Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

What is the sociological concept coined by irving janis

16/03/2021 Client: saad24vbs Deadline: 2 Day

The sociological theory known as groupthink was first developed by Irving Janis in 1972. Groupthink became popular almost instantly, because of its applicability to a wide variety of academic disciplines and everyday problems in politics and business. Despite its popularity however, researchers have had difficulty empirically verifying the theory. Thus, in addition to reviewing the specifics of Janis's original model, and a sample of the ways in which it has been used, the arguments of its critics will be reviewed. Most critics propose reformulations of Janis's theory, although some suggest it should be abandoned altogether.

Keywords Antecedents; Consensus-seeking; Decision Making; Group Cohesion; Groupthink; Janis, Irving; Symptoms

Groupthink

Overview

First introduced in 1972 by Irving Janis, groupthink is a theory that attempts to explain why groups sometimes make poor decisions. Janis was particularly interested in the practical applications of his work; indeed, much of his theory was derived from case studies of political advisory groups for four different US presidents. The immediate relevance of his theory made it an instant success and just three years after the idea was introduced, the term groupthink appeared in Webster's Dictionary, defined as "conformity to group values and ethics" (Turner & Pratkanis, 1998). Janis (1972), however, defined it a little more broadly, as, "a quick and easy way to refer to a mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' strivings for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action" (p. 9).

At first, the theory had great impact. As McCauley (1998) states, "The success of the groupthink model is a phenomenon worth attention in its own right" (p. 157). But what makes the success of groupthink different from the success of any other sociological theory? It is precisely because groupthink achieved this success despite a lack of evidence in support of the theory. As Paulus (1998) states, "The instant and continuing popularity of groupthink in the social psychology and organizational textbooks is a bit surprising given the relatively weak empirical basis [upon which it rests]" (p. 364). Turner and Pratkanis (1998) are a little more direct in arguing that no research has supported Janis's original hypothesized model.

As a result, many sociologists have spent as much time attempting to explain the success of Janis's theory as they have investigating the theory itself. Paulus (1998) points to the simplicity of the theory, as well as Janis's promotional efforts —its original publication in Psychology Today and the subsequent release of a film—as explanations for its widespread appeal. McCauley (1998) explains its success by describing three characteristics of the scholarly and popular audience. First and foremost, McCauley (1998) argues, groupthink satisfied the audience's hunger for applied research. Indeed, Janis's own interest in application is evident in his introduction to Victims of Groupthink. He states, "How can groupthink be prevented? In the nuclear age, perhaps all of us might justifiably feel slightly less insecure if definitive answers to this could be quickly pinned down and applied" (Janis, 1972, p. vi). Janis even left his position at Yale so that he could give his full attention to research that might help prevent nuclear war (Janis, 1986). In addition to appealing to an audience's thirst for applied research, groupthink also served two other ends after it was first introduced. It allowed people to evaluate poor decisions without placing blame on any single individual, and it helped maintain peoples' belief in the democratic ideal that group decisions should be better than individual ones (McCauley, 1998).

Whatever the reason for the popularity of groupthink, it is difficult to overlook the inherent irony in the widespread acceptance of the theory in the absence of evidence. Groupthink is a theory purporting the dangers of consensus-seeking in the absence of evidence, and yet it seems to have become a victim of the very thing it warns against. As Turner and Pratkanis (1998) conclude, "the unconditional acceptance of the groupthink phenomenon without due regard for the body of scientific evidence surrounding it leads to unthinking conformity to a theoretical standpoint that may be invalid for the majority of circumstances. This in turn leads to a spiral of ignorance and superstition that is not easily circumvented" (p. 133).

Groupthink Theory

It is arguably as important to understand the way in which groupthink theory was developed as it is to understand the theory itself. Janis' interest in the idea was piqued when reading about policy decisions made by advisory groups to American presidents. Janis (1972) states, "The main theme of this book occurred to me while reading Arthur M. Schlesinger's chapters on the Bay of Pigs in A Thousand Days. How could bright, shrewd men like John F. Kennedy and his advisers be taken in by the CIA's stupid, patchwork plan? I began to wonder whether some kind of psychological contagion…had interfered with their mental alertness" (p. iii). As a result, Janis chose to develop his theory by analyzing four policy decisions that resulted in what he referred to as "fiascos." The four case studies included:

• Franklin D. Roosevelt's 1941 decision to focus on training rather than defense of Pearl Harbor, despite warnings of a possible surprise attack;

• President Truman's 1950 decision to escalate the Korean War;

• President Kennedy's 1960 decision to invade Cuba and,

• President Johnson's decision to escalate the Vietnam War.

Later, Janis added President Nixon's decision to cover up the Watergate break-in as a fifth example of groupthink; he eventually concluded that Watergate provided his best example of the phenomenon (Esser, 1998). In addition to analyzing policy decisions ending in fiascos, Janis also conducted case studies of two successful group decision-making processes—the Marshall Plan to avert economic collapse in post-war Europe and the handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962 (Esser, 1998). Although Janis acknowledged that additional research would be needed, these case studies provided the foundation for his theory.

