In
this part of the literature review, both leadership and emotional intelligence
are going to be discussed. There are different styles of leadership and in this
chapter, we are going to discuss only Transformational and Laissez-Faire
leadership styles. In an organizational context, leadership has a great
significance and it has been suggested that at some extent, leadership is
associated with emotional intelligence. Thus, studies are going to be examined
and information will be collected from the point of view of different
researchers.
Leadership of the perspective of
Emotional Intelligence
Grint,
Jones, and Holt (2016) explain that leadership as a topic has been gaining
attention for more than hundreds of years. However, the necessity of effective
leadership has been mentioned more strongly than at present. They argue that in
this international and changing environment, an answer is held by leadership to
the success for not only organizations and people, but also nations, regions,
and sectors (Grint, Jones, & Holt, 2016).
In
spite of the recognition of the significance of leadership, there is a certain
confusion as to how leadership can actually be described and what its
definition is now. In review research for leadership, the authors concluded
that in studies, there are as many definitions as there are people who have
tried to simplify the concept. At the center of the issue regarding the
definition of leadership, there exist two basic difficulties according to Kruse
(2013) (Kruse, 2013).
First
of all, notions such as happiness, freedom, and love are often associated with
leadership. It indicates that the concept is a complex construct which opens to
different subjective interpretations.
Individuals
have their own understandings of what leadership is all about based on both
learning and experience. Secondly, the manner in which leadership is understood
and defined is influenced strongly by the theoretical stance that a person
takes. (Nohria & Khurana, 2010). In addition, there
are people who perceive leadership as the result of some characteristics or
traits which leaders possess. Some others perceive it as a social process that
arises from relationships of groups. A difference in opinions is resulted by
these divergent views.
Ulrich
and Smallwood (2012) studying leadership theory seemed to identify 4 common
themes in the manner how leadership is conceived now: (1) It is a process; (2)
influence is involved in leadership; (3) in a group context, leadership takes
place; and (4) goal attainment is involved in leadership.
Thus,
they define “leadership is actually a process in which several individuals are
influenced by a person for achieving a common objective” (Ulrich & Smallwood, 2012). It can be said that
this definition is good but it still is indicating a person as a lead source. A
more combined leadership concept emerges from a review: “Most of the leadership
definitions illustrate an assumption that it includes a process of social influence
where a person exerts an intentional influence over other individuals for
structuring relationships and activities in an organization or a group”.
However, even this definition is obscuring as much as it is revealing. It
raises a question regarding the actual nature of this influence and how
relationships and activities can be structured by it (Silva, 2016)
In
short, the process of leadership is quite complex as it touches many other
significant personal, social, and organizational processes. It relies on the
procedure of influence, which inspires people to thrive so that they can
achieve group objectives through personal motivation and not through coercion.
Now, it is all upon the choice to select which definition as it will be informed
by the person’s own beliefs, organizational situation, and predispositions (Porter & Nohria, 2010).
Style Linked with Leadership
Giltinane (2013) explains that
both leadership styles and leadership have been the center of significant
discussion and debate for as long as individuals have been collaborating in the
form of groups. There are many definitions of leadership just as there are many
researchers of the subject. Some researchers focus on a specific leadership
characteristic while some exclaim that leaders possess some common skills and
habits (Giltinane, 2013). In order to properly understand these
characteristics and habits, styles of leadership have been proposed (Jogulu, 2010).
Transformation Leadership Style
Transformation leadership or superior performance of leadership takes place when leaders
elevate and broaden the interests of their workers when awareness is generated
by them and both the mission and purposes of the group are simplified. It also
exists when leaders stir their workers for looking beyond their own interests
for the stake of the group.
These
results are achieved by transformation leaders in different ways; they might
adopt a charismatic behavior towards their workers; they might be meeting the
emotional requirements of workers, or employees might intellectually be stimulated
by them. Obtaining charisma in the perception of employees is quite close to
being effective in being a transformational leader (Sadeghi & Pihie, 2012). Such leaders are
very capable and they don’t only have confidence but also trust in them.
Employees
are both excited and inspired by charismatic leaders with the idea that they
might capable of accomplishing tough goals with extra effort. In addition,
transformational leaders are considerate. They make sure that they are paying
close attention to differences which exist among workers (Odumeru & Ogbonna, 2013). They become
teachers to all those who require their assistance in developing and growing.
When it comes to being a transformational leadership, intellectual stimulation
is also significant. Leaders who are intellectually stimulating are capable of
showing new ways for solving problems and teach them to see issues as the
problems which must be resolved. They also teach employees that rational
solutions must be emphasized upon by them. A transformational leader is
successfully able to make his employees just as capable as him by making their
more innovative in the face of serious issues. With his help, they are able to
overcome tough issues on their own (McCleskey, 2014).
Malaise-Zaire Leadership Style
This
style of leadership is also referred to as hands-off leadership style. It would
not be wrong to say that when it comes to freedom, this style is the most
flexible. The manager doesn’t offer instructions or directions to workers but
gives them as much liberty as possible.L aissezFaires tyle appears to be
easy-going and simple among subordinates and leaders. Both transactional and
transformational leadership styles have been identified to be correlated
positively with the outcomes in different kinds of organizations according to Chaudhry and Javed (2012) (Chaudhry & Javed, 2012).
Wong
and Giessner (2018) say that Burns (1978) has mentioned behaviors of
transactional leadership to be found on a process of exchange in which rewards
are offered by the leader in return for the effort of a subordinate.
