1
This text was adapted by The Saylor Foundation under a Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License without
attribution as requested by the work’s original creator or licensee.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
2
Chapter 7 Managing Stress and Emotions
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After reading this chapter, you should be able to do the following:
1. Understand the stress cycle.
2. Recognize the sources of stress for employees.
3. Recognize the outcomes of stress.
4. Understand how to manage stress in organizational contexts.
5. Understand the role emotions play for attitudes and behaviors at work.
6. Learn about emotional labor and how to manage it.
7. Understand how emotions can affect perceptions of what is ethical.
8. Understand cross-cultural differences in stressors.
Getting Emotional at American Express Death and money can be emotional topics. Sales reps at American Express
Company’s life insurance division had to deal with both these issues when
selling life insurance, and they were starting to feel the strain of working with
such volatile emotional materials every day. Part of the problem
representatives faced seemed like an unavoidable side effect of selling life
insurance. Many potential clients were responding fearfully to the sales
representatives’ calls. Others turned their fears into anger. They replied to the
representatives’ questions suspiciously or treated them as untrustworthy.
The sales force at American Express believed in the value of their work, but
over time, customers’ negative emotions began to erode employee morale.
Sales of policies slowed. Management insisted that the representatives ignore
their customers’ feelings and focus on making sales. The representatives’ more
aggressive sales tactics seemed only to increase their clients’ negative
3
emotional responses, which kicked off the cycle of suffering again. It was
apparent something had to change.
In an effort to understand the barriers between customers and sales
representatives, a team led by Kate Cannon, a former American Express
staffer and mental-health administrator, used a technique called emotional
resonance to identify employees’ feelings about their work. Looking at the
problem from an emotional point of view yielded dramatic insights about
clients, sales representatives, and managers alike.
The first step she took was to acknowledge that the clients’ negative emotions
were barriers to life insurance sales. Cannon explained, “People reported all
kinds of emotional issues—fear, suspicion, powerlessness, and distrust—
involved in buying life insurance.” Clients’ negative emotions, in turn, had
sparked negative feelings among some American Express life insurance sales
representatives, including feelings of incompetence, dread, untruthfulness,
shame, and even humiliation. Management’s focus on sales had created an
emotional disconnect between the sales reps’ work and their true
personalities. Cannon discovered that sales representatives who did not
acknowledge their clients’ distress felt dishonest. The emotional gap between
their words and their true feelings only increased their distress.
Cannon also found some good news. Sales representatives who looked at their
job from the customer’s point of view were flourishing. Their feelings and their
words were in harmony. Clients trusted them. The trust between these more
openly emotional sales representatives and their clients led to greater sales
and job satisfaction. To see if emotional skills training could increase job
satisfaction and sales among other members of the team, Cannon instituted a
course in emotional awareness for a test group of American Express life
4
insurance sales representatives. The goal of the course was to help employees
recognize and manage their feelings. The results of the study proved the value
of emotional clarity. Coping skills, as measured on standardized psychological
tests, improved for the representatives who took Cannon’s course.
The emotional awareness training program had significant impact on
American Express’s bottom line. Over time, as Cannon’s team expanded their
emotion-based program, American Express life insurance sales rose by tens of
millions of dollars. American Express’s exercise in emotional awareness shows
that companies can profit when feelings are recognized and consciously
managed. Employees whose work aligns with their true emotions make more
believable corporate ambassadors. The positive use of emotion can benefit a
company internally as well. According to a Gallup poll of over 2 million
employees, the majority of workers rated a caring boss higher than increased
salary or benefits. In the words of career expert and columnist Maureen
Moriarity, “Good moods are good for business.”
Sources: Schwartz, T. (2008, September 11). How do you feel? Fast
Company. Retrieved January 28, 2009,
fromhttp://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/35/emotion.html?page=0%2C2
; Kirkwood, G., & Ward, C. (2002, May 5). Ch…Ch…Ch…Changes. Paper
presented at FMA Ideation; Moriarty, M. (2007, June 7). Workplace coach:
Don’t underestimate emotional intelligence. Seattle Post-Intelligencer.
