Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

The reggio emilia early childhood program focuses on _____

23/11/2021 Client: muhammad11 Deadline: 2 Day

Observation And Analysis

to use for both your classroom observation and analysis. Observation: Two Videotaped Classrooms 1. Write your observation notes for both classrooms on this form. 2. Once the observation is completed, type the information you recorded into the form. Analysis Follow the instructions below for analysis of the two videotaped classroom observations. Due in Unit 4: The completed, typed form must contain both the observation and analysis. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VIDEOTAPE #1

Observer’s Name: _Jodi Starr________________Videotape Title: “Literacy Lesson First Grade”studen

Date(s) of Observation: ___7/13/18_________ Time(s): Start: _3:35_________ End: _3:45_________

CENTER/FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME/SCHOOL INFORMATION

Program Type (“X” for all that apply): X public _private _non-profit _faith-based _corporate _other: __________ Teaching Staff Total Observed: __1__ Teachers ___1_ Assistant Teachers __1___ Other: __observing administrator

Children Total Observed: ____Infants ____ Toddlers ____ Preschoolers ____Kindergartners 8 Primary (1-3)

EDUCATIONAL APPROACH You are looking for signs of quality, applied theories, one or two specific approaches,

and developmentally appropriate practices. Program’s Philosophy (Listen for descriptions of the listed items. Is there a specific theory-based philosophy, model, approach or curriculum? What is their approach to family engagement?)

Mission and Vision: to teach a reading/literacy lesson to school aged children Educational Philosophy: Seemed close to Reggio Emilia’s 100 Language of Children Curriculum Approach: Literacy Based, focusing on a broader concept presented in a grade level story Family Engagement: Family engagement was not present in this video

CHS111: Foundations of Early Childhood Education

Videotaped Classroom Observation & Analysis Tool

POSTED CLASSROOM INFORMATION Do you see signs of the following in the videotape?

(Put “X” for all that are observed): ___ Daily Schedule _X__ Lesson Plan ___Parent/Family Bulletin Board ___ Children’s Creations: (e.g., art, writing, dictated stories) ___ Other _______________________________________________________________________________

Lesson Plan: Describe evidence of developmental domains and early learning standards? (Hint: You may find evidence in a lesson plan or postings around the classroom in different learning centers, on the Family Bulletin Board.)

The lesson plan was a literacy lesson based on the question “is our world the same as it was”. The lesson started with background knowledge vocabulary words, and moved through predictions about story, the story, small group discussing about the topic and larger class discussion about the topic. Students used graphic organizers for their predictions.

OBSERVED EXPERIENCES Write only what you see and what you hear! Only the facts! No opinions!

Location (Check all that apply): __X__ Classroom _____ Outdoors (e.g., playground) _____ Indoor Gymnasium _____Other: ___________________________________________

Daily Schedule Routine (e.g., free choice, morning meeting, transition to outdoors, … )

Literacy lesson—focusing on the concept of past and present, included vocabulary lesson, a story to read, books to explore, and a graphic organizer to record predictions and illustrate the story. Materials being used: Vocabulary picture cards, graphic organizer, books, large paper to write out

sentences and concepts for all students to see, Signs of Children’s Interest and Engagement in the activities: The students actively waved their hands when asked a question, the teacher employs a point system for good behavior and appropriate responses to questions. Teacher-Child Interactions (including words spoken, gestures, actions, etc.): The teacher used a gesture called release the answer, where the child whispers the answer into his or her first and on que releases the answer to the class, the teacher crouches down to the students’ level, prompts the students, asks direct questions and for repetition of words and statements he’s already made. He also breaks up the lesson into several different parts to keep the children engaged – there is a vocab card component, the syllable walk, small group conversations and larger group teach and repeat portions. Child-Child Interactions (including words spoken, gestures, actions, etc.): The children break off into pairs and discuss the concepts and to explore different books together and they walk around together during the syllable walk. Teacher-Family Interactions (e.g., communication during arrival and departure, encouraging family members to read or play with children, help with separations and transitions) None are observed

Other (add any relevant additional information that you gathered below) – not required.

