Assessment Instrument Review - 10
Assessment Instrument Review One
Name of Instrument
Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests- 3rd Edition (WRMT-3)
Publication Date
2011
Purpose of Instrument
Instrument is used to assess academic achievement in reading (Brunsman, 2014). The WRMT-3 uses scores in nine areas including letter identification, phonological awareness, rapid automatic naming, word identification, word attack, listening, word, and passage comprehension and oral reading fluency (Pierangelo & Giuliani, 2017). These scores produce another additional four cluster scores regarding the students readiness, basic skills, reading comprehension, and total reading skills (Brunsman, 2014). It is administered individually or in small groups in test format (Brunsman, 2014).
Age or Target Population
The WRMT-3 can be used with students from grades three through twelve (Brunsman, 2014).
Reliability
Split-half reliability scores fell between .64 and .97, with an average reliability score between .85 and .95 (Brunsman, 2014). Test-retest reliability was determined based on 155 students and ranged from .52 to .97 (Brunsman, 2014).
Validity
Evidence of construct validity was found for reading achievement (Brunsman, 2014). Patterns were found to increase as the age of test takers increased (Brunsman, 2014).
Norm Group Population
The WRMT-3 was normed during 2009-2010 using 5000 individuals ranging from 4 and ½ years to 79 years 11 months (Brunsman, 2014). The group was representative of the United States for variables such as geographical location, gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status and the presence of disabilities (Brunsman, 2014).
Kinds of Scores
Scores for the WRMT-3 are available in raw and standard scores, percentiles, and grade and age equivalents so that the student’s reading ability can be compared to those of his or her peers (Brunsman, 2014).
Cost of Instrument
The total cost for both forms of the kit with the administration manual included is $683.70, with lower pricing for individual forms (Brunsman, 2014).
Cost of Protocols
The cost for the administration protocol is $165 (Brunsman, 2014).
List All Personnel Using Instrument
The WRMT-3 should only be administered by trained professionals such as educational diagnosticians (Pierangelo & Giuliani, 2017).
Assessment Information Use
This instrument is used to screen and assess reading achievement (Brunsman, 2014). The information gained from the WRMT-3 can provide guidance for IEP development as well as decisions regarding educational placement (Brunsman, 2014).
Justification and Recommendation for School Use
I would recommend the use of the WRMT-3 in my district for multiple reasons. The first reason is because the demographic makeup of my district tends to have many students who struggle in their reading abilities, so this test could help in assessing and identifying deficits. Additionally, this instrument was found to have good reliability and adequate validity so I believe it to be a viable option for assessing reading achievement (Brunsman, 2014).
References
Brunsman, B. (2014). Woodcock reading mastery tests-Third edition. Mental Measurements Yearbook, 19. Retrieved from https://eds-b-ebscohost-com.libproxy.lamar.edu/ehost/detail/detail?vid=3&sid=81ce81ba-a760-4248-9d37-163dc65f5c45%40sessionmgr104&bdata=JmxvZ2luLmFzcCZzaXRlPWVob3N0LWxpdmU%3d#AN=test.3351&db=mmt
Pierangelo, R., & Giuliani, G. A. (2017). Assessment in special education: A practical approach (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Assessment Instrument Review Two
Name of Instrument
Kaufman Tests of Educational Achievement-3rd Edition (KTEA-3)
Publication Date
The KTEA-3 was first published in 1985, with its most recent third edition being published in 2014 (Mackler, 2017).
Purpose of Instrument
This instrument is a comprehensive test of academic achievement (Pierangelo & Giuliani, 2017). The KTEA-3 is comprised of 14 subtests that generate scores for five composite areas including reading, math, written language, oral language, and comprehensive achievement (Pierangelo & Giuliani, 2017). It is a battery of assessments that is individually administered to students (Pierangelo & Giuliani, 2017).
Age or Target Population
The KTEA-3 is appropriate for individuals ages 4 to 25 (Pierangelo & Giuliani, 2017),
Reliability
Split-half reliability was calculated for all untimed subtests in the KTEA-3 (Mackler, 2017). Reliability coefficients were relatively elevated with averages between .80 and .90, although the oral fluency coefficient was measured to be in the .70 range (Mackler, 2017). The strongest reliability was found in five subtests, mid to high .90s, with slightly lower coefficients in another 5 areas falling between .80 and .90 (Mackler, 2017). Interrater reliability coefficients were high for oral and written expression which is indicative of consistent scoring criteria (Mackler, 2017).
Validity
The KTEA-3 demonstrates concurrent validity, which is important for school assessments (Mackler, 2017). Previous studies found evidence of validity for the subtests and composite scores (Mackler, 2017).
Norm Group Population
The KTEA-3 was normed using 2,600 English-speaking students with no physical or perceptual deficits whose ages ranged from prekindergarten through grade 12 (Mackler, 2017).
Kinds of Scores
Five composite scores are generated via 19 subtests, which can then be converted to standard scores (Mackler, 2017). The standard scores can also generate percentile scores to compare individual academic achievement levels (Mackler, 2017).
Cost of Instrument
The total cost of the KTEA-3 is $992.45 for both forms, the scoring manual, and multiple score reports (Mackler, 2017). Additional pricing is available for individual forms and other resources (Mackler, 2017).
Cost of Protocols
The protocol for the KTEA-3 is $32.95 for only the record form (Mackler, 2017).
List All Personnel Using Instrument
This instrument must be administered by someone with a master’s degree in a related field or someone with appropriate licensures, such as an educational diagnostician (Mackler, 2017).
Assessment Information Use
The KTEA-3 is used to determine overall levels of academic achievement for individuals (Mackler, 2017). This instrument also uses parallel forms which can help compare pre and posttests, as well provide a means for progress monitoring (Mackler, 2017).
Justification and Recommendation for School Use
I would recommend the continued use of the KTEA-3 in my current school district. The batteries cover a variety of areas that help with the understanding of an individual’s academic strengths and challenges (Mackler, 2017).
References
Macker, K. (2017). Kaufman tests of educational achievement-Third edition. Mental Measurements Yearbook, 20. Retrieved from https://eds-b-ebscohost-com.libproxy.lamar.edu/ehost/detail/detail?vid=8&sid=81ce81ba-a760-4248-9d37-163dc65f5c45%40sessionmgr104&bdata=JmxvZ2luLmFzcCZzaXRlPWVob3N0LWxpdmU%3d#AN=test.6516&db=mmt
Pierangelo, R., & Giuliani, G. A. (2017). Assessment in special education: A practical approach (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Assessment Instrument Review Three
Name of Instrument
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition, Integrated (WISC-V Integrated)
Publication Date
The WISC-V Integrated was first published in 2004, with its most recent fifth edition being published in 2015 (Bugaj, 2017).