Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

What is the sociological concept coined by irving janis

16/03/2021 Client: saad24vbs Deadline: 2 Day

The sociological theory known as groupthink was first developed by Irving Janis in 1972. Groupthink became popular almost instantly, because of its applicability to a wide variety of academic disciplines and everyday problems in politics and business. Despite its popularity however, researchers have had difficulty empirically verifying the theory. Thus, in addition to reviewing the specifics of Janis's original model, and a sample of the ways in which it has been used, the arguments of its critics will be reviewed. Most critics propose reformulations of Janis's theory, although some suggest it should be abandoned altogether.

Keywords Antecedents; Consensus-seeking; Decision Making; Group Cohesion; Groupthink; Janis, Irving; Symptoms

Groupthink

Overview

First introduced in 1972 by Irving Janis, groupthink is a theory that attempts to explain why groups sometimes make poor decisions. Janis was particularly interested in the practical applications of his work; indeed, much of his theory was derived from case studies of political advisory groups for four different US presidents. The immediate relevance of his theory made it an instant success and just three years after the idea was introduced, the term groupthink appeared in Webster's Dictionary, defined as "conformity to group values and ethics" (Turner & Pratkanis, 1998). Janis (1972), however, defined it a little more broadly, as, "a quick and easy way to refer to a mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' strivings for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action" (p. 9).

At first, the theory had great impact. As McCauley (1998) states, "The success of the groupthink model is a phenomenon worth attention in its own right" (p. 157). But what makes the success of groupthink different from the success of any other sociological theory? It is precisely because groupthink achieved this success despite a lack of evidence in support of the theory. As Paulus (1998) states, "The instant and continuing popularity of groupthink in the social psychology and organizational textbooks is a bit surprising given the relatively weak empirical basis [upon which it rests]" (p. 364). Turner and Pratkanis (1998) are a little more direct in arguing that no research has supported Janis's original hypothesized model.

As a result, many sociologists have spent as much time attempting to explain the success of Janis's theory as they have investigating the theory itself. Paulus (1998) points to the simplicity of the theory, as well as Janis's promotional efforts —its original publication in Psychology Today and the subsequent release of a film—as explanations for its widespread appeal. McCauley (1998) explains its success by describing three characteristics of the scholarly and popular audience. First and foremost, McCauley (1998) argues, groupthink satisfied the audience's hunger for applied research. Indeed, Janis's own interest in application is evident in his introduction to Victims of Groupthink. He states, "How can groupthink be prevented? In the nuclear age, perhaps all of us might justifiably feel slightly less insecure if definitive answers to this could be quickly pinned down and applied" (Janis, 1972, p. vi). Janis even left his position at Yale so that he could give his full attention to research that might help prevent nuclear war (Janis, 1986). In addition to appealing to an audience's thirst for applied research, groupthink also served two other ends after it was first introduced. It allowed people to evaluate poor decisions without placing blame on any single individual, and it helped maintain peoples' belief in the democratic ideal that group decisions should be better than individual ones (McCauley, 1998).

Whatever the reason for the popularity of groupthink, it is difficult to overlook the inherent irony in the widespread acceptance of the theory in the absence of evidence. Groupthink is a theory purporting the dangers of consensus-seeking in the absence of evidence, and yet it seems to have become a victim of the very thing it warns against. As Turner and Pratkanis (1998) conclude, "the unconditional acceptance of the groupthink phenomenon without due regard for the body of scientific evidence surrounding it leads to unthinking conformity to a theoretical standpoint that may be invalid for the majority of circumstances. This in turn leads to a spiral of ignorance and superstition that is not easily circumvented" (p. 133).

Groupthink Theory

It is arguably as important to understand the way in which groupthink theory was developed as it is to understand the theory itself. Janis' interest in the idea was piqued when reading about policy decisions made by advisory groups to American presidents. Janis (1972) states, "The main theme of this book occurred to me while reading Arthur M. Schlesinger's chapters on the Bay of Pigs in A Thousand Days. How could bright, shrewd men like John F. Kennedy and his advisers be taken in by the CIA's stupid, patchwork plan? I began to wonder whether some kind of psychological contagion…had interfered with their mental alertness" (p. iii). As a result, Janis chose to develop his theory by analyzing four policy decisions that resulted in what he referred to as "fiascos." The four case studies included:

• Franklin D. Roosevelt's 1941 decision to focus on training rather than defense of Pearl Harbor, despite warnings of a possible surprise attack;

• President Truman's 1950 decision to escalate the Korean War;

• President Kennedy's 1960 decision to invade Cuba and,

• President Johnson's decision to escalate the Vietnam War.

Later, Janis added President Nixon's decision to cover up the Watergate break-in as a fifth example of groupthink; he eventually concluded that Watergate provided his best example of the phenomenon (Esser, 1998). In addition to analyzing policy decisions ending in fiascos, Janis also conducted case studies of two successful group decision-making processes—the Marshall Plan to avert economic collapse in post-war Europe and the handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962 (Esser, 1998). Although Janis acknowledged that additional research would be needed, these case studies provided the foundation for his theory.