Analysis #1 Complete all three sections for Videotape #1.

1. Provide a brief description of the videotape.

This video showed a literacy lesson in a first grade class based on the story “Long Ago and Far Away” The teacher started off with guiding questions, “is our world the same as it was”. He continued with background knowledge words and went through predictions about the story using a graphic organizer. He followed up the story with small group discussion about the story as well as offered other examples of new old, like a book about new and old cars that the children could explore in small groups. The lesson focused on repetition about the concepts of past and present.

2. Describe at least three of the following: a) educational approach (e.g., intentional play,

project-based learning, Reggio Emilia, Montessori, High/Scope), b) lessons and/or activities

implemented, c) observed teaching practices, d) children’s engagement in different learning

experiences, e) teacher-child interactions, f) child-child interactions, and g) teacher-family

interactions.

A. I think the teacher employs portions of several different approaches. The first one being Reggio

Emilia’s 100 different languages approach. The teacher presented several different activities and

methods for the children to absorb the information, and even incorporated physical activity such as

the “syllable walk” to reach every child.

I also observed some of the High Scope “learn-do-review-approach” in that the teacher provided

the basic knowledge of the lessons, gave several activities such as small group discussions and

the graphic organizer and then came back to the larger group. He also began the lesson with a

The teacher seems to be undergoing an observation by a school administrator and brings that administrator in the lesson and asking the students to respond to him directly.

challenging question “Is our world the same as it was?” and went on to provide the children with

the knowledge and confidence to formulate their answers.

B. The teacher started ”The Long Ago and Far Away Lesson” with a thematic question “is our world

the same as it was?” to focus the kids thinking on the differences between past and present that

the story was based on. He then moved through a vocabulary lessons, had kids make predictions

about their story, using as graphic organizer which also had space for them to do their own

illustrations of the story. He implemented small group discussions and engage himself with those

small groups to talk about the story and the predictions, and followed up the lesson with a different

contrast of past and present, providing the students with different books depicting things such as

old and new cars.

C/D. The teacher implemented a lot of repetition and physical gestures to keep not only keep the

classroom calm but to help children absorb and remember the vocabulary words he was teaching. He

used small groups, and a lot of questions to engage his students and was often seen crouching down

to the student’s level to ask a specific question or assess if the child was picking up the concept. He

created a strong theme for the lesson with a variety of activities beyond just reading the story to really

show the kids the difference between past and present. The lesson involved verbal, written, artistic,

physical and social aspects of learning. Keeping the kids moving from one activity to the next

including getting up several times and walking around, really helped the kids to stay engaged and

focused. He took the time to really focus on each kid’s answer and meeting the small groups on their

physical level. There was also an assistant teacher available to help kids that seemed to need a little

extra assistance.

E. The teacher appeared very respectful of the children, their responses and their needs throughout

the lesson. Often, we don’t picture teachers of young children as large, muscled, young men, but this

teacher was extremely warm, spirited and positive and connected very well with his students. He

seemed aware of his stature and repeatedly crouched down to be at eye level with the children as they

sat at their desks.

F. The children in the class were very well behaved, and since they were continuously stimulated by

both physical and educational stimulus, they were not antsy or restless, which might cause them to

negatively interact with each other or start little conversations and physical problems during the

lesson. The children were taught as a large group at their desks on sitting together on a carpet. They

were also broken down into small groups to discuss the story, their predictions and the secondary

materials presented at the end of the lesson. Even during the syllable walk, which might be a time for

children to get rowdy, the moved respectfully through the classroom and amongst one another.

G. No teacher/family interactions were shown in this video

Connect at least one observed experience to early learning and development standards.

This lesson focused on literacy. Not just reading to read, but reading and vocabulary to understand

larger concepts. This approach folds right into the Head Start theory that literacy sets young children up for

a lifetime of successful learning. It established a foundation for critical thinking and a sense of curiosity by

presenting not just curriculum materials but also outside materials that showed the same concept in different

forms.