Retrieved July 1, 2008, from
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/318345_workcoach04.html
http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/35/emotion.html?page=0%2C2
http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/35/emotion.html?page=0%2C2
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/318345_workcoach04.html
5
7.1 What Is Stress?
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
1. Learn about the General Adaptation Syndrome.
2. Learn what stressors are.
3. Understand the outcomes of stress.
4. Understand individual differences in experienced stress.
Gravity. Mass. Magnetism. These words come from the physical sciences.
And so does the term stress. In its original form, the word stress relates to the
amount of force applied to a given area. A steel bar stacked with bricks is being
stressed in ways that can be measured using mathematical formulas. In
human terms, psychiatrist Peter Panzarino notes, “Stress is simply a fact of
nature—forces from the outside world affecting the individual.” [1] The
professional, personal, and environmental pressures of modern life exert their
forces on us every day. Some of these pressures are good. Others can wear us
down over time.
Stress is defined by psychologists as the body’s reaction to a change that
requires a physical, mental, or emotional adjustment or response. [2] Stress is
an inevitable feature of life. It is the force that gets us out of bed in the
morning, motivates us at the gym, and inspires us to work.
As you will see in the sections below, stress is a given factor in our lives. We
may not be able to avoid stress completely, but we can change how we respond
to stress, which is a major benefit. Our ability to recognize, manage, and
maximize our response to stress can turn an emotional or physical problem
into a resource.
6
Researchers use polling to measure the effects of stress at work. The results
have been eye-opening. According to a 2001 Gallup poll, 80% of American
workers report that they feel workplace stress at least some of the
time. [3] Another survey found that 65% of workers reported job stress as an
issue for them, and almost as many employees ended the day exhibiting
physical effects of stress, including neck pain, aching muscles, and insomnia.
It is clear that many individuals are stressed at work.
The Stress Process
Our basic human functions, breathing, blinking, heartbeat, digestion, and
other unconscious actions, are controlled by our lower brains. Just outside
this portion of the brain is the semiconscious limbic system, which plays a
large part in human emotions. Within this system is an area known as the
amygdala. The amygdala is responsible for, among other things, stimulating
fear responses. Unfortunately, the amygdala cannot distinguish between
meeting a 10:00 a.m. marketing deadline and escaping a burning building.
Human brains respond to outside threats to our safety with a message to our
bodies to engage in a “fight-or-flight” response. [4] Our bodies prepare for these
scenarios with an increased heart rate, shallow breathing, and wide-eyed
focus. Even digestion and other functions are stopped in preparation for the
fight-or-flight response. While these traits allowed our ancestors to flee the
scene of their impending doom or engage in a physical battle for survival, most
crises at work are not as dramatic as this.
Hans Selye, one of the founders of the American Institute of Stress, spent his
life examining the human body’s response to stress. As an endocrinologist who
studied the effects of adrenaline and other hormones on the body, Selye
believed that unmanaged stress could create physical diseases such as ulcers
7
and high blood pressure, and psychological illnesses such as depression. He
hypothesized that stress played a general role in disease by exhausting the
body’s immune system and termed this the
General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS). [5]
Figure 7.2
In Selye’s GAS model, stress affects an individual in three steps: alarm,
resistance, and exhaustion.
In the alarm phase of stress, an outside stressor jolts the individual, insisting
that something must be done. It may help to think of this as the fight-or-flight
moment in the individual’s experience. If the response is sufficient, the body
will return to its resting state after having successfully dealt with the source of
stress.
In the resistance phase, the body begins to release cortisol and draws on
reserves of fats and sugars to find a way to adjust to the demands of stress.
