Subjective theory of contracts

City of Everett Washington v.Mitchell, 631 P.2d 366, Web 1981 Wash. Lexis 1139 Supreme Court of Washington.
Welles v. Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences, Web 2004 U.S.Dist. Lexis (2004) United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Mesaros v.United States, 845 F.2d 1576, Web 1988 U.S.App Lexis 6055, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Check the Legal Cases tab if you have trouble findng the cases on the internet or ask our wonderful librarian to help you. See Discussion Board for how to communicate with her.
2. Answer the following questions:

What theory does the court use to evaluate the contract?
What is the objective theory of contracts?
When will a court set aside a contract?
Should an advertisement be treated as an offer rather than an invitation to make an offer? Why or why not?
3. Post your answer answer below

4. Reply to at least two of your classmate ( updating later ).

Grading
This assignment is worth 25 points toward your course grade. You will receive full credit for posting your introduction as directed. Please see the grading rubric below.

Grading Criteria

Points

Discussion Forum Response

Addressed all requirements/answered all questions.
Wrote substantive postings of 1 or 2 paragraphs (6 - 8 sentences) for each.
10 points

Use of Terms and Ideas Learned

Used terms from chapter correctly where appropriate.
Used ideas from chapter correctly (with citation) to clarify, explain, or support an argument.
5 points

Contribution to Discussion

Replied in thoughtful, meaningful, and helpful ways.
Advanced the discussion whenever possible.
5 points

Response to posting of other students

Responses to posting of two students
5 points