3. State how your observation findings compare to what you have learned about quality care and education, developmentally appropriate practices (DAP), and the Code of Ethical Conduct. This observation showed me that DAP practices are alive and well and being implemented even in elementary classrooms. It was clear that this teacher understood his students learning levels and how to reach them and presented the information in a variety of forms to meet those needs. He taught to the whole child by bringing in non-curriculum materials that explored the subject at hand but might appeal to the kids in a different, more personal way than the assigned story. He created a lesson that would influence all types of learners in a warm and pleasant atmosphere.

VIDEOTAPE #2 Observer’s Name: Jodi Starr______________ Videotape Title: Language Learning for Infants and Toddlers Date(s) of Observation: __7/13/18______________Time(s): Start_6:44______ End:

____6:55___________

CENTER/FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME/SCHOOL INFORMATION

Program Type (“X” for all that apply): _public _private _non-profit _faith-based _corporate _other: __________ Teaching Staff: many different teachers and various babies Total Observed: _____ Teachers _____ Assistant Teachers ______ Other: ________________

Children: Total Observed: _many___Infants ____ Toddlers ____ Preschoolers ____Kindergartners ____ Primary

(1-3)

EDUCATIONAL APPROACH You are looking for signs of quality, applied theories, one or two specific approaches,

and developmentally appropriate practices. Program’s Philosophy (Listen for descriptions of the listed items. Is there a specific theory-based philosophy, model, approach or curriculum? What is their approach to family engagement?)

Mission and Vision: Positive language expansion for infants and toddlers Educational Philosophy: using a positive and engaged relationship to teach language skills Curriculum Approach: teaching language and literacy through every day language use Family Engagement: no family interaction was shown

POSTED CLASSROOM INFORMATION Do you see signs of the following in the videotape?

(Put “X” for all that are observed): __X_ Daily Schedule ___ Lesson Plan ___Parent/Family Bulletin Board Children’s Creations: (e.g., art, writing, dictated stories) ___ Children’s Creations: (e.g., art, writing, dictated stories) ___ Other ______________________________________________________________________________

Lesson Plan: Describe evidence of developmental domains and early learning standards? (Hint: You may find evidence in a lesson plan or postings around the classroom in different learning centers, on the Family Bulletin Board.)

The teachers used language throughout their daily routines to increase language skills. They would repeat appropriate words and questions throughout the day. For example, during changing, the teacher would talk directly, one on one to the baby about what she was doing. The teachers were sure to use very descriptive language and lots of repetition.

OBSERVED EXPERIENCES Write only what you see and what you hear! Only the facts! No opinions!

Location (Check all that apply): ____X Classroom X_____ Outdoors (e.g., playground) _____ Indoor Gymnasium _____Other: __________________________________________

Daily Schedule Routine (e.g., free choice, morning meeting, transition to outdoors, … )

All different scenarios of eating, playing, diaper changing, outdoor play. Materials being used: basic early childhood classroom set-ups, diaper changing stations, child sized furniture, outdoor play equipment, carpets for play, motor skills toys. Signs of Children’s Interest and Engagement in the activities: The children were extremely engaged

with their caregivers as they are young enough to be reliant on them for all basic needs, they were all paying attention when the teachers were talking. Teacher-Child Interactions (including words spoken, gestures, actions, etc.): During the variety of examples, the teachers were speaking directly to one child or a small group of children about their environment and the activities directly affecting the children or going on around them. Teacher language was coupled with gestures, hugging, and conducting necessary activities such as diaper changing. Child-Child Interactions (including words spoken, gestures, actions, etc.): Most of the children were

too young to really interact with each other, but they played or ate side by side in small groups. Teacher-Family Interactions (e.g., communication during arrival and departure, encouraging family members to read or play with children, help with separations and transitions)

No teacher family interactions were shown.

Other (add any relevant additional information that you gathered below) – not required.

Analysis #2 Complete all three sections for Videotape #2.

1. Provide a brief description of the program.

This video showed different vignettes of teachers and their infant/toddlers students engaged in everyday activities where the teacher used descriptive and repetitive language about their environment, daily routine and play activities to enhance positive language expansion.

