Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Tesla strategic business units

31/12/2020 Client: saad24vbs Deadline: 10 Days

FORUM 1 - UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 1


CASE STUDY 2 – TESLA 10


Student Name


Liberty University


BCG Matrix (Appendix )

The two strategic business units (SBUs) of Tesla evaluated via the BCG Matrix were the automotive operations and the energy generation storage organizational segments. The automotive services are the cash cow of Tesla because it is generating the most profit and revenue between the two SBUs, and consumes most the share earning within the company. The energy generation and storage segment of Tesla are the problem child because it makes up a small share of earnings and will require more resources and strategic initiatives to help grow this SBU. Therefore, the automotive operations are the more profitable business unit when compared to it lesser performing SBU energy generation and storage. Tesla's can utilize some of the cash generated from the automotive operations and invest it in energy production and storage to help maximize growth.


Product Life Cycle


Tesla life cycle is between the initial and growth stage since the development of electric cars is becoming more mainstream. Tesla currently manufactures three models which are the X, S and 3 type that vary in size from compact to medium sized vehicles. In the future, as growth for the company continues larger cars like SUV and minivans will be developed. Also, as the demand for electric vehicles increases to help mitigate air pollution and waste, more automobile companies will pursue the technology advancements of producing electrically operated vehicles. Therefore, to help prevent adverse effects from the mature development of electric motor vehicle in the automobile industry, Tesla will have to employ techniques like mass production of a various model to fit the needs of all consumers and find a way to expand their customer base by offering a reasonably priced vehicle. The overall objective is to adapt to the market and keep profits high as possible.


Competitive Forces Analysis


The automotive industry is a very competitive market which requires multiple strategic initiatives to help entice consumers and maximize profits. The automobile industry in the United States is saturated with both dominant domestic and import companies such as Ford, Chevy, Toyota, Honda, BMW and Volkswagen to name a few. Tesla is the smaller company that specializes in making high-end electric motor vehicles by providing an alternative to standard gasoline fuel. With the rise of cars being environmentally healthy and minimizing pollution, Tesla will be a competitive force to be reckoned with in a competitive automobile industry consumed by gasoline operated vehicles.


Porter’s Five Forces


· The Threat of New Entrants: The threat of new entrants in the auto industry is always high. Automobile companies are always going to challenge each other for sustaining success by holding a majority of the market, high profits, and maintaining a huge consumers base by offering what people desire (McMullen, 2016). In the case of Tesla, the company offers a high quality, sporty, cutting edge, electric propelled a motor vehicle, and depending on the demand by consumers this niche automaker could become a force in a large automobile industry that has both Honda and Toyota to compete against for electrical car dominance.


· Bargaining Power of Buyers: Barging power for consumers is moderate for Tesla. Tesla does participate in a niche market, by offering an electric vehicle that is high priced aimed at targeting high-end users. Therefore, Tesla is providing a specific high-quality vehicle, to a particular demographic, which directly impacts bargaining power for buyers. Also, federal and local governments are providing incentives for cleaner technologies (DeShazo, Sheldon, & Larson, 2017), which directly impacts the demand for electric cars keeping the power of bargaining power low.


· Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Bargaining power of suppliers is high because Tesla is very dependent on suppliers delivering raw materials and components that could impact production timelines directly affecting cost. Tesla vehicles are made up of very savvy technology, which is driven by research and development of significant technological parts, which too can impact bargaining power of suppliers.


· The Threat of Substitutes: The threat of substitute that could affect Tesla's low. Although other automobile companies such as Honda and Toyota offer electric hybrid vehicles, a majority of Tesla car are customized and made to order. Therefore, Tesla affords its consumers the opportunity to get the vehicle they went at the point of purchase vice having to search for the electric car they want.


· Competitive Rivalry: The automotive industry is a very competitive market which requires multiple strategic initiatives to help entice consumers and maximize profits. The automobile industry in the United States is saturated with both dominant domestic and import companies such as Ford, Chevy, Toyota, Honda, BMW and Volkswagen to name a few. Tesla is a smaller company that specializes in making high-end electric motor vehicles by providing an alternative power source rather than the standard gasoline fuel. With the rise of cars being environmentally healthy and minimizing pollution, Tesla is a competitive force to be reckoned with in a competitive automobile industry consumed by gasoline operated vehicles, and the completion being Honda and Toyota which offer hybrid vehicle ran off both electricity and gas.


