: It is not ethically acceptable to invite a “captive audience” to participate in research on the spot (i.e., to ask an entire class or a group of meeting attendees to complete a survey during their session). Such a dynamic would not provide sufficient privacy or respect for their right to decline research participation. However, a researcher may use the last few minutes of a class session or meeting to introduce a study and distribute materials, such that the potential participants can then take their time to decide later about participation. ] [3: Generally, data collection cannot be approved during work hours or school hours unless a “free period” has been identified (e.g., lunch, study hall) so the research activities can be separated from the participants’ regular activities. It is important to maintain an “opt in” dynamic rather than implying that employees/students/group members are expected to participate.] [4: A researcher can ask a service provider (nurse, physician, therapist, etc.) or an aid provider (shelter staff) to give research invitations to clients who meet the inclusion criteria. However, we cannot approve for the service/aid provider to answer questions about the study, obtain consent, or collect data (unless the data is being collected by the organization itself for purposes other than the study).] [5: Doctoral research directly benefits the student (allowing him or her to obtain a degree), and so the researcher should minimize the potential for either (a) conflict of interest or (b) perceived coercion to participate. Researchers who are in positions of authority or familiarity must take extra precautions to ensure that potential participants are not pressured to take part in their study. Examples: -a professor researcher may recruit her students AFTER grades have been assigned -a psychologist researcher may recruit clients from ANOTHER psychologist’s practice -a manager researcher may conduct ANONYMOUS data collection so that subordinates do not perceive their responses or [non]participation as being associated with their job standing]


15. If vulnerable[endnoteRef:6] individuals will be specifically sought out as participants, is such targeted recruitment justified[endnoteRef:7] by a research design that will specifically benefit that vulnerable group at large? Describe why. To specifically recruit vulnerable individuals as participants, the researcher will need to submit Form D for Non-expeditable Studies in addition to this self-check. [6: Vulnerable participants include students, patients, the researcher’s subordinates, children, prisoners, residents of any facility, mentally/emotionally disabled individuals, crisis victims, or anyone else who might feel undue pressure to participate in the study or be in any way limited in protecting their own best interests. Pregnant women (and their unborn children) are only considered a vulnerable population when a study involves physically risky data collection.] [7: Targeted recruitment of children as participants can only be approved when a majority of the IRB votes that the study’s benefits justify its risks/costs (such as disruption to instructional time). For recruitment of adult vulnerable populations, IRB staff will determine on a case-by-case basis whether approval must be issued via the full board’s vote (as opposed to expedited ethics review).]


16. If vulnerable[endnoteRef:8] adults might happen to be included (without the researcher’s knowledge), would their inclusion be justified[endnoteRef:9]? Describe why. [8: It is ethically acceptable to unknowingly include certain vulnerable adult populations if screening for that particular status would be overly invasive, given the research topic: for example, a researcher might unknowingly have participants who happen to be pregnant, residents of a facility, mentally/emotionally disabled, victims of a crisis, or elderly. We don’t expect researchers to screen for these statuses routinely for minimal risk research. However, minors may never be unknowingly recruited; adult recruitment procedures must deliberately avoid recruiting minors and/or include a reliable way of discerning that participants are 18 or older.] [9: Usually, studies possibly involving unknowing inclusion of vulnerable adults are still eligible for expedited ethics review.]


17. If anyone would be excluded from participating, is their exclusion justified? Is their exclusion handled respectfully and without stigma[endnoteRef:10]? Describe. [10: When applicable, the exclusion criteria should be listed on the recruitment material (flyer, invitation email,etc.) or consent form to prevent situations in which the researcher rejects volunteers in a stigmatizing manner.]


18. If the research procedures might reveal criminal activity or child/elder abuse that necessitates[endnoteRef:11] reporting, are there suitable procedures in place for managing this? Describe. [11: Any limits to confidentiality (i.e., duty to report) must be mentioned in the consent form.]


19. If the research procedures might reveal or create an acute psychological state that necessitates referral, are there suitable procedures in place to manage this? Describe.


20. If the research design has multiple groups, are measures in place to ensure that all participants can potentially benefit equally[endnoteRef:12] from the research? Describe how. [12: Control groups must be eligible to partake in the intervention after the study, if results show the intervention to be beneficial. If the design does not involve a control group, then the researcher only needs to ensure that all participants have equal access to the study results.]


21. Applicable for student researchers: Will this researcher be appropriately qualified[endnoteRef:13] and supervised[endnoteRef:14] in all data collection procedures? Describe how. [13: Researchers must be able to document their training in the data collection techniques and the IRB might require the researcher to obtain additional training prior to ethics approval. For most student researchers, the research course sequence is sufficient but some research procedures (such as interviewing people with mental disabilities) may require additional training. For psychological assessments, the manual indicates specific qualifications required. Data collection from children requires a background check/clearance through a local agency.] [14: Remote supervision is suitable for most studies but onsite supervision may be required for certain types of sensitive data collection (e.g., interviews or assessment regarding emotional topics).]