From these six case studies, Janis developed a tri-partite model of the groupthink phenomenon. Specifically, he identified five antecedent conditions to groupthink, eight symptoms of groupthink, and seven symptoms of defective decision making (Janis & Mann, 1977). The antecedent conditions and symptoms increase the likelihood, he argued, of a poor decision outcome. He acknowledged, however, that the link between symptoms of groupthink and poor decision outcomes is imperfect, and that successful outcomes can sometimes result from defective decisions (Janis, 1972).




















































Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Calculation Guru
Ideas & Innovations
Pro Writer
Custom Coursework Service
Financial Analyst
Engineering Exam Guru
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Calculation Guru

ONLINE

Calculation Guru

I am known as Unrivaled Quality, Written to Standard, providing Plagiarism-free woork, and Always on Time

$21 Chat With Writer
Ideas & Innovations

ONLINE

Ideas & Innovations

Give me a chance, i will do this with my best efforts

$101 Chat With Writer
Pro Writer

ONLINE

Pro Writer

You can award me any time as I am ready to start your project curiously. Waiting for your positive response. Thank you!

$101 Chat With Writer
Custom Coursework Service

ONLINE

Custom Coursework Service

Give me a chance, i will do this with my best efforts

$97 Chat With Writer
Financial Analyst

ONLINE

Financial Analyst

I will cover all the points which you have mentioned in your project details.

$56 Chat With Writer
Engineering Exam Guru

ONLINE

Engineering Exam Guru

I will cover all the points which you have mentioned in your project details.

$37 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

Tiger river siberian hot tub manual - Capability statement template powerpoint - School of electrical engineering and telecommunications - Why nice guys finish last by julia serano - Bernhard rapid relief 1000 - Executive Summary - Week 1 for jessica - What military advantages and disadvantages did the romans have - The introductory stage will be followed by a _____ stage for a successful product. - Oh my love metallic accordion pleat off the shoulder set - Managerial Finance Research Assignment - South africa map quiz - Martini absorb xhd 100 - Singapore airlines balancing act - How to calculate quarterly sales in excel - Building an organization capable of good strategy execution entails - Download the file below - Nco 2020 - Owl english purdue edu owl resource 614 03 - Emirates airline management structure - What lie did captain beatty tell montag - Wishful yo glow australia - Does nitrogen have lone pairs - King lear edgar monologue - Marketing real people real choices study guide - Managerial and cost accounting exercises i - Difference between symbolism and motif - Program Reflection 6 - Mckinsey 7s worksheet example - A summary of the outsiders - How do protozoa reproduce - Economy Quiz - Faces in the crowd valeria luiselli pdf - Healthcare balanced scorecard and dashboard - Chest pain focused assessment shadow health - Projectile motion pre lab investigation answers - Genogram rules - Pastoral care in context - Ar 608 18 army pubs - Industry Analysis Article 3 Pages(Minimum) - Ionic formula for potassium chloride - The container store's secret to success employee satisfaction - Stress, Resilience, and Prevention - Depaul university css code - Mater christi catholic primary school - Frimley a&e waiting time - An ophthalmoscopic eye examination involves - Discussion Question 1 week 10 - Hal and me nicholas carr - Bondi to coogee bus - Provide services to customers on account - Ángel abrir puerta laboratorio - Gtg stands for in automata - Human ecology current events article 2018 - Vigo vacations has $200 million - Assign 1 - Blank training matrix template - Leadership THOUGHT RESPONSES - 1a henstock road arcadia - 115 brysons road warrandyte - Define object intention and circumstances in relation to human acts - St george car finance statement - Io parlo tu parli lui parla - Roland characteristics in the song of roland - American History 110 Assignment and Quiz - Stocks - 7 14 the electrocomp corporation manufactures - MG495 Business Policy: Final Case Study (FedEx) - Mandurah line train timetable - Biology photosynthesis absorption spectrum for chlorophyll worksheet answers - Nur340promptw4 - Communicative Function of Behavior Essay - Life science 2004 creative teaching press kingdom plantae - Abb dcs800 technical guide - Conductor meaning in science - Bid Response Proposal Presentation - Wanda beach coastal management - Pt tata consultancy services indonesia - Assignment 1: Developing Your Personal Financial Plan - Peer to peer sharing technology - 9.2 data distributions and outliers practice and problem solving - Deuteronomic cycle - Recreation and wellness intranet project requirements traceability matrix - Cross-Cultural Leadership - Internal and external stakeholders in healthcare - The ultimate anabolic cookbook 2.0 free - Soc 808 sociology of food and eating test bank - Organizational change and employee engagement - Servant leadership ethics and entrepreneurism - Multicultural barbie and the merchandising of difference - Introduction to smartphones ppt - The six simple principles of viral marketing - Difficult conversations how to discuss what matters most epub - Preparation of esters experiment grade 12 answers - An oil rig searches for and finds oil reservoirs quizlet - Digital radio stations adelaide - Movie exhibition industry case analysis questions - Managment - Resume - Class a engineering bricks