Competitive Profile Analysis (Appendix )


The competitive profile matrix was based on evaluating 12-critical success factors of Tesla, the Ford Motor Company, and Toyota. The most critical factors for success for all three automobile companies are advertisement, customer service, brand value, economic profit, customer loyalty, and quality. Tesla is a young car company in the United States, but it lagged in competitive profiling with a total score of 23.65. Tesla's highest rating was based on research and development since it is a high-end luxury electric motor vehicle with savvy technology and battery powered and operated. Then customer loyalty is high as well since most of the consumers come from a particular economic demographic that shows continued support for the Tesla brand. Tesla rating for price competitiveness is low since the vehicle is marketed with a high price tag not competing against the standard models of both Ford and Toyota. Also, their R&D is greater because it is battery-operated vehicles with slot technological interfaces, whereas Ford and Toyota's sell more car globally since their production are more streamlined or economical to scale.


Competitors Ratios Analysis (Appendix )


When evaluating the competitors’ ratio analysis Ford has the highest debt to equity ratio of all competitors, but Ford and Toyota can meet short-term financial liabilities as indicated on their quick ratio, whereas Tesla is below one indicating they will have a harder time meeting the short-term financial obligations. When evaluating the return on equity (ROE) which is the competitor's profit to shareholder equity, Tesla was not profitable for how much money shareholder invested with – a 9.1 ROE in 2016. Both Ford and Toyota earned modest profits per shareholder equity with both ratios being greater than 1 in 2016. The net gain for all competitors was very similar because all competitors were below the ratio, which an indication that a trend is happening within the automobile industry for all three competitors at


Alternative Strategies


There are multiple strategies that Tesla can utilize to help stimulate and sustain growth. A strategic concept can either hinge on previous initiatives or look for alternate innovative ways to increase growth. Below are the follow strategic alternatives that can be used.


1. Stability Strategy


2. Expansion Strategy


Stability Strategy


Stability strategy is employed for companies that are not looking to expand or introduce new items into a separate market. The is strategic alternative could be perfect for Tesla because sustainable and continued growth is important for a new company.


· This will allow for complete focus on introducing high-quality products into current market


· Narrow focus of resources in R&D to enhance current products.


· Will help increase the performance of goods over time incrementally.


· Enhances current vehicle production.


· Allows the company to capitalize on current productive processes.


Stability strategy will help Tesla focus on improving technology and quality of existing vehicles in the market not necessarily hindering growth by not expanding. Some disadvantages could be.


· Slower introductory of newer vehicles into the market


· Innovation for expansion is hindered, one avenue for growth


· Customers will be limited to just this one product produced by a company.


Expansion Strategy


The expansion strategy can be employed by Tesla to help determine other ways to break into other markets and raise their strategic competitive advantage. Tesla can utilize expansion to help increase growth and mitigate a rapid decline by not expanding and adapting to the market demand and growing market share and using resources. Some advantages of expansion:


· R& D can be enhanced within the organization


· Opportunity to improve innovative ideas and diversify products


· Economic of scale


Disadvantages of expansion strategy


· Require massive capital investment


· Different customer base


· Outsourcing


Regardless if you're a pursuing stability or expansion plans, they are great alternatives depending on the objective of the company and current state of the market.


Reference


DeShazo, J. R., Sheldon, T. L., & Carson, R. T. (2017). Designing policy incentives for cleaner technologies: Lessons from California's plug-in electric vehicle rebate program. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 84, 18-43.


McMullen, S. (2016). Giving Consumers What They Want?. In Animals and the Economy (pp. 45-61). Palgrave Macmillan UK.


Competitive Profile Matrix (Appendix )




Tesla


Ford


Toyota


Critical Success Factors


Weight


Rating


Score


Rating


Score


Rating


Score


Advertising


1.00


1


1.00


4


4.00


3


3.00


Market Penetration


0.75


2


1.50


4


3.00


4


3.00


Customer Service


1.00


3


3.00


3


3.00


4


4.00


Distribution Channels


0.50


2


1.00


4


2.00


4


2.00


R&D Spending


0.60


4


2.40


2


1.20


3


1.80


Brand Value


1.00


3


3.00


4


4.00


4


4.00


Financial Profit


1.00


1


1.00


3


3.00


4


4.00


Customer Loyalty


1.00


4


4.00


3


3.00


4


4.00


Global Expansion


0.60


2


1.20


3


1.80


3


1.80


Product Quality


1.00


3


3.00


2


2.00


4


4.00


Online Presence


0.75


3


2.25


1


0.75


1


0.75


Price Competitiveness


0.30


1


0.30


3


0.90


3


0.90


Totals


9.50




23.65




28.65




33.25


Competitors Ratios (Appendix )


