Relationship between good leadership and a career dedicated to public service

        Charles Hamilton was born in Washington, D.C. and went to college at Dunbar High School in Washington. The ambition of Houston was inspired by the scorn and hate showered on him along with his fellow Negros by Americans. That was the reason why Houston didn’t want to die for a world that they ruled. He made up his mind to study law and fight for those who were unable to fight for themselves (McNeil, 2011).

        Thur good Marshall actually was one of the most important American lawyers of the 20^th century. His efforts were invested in the transformation of the legal landscape of the nation by challenging segregation on the basis of racism that relegated millions to a citizenship of second-class. I believe that he was the main player of the twentieth century.

        Oliver W. was born in Richmond and I can certainly say that this early legal career didn’t foreshadow his later successes. At a point, he had given up his legal practices and had started to work as a waiter. He got back to Richmond and started practicing law. It was the first case that he won against Norfolk that ignited his passion in civil rights.

        I believe that that being in between was not only a curse but also a blessing for Pauli Murray. From the very start, she displayed an artistic mind and a preference for the section of a clothing store for boys. It was her legal quest to eradicate and eliminate Jane Crow.

        Jack Greenberg for decade was at the very forefront of the legal challenges of civil rights in the federal courts. He played a part in the Brown case and presented the voting rights in 1965 in Selma. He actually filed 850 cases and left an indelible mark on the doctrine of employment discrimination.

        Reynaldo Garza became interested in the study of law at a very young age and his father used to take him to the courthouse for observing trials. It was the alliances in the University which he created and propelled him into judicial appointments and politics.

        It was in 1990 when Eleanor Holmes Norton was chosen to Congress from the District of Columbia and during her time in the Congress, Holmes fought for the voting rights of Columbia residents. She also formulated a passage of bill that permits the residents to attend almost any public university or college in the nation (Lester, 2004).

        Nancy Gertner actually began her legal career by defending Susan Saxe on a trial for her part in a robbery that had resulted in the murder of an officer. This case was the main player that stirred her career and gave her the push that she needed (Gertner, 2011).

Explanations about relationship between good leadership and carrier dedicated to public service

        Actually, it can be said that leadership is what leads to effective public service and without leadership, a person cannot stand up for the rights of people that he or she leads. Public service is all about defending the public rights and making sure that the public is gaining what it really deserved and that no one is there to steal these rights. Public cannot speak on its part because there is not sufficient skills of leadership in it. There is lack of people who can walk in front of others and not only preach but lead them to what they need. Public require a leader who is not only wise but is also capable of taking it to the right path. For instance, if a person cannot stand for himself then he would definitely need a person who can give him what he really needs. This is the skill of a leader and in order to serve in the public service, it is a must for the person to possess leadership skills.

        A leader doesn’t only have to be wise but he or she must also be able to bear the responsibility of every person on shoulders. Not every person is able to do and in public service, there is no place for a person who cannot be a leader. After all, fighting for the sake of public, a person also has to face the court and it also requires leadership. Therefore, it can be said that for achieving a dedicated career in public service, leadership is necessary. In Fire in my Soul by Joan Lester, it has been explained that Eleanor Holmes from the very start was taught about leadership and it played the central role in her success. It allowed her to fight for her rights before for the rights of her public (Pathi, 2010).

Explanations from five readings

            In Fire in my Soul by Joan Lester, it has been described that the grandmother of Eleanor Holmes laid the foundation for her entire life. She used to tell him that it was her duty as a first born to control the events by taking the responsibility. In addition, she used to tell her that Eleanor was not supposed to let the events control but the other way around. Her grandmother had raised her in such a way that she would be the hope of her family. Her Aunt Selena used to say that she was her favorite. Moving on, it was Coleman who reinforced the lessons of Grandmother Nellie about leadership. For instance, when Eleanor or maybe her sister got back from the corner store with the bare piece of bread or other item that was bagged, Coleman told her that she must go back to the store and tell the shopkeeper that she wouldn’t take bread if it is not bagged. Eleanor turned around with reluctance and fought for her rights before coming back with a bread in a bag. That is how she learned that no matter what, she had to fight for her rights.       In Charles Hamilton Houston and the Struggle for Civil Rights by Genna Rae McNeil, it has again been emphasized that the legacy of Charles Houston is the base that he built for eliminating and deterring the racial oppression which was enforced by other through violence and through system. Due to his leadership in the legal education, his ardor as an advocate, and his vision and ambition as a lawyer are what the humanity has at the moment to continue onwards and make a nation that he along with some other dedicated Americans desired. Nancy Gerner in her In Defense of Women: Memoirs of an Unrepentant Advocate also explains that the voice of Susan ran within her and told her to be aggressive and be a leader even when you don’t know what the right direction is at the moment. Even when she faced different and confusing circumstances, she wouldn’t let go of her leadership and that is what allowed her to overcome the rigorous hurdles that she faced in her career. Similarly, in The Making of a Supreme Court Justice by Young Thurgood and The Autobiography of a Black Activist, Feminist, Lawyer, Priest, and Poet by Pauli Murray, it has been greatly emphasized that it is the leadership that allowed the figures to not let go and step back. Even though Pauli Murray faced various obstacles and a risk that exploited herself, she fought strongly and served as a true leader.