This reaction works well for short periods of time, but it is only a temporary
8
fix. Individuals forced to endure the stress of cold and hunger may find a way
to adjust to lower temperatures and less food. While it is possible for the body
to “adapt” to such stresses, the situation cannot continue. The body is drawing
on its reserves, like a hospital using backup generators after a power failure. It
can continue to function by shutting down unnecessary items like large
overhead lights, elevators, televisions, and most computers, but it cannot
proceed in that state forever.
In the exhaustion phase, the body has depleted its stores of sugars and fats,
and the prolonged release of cortisol has caused the stressor to significantly
weaken the individual. Disease results from the body’s weakened state, leading
to death in the most extreme cases. This eventual depletion is why we’re more
likely to reach for foods rich in fat or sugar, caffeine, or other quick fixes that
give us energy when we are stressed. Selye referred to stress that led to disease
as distress and stress that was enjoyable or healing as eustress.
Workplace Stressors
Stressors are events or contexts that cause a stress reaction by elevating levels
of adrenaline and forcing a physical or mental response. The key to remember
about stressors is that they aren’t necessarily a bad thing. The saying “the
straw that broke the camel’s back” applies to stressors. Having a few stressors
in our lives may not be a problem, but because stress is cumulative, having
many stressors day after day can cause a buildup that becomes a problem. The
American Psychological Association surveys American adults about their
stresses annually. Topping the list of stressful issues are money, work, and
housing. [6] But in essence, we could say that all three issues come back to the
workplace. How much we earn determines the kind of housing we can afford,
and when job security is questionable, home life is generally affected as well.
9
Understanding what can potentially cause stress can help avoid negative
consequences. Now we will examine the major stressors in the workplace. A
major category of workplace stressors are role demands. In other words, some
jobs and some work contexts are more potentially stressful than others.
Role Demands
Role ambiguity refers to vagueness in relation to what our responsibilities are.
If you have started a new job and felt unclear about what you were expected to
do, you have experienced role ambiguity. Having high role ambiguity is related
to higher emotional exhaustion, more thoughts of leaving an organization, and
lowered job attitudes and performance. [7] Role conflict refers to facing
contradictory demands at work. For example, your manager may want you to
increase customer satisfaction and cut costs, while you feel that satisfying
customers inevitably increases costs. In this case, you are experiencing role
conflict because satisfying one demand makes it unlikely to satisfy the
other. Role overload is defined as having insufficient time and resources to
complete a job. When an organization downsizes, the remaining employees
will have to complete the tasks that were previously performed by the laid-off
workers, which often leads to role overload. Like role ambiguity, both role
conflict and role overload have been shown to hurt performance and lower job
attitudes; however, research shows that role ambiguity is the strongest
predictor of poor performance. [8] Research on new employees also shows that
role ambiguity is a key aspect of their adjustment, and that when role
ambiguity is high, new employees struggle to fit into the new organization. [9]
Information Overload
Messages reach us in countless ways every day. Some are societal—
advertisements that we may hear or see in the course of our day. Others are
professional—e-mails, memos, voice mails, and conversations from our
10
colleagues. Others are personal—messages and conversations from our loved
ones and friends. Add these together and it’s easy to see how we may be
receiving more information than we can take in. This state of imbalance is
known as information overload, which can be defined as “occurring when the
information processing demands on an individual’s time to perform
interactions and internal calculations exceed the supply or capacity of time
available for such processing.”[10] Role overload has been made much more
salient because of the ease at which we can get abundant information from
Web search engines and the numerous e-mail and text messages we receive
each day. [11] Other research shows that working in such a fragmented fashion
significantly impacts efficiency, creativity, and mental acuity. [12]
Top 10 Stressful Jobs As you can see, some of these jobs are stressful due to high emotional labor
(customer service), physical demands (miner), time pressures (journalist), or
all three (police officer).
1. Inner city high school teacher
2. Police officer
3. Miner
4. Air traffic controller
5. Medical intern
6. Stockbroker
7. Journalist
8. Customer service or complaint worker
9. Secretary
10. Waiter
11
Source: Tolison, B. (2008, April 7). Top ten most stressful jobs. Health.