FY 2016 Competitors Analysis


Ratios


Ford


Tesla


Toyota


Debt to Equity Ratio


4.6


1.5


1.1


Quick Ratio


1.2


0.72


1.1


Return on Equity


2.5


-9.1


1.3


Net Profit Margin


0.8


0.9


0.4


BCG Matrix Appendix ( )


High+20


Star


Question Mark



image2.png


Medium 0


Cash Cow


Dog


image3.png


Low -20


image1

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

University Coursework Help
Helping Hand
Top Essay Tutor
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
University Coursework Help

ONLINE

University Coursework Help

Hi dear, I am ready to do your homework in a reasonable price.

$37 Chat With Writer
Helping Hand

ONLINE

Helping Hand

I am an Academic writer with 10 years of experience. As an Academic writer, my aim is to generate unique content without Plagiarism as per the client’s requirements.

$35 Chat With Writer
Top Essay Tutor

ONLINE

Top Essay Tutor

I have more than 12 years of experience in managing online classes, exams, and quizzes on different websites like; Connect, McGraw-Hill, and Blackboard. I always provide a guarantee to my clients for their grades.

$40 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

Improper fraction example with drawing - Purpose - What is a market product grid - Cesa horizons job vacancies - Cells alive how big - Axa graduate scheme uk - Summary of cowspiracy - Pros of Using Free Essay Samples Paperwall101 - Baroque Art - E-business#2-ECOM421 - Field artillery certification tables - Genetically modified foods harmful or helpful deborah b whitman - State parallel axis theorem - Cool tools kevin kelly pdf - Speciality packaging corporation case study solution - Degree of polymerization calculator - Analytical essay to kill a mockingbird - John cheston net worth - Assignment - IFG case study - Identifying cations in solution lab answers - Atomic packing factor definition - Icdl module 1 exam questions - Technology Advancement – Challenges and Changes - Helmholtz coil magnetic field derivation - 3 mental acts of logic - Article - Bachelor of commerce uq program plan - South delaware coors case study solution - Higher chemistry problem solving questions - English - Friday - Convert 1 atm to mmhg - Leadership and Management - Alibaba case study solution - Sentence starters for analysis - Which clinical initiatives require informatics to be optimally effective - How to fill out an amortization table - Negative response letter - Climate change informative speech outline - Shadow health focused exam chest pain brian foster - Rome engineering an empire - How to identify fake sk ii - Week8 - Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative - Ob case study with answers - Urn of sacred ashes poison or not - Brisbane city council australia day awards - Eye level medium shot - Nursing Informatics - Which platforms can you develop apps and how? - In most spanish speaking countries married women legally - Bus 311 week 5 final paper - Steve humble trap door designer - Unit VIII ORG BH - Casio fx 82 normal distribution - The same origin policy - Hyper competition in strategic marketing - Bangladesh high commission canberra passport - The inverted u theory - The last mountain movie worksheet answers - Borneol nmr - Reflective Analysis: Risk Management and the Role of Managed Care - Cloverleaf 4 h club - Crown employees public sector award - Stanford university press address - Describe the steps in developing a flexible budget - Vitamin c concentration experiment - Mmu counselling drop in - Wheel and axle simple machine diagram - Che che kule song - Contact centre customer relations - England productions performs london shows - Rad model advantages and disadvantages - Bangladesh high commission sydney - Example of internal memo proposal - Diorama of a hurricane - Individual therapy - Inrush current limiter mosfet - When did an elizabethan baptism occur - Wk7 responses 6053 - How do you make the distinction between doing a safety plan and a harm reduction plan? - City of clearwater municipal services building - Bios apothecary amaranth infused hair serum reviews - Customized Tours Uk - Strayer outline - Unplugged the myth of computers in the classroom pdf - Extraordinary circumstances the journey of a corporate whistleblower summary - The condition of education 2020 - Telemation e crm - Assignment: Application of Attachment Theory to a Case Study - Managing operations - Ucl msc machine learning - HIV/AIDS - 20 Page Research Paper: Must be APA Style, 12 Point Font, Cite References - 5-2-1/6-1-1 discussion: research plan - Security Architecture & Design - Paul mchenry roberts how to say nothing - SUNNYSIDE ABORTION CLINIC +27717852514 ABORTION CLINICS IN MAMELODI ABORTION PILLS IN MAMELODI, SOWETO, WITBANK, - Reflection of a bollywood film and 2 readings - The leadership challenge 5th edition pdf free download