2. Describe at least three of the following: a) educational approach (e.g., intentional play,

project-based learning, Reggio Emilia, Montessori, High/Scope), b) lessons and/or activities

implemented, c) observed teaching practices, d) children’s engagement in different learning

experiences, e) teacher-child interactions, f) child-child interactions, and g) teacher-family

interactions.

A. The educational approach was teaching language through interaction.

B. This type of teaching definitely reflects the Reggio Emilia approach’s emphasis on the child’s

relationships. The trust between the teacher and child engages the child to everything the teacher is

saying and allows him or her to absorb the language in a dynamic and positive environment.

C. The teachers spoke slowly, intentionally, asked the children questions, repeated themselves and

addressed children individually or in small groups.

D. The children were shown in basic daily routine activities such as eating, but also in indoor and outdoor

play with books, motor skill toys, all connected through the teacher’s language.

E. The children interacted with each other only slightly given their ages. The teachers worked to connect

them but it was mostly parallel play and eating.

F. No family interactions were depicted.

Connect at least one observed experience to early learning and development standards.

This video was not a straight observation like video 1, it was many different scenes involving a variety of teachers and children of different ages.

One of the teachers used the number 5 in Spanish to address the class, and repeated several times Cinco

for the children. She brought one child’s culture into the classroom for the others to learn and share. The

positive use of a basic term in Spanish showed the depth of teacher’s relationship and her willingness to

bring diversity to her classroom.

3. State how your observation findings compare to what you have learned about quality care and education, developmentally appropriate practices (DAP), and the Code of Ethical Conduct. This entire video depicted developmentally appropriate practice, the way the children were coached, the way the teachers engaged with each child and used language, repetition and their environment to teach them language. The Spanish lesson in particular spoke to the idea of teaching the whole childhood, as did the descriptions and questions surrounding daily, mundane activities. Using the environment and the relationship between the teacher and students.to use for both your classroom observation and analysis. Observation: Two Videotaped Classrooms 1. Write your observation notes for both classrooms on this form. 2. Once the observation is completed, type the information you recorded into the form. Analysis Follow the instructions below for analysis of the two videotaped classroom observations. Due in Unit 4: The completed, typed form must contain both the observation and analysis. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VIDEOTAPE #1

Observer’s Name: _Jodi Starr________________Videotape Title: “Literacy Lesson First Grade”studen

Date(s) of Observation: ___7/13/18_________ Time(s): Start: _3:35_________ End: _3:45_________

CENTER/FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME/SCHOOL INFORMATION

Program Type (“X” for all that apply): X public _private _non-profit _faith-based _corporate _other: __________ Teaching Staff Total Observed: __1__ Teachers ___1_ Assistant Teachers __1___ Other: __observing administrator

Children Total Observed: ____Infants ____ Toddlers ____ Preschoolers ____Kindergartners 8 Primary (1-3)

EDUCATIONAL APPROACH You are looking for signs of quality, applied theories, one or two specific approaches,

and developmentally appropriate practices. Program’s Philosophy (Listen for descriptions of the listed items. Is there a specific theory-based philosophy, model, approach or curriculum? What is their approach to family engagement?)

Mission and Vision: to teach a reading/literacy lesson to school aged children Educational Philosophy: Seemed close to Reggio Emilia’s 100 Language of Children Curriculum Approach: Literacy Based, focusing on a broader concept presented in a grade level story Family Engagement: Family engagement was not present in this video

CHS111: Foundations of Early Childhood Education

Videotaped Classroom Observation & Analysis Tool

POSTED CLASSROOM INFORMATION Do you see signs of the following in the videotape?

(Put “X” for all that are observed): ___ Daily Schedule _X__ Lesson Plan ___Parent/Family Bulletin Board ___ Children’s Creations: (e.g., art, writing, dictated stories) ___ Other _______________________________________________________________________________

Lesson Plan: Describe evidence of developmental domains and early learning standards? (Hint: You may find evidence in a lesson plan or postings around the classroom in different learning centers, on the Family Bulletin Board.)