Retrieved January 28, 2009, from the WCTV News Web
site:http://www.wctv.tv/news/headlines/17373899.html.
Work–Family Conflict
Work–family conflict occurs when the demands from work and family are
negatively affecting one another. [13] Specifically, work and family demands on
a person may be incompatible with each other such that work interferes with
family life and family demands interfere with work life. This stressor has
steadily increased in prevalence, as work has become more demanding and
technology has allowed employees to work from home and be connected to the
job around the clock. In fact, a recent census showed that 28% of the
American workforce works more than 40 hours per week, creating an
unavoidable spillover from work to family life. [14] Moreover, the fact that more
households have dual-earning families in which both adults work means
household and childcare duties are no longer the sole responsibility of a stay-
at-home parent. This trend only compounds stress from the workplace by
leading to the spillover of family responsibilities (such as a sick child or elderly
parent) to work life. Research shows that individuals who have stress in one
area of their life tend to have greater stress in other parts of their lives, which
can create a situation of escalating stressors. [15]
Work–family conflict has been shown to be related to lower job and life
satisfaction. Interestingly, it seems that work–family conflict is slightly more
problematic for women than men. [16] Organizations that are able to help their
employees achieve greater work–life balance are seen as more attractive than
those that do not. [17] Organizations can help employees maintain work–life
balance by using organizational practices such as flexibility in scheduling as
http://www.wctv.tv/news/headlines/17373899.html
12
well as individual practices such as having supervisors who are supportive and
considerate of employees’ family life. [18]
Life Changes
Stress can result from positive and negative life changes. The Holmes-Rahe
scale ascribes different stress values to life events ranging from the death of
one’s spouse to receiving a ticket for a minor traffic violation. The values are
based on incidences of illness and death in the 12 months after each event. On
the Holmes-Rahe scale, the death of a spouse receives a stress rating of 100,
getting married is seen as a midway stressful event, with a rating of 50, and
losing one’s job is rated as 47. These numbers are relative values that allow us
to understand the impact of different life events on our stress levels and their
ability to impact our health and well-being. [19] Again, because stressors are
cumulative, higher scores on the stress inventory mean you are more prone to
suffering negative consequences of stress than someone with a lower score.
OB Toolbox: How Stressed Are You? Read each of the events listed below. Give yourself the number of points next
to any event that has occurred in your life in the last 2 years. There are no
right or wrong answers. The aim is just to identify which of these events you
have experienced.
Table 7.1 Sample Items: Life Events Stress Inventory
Life event Stress points Life event
Stress points
Death of spouse 100 Foreclosure of mortgage or loan 30
Divorce 73 Change in responsibilities at work 29
13
Life event Stress points Life event
Stress points
Marital separation 65 Son or daughter leaving home 29
Jail term 63 Trouble with in-laws 29
Death of close family member 63
Outstanding personal achievement 28
Personal injury or illness 53 Begin or end school 26
Marriage 50 Change in living location/condition 25
Fired or laid off at work 47 Trouble with supervisor 23
Marital reconciliation 45 Change in work hours or conditions 20
Retirement 45 Change in schools 20
Pregnancy 40 Change in social activities 18
Change in financial state 38 Change in eating habits 15
Death of close friend 37 Vacation 13
Change to different line of work 36 Minor violations of the law 11
Scoring:
If you scored fewer than 150 stress points, you have a 30% chance of
developing a stress-related illness in the near future.
If you scored between 150 and 299 stress points, you have a 50% chance of
developing a stress-related illness in the near future.
14
If you scored over 300 stress points, you have an 80% chance of developing a
stress-related illness in the near future.
The happy events in this list such as getting married or an outstanding
personal achievement illustrate how eustress, or “good stress,” can also tax a
body as much as the stressors that constitute the traditionally negative
category of distress. (The prefixeu- in the word eustress means “good” or
“well,” much like the eu- in euphoria.) Stressors can also occur in trends. For
example, during 2007, nearly 1.3 million U.S. housing properties were subject
to foreclosure activity, up 79% from 2006.
