Special Problems, Challenges and the Future of Policing In
America
The United
States Department of Homeland Security or DHS
The
United
States Department of Homeland Security or DHS is a of the United States Federal Government which
has certain responsibilities in the context of public security, coarsely
similar to the other countries’ home ministries. The United States Department of Homeland
Security or DHS was established in November 2002, making it becomes the
youngest in the United States (IBP, Inc.,
2016).
The missions stated by DHs are to implicate anti-terrorism, the security of the
US border, customs & immigration, cybersecurity, as well as prevention and
management of the disaster. Amongst 22 different agencies under the United
States Department of Homeland Security, three agencies that related to
the Federal Law enforcement are as mentioned below:
1. Federal
Protective Service or FPS
The
Federal
Protective Service or FPS represented as a division of the DHS uniform
security police. FPS has its responsibility of protecting as well as providing
incorporated law execution in addition to the security services, with a purpose
to facilitate security for around whether owned or rented by the General
Services Administration or GSA along with their entire residents (Reese, 2010). The functions of
this Federal
Protective Service are included:
·
Performing the Facility Security
Assessments
·
Formatting countermeasures for resident agencies
·
Preserving the presence of uniformed law
enforcement
·
Preserving fortified contract securities
·
Conducting the environment appropriateness
checks meant for the contract employees
·
Observing security alarms throughout
centralized communication hubs
2. The Federal
Law Enforcement Training Centers
The
Federal
Law Enforcement Training Centers or FLETC is an agency that serves as
an interagency law enforcement training unit designed for roughly 91 Federal
law enforcement agencies in the United States. The FLETC has its clear mission
to "...train
those who protect our homeland." In addition to this, FLETC also has
been providing valuable training to some states, campus, local, group, as well
as the international law enforcement agencies. Thus, the main function of FLETC
is providing beneficial training sessions in the most common areas for the
entire officers of law enforcement such as weapons, tactics, driving,
investigations, along with some legal training as well (Centers,
2019).
3. The
Federal Emergency Management Agency or FEMA
The
Federal
Emergency Management Agency or FEMA was initially established under the
and then realized by two in 1979. The functions of the Federal
Emergency Management Agency or FEMA are mentioned as follow (Kapucu,
Arslan, & Collins, 2010):
·
Organizing the response of the Federal
Government to disasters
·
Delivering help and assistance to the
local, state governments, and citizens both at immediate condition right after
a disaster, and also for the longer term as well.
From
the three agencies above, the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers
or FLETC can be considered as the one with the greatest responsibility. The
reason is due to this agency has its responsibility to provide training for the
people who wants to protect the country. For this reason, it is obvious that
the Federal
Law Enforcement Training Centers or FLETC is the one who actually makes
the foundation to secure the country with the trained individuals who will
perform well in protecting the country from any hazard.
The Purposes of the Uniform Crime
Reports (UCR) and the National Crime Information Center (NCIC)
The Uniform Crime Reports or UCR
The
Uniform Crime Reports which launched by the FBI are typically grounded on data
produced at the local stage. The main purpose of the Uniform Crime Reports
creation was to measure the statistics for the rate of crimes meant for the
national comparison. There are seven types of crimes that have been considered
to be fundamental in the context of comparing the rates of crime which are:
·
Murder
·
Non-inattentive man slaughtered
·
Robbery
·
Violent rape
·
Forced physical attack
·
Burglary
·
Vehicle theft
The
program of Uniform Crime Reports or UCR was actually based on work through
the along with the . Every single month, the
law enforcement agencies regularly report the figure of the identified list of
crimes within their authority and send it to the FBI. This mostly integrates
the crimes reported by the public to the police officers. In addition to this,
the report might also integrate certain crimes that have been discovered by the
police officers and also crimes that known from other types of sources (Jamieson, et
al., 2012).
The National Crime
Information Center or NCIC
Conversely, the National Crime Information Center
or NCIC is actually the core database in the United States meant for
tracking down the crime-associated information. The National Crime Information
Center is preserved by the Criminal Justice Information Services Division or
CJIS of FBI, and it is as well interlinked with the state, tribal, federal,
local agencies and administrative center. The purpose of the National Crime
Information Center creation was actually to generate a centralized data system
to facilitate and simplify the flow of information amongst the various branches
of law enforcement (Harmon, 2015).
The Uniform
Crime Reports have certain particular strengths and weaknesses,
which actually depend on how the data is used. Certain strengths can be seen
from how the ultimate data is liberated of populace, and will definitely
available to the American public. Furthermore, it also places actual crime data
into a consumable arrangement. It permits the general public to view the
historical crime viewpoint over the years. However, some weaknesses from the Uniform
Crime Reports are that it merely establishes crimes that have discovered
by police, also, it does not include the greatest aspect that might be
reported, and it is not 100% accurate. In fact, some changes in local laws might
able to cause information spears. The data is quite slow to have occurred.
Weaknesses of the Uniform Crime Reports are that it neglects some crimes
that are not reported to police, and thus, it ignores almost drug usage, and frequently
contains some errors in reporting.
The Roles of Police
Executives
In relation to the Mintzberg Model
of police executives, there are three roles of the Chief Executive Officers or
CEO which mentioned such as:
·
The
interpersonal role which consists of leadership and cooperation obligations
·
The
informational role which includes in monitoring or checking and distributing accurate
information, while also performing as the representative.