From these six case studies, Janis developed a tri-partite model of the groupthink phenomenon. Specifically, he identified five antecedent conditions to groupthink, eight symptoms of groupthink, and seven symptoms of defective decision making (Janis & Mann, 1977). The antecedent conditions and symptoms increase the likelihood, he argued, of a poor decision outcome. He acknowledged, however, that the link between symptoms of groupthink and poor decision outcomes is imperfect, and that successful outcomes can sometimes result from defective decisions (Janis, 1972).




















































Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Calculation Guru
Ideas & Innovations
Pro Writer
Custom Coursework Service
Financial Analyst
Engineering Exam Guru
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Calculation Guru

ONLINE

Calculation Guru

I am known as Unrivaled Quality, Written to Standard, providing Plagiarism-free woork, and Always on Time

$21 Chat With Writer
Ideas & Innovations

ONLINE

Ideas & Innovations

Give me a chance, i will do this with my best efforts

$101 Chat With Writer
Pro Writer

ONLINE

Pro Writer

You can award me any time as I am ready to start your project curiously. Waiting for your positive response. Thank you!

$101 Chat With Writer
Custom Coursework Service

ONLINE

Custom Coursework Service

Give me a chance, i will do this with my best efforts

$97 Chat With Writer
Financial Analyst

ONLINE

Financial Analyst

I will cover all the points which you have mentioned in your project details.

$56 Chat With Writer
Engineering Exam Guru

ONLINE

Engineering Exam Guru

I will cover all the points which you have mentioned in your project details.

$37 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

Tara yosso critical race counterstories - The stolen white elephant sparknotes - Small Lisp and C Code - Basic tools for process improvement module 7 - 6 coora road yowie bay - Triangle diamond necklace girlfriends guide to divorce - The innocent anthropologist chapter summaries - Galloway township police department - Which of the following bonds is the weakest - Paper - Job based pay vs person based pay - Quantitative analysis of medical records - A whisper of aids summary - Cgp and itar clearance - Unisuper binding death nomination form - When do joey and rachel date - What is marlow's mission in heart of darkness - Principles of effective writing - Individual risk management report, Streakers Hair and Beauty Salon - Chocolate lovers unite a role playing simulation on web analytics - Excel Question - Elevation of a shape - Prince sports inc case study - "A" WORK DISCUSSION IN 15 HOURS - How to determine words per minute - Chapter 8 cellular reproduction cells from cells - 7 14 the electrocomp corporation manufactures - Lyrics for under the sea - Iv x pv factorial design example - Perceptual map presentation mkt 421 powerpoint - Borderlands 2 caustic caverns undiscovered challenge - Radish seed germination lab results - What does the net change in the potato sample indicate - Reply to each post (Must be 150 words long for each one) in words. I expect perfect APA technique. The minimum requirement is three (3) scholarly sources with at least one (1) source a peer reviewed article published in the last 7 years. - Population density of bangladesh per square km - Michael uvalle law boss commercial - Rotor earth fault protection - Ancient egypt pyramid diorama - Ben and jerry's balance sheet - What are the resulting phenotypes - Responsible service of alcohol check - Counseling the culturally different theory and practice - Lds young women handbook - I tituba black witch of salem chapter 1 summary - Oppression remedy s232 - For my own good all causes shall give way - Rest com au memberaccess - Html2 css - Final Retrospective Research Proposal - Cross examination debate questions - Week 2 course project proposal - Interpersonal process recording sample - 7 billion and counting - Company rms customer number - 33130 mathematical modelling 1 - Yahoo messenger server ip address - Examples of government accounting journal entries - Slla constructed response practice questions - Discussion - Redox reaction examples everyday life - Token economy parenting - Platform error bad module bin friendsui not loading - Falmouth figure skating club - Emerald city wizard of oz characters - African American History Journal - Letter from an unknown woman text - Volar judith ortiz cofer pdf - Aqa a level psychology grade boundaries - Limiting reactant activity with food - Characteristics of chaparral biome - Drishtikon a management journal - San diego zoo annual visitors - Crystal glassware company has the following standards and flexible-budget data. - Preparing Statement of Cash Flows - Fat city special education video - Individual project - Advantages of using rubrics - Spanish numbers 31 100 - Federal safeguards for financial reporting abuse - Call optus stolen phone - Absolute value graph calculator - Weather - Characteristics of accounting information pdf - Dorothy johnson behavioral system model - Past tense of sew - Perturb and observe mppt algorithm matlab code - Point of view video - Table 2 generation data produced by monohybrid crosses - What are good questions to ask a military recruiter - A long-standing charge against intermediaries is that they mark up prices beyond the ________. - Entertainer who sang about deeds of knights - Leg lig lect root word definition - I have seen roses damasked red and white meaning - The prince by niccolo machiavelli answers - Policy, Legal, Ethics and Cmplc - I never sang for my father sparknotes - Walmart in china case study - Epremis billing manual - CORRECT LITERATURE REPORT !!!!! ( PROFESSOR ADJUSTMENTS) - Point cook coastal park walk