Source: Adapted from Holmes, T. H., & Rahe, R. H. (1967). The social
readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213–218.
Downsizing
A study commissioned by the U.S. Department of Labor to examine over
3,600 companies from 1980 to 1994 found that manufacturing firms
accounted for the greatest incidence of major downsizings. The average
percentage of firms by industry that downsized more than 5% of their
workforces across the 15-year period of the study was manufacturing (25%),
retail (17%), and service (15%). A total of 59% of the companies studied fired
at least 5% of their employees at least once during the 15-year period, and 33%
of the companies downsized more than 15% of their workforce at least once
during the period. Furthermore, during the recessions in 1985 to 1986 and
1990 to 1991, more than 25% of all firms, regardless of size, cut their
workforce by more than 5%. [20] In the United States, major layoffs in many
sectors in 2008 and 2009 were stressful even for those who retained their
jobs.
15
The loss of a job can be a particularly stressful event, as you can see by its high
score on the life stressors scale. It can also lead to other stressful events, such
as financial problems, which can add to a person’s stress score. Research
shows that downsizing and job insecurity (worrying about downsizing) is
related to greater stress, alcohol use, and lower performance and
creativity. [21] For example, a study of over 1,200 Finnish workers found that
past downsizing or expectations of future downsizing was related to greater
psychological strain and absence. [22] In another study of creativity and
downsizing, researchers found that creativity and most creativity-supporting
aspects of the perceived work environment declined significantly during the
downsizing. [23] Those who experience layoffs but have their self-integrity
affirmed through other means are less susceptible to negative outcomes. [24]
Outcomes of Stress
The outcomes of stress are categorized into physiological and psychological
and work outcomes.
Physiological
Stress manifests itself internally as nervousness, tension, headaches, anger,
irritability, and fatigue. Stress can also have outward manifestations. Dr. Dean
Ornish, author of Stress, Diet and Your Heart, says that stress is related to
aging. [25] Chronic stress causes the body to secrete hormones such as cortisol,
which tend to make our complexion blemished and cause wrinkles. Harvard
psychologist Ted Grossbart, author of Skin Deep, says, “Tens of millions of
Americans suffer from skin diseases that flare up only when they’re
upset.” [26] These skin problems include itching, profuse sweating, warts, hives,
acne, and psoriasis. For example, Roger Smith, the former CEO of General
Motors Corporation, was featured in a Fortune article that began, “His
16
normally ruddy face is covered with a red rash, a painless but disfiguring
problem which Smith says his doctor attributes 99% to stress.” [27]
The human body responds to outside calls to action by pumping more blood
through our system, breathing in a more shallow fashion, and gazing wide-
eyed at the world. To accomplish this feat, our bodies shut down our immune
systems. From a biological point of view, it’s a smart strategic move—but only
in the short term. The idea can be seen as your body wanting to escape an
imminent threat, so that there is still some kind of body around to get sick
later. But in the long term, a body under constant stress can suppress its
immune system too much, leading to health problems such as high blood
pressure, ulcers, and being overly susceptible to illnesses such as the common
cold.
The link between heart attacks and stress, while easy to assume, has been
harder to prove. The American Heart Association notes that research has yet
to link the two conclusively. Regardless, it is clear that individuals under stress
engage in behaviors that can lead to heart disease such as eating fatty foods,
smoking, or failing to exercise.