The lesson plan was a literacy lesson based on the question “is our world the same as it was”. The lesson started with background knowledge vocabulary words, and moved through predictions about story, the story, small group discussing about the topic and larger class discussion about the topic. Students used graphic organizers for their predictions.

OBSERVED EXPERIENCES Write only what you see and what you hear! Only the facts! No opinions!

Location (Check all that apply): __X__ Classroom _____ Outdoors (e.g., playground) _____ Indoor Gymnasium _____Other: ___________________________________________

Daily Schedule Routine (e.g., free choice, morning meeting, transition to outdoors, … )

Literacy lesson—focusing on the concept of past and present, included vocabulary lesson, a story to read, books to explore, and a graphic organizer to record predictions and illustrate the story. Materials being used: Vocabulary picture cards, graphic organizer, books, large paper to write out

sentences and concepts for all students to see, Signs of Children’s Interest and Engagement in the activities: The students actively waved their hands when asked a question, the teacher employs a point system for good behavior and appropriate responses to questions. Teacher-Child Interactions (including words spoken, gestures, actions, etc.): The teacher used a gesture called release the answer, where the child whispers the answer into his or her first and on que releases the answer to the class, the teacher crouches down to the students’ level, prompts the students, asks direct questions and for repetition of words and statements he’s already made. He also breaks up the lesson into several different parts to keep the children engaged – there is a vocab card component, the syllable walk, small group conversations and larger group teach and repeat portions. Child-Child Interactions (including words spoken, gestures, actions, etc.): The children break off into pairs and discuss the concepts and to explore different books together and they walk around together during the syllable walk. Teacher-Family Interactions (e.g., communication during arrival and departure, encouraging family members to read or play with children, help with separations and transitions) None are observed

Other (add any relevant additional information that you gathered below) – not required.

Analysis #1 Complete all three sections for Videotape #1.

1. Provide a brief description of the videotape.

This video showed a literacy lesson in a first grade class based on the story “Long Ago and Far Away” The teacher started off with guiding questions, “is our world the same as it was”. He continued with background knowledge words and went through predictions about the story using a graphic organizer. He followed up the story with small group discussion about the story as well as offered other examples of new old, like a book about new and old cars that the children could explore in small groups. The lesson focused on repetition about the concepts of past and present.

2. Describe at least three of the following: a) educational approach (e.g., intentional play,

project-based learning, Reggio Emilia, Montessori, High/Scope), b) lessons and/or activities

implemented, c) observed teaching practices, d) children’s engagement in different learning

experiences, e) teacher-child interactions, f) child-child interactions, and g) teacher-family

interactions.

A. I think the teacher employs portions of several different approaches. The first one being Reggio

Emilia’s 100 different languages approach. The teacher presented several different activities and

methods for the children to absorb the information, and even incorporated physical activity such as

the “syllable walk” to reach every child.

I also observed some of the High Scope “learn-do-review-approach” in that the teacher provided

the basic knowledge of the lessons, gave several activities such as small group discussions and

the graphic organizer and then came back to the larger group. He also began the lesson with a

The teacher seems to be undergoing an observation by a school administrator and brings that administrator in the lesson and asking the students to respond to him directly.

challenging question “Is our world the same as it was?” and went on to provide the children with

the knowledge and confidence to formulate their answers.

B. The teacher started ”The Long Ago and Far Away Lesson” with a thematic question “is our world

the same as it was?” to focus the kids thinking on the differences between past and present that

the story was based on. He then moved through a vocabulary lessons, had kids make predictions

about their story, using as graphic organizer which also had space for them to do their own

illustrations of the story. He implemented small group discussions and engage himself with those

small groups to talk about the story and the predictions, and followed up the lesson with a different

contrast of past and present, providing the students with different books depicting things such as

old and new cars.

C/D. The teacher implemented a lot of repetition and physical gestures to keep not only keep the

classroom calm but to help children absorb and remember the vocabulary words he was teaching. He

used small groups, and a lot of questions to engage his students and was often seen crouching down

to the student’s level to ask a specific question or assess if the child was picking up the concept. He

created a strong theme for the lesson with a variety of activities beyond just reading the story to really

show the kids the difference between past and present. The lesson involved verbal, written, artistic,

physical and social aspects of learning. Keeping the kids moving from one activity to the next

including getting up several times and walking around, really helped the kids to stay engaged and

focused. He took the time to really focus on each kid’s answer and meeting the small groups on their

physical level. There was also an assistant teacher available to help kids that seemed to need a little

extra assistance.