Follower-leader relationships are believed to be formed on a set of bargains or
transactions between followers and leaders. Recent studies on organizational
commitment and leadership style (Wong & Giessner, 2018) indicate that
transactional and transformational leadership have a positive relationship with
the organizational commitment of workers while workers of KSA organization are
more affected by transformational leadership. Authors also point out a sense of
urgency in this leadership style is important for ensuring buy-in among
workers.
In
contrast to both transactional and transformational leadership, leaders
adopting laissez-faire style exercise control over workers only a little and
offer them significant freedom for carrying out their tasks in the absence of
direct supervision. Such a leader also gives the authority of making decisions
to the group and agrees with their collective decision (Yang, 2015).
Leadership and Emotional Intelligence
Goleman, Boyatzis, and McKee (2013) suggest that since the
last ten years, interpersonal skills have gained more attention and have also
become more important to effective leadership. And where leaders once appeared
to inspect, plan, and control the running of a firm, leadership styles have taken
the control. They appear to inspire and motivate others for fostering positive
work attitudes and creating a sense of importance and contribution among
workers (Goleman, Boyatzis, & McKee, 2013).
These
contemporary requirements of leadership have place completely new demands on
the training programs of leaders for developing these skills in leaders and on
companies involved in the selection of leaders to determine them in candidates.
Consequently, the study has been examining the underlying behaviors and
attributes of leaders who effectively carry out these roles of leadership for
identifying the training and selection criteria for the development and
recruitment of effective leaders. Construct of EI or emotional intelligence has
recently gained attention as an attribute of successful leadership (Harms & Credé, 2010).
Emotional
intelligence is explained as a group of abilities which refer in part to how
successfully a person handles emotions within others and himself. It has
actually been suggested that in leadership, handling emotions effectively might
contribute to how a person deals with the requirements of people and how one
motivates workers Effective leadership skills at present have been suggested to
depend on the understanding abilities related to EI and emotions (Cavazotte, Moreno, & Hickmann, 2012).
Transformation Leadership and
Emotional Intelligence
In
spite of concerns about several measurements of EI, interest in emotional
intelligence still is high, particularly in the domain of leadership. Clarke
(2010) explains that a recent meta-analysis has suggested EI has 0.24 as
operational validity with criteria related to employment (Clarke, 2010). It has been noted by anthropologists
that precise recognition and emotional displays of the emotional display of
individuals are important for effective leadership and functioning in primate
societies. In addition, there are several theoretical arguments which can be
made for relationships among effective leadership and EI, particularly
transformational leadership (Hur, Berg, & Wilderom, 2011).
Competencies
of EI including empathy, transparency, self-awareness, and self-confidence have
been discussed to be important exchanging visionary messages. It has been
suggested by Mathew and Gupta (2015) suggest several aspects of emotional
intelligence which would make transformational leadership easier. First of all,
empathy might be important for transformational leaders who exhibit individual
consideration to followers. Secondly, positive confidence and effective might
be promoted by emotion management in followers to generate and express new
ideas. Thirdly, self-aware leaders might have greater than normal sense of
meaning and purpose. Fourth, those who are skilled at the management of
emotions are also the ones who are more likely to put the needs of others ahead
of their own needs. Authors also discussed that emotional appeals might be
utilized transformational leaders for inspiring workers. They suggest that
adherence to moral or professional leaders are common aspects of both
transformational leadership and EI (Mathew & Gupta, 2015).
It
has been identified that different styles of leadership can be displayed by
leaders at different times to various degrees. However, effective leaders are
explained as exhibiting behaviors of transactional leadership more than the
ineffective and passive behaviors of non-leadership (Sadri, 2012).
Even though there has been significant research displaying the success of
transformational leadership in firms, there has been a lack of studies
investigating the background of behaviors.
Early
studies have connected transformational leadership with different biographical
factors like parents having an active interest in their child’s development,
high moral standards of parents, and whether or not workers enjoyed studying
before their experience at the organization (Føllesdal & Hagtvet, 2013). With respect to
psychological factors, this leadership has been connected with higher standards
of traits including Openness, Emotional Stability, Agreeableness, and
Extraversion. Transformational leadership has also been found to be associated
with higher intelligence levels. But the overall capacity of differences to
indicate transformational leadership has not been satiable (Corona, 2010).
A
meta-analysis of the relation between Big Five traits and transformational
leadership found that correct correlation among these constructs ranges to .23
from .09. Consequently, it has been described that all other unexplored factors
like emotional intelligence might be helpful in predicting the behaviors of
transformational leadership (Batool, 2013)
Although
there are a few theoretical underpinnings for guiding hypotheses regarding the
relationship of laissez-faire and transactional leadership styles with
emotional intelligence, it has been explained that for providing an equitable
and effective exchange in characteristics of behaviors of contingent reward,
traits, and abilities related to the elevated EI must be possessed by leaders.
Since routine and reactive leadership behaviors are reflected by active
management, it is not presumed that a relationship with emotional intelligence
would exist. However, it is also expected that emotional intelligence would
exhibit a negative relation with the passive management and behaviors of
laissez-faire leadership because people with elevated emotional intelligence
are perceived to be higher on self-efficacy and initiative (Anand & UdayaSuriyan, 2010).
Leadership Self-Efficacy
Personal
well-being and human accomplishment are enhanced by a strong sense of
self-efficacy in various ways. Individuals who have high assurance in their
abilities approach tough tasks as nothing but challenges to be cleared rather
threats which must be avoided. Deep engrossments in tasks and intrinsic
interest are promoted by this efficacious outlook. They maintain a strong