Psychological
Depression and anxiety are two psychological outcomes of unchecked stress,
which are as dangerous to our mental health and welfare as heart disease, high
blood pressure, and strokes. The Harris poll found that 11% of respondents
said their stress was accompanied by a sense of depression. “Persistent or
chronic stress has the potential to put vulnerable individuals at a substantially
increased risk of depression, anxiety, and many other emotional difficulties,”
notes Mayo Clinic psychiatrist Daniel Hall-Flavin. Scientists have noted that
17
changes in brain function—especially in the areas of the hypothalamus and the
pituitary gland—may play a key role in stress-induced emotional problems. [28]
Work Outcomes
Stress is related to worse job attitudes, higher turnover, and decreases in job
performance in terms of both in-role performance and organizational
citizenship behaviors. [29]Research also shows that stressed individuals have
lower organizational commitment than those who are less
stressed. [30] Interestingly, job challenge has been found to be related to higher
performance, perhaps with some individuals rising to the challenge. [31]The key
is to keep challenges in the optimal zone for stress—the activation stage—and
to avoid the exhaustion stage. [32]
Figure 7.4
Individuals who are able to find the right balance between work that is too
challenging and work that is not challenging enough see increases in
performance.
18
Individual Differences in Experienced Stress
How we handle stress varies by individual, and part of that issue has to do
with our personality type. Type A personalities, as defined by the Jenkins
Activity Survey, [33]display high levels of speed/impatience, job involvement,
and hard-driving competitiveness. If you think back to Selye’s General
Adaptation Syndrome, in which unchecked stress can lead to illness over time,
it’s easy to see how the fast-paced, adrenaline-pumping lifestyle of a Type A
person can lead to increased stress, and research supports this
view. [34] Studies show that the hostility and hyper-reactive portion of the Type
A personality is a major concern in terms of stress and negative organizational
outcomes. [35]
Type B personalities, by contrast, are calmer by nature. They think through
situations as opposed to reacting emotionally. Their fight-or-flight and stress
levels are lower as a result. Our personalities are the outcome of our life
experiences and, to some degree, our genetics. Some researchers believe that
mothers who experience a great deal of stress during pregnancy introduce
their unborn babies to high levels of the stress-related hormone cortisol in
utero, predisposing their babies to a stressful life from birth. [36]
Men and women also handle stress differently. Researchers at Yale University
discovered estrogen may heighten women’s response to stress and their
tendency to depression as a result. [37] Still, others believe that women’s
stronger social networks allow them to process stress more effectively than
men. [38] So while women may become depressed more often than men,
women may also have better tools for countering emotion-related stress than
their male counterparts.
OB Toolbox: To Cry or Not to Cry? That Is the Question…
19
As we all know, stress can build up. Advice that’s often given is to "let it all
out" with something like a cathartic "good cry." But research shows that crying
may not be as helpful as the adage would lead us to believe. In reviewing
scientific studies done on crying and health, Ad Vingerhoets and Jan Scheirs
found that the studies “yielded little evidence in support of the hypothesis that
shedding tears improves mood or health directly, be it in the short or in the
long run.” Another study found that venting actually increased the negative
effects of negative emotion. [39]
Instead, laughter may be the better remedy. Crying may actually intensify the
negative feelings, because crying is a social signal not only to others but to
yourself. “You might think, ‘I didn’t think it was bothering me that much, but
look at how I’m crying—I must really be upset,’” says Susan Labott of the
University of Toledo. The crying may make the feelings more intense. Labott
and Randall Martin of Northern Illinois University at Dekalb surveyed 715
men and women and found that at comparable stress levels, criers were more
depressed, anxious, hostile, and tired than those who wept less. Those who
used humor were the most successful at combating stress. So, if you’re looking
for a cathartic release, opt for humor instead: Try to find something funny in
your stressful predicament.
Sources: Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M., & Scheirs, J. G. M. (2001). Crying and
health. In A. J. J. M. Vingerhoets & R. R. Cornelius (Eds.), Adult crying: A
biopsychosocial approach (pp. 227–247). East Sussex, UK: Brunner-
Routledge; Martin, R., & Susan L. (1991). Mood following emotional crying:
Effects of the situation. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(2), 218–233;
Bostad, R. The crying game. Anchor Point, 1–8. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from
http://www.nlpanchorpoint.com/BolstadCrying1481.pdf
KEY TAKEAWAY
http://www.nlpanchorpoint.com/BolstadCrying1481.pdf