Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Scientific merit example

30/12/2020 Client: saad24vbs Deadline: 10 Days

SCIENTIFIC MERIT


INTRODUCTION Scientific merit is the degree of quality of a research study. When the scientific merit of a research study is high, this means that the research has contributed valuable, meaningful, and valid information to a scientific discipline. This presentation will explain the basic components of scientific merit so that you so that you can evaluate the work of others as well as your own.


WHAT IS SCIENTIFIC MERIT There are three dimensions to scientific merit, and each will be discussed in turn. The three dimensions include advancing the current knowledge base, contributing to theory, and meeting the hallmarks of good research.


ADVANCE KNOWLEDGE BASE The first requirement for research to have scientific merit, is that is must advance the knowledge base in the field of study. That is to say that for us to value the research, it must contribute new knowledge to one's discipline, such as psychology. In order to determine whether research advances the knowledge base, we should ask, "Does the study address something that is not known or has not been studied before?" If the study only replicates previous findings, then it does not advance the knowledge base. In order to know whether or not research addresses something that has been studied before, you need to read and have an understanding of the literature, meaning the primary research articles on the topic. Knowledge represented in a literature review tells us what IS known. Once we understand what IS known, then we are in a position to see what is NOT known. The gap in the literature is also called the research problem. Research that is published in journal articles will present a pertinent literature review in the Introduction section of the article so that the reader can understand the current knowledge in the field.


We should also ask, "How does the research study make new contributions to the empirical knowledge base about the specific topic?" The manner in which information is gained in order for it to contribute to the knowledge base is important. Research in psychology must be empirical, which means the data collected is based upon observations that can be made and measured by anyone under the same conditions. We should also ask, "How is the research study extending the information to what is known in the literature already?" That is, we need to know how the research study connects to, relates to, or fits in, with other research findings. By extending information, we increase our depth of understanding about a phenomenon.


To evaluate how well the research advances the knowledge base, we might ask questions in layman's terms such as: So what? Why is this research important? Who cares? Seriously, who is interested in the results of the study? Who is the intended audience, and how might they use the results? What change or new understanding do the findings bring? What does this study offer that is new and fresh? As an analogy, think of research findings as individual pieces of a jigsaw puzzle, how and where will this research finding—this piece—fit in? Will it help bridge a large gap, a small one? Is it a piece that will pull together several areas of the


puzzle? Is it a piece that might go in a certain area of the puzzle, but not really connect to anything that's already there? As the French scientific philosopher Henri Poincare noted, "Science is facts; just as houses are made of stones, so is science made of facts; but a pile of stones is not a house and a collection of facts is not necessarily science." Therefore, part of understanding how well a research finding advances knowledge in the field depends on how it fits in with other findings.


CONTRIBUTION TO THEORY Theories are the foundation of a researcher's toolkit. Theories provide the theoretical framework that underlies research and organize the observations that have been made regarding a particular phenomenon. We all have theories. For example, you might have a theory about effective parenting. Whether you are a parent or not, you have made observations of people parenting their children, seen movies or TV shows of the same, heard about others' experience, and read books. If you are a parent, you have direct experience with parenting. As we make observations, we think about what is being observed. We organize our thoughts in such a way that beliefs, attitudes, and opinions are formed about phenomenon. These beliefs, attitudes and opinions that are formed from our thoughts about observations can be used to formulate theories about how and why things occur. Researchers use theories as the basis of their research studies; testing, advancing, extending, and even creating new theories that provide insight into a particular phenomenon.


The second dimension used to evaluate scientific merit is the degree to which the research contributes to theory. There are various ways in which research can do this. We might ask if the research provides evidence that generates a brand new theory. We might also ask, does the research finding refine or add to an existing theory? Theories are never perfect, and they are always open to verification. So we might also ask, does the research test to confirm or refute current theory? And last, we could ask, "Does the research expand theory by telling us something new about how it can be applies?" Some theories lend themselves well to practical applications, such as therapy or education. Research might contribute to theory by showing how the theory might be applied in a certain context.


HALLMARKS OF GOOD RESEARCH Like most other human endeavors, research can be well done, or poorly done. Obviously, research that is done well has more scientific merit than research that is done poorly. But how can we evaluate whether research is good? Simply put, research is good when it is based upon sound methodology. Specifically, we can look at whether the research meets certain hallmarks of good research. The first question is, "Can the study answer the research questions with the design and method proposed?" That is to say, the research Questions must address the research problem (the gap in the literature). Furthermore, the research questions must help solve the research problem. The methodology should logically follow the research questions. You might think of the research questions as a direct bridge between the research problem, the gap in the literature, and the actual research study.


The second question is, "Are the research questions aligned with the selection of the design, method, instruments/measures, and data analysis?" In other words, does everything match up? Do the research questions logically correspond to the design and method? Are the instruments used to collect the data appropriate to the methodology and design, and do the instruments generate data that can be used to answer the research questions? Is the data analysis appropriate? Will the data analysis give the researcher an answer to the research question? Notice that what makes research good is not the results that were generated by the study but how the study was conducted, more specifically the methodology, and how well the methodology answers the research questions, which in turn helps solve the research problem.