E. The teacher appeared very respectful of the children, their responses and their needs throughout

the lesson. Often, we don’t picture teachers of young children as large, muscled, young men, but this

teacher was extremely warm, spirited and positive and connected very well with his students. He

seemed aware of his stature and repeatedly crouched down to be at eye level with the children as they

sat at their desks.

F. The children in the class were very well behaved, and since they were continuously stimulated by

both physical and educational stimulus, they were not antsy or restless, which might cause them to

negatively interact with each other or start little conversations and physical problems during the

lesson. The children were taught as a large group at their desks on sitting together on a carpet. They

were also broken down into small groups to discuss the story, their predictions and the secondary

materials presented at the end of the lesson. Even during the syllable walk, which might be a time for

children to get rowdy, the moved respectfully through the classroom and amongst one another.

G. No teacher/family interactions were shown in this video

Connect at least one observed experience to early learning and development standards.

This lesson focused on literacy. Not just reading to read, but reading and vocabulary to understand

larger concepts. This approach folds right into the Head Start theory that literacy sets young children up for

a lifetime of successful learning. It established a foundation for critical thinking and a sense of curiosity by

presenting not just curriculum materials but also outside materials that showed the same concept in different

forms.

3. State how your observation findings compare to what you have learned about quality care and education, developmentally appropriate practices (DAP), and the Code of Ethical Conduct. This observation showed me that DAP practices are alive and well and being implemented even in elementary classrooms. It was clear that this teacher understood his students learning levels and how to reach them and presented the information in a variety of forms to meet those needs. He taught to the whole child by bringing in non-curriculum materials that explored the subject at hand but might appeal to the kids in a different, more personal way than the assigned story. He created a lesson that would influence all types of learners in a warm and pleasant atmosphere.

VIDEOTAPE #2 Observer’s Name: Jodi Starr______________ Videotape Title: Language Learning for Infants and Toddlers Date(s) of Observation: __7/13/18______________Time(s): Start_6:44______ End:

____6:55___________

CENTER/FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME/SCHOOL INFORMATION

Program Type (“X” for all that apply): _public _private _non-profit _faith-based _corporate _other: __________ Teaching Staff: many different teachers and various babies Total Observed: _____ Teachers _____ Assistant Teachers ______ Other: ________________

Children: Total Observed: _many___Infants ____ Toddlers ____ Preschoolers ____Kindergartners ____ Primary

(1-3)

EDUCATIONAL APPROACH You are looking for signs of quality, applied theories, one or two specific approaches,

and developmentally appropriate practices. Program’s Philosophy (Listen for descriptions of the listed items. Is there a specific theory-based philosophy, model, approach or curriculum? What is their approach to family engagement?)

Mission and Vision: Positive language expansion for infants and toddlers Educational Philosophy: using a positive and engaged relationship to teach language skills Curriculum Approach: teaching language and literacy through every day language use Family Engagement: no family interaction was shown

POSTED CLASSROOM INFORMATION Do you see signs of the following in the videotape?

(Put “X” for all that are observed): __X_ Daily Schedule ___ Lesson Plan ___Parent/Family Bulletin Board Children’s Creations: (e.g., art, writing, dictated stories) ___ Children’s Creations: (e.g., art, writing, dictated stories) ___ Other ______________________________________________________________________________

Lesson Plan: Describe evidence of developmental domains and early learning standards? (Hint: You may find evidence in a lesson plan or postings around the classroom in different learning centers, on the Family Bulletin Board.)

The teachers used language throughout their daily routines to increase language skills. They would repeat appropriate words and questions throughout the day. For example, during changing, the teacher would talk directly, one on one to the baby about what she was doing. The teachers were sure to use very descriptive language and lots of repetition.

