What are the four components of health care

Four Components Of Health Care

There are many reasons why a bill is introduced into legislation, helping a select group of people to make sure that everyone in the country is being protected. It is important as a healthcare provider to understand, how different bills effect the healthcare profession.

Select a current health care bill that addresses one or more of the components of healthcare. You will use three to five academic sources to write this paper.

Write a 1,250-1,500-word paper about how the bill affects health care services in the community in which you live. Include the following:

Summarize the components of the health care bill.
Describe the health care components that are addressed in this bill.
Who sponsored this bill? Who are the proponents of the bill and who opposes this legislation? What is their position (i.e., why do they disagree?).
Does this bill helps or hinders health care services in the community. Describe how it may affect allied health professionals.
Does this bill affect the health care and allied health care professionals?
Review the American Psychological Association (APA) writing style guidelines and resources located in the Student Success Center. APA format is required for most assignments, so students should become familiar with these resources to facilitate the successful completion of course assignments.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Top of Form

our Components of Health Care

1 Does Not Meet Expectations 0.00%

2 Approaches Expectations 65.00%

3 Meets Expectations 75.00%

4 Exceeds Expectations 85.00%

5 Outstanding 100.00%

70.0 %Content

10.0 %Summary of the Health Care Bill

Subject knowledge is not or is poorly demonstrated. Summary of the health care bill is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant.

Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent. Summary of the health care bill lacks comprehension, and understanding of what the purpose is of the bill. Sufficient justification of the bill is lacking. This is weak or marginal coverage of the bill, with gaps in presentation.

Some subject knowledge is evident. Summary of the health care bill has some comprehension of the material and attempts to outline the proposal using outside sources. The bill is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The bill presents marginal justification of purpose. All the subject matter in the bill is covered in minimal quantity and quality.

Subject knowledge appears to be good. Summary of the health care bill shows integrative comprehension of the proposal. The bill's proposal is strong, showing a logical progression. The summary shows a smooth progression through the bill. There is a comprehensive coverage of subject matter.

Demonstrates thorough subject knowledge and understanding. Summary of the health care bill is a very well written piece that shows as integrative comprehension and thoughtful application of the material covered in the bill. Clear and convincing outline that is insightful and represents a persuasive understanding of the bill that covers beyond what is needed for the bill.

15.0 %Identification of the Bill?s Stakeholders and their Positions Pro or Con

Subject knowledge is not or is poorly demonstrated. Summary of the bill?s stakeholders? interest and their positions is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant.

Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent. Summary of the stakeholders? interest and their positions pro or con is vague and irrelevant. Sufficient justification of the positions is lacking. This is weak or marginal coverage of the stakeholders? interest, with gaps in presentation.

Some subject knowledge is evident. Provides basic summary of the stakeholders? interest and positions, both pro and con and presentation is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The summary presents marginal justification of the stakeholders? interests. Stakeholder pros and cons are covered in minimal quantity and quality.

Subject knowledge appears to be good. A clear description of the stakeholders? interests is presented along with a thorough discussion of the various pros and cons of each.

Demonstrates thorough subject knowledge and understanding. A comprehensive description of the stakeholders? interests as well as their pros and cons is presented with rich detail and includes a logical and insightful discussion of all necessary elements. Includes supportive examples to further understanding.

20.0 %Description of Effect on Delivery of Services

Subject knowledge is not or is poorly demonstrated. A description of the effect on delivery of services that should govern is either missing or not evident to the reader.

Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent. A description of the effect on delivery of services is present, but it is incomplete or illogical.

Some subject knowledge is evident. A basic description of the effect on delivery of services is presented but remains cursory.

Subject knowledge appears to be good. A clear description of the effect on delivery of services is presented and includes a reasonable discussion of all necessary elements.

Demonstrates thorough subject knowledge and understanding. A description of the effect on delivery of services is presented with rich detail and includes a logical and insightful discussion of all necessary elements. Includes supportive examples to further understanding.

20.0 %Description of Effect on Allied Health Professionals

Subject knowledge is not or is poorly demonstrated. A description of the effect of allied health professionals is either missing or not evident to the reader.

Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent. A description of the effect of allied health professionals is present, but it is incomplete or illogical.

Some subject knowledge is evident. A description of the effect of allied health professionals is presented but remains cursory.

Subject knowledge appears to be good. A description of the effect of allied health professionals is presented and includes a reasonable discussion of all necessary elements.

Demonstrates thorough subject knowledge and understanding. A description of the effect of allied health professionals is presented with rich detail and includes a logical and insightful discussion of all necessary elements. Includes supportive examples to further understanding.

5.0 %Research Sources (Sources are appropriate, relevant, etc. Also, sources meet assignment quantity and type specifications. Sources include three to five [3-5] academic resources.)

Sources are not used or cited as required in the assignment instructions. Uses non-credible sources.

Source relevance is vague and/or inconsistent. Does not include references appropriate sources: three to five academic resources.

Source relevance is mostly applicable and appropriate. Includes references from appropriate sources: three to five academic resources.

Source relevance is applicable and appropriate in all instances. Includes references from appropriate sources: five or more academic resources.

Source relevance is applicable and appropriate in all instances as well as sparking interest in the reader to pursue further investigation. Includes references from appropriate sources: more than five academic resources.

20.0 %Organization and Format

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.