The third question asks, "Is the study ethically sound?" All research must meet the ethical standards put in place by a researcher's Institutional Review Board, or IRB, guidelines and regulation required by the American Psychological Association, and federal law. As part of your training as a Capella graduate student, you are required to undergo special training through the CITI program to help ensure you understand the ethical standards required when performing research. How is scientific merit related to ethics?


SCIENTIFIC MERIT AND ETHICS Besides the requirements regarding the ethical treatment of research participants, such as giving informed consent, there is the additional requirement that the research be scientifically valid. If research does not advance the knowledge base, does not contribute to theory, and does not meet the hallmark of utilizing sound scientific methodology, then it is unethical to do the research. Stated another way, it is unethical to do bad or unnecessary research. As Pilkington wrote in 2002, "If a study does not hold substantial promise of answering a significant question, thereby generating valuable knowledge, then there is no justification for exposing persons to the actual or potential risks and inconvenience of participation."

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Helping Hand
University Coursework Help
Top Essay Tutor
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Helping Hand

ONLINE

Helping Hand

I am an Academic writer with 10 years of experience. As an Academic writer, my aim is to generate unique content without Plagiarism as per the client’s requirements.

$100 Chat With Writer
University Coursework Help

ONLINE

University Coursework Help

Hi dear, I am ready to do your homework in a reasonable price.

$102 Chat With Writer
Top Essay Tutor

ONLINE

Top Essay Tutor

I have more than 12 years of experience in managing online classes, exams, and quizzes on different websites like; Connect, McGraw-Hill, and Blackboard. I always provide a guarantee to my clients for their grades.

$105 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

Aloe barberae root system - Fiesta spaghetti sauce 1kg price - Why do goldfish release dilute urine - Communication accommodation theory in the workplace - Helmholtz coil magnetic field derivation - WEEK 1 - The mysteries of harris burdick inferencing lesson - What part of the ship is the bow - Cloud computing business model ppt - Data Mining Paper with Analysis - Pp management - HR management - Course Project - $20.00 - Pure substances and mixtures multiple choice - Indirect connection to public sewer - Cedar hill capital partners - Capital Budgeting and Financial Analysis-Write annotated bibliography for two articles - 900 words - ORGANIC CHEMISTRY LAB REPORT (TYPED) : DETERMINING CAPILLARY TUBE MELTING POINTS - Earthquake stewart the owner of abc construction - Medical image analysis question - Is macconkey agar chemically defined - Is wd 40 liquid flammable - The compass of shame nathanson 1992 - Why are frankie and patricia in the hospital - Different types of context clues - Clement hall texas tech - Log book sample for internship - Simms minimec injector pump manual - Paper follow up - Volunteer task list template - Quotes in the giver - The educator's word frequency guide - Maximum muscle 9-week advanced training for gains pdf - Dna polymerase iii always adds nucleotides to the - Discussion #2 - Forum 3 Module 6 - Genogram projects - Http www mhhe com physsci chemistry essentialchemistry flash buffer12 swf - 16 hamilton terrace lamlash - Week 3 - It's like pulling teeth a case study in - Shadow health chest pain answers - Eric helms 5 day full body - Home health nurse differ from traditional nursing care in hospital setting - The time complexity of algorithms. - Cost to open jamba juice franchise - Imagonline - 3d plant cell model materials - Netflix in 2011 case study summary - Cybersecurity - Triangular numbers up to 100 - Alva gas heater problems - Beowulf battle with grendel mother text - A project requires an initial investment of $100 000 - Chick fil a sales per store - Potential evapotranspiration potet refers to - W2PsychoPharmacol - International date line eastern time zone - Certificate 3 in laboratory skills - Discussion math - What is a fraction equivalent to 4 4 - Chapter 3 of Vold's Theoretical Criminoloby - Essay using gibbs reflective cycle - Succession management at general electric - Dermnet skin disease atlas - A portrait of linear algebra 3rd edition pdf - Chart of nuclides explained - Strangle her in bed even the bed she hath contaminated - Cambridge igcse mathematics syllabus - ICT how mcuh - Ap calculus ab homework help - Examples of government accounting journal entries - Sociology chapter 6 review answer key - Calculate the radius of vanadium atom - Binomial expansion exam solutions - Distance and bearing between two cities - How to do trigonometry word problems - Cow eye parts and functions - Schneider electric circuit breaker application guide - Super channel bender for sale - Case study 8 1 klm airlines - A typical laboratory centrifuge rotates at - Identify the sentence that contains a noun clause in italics - Facebook's internet org initiative serving the bottom of the pyramid - Calibrating a spectroscope - The Role of the SWOT Analysis - What is 3.5 as a mixed number - 600 minimum word memorandum - Arcing fault current calculation - For kim wood - Vampires in the lemon grove story analysis - Bloomberg bmc answers pdf - Social harmony english language - Montgomery Bus Boycott - Green computing project - How to make a histogram in spss - Harwood 11 objections to utilitarianism - Riordan manufacturing virtual organization - Determining speed from skid marks - Pre tax allows deds