OBSERVED EXPERIENCES Write only what you see and what you hear! Only the facts! No opinions!

Location (Check all that apply): ____X Classroom X_____ Outdoors (e.g., playground) _____ Indoor Gymnasium _____Other: __________________________________________

Daily Schedule Routine (e.g., free choice, morning meeting, transition to outdoors, … )

All different scenarios of eating, playing, diaper changing, outdoor play. Materials being used: basic early childhood classroom set-ups, diaper changing stations, child sized furniture, outdoor play equipment, carpets for play, motor skills toys. Signs of Children’s Interest and Engagement in the activities: The children were extremely engaged

with their caregivers as they are young enough to be reliant on them for all basic needs, they were all paying attention when the teachers were talking. Teacher-Child Interactions (including words spoken, gestures, actions, etc.): During the variety of examples, the teachers were speaking directly to one child or a small group of children about their environment and the activities directly affecting the children or going on around them. Teacher language was coupled with gestures, hugging, and conducting necessary activities such as diaper changing. Child-Child Interactions (including words spoken, gestures, actions, etc.): Most of the children were

too young to really interact with each other, but they played or ate side by side in small groups. Teacher-Family Interactions (e.g., communication during arrival and departure, encouraging family members to read or play with children, help with separations and transitions)

No teacher family interactions were shown.

Other (add any relevant additional information that you gathered below) – not required.

Analysis #2 Complete all three sections for Videotape #2.

1. Provide a brief description of the program.

This video showed different vignettes of teachers and their infant/toddlers students engaged in everyday activities where the teacher used descriptive and repetitive language about their environment, daily routine and play activities to enhance positive language expansion.

2. Describe at least three of the following: a) educational approach (e.g., intentional play,

project-based learning, Reggio Emilia, Montessori, High/Scope), b) lessons and/or activities

implemented, c) observed teaching practices, d) children’s engagement in different learning

experiences, e) teacher-child interactions, f) child-child interactions, and g) teacher-family

interactions.

A. The educational approach was teaching language through interaction.

B. This type of teaching definitely reflects the Reggio Emilia approach’s emphasis on the child’s

relationships. The trust between the teacher and child engages the child to everything the teacher is

saying and allows him or her to absorb the language in a dynamic and positive environment.

C. The teachers spoke slowly, intentionally, asked the children questions, repeated themselves and

addressed children individually or in small groups.

D. The children were shown in basic daily routine activities such as eating, but also in indoor and outdoor

play with books, motor skill toys, all connected through the teacher’s language.

E. The children interacted with each other only slightly given their ages. The teachers worked to connect

them but it was mostly parallel play and eating.

F. No family interactions were depicted.

Connect at least one observed experience to early learning and development standards.

This video was not a straight observation like video 1, it was many different scenes involving a variety of teachers and children of different ages.

One of the teachers used the number 5 in Spanish to address the class, and repeated several times Cinco

for the children. She brought one child’s culture into the classroom for the others to learn and share. The

positive use of a basic term in Spanish showed the depth of teacher’s relationship and her willingness to

bring diversity to her classroom.

3. State how your observation findings compare to what you have learned about quality care and education, developmentally appropriate practices (DAP), and the Code of Ethical Conduct. This entire video depicted developmentally appropriate practice, the way the children were coached, the way the teachers engaged with each child and used language, repetition and their environment to teach them language. The Spanish lesson in particular spoke to the idea of teaching the whole childhood, as did the descriptions and questions surrounding daily, mundane activities. Using the environment and the relationship between the teacher and students.

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Essay & Assignment Help
Study Master
Calculation Guru
Engineering Guru
Top Academic Guru
Premium Solutions
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Essay & Assignment Help

ONLINE

Essay & Assignment Help

I find your project quite stimulating and related to my profession. I can surely contribute you with your project.

$35 Chat With Writer
Study Master

ONLINE

Study Master

I have assisted scholars, business persons, startups, entrepreneurs, marketers, managers etc in their, pitches, presentations, market research, business plans etc.

$31 Chat With Writer
Calculation Guru

ONLINE

Calculation Guru

After reading your project details, I feel myself as the best option for you to fulfill this project with 100 percent perfection.