22. If an existing survey or other data collection tool will be used, has the researcher appropriately complied with the requirements[endnoteRef:15] for legal usage? Describe how. [15: READ THIS IF YOU ARE USING A PUBLISHED INSTRUMENT: Many assessment instruments published in journals can be used in research as long as commercial gain is not sought and proper credit is given to the original source (United States Code, 17USC107). However, publication of an assessment tool’s results in a journal does not necessarily indicate that the tool is in the public domain. The copyright holder of each assessment determines whether permission and payment are necessary for use of that assessment tool. Note that the copyright holder could be either the publisher or the author or another entity (such as the Myers and Briggs Foundation, which holds the copyright to the popular Myers-Briggs personality assessment). The researcher is responsible for identifying and contacting the copyright holder to determine which of the following are required for legal usage of the instrument: purchasing legal copies, purchasing a manual, purchasing scoring tools, obtaining written permission, obtaining explicit permission to reproduce the instrument in the dissertation, or simply confirming that the tool is public domain. Even for public domain instruments, Walden University requires students to provide the professional courtesy of notifying the primary author of your plan to use that tool in their own research. Sometimes this is not possible, but at least three attempts should be made to contact the author at his or her most recently listed institution across a reasonable time period (such as 2 weeks). The author typically provides helpful updates or usage tips and asks to receive a copy of the results. This type of communication with the author is not necessary when a website or publisher clearly states that the tool is publicly domain. Many psychological assessments are restricted for use only by suitably qualified individuals. When in doubt, researchers must check with the test’s publisher to make sure that they are qualified to administer and interpret any particular assessments that they wish to use. READ THIS IF YOU ARE CREATING YOUR OWN INSTRUMENT OR MODIFYING AN EXISTING INSTRUMENT: It is not acceptable to modify assessment tools without explicitly citing the original work and detailing the precise nature of the revisions. Note that even slight modifications to items or instructions threaten the reliability and validity of the tool and make comparisons to other research findings difficult, if not impossible. Therefore, unless a purpose of the study is to compare the validity and reliability of a revised measure with that of one that has already been validated, changes should not be made to existing measures. ]

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Helping Hand
Top Essay Tutor
University Coursework Help
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Helping Hand

ONLINE

Helping Hand

I am an Academic writer with 10 years of experience. As an Academic writer, my aim is to generate unique content without Plagiarism as per the client’s requirements.

$80 Chat With Writer
Top Essay Tutor

ONLINE

Top Essay Tutor

I have more than 12 years of experience in managing online classes, exams, and quizzes on different websites like; Connect, McGraw-Hill, and Blackboard. I always provide a guarantee to my clients for their grades.

$85 Chat With Writer
University Coursework Help

ONLINE

University Coursework Help

Hi dear, I am ready to do your homework in a reasonable price.

$82 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

English stage 6 prescriptions - Volumetric analysis lab report - Country of origin codes - Ktea 3 subtest descriptions - Leadership in Healthcare Organization W5 Project - Dr eben alexander malpractice - Conduct a value chain analysis of the walt disney co - Porter generic strategies 1980 - Business financial Plan - 6is of e marketing - Convert amps to wattage - Skinpen by bellus medical for sale - Sas an error occurred executing the workspace job - The cherokee removal a brief history with documents summary - Greek root ast meaning - For prof avril - Erosion and deposition worksheet - How to write reflection 3 for english sba - Orthodontic instruments study guide - Nanda nursing diagnosis 2017 - Deflection formula for point load - Ideal logic service mode - Case 3 walmart manages ethics and compliance challenges answers - What is the primary purpose of job specialization - Bu ke qi in mandarin pronunciation - 12 major olympian gods - Co nh3 6 cl3 - Fully defined sketch solidworks - Norman maccaig poems annotated - Lizard evolution virtual lab answer key - Article Summary for The secret sauce of SaaS by Wayne Morris - The persian king who regularized tax levies - Prayer for end of term - Greek theater evolved out of - The musketeers season 2 episode guide - Christian Studies - How to Get Assignment Help - ACCOUNTING - Lay my burden down meaning - Access module 1 sam textbook project - 4-5 page assignment - Why do crickets chirp more at higher temperatures - Discharged for off duty behavior case study - Week 8 discussion - Future of Nursing - Integer n frequency synthesizer - Discussion Questions - Reply to discussion- Nicole - I Need 2 to 3 pages on Business name - Access to cashier secondlife com was denied - World Lit II Test 2 - Investment Portfolio Management Assignment - Coles kellyville plaza - Apply marketing lemonade part 1 - Shannon weaver model of communication - Yc open university courses - Networker 9.1 admin guide - Cisco collaboration design guide - Does marketing create or satisfy needs pdf - Imperial pharmacology entry requirements - Literary Analysis - Discussion 6 - Accelerate learning math connections answers - Roots of complex numbers de moivre's theorem - Bathe in reeking wounds - Vic police air wing scanner - Grade boundaries for a level psychology - Java slot machine source code - 20 1 dilution ratio - Modeling a plate boundary investigation 9 answers - Airbnb case study harvard pdf - Short Essay - Dissertation Literature Outline - What does thane of cawdor mean - Lean manufacturing tools (process planning) - Identify the expanded accounting equation from the options below - Ucl reading list english - What is a flax dam - Ethical considerations when prescribing for friends and family - Assignment: Ethics in Accounting - Guests of the sheik pdf - Sleek writers - Brian samples missing dublin ga - Midterm Exam - The Law & Ethics of IA (Grduate Level) - Project l has the following cash flows, and its cost of capital is 10%. what is l's mirr? - Healthcare Economic Week 4 Discussion - Beast of buckingham palace kmart - Why being a thinker means pocketing your smartphone - Capstone project milestone 2 design for change proposal guidelines - Discussion Response wk 4 - Separation of the components of a mixture lab report - What to do with a history degree besides teach - Followers insight checkpoint required - Help with essay - Given the following continuous-time system in s-domain with a unit-step input signal: - Persuasive speech conclusion example - On seeing england for the first time thesis - Multisim 14.0 - Penn foster microsoft excel graded project formulas - Assignment: Concept Analysis