Tna in hrm

Every organization needs to train their employees from time to time to keep them updated on the knowledge and skills needed for the job. Training is important and can be a big investment for the corporation. The first step in an effective employee training program is to identify the knowledge or skills the employees are missing or need to improve upon. This can be accomplished by performing a needs assessment at both individual and organizational levels. This process includes establishing an understanding of the current organizational status, as far as the employee skills are concerned, and at what level it should be in the future.

“A training needs analysis (TNA) is a systematic method for determining what caused performance to be less than expected or required. Performance improvement is the focus of training” (Blanchard & Thacker, 2007, p. 101). By performing a TNA, a company or organization can decide if training can improve performance issues. A TNA can be performed when a company or organization decides to change a policy or has concerns about a specific issue. A TNA also can be performed to help encourage and enhance team-building skills.

Team E has chosen Starbucks Corporation as the organization to perform a needs analysis that identifies training objectives and defines a measuring system that identifies those objectives’ effectiveness. The analysis will include an organizational analysis, a team analysis, and a task analysis.

Organizational Analysis

Since the time Starbucks was founded in 1971, the company has undergone tremendous development that has not been attained by many global companies. However, for the sustainability of the development the company has had so far, there is a need to look at issues that have acted as hindrances in the development of the company (Bucks, 2009). These issues range from: organizational needs, conflict with host nations, dealing with hostilities and ensuring that the responses made by the customers are looked into.

Between 2001 and 2008, Starbucks had managerial problems that led to instability in the profits made. Between these times, two CEOs served the company (Gilbert, 2008). The first five years were under Orin Smith and the last three years the company was led by Jim Donald. During this time there was an unsteady rise and fall in business that was culminated by closure of 300 outlets in the United States of America (Bucks, 2009). However, between 2009 and 2012 when the management was given back to Howard Schultz, the company could get back on its feet. This poses a major threat on the future of the company. Bearing this in mind, Starbucks should be able to create a modernity that will ensure the continuity of business preempting post Howard era of the company (Bucks, 2009).

Starbucks closed its stores in Israel in 2008 because of operational difficulties. Some of the difficulties include the historic war between Israel and Palestine. Whereas Starbucks closed its stores, there are many companies both local and international that have still maintained their markets there. This calls on the ability of the company to deal with hostilities (Gilbert, 2008). There is no proof that the 62 countries where Starbucks has extended its markets will remain peaceful. The September 11, 2001 terrorist attack in America is one of experiences that caught the world by surprise. The attack revealed how prone any part of the world was to insecurity and thus the need for any company to be prepared for hostility occurrences.

The other area that Starbucks needs to improve on is how to deal with the feedback from customers and other external environment. A case in this respect is the outcry on the treatment of revenue gotten from Ethos water a company that Starbucks purchased in 2003 (Gilbert, 2008). In the branded bottles’ the company indicates that the sales made are aimed at ensuring that clean water is available to children. Critics have been raising the query why the brand is not yet charitable. In response, Starbucks argues that the statement on the bottle is aimed at creating awareness on need to use clean water (Bucks, 2009). This has raised even more criticism that is a risk to the market of both the Ethos brand and other products of Starbucks.