$20 Chat With Writer
Engineering Guru

ONLINE

Engineering Guru

I am an elite class writer with more than 6 years of experience as an academic writer. I will provide you the 100 percent original and plagiarism-free content.

$20 Chat With Writer
Top Academic Guru

ONLINE

Top Academic Guru

I am a PhD writer with 10 years of experience. I will be delivering high-quality, plagiarism-free work to you in the minimum amount of time. Waiting for your message.

$18 Chat With Writer
Premium Solutions

ONLINE

Premium Solutions

I am an academic and research writer with having an MBA degree in business and finance. I have written many business reports on several topics and am well aware of all academic referencing styles.

$38 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

12 angry men video questions - Cargo securing for road transport - Music Appreciation - Requirements compliance matrix template - Calcium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid net ionic equation - Processing hour of code - They say i say chapter 1 summary - United states v microsoft antitrust case summary - Ocr m1 june 2014 - Change management simulation - Project 2 - In the earliest stages of the just-in-time training project, which task is completed first? - Sula critical analysis - Cristina re stockists adelaide - Analyze the case study in this folder Tobacco Industry Manipulation of Research. - Cultural Studies - Assignment needed by Sunday @ 9am. - Dragon age inquisition ritual puzzle - Hls hyperactive libido syndrome - Six stages of sensorimotor intelligence - Environment lapse rate - Www pigeon craic com auctions - Intentional interviewing and counseling 8th edition ebook - What does sociological perspective mean - Master data services add in for excel - Criminal Justice - Gull wing ic package - E3 spark plug heat range chart - Family relatives and kith - Essay - City two point perspective - Stephen robbins organizational behaviour ppt 13th edition - File submission: Computer Operation Vocabulary - Compound employee api query - 4.5 9 distance in kilometers codehs - Dark dense igneous rock - Mailbox magazine companion preschool april may 2010 learning centers - Week 5 socioautobiography audio powerpoint - Footprint on your heart by gary lenhart analysis - What does baggage mean in romeo and juliet - Advertising tricks of the trade - Romeo and juliet catholic protestant - A dc motor delivers mechanical power to a rotating - NCM_Journal Review - Benchmark patient's spiritual needs case analysis - Suffolk hunt pony club - Tescos aims and objectives - Big little z what begins with - Emotional intelligence involves all of the following abilities except - Cypress pine house stumps - Cloud computing - The book joey reads to emma on friends - Diffusion and osmosis experiment with potatoes - Difference between saber and conocer - Integer sequences should you believe in patterns - A horseman in the sky conflict - Benchmark: Southwest Transit - Easy English homework - IT Forum Reply - Financial accounting information for decisions 6th edition - Chapter 15 vehicle spotting latin translation - Cisco umbrella sku list - Kal so4 2 name - Short - Uq confirmation of enrolment - Roald dahl family tree - 10000000 in scientific notation - Cloud Computing Paper - Compact laminate cut to size - Write a essay - Kimmel center les mis tickets - Business analytics essay sample - Bill inmon vs ralph kimball - Miller corporation has a premium bond making - Discussion Question 1 - What are the three primary behavior determinants of organizational behavior - Logic and critical thinking ppt - Electrical test instruments maryland - Klinefelter Syndrome - Free descriptive essay on nature - Cultural artifact speech - Example of speech essay - Business Operation Paper 1 - Scottish power safety rules - Yo quiero taco bell translation - Beloved wife is not well behaved baka - Argumentative thesis statement on police brutality - Bachelor of engineering uts - PowerPoint on Nursing theory Peaceful End of Life Nursing Theory by Cornelia Ruland and Shirley Moore - Iv characteristics of zener diode experimentiv characteristics of zener diode experiment - Georgy girl ukulele chords - Klein isd two step equations answers - Quicksilver outer barrier reef - Hot soup temperature celsius - Pearson education 2010 edexcel gcse science activity pack - My exam timetable unimelb - What is integrity interview question - Zeise's salt ppt - O in police alphabet - Lancaster uni campus map