Definition of leadership

What is a leadership?

A brief definition is that leadership defined as the style of encouraging a set or group of people on their performance to accomplish a shared objective. In a public service area, this would mean leading personnel with an approach to reach the public’s demands and requirements (Wart, 2005).

Difference between good leader, moderate leader and poor leader

There are tangible differences among good leader and poor leaders. A poor leader is the leader that people will feel contempt to work for day by day; the person who not ever recognizes the successes and only highlights on the faults of their staff. In the other hand, a good leader really trusts in his hard work. A good leader has a sturdy sense of determination that appears in even the utmost basic responsibilities. An example from a good leader encourages the staff to attempt for achievement and success.

Good leaders shoot for the impossible

Good leaders increase everything to be higher than they could grip. Their objectives are apparently incredible, and their principles for the achievement of for themselves and their team seem like difficult to get to. While bad leaders will only focus on easy goals for them to achieve so that they would not need any hard work for that.

Good leaders never fear to express emotion

Bad leaders distance themselves from their staffs. They try to make an image of anxiety and secret. Therefore, their staffs feel difficult to get close and present their concepts and restraining the movement of improvement. Good leaders practice huge discipline, without any fear to be thrilled when their staff has achieved wonderful results. They are free around what they must to do to progress, and what they have not bring up to their own principles, they never irritate to apologize and create restitutions.

While moderate leader is the leader who recognize a number of issue and they create and depend on the method to preserve the issue. Moderate leaders frequently establish further suppleness in negotiation. They are frequently eager to think through a variation of choices and they also pay attention to their concern and the other people’s concern as well (Schermerhorn, 2011).

Difference between good leadership from mediocre leadership

The difference between mediocre leadership with good leadership are:

Mediocre leaders try to connect with everyone while good leaders connect with a few

For mediocre leaders, a best investment for a leader is actually on the level of the leaders to focus on some number of certain people.

Mediocre leaders implement responsibilities while good leaders authorize the people to do their responsibilities.

Mediocre leaders more prefer to do the responsibilities by themselves than just authorize the people to do their own responsibilities.

Mediocre leaders try to reproduce on what they perceive from other people. In the other hand, good leaders appeal the motivation.

Mediocre leaders perform their leadership spontaneously in reply to other people’s actions while good leaders perform their leadership proactively.

Mediocre leaders give their efforts to block up the cracks in their team work while good leaders remain concentrated within their title role and rewards.

Mediocre leaders make everything for the people while good leaders make everything along with the people.

Mediocre leaders tempt to merely make everything that we like and endeavor to search people to realizing those things to happen. In the other hand, good leader biddings people alongside for the expedition and progresses everything along with them (Kelley, 2013).

Definition about each type of leader and its explanation

There are five types of leader as follow:

Relational Leader

Relational leaders shape good connections with the purpose of give the influence to others. People desire to agree with them due to their personality, not based on their knowledge. They improve shared admiration among others and perform well works with others.

Managerial Leader

Managerial leaders are considered to have the less efficiency since they have the less encouragement. People merely just follow them since they must to. Managerial leaders are not interested to work for others. Their wish is to make others work for them due to their good position. They view others as devices which they could use to achieve the goal of the day, and they also always make decisions.

Motivational Leader

Motivational leaders search for shared advantage intended for themselves, other people, and also the group. People desire to follow their leadership due to both their personality and their knowledge as well. They are also able to affect others people from different area.

Transformation Leader

Transformational leaders have the desire and drive to transform other people. They claimed to be the greatest persuasive of the five types of leaders. They are extremely valued along with their status. They are also recognized for emerging other leaders. Their inspiration touches the people in the entire businesses and through various groups. Their inspiration is constantly being transmitted over various different leaders at numerous diverse periods in various places.

Inspirational Leader

Inspirational leaders inspire relational leaders and managerial leader to convert into inspirational leaders. They pay attention in increasing themselves to inspire other people to develop. They put their focus on the personality growth (Kelley, 2013).

Qualities of good leader in detail

Good leadership require expressive powers and behavioral features which able to pull intensely on a leader's intellectual along with their spiritual assets. Qualities required on behalf of wealthy relations concerning leaders and team members comprise reliability, honesty, assurance and also empathy (James Charles Collins, 2001).

Important Qualities of good leader are:

Adaptability

Adaptability of any system is a progressively important feature of good leadership due to the world is gradually intricate and active.

Delegation

Delegating responsibilities toward the correct individual or section is an essential ability for all leader to attain. Believing that the team along with idea from the leaders is a symbol of decisive power and will empower everyone to grow by producing a circle of belief.