·
The
decision making role
Amongst
the three roles above, the first one is the most essential to lead the success
for the Chief Executive Officers. The reason is due to the interpersonal role
which consists of leadership and cooperation obligations will definitely
represent how the Chief
Executive Officers succeeded to perform all of the responsibilities and duties that
he has to complete (Andreescu & Vito, 2010).
Legislative
enactments that are in place to help combat terrorism and its effectiveness
Terrorism has defined as a
perception that confronts a simple and also direct legal meaning. For this
reason, it is not a surprising fact that, up till now, there is no inclusive
convention in the context of terrorism which has a universally acknowledged definition
of what exactly could be defined as terrorism itself. As a consequence, various
different countries across the world have been inventing their own descriptions
of what creates terrorism to have appeared in the country, which are normally
found in their criminal law. Thus, anti-terrorism legislation is the law that
have the main purpose to fight terrorism. These laws are typically not
following any particular assassinations or bombings at all times. Instead, the
anti-terrorism legislations normally include some particular amendments which
sanction the country to bypass its legislation to fight the terrorism crimes
under suspected surroundings of requirement.
Two examples of legislative
enactments in the United States along with its effectiveness are:
·
The
Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989
This
legislation was actually a part of the United States legislature which approved
into law in the year 1990. This legislation has provided the application of the
Biological
Weapons Convention, along with the criminal penalties designed for any
violation of its requirements. This law was amended in the year of 1996 and
also has been utilized as a foundation to take legal action on some criminals. This
legislation has stated that it is illegal to manufacture, purchase, or sell any
type of biological agent to be used as a dangerous weapon. In addition to this,
this legislation also has provided an explanation that in case the amount of
biological agent, poison, or toxin which are appeared to have no peaceful
objective, then it would be measured and consequently demolished (Martin, 2011).
One
of the main preliminary consequences of this legislation was occurred to be the
difficulty in attaining successful criminal prosecution. The reason is due to
the determination to utilize the biological agents to become a weapon had to be
really proven by the prosecutors. For this reason, this situation could be used
as a defense by the criminals with the fact that the biological agents were
‘peaceful objectives’ reasonable.
·
The Homeland Security Act or HAS 2002
The
Homeland
Security Act was established right after the tragedy of September 11.
This Act is quite similar with the or IRTPA in the context of re-organizing and
also centralizing the functions of Federal Security, with a purpose to meet the
post ‘Cold War’ threats along with its subsequent challenges.
However,
there are some characteristic contradictions in this Act that not solved simply
by re-organization. These have reflected negotiations along with further
committees required to secure the passage. Yet, the outcome is often to be
inconsistent or might also be conflicting with the authorities. For instance, this Act has recognized that the first
responsibility of the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) is to prevent terrorist attacks to have appeared in the United States.
However, the language of this legislation has eventually made obvious that both
investigation and prosecution of terrorism will remain with the Federal Bureau of
Investigation which
will then allocate DHS as an investigative and consultative role in
intelligence accomplishments (Grillot & Cruise, 2016).
The problems related to determining the
actual numbers of hate crimes
Hate
crime which is also known as bias crime defined as a prejudgment-motivated
crime that appears at the time a criminal targets a victim due to they are
members of specific social groups or ethnic. Hate crime is different from other
types of crimes since it commonly refers to criminal actions that are observed
to have been encouraged by bias in contradiction of one or more of the social
group.
Determining the actual number of
hate crimes is quite difficult due to the fact that most of the hate crimes’
victims typically do not report the crimes to the authorities. For instance,
the gay populations would not report any hate crime performed against them due
to they think that it would only be useless and the police officers would not
listen or accepting their reports (Herek, 2017). Thus, hate crime
statistics are difficult to be recorded if compare with other types of crimes.
References of Special Problems,
Challenges and the Future of Policing In America
Andreescu, V., & Vito, G. F. (2010). An
exploratory study on ideal leadership behaviour: the opinions of American
police managers. International Journal of Police Science & Management ,
567-583.
Centers, F. L.
(2019). Department of Homeland Security Federal Law Enforcement Training
Centers Cheltenham, Maryland.
Grillot, S. R.,
& Cruise, R. J. (2016). Protecting Our Ports: Domestic and
International Politics of Containerized Freight Security. Routledge.
Harmon, R. A.
(2015). Federal programs and the real costs of policing. NYUL Rev,
870.
Herek, G. M.
(2017). Documenting hate crimes in the United States: Some considerations on
data sources. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity ,
143.
IBP, Inc. (2016). US
Homeland Security Laws and Regulations Handbook Volume 1 Terrorism and
Homeland Security Laws. Lulu.com.
Jamieson, R.,
Land, L. P., Winchester, D., Stephens, G., Steel, A., Maurushat, A., &
Sarre, R. (2012). Addressing identity crime in crime management information
systems: Definitions, classification, and empirics. Computer Law &
Security Review, 381-395.
Kapucu, N.,
Arslan, T., & Collins, M. L. (2010). Examining intergovernmental and
interorganizational response to catastrophic disasters: Toward a
network-centered approach. Administration & Society, 222-247.
Martin, A.-E.
(2011). Securing the Homeland: A Risk-Cost-Benefit Analysis of US
Anti-Terrorism Expenditures.
Reese, S. (2010). Federal
Building and Facility Security. DIANE Publishing.