Communication

Even though the objectives might appear obvious in the mind good leaders will still communicate these concepts purely and briefly. This is due to good leaders always want the team to functioning on the way to the similar objective.

Confidence

Good leader have to be overflow with confidence, express a little bit of arrogance and forcefulness to get the reverence of their team.

Strength of mind

Strength of mind and enthusiasm work together and create better approach to encourage rather than to aggressively get tangled with the team.

Define public service with example

        A Public Service is typically consisting of organizations or societies which are formally possessed and functioned by way of the government and presented to deliver services for the public or people in a country. If we speaking of the charitable segment, administrations in the public service do not search for to produce any revenue. Subsidy for the organizations which considered as public services are regularly elevated over a variation of approaches, as well as tolls, charges, taxes and throughout fiscal transferences from further stages of government. Even though the terms of public services are neither publicly delivered nor publicly sponsored, on behalf of societal and governmental motives they are typically matter to rule working further than implementing to furthermost financial areas. Public policy when made in the public's interest and motivations can provide public services. Diverse governments in all over the world might engage their individual exclusive technique of subsidy for public services. From time to time, the public service will companion with a society which included in the private area to generate a “Public-Private Partnership (P3s).” These huge and mixture organizations function together to in cooperation bring out a service or industry project to public (Hermann & Flecker, 2013).

        A public service from time to time might have the appearances and consider as more like a public moral. On the other hand, furthermost are services that might be supplied and provided by the market place which also rendering to dominant social standards. In some cases, they also might be supplied by local or state dominations, specifically in areas which are claimed to be accepted dominations. Some examples of organizations in the public service area are mentioned such as; Education (Libraries or Schools) Electricity, Healthcare, Police Services, Public Transit, Social Services, Fire Service, Emergency Services, Infrastructure, Law Enforcement , Gas and Oil, Waste Management, Military, Postal Service etc.

Information about five lawyers related to public service

Five lawyers that related to public service are mentioned as:

Charles Hamilton Houston

One of the greatest powerful persons in African American which lived in the middle of the two world conflicts was Charles Hamilton Houston. He is a professor and also a lawyer, he devoted his lifetime to release his societies commencing the pledges of discrimination and racism.

Nancy Gertner

Nancy Gertner is a prior federal judge in the United States who made her career about standup up for women’s privileges, public rights and impartiality for everyone. She has printed broadly on condemning, judgment, and legal proof; women’s rights; as well as the system in jury.

Eleanor Holmes Norton

She is an American lawyer and political figure who ruined a number of barriers in the term of gender and racial throughout her career, where she secured the rights of other people for equal prospect.

Ertharin Cousin

She is an Executive Director of the United Nations World Food Programme which is also a previous law alumna from the “University of Georgia School of Law.” She has frequently been named with “a Chicagoan who helps feed the world” for her public work in the low pay district of Chicago.

Mohandas Gandhi

He studied law in London, for a short time experienced in India, later on he went to South Africa, where he expended two eras. Gandhi initially departed there as a lawful consultant, but his life transformed to become a sponsor for the rights of the burdened people.

Demonstration about person’s personal interest and public service

        Personal interest defined as an occasion for a single worker to get the benefit or advantage from an organization. Due to the wide-ranging responsibilities executed on public service representatives, a variation of personal interests might turn out into struggle, or going to turn out into conflict, along with the presentation of formal responsibilities. The arrival of a struggle or conflict of interest might be as severe as an authentic conflict due to it might able to decrease public self-assurance in the trust and honesty of the public service. As a result, activities that able to increase the arrival of a conflict of interest in the awareness of a rational people with understanding of the appropriate evidences must be evaded.

        For example, personal interests of the “decision-maker “(containing the interests of memberships of their straight families, relations, business companions, etc.).  Public administrators should at all times perform in the area and responsibilities of public interest rather than their personal interests. For that reason, people who work in public service must able to evade situations and conditions in which the conflict in their personal interests able to possibly turn out become conflict, or else, may rationally be recognized to create the conflict along with the neutral accomplishment of their formal responsibilities (OECD, 2004).

Demonstration about relationship between good leadership and a career focused

        Leadership, similar to furthermost stuffs in life, have need of sense of balance. Leaders would not do well without concentrating on your team member, and they would not also prosper except the leader pay attention on the results. Leaders who are able to focus in the same way on consequences encourage general public to perform their best performance, deprived of misplacing vision of the larger image. Five aspects which the leaders need to be focused on are as mention below.

        Good leaders are well thought-out and be familiar with in what way to place in order. Good leaders are always focused and eager to get the wide-ranging image. Just with being a leader is already challenging and exciting enough. However, a good leader recognizes in what way to remain focused deeply on himself, on his staffs, and also on taking on the moving world to become improve in the forthcoming of his organization (Yost & Plunkett, 2011).

        A good leader who takes care on his staffs is considered as the toughest one. A good leader could make the staffs feel favored for as well as secure which will deliver larger benefits for the staff. Therefore, good leaders must keep the focus to make sure the achievement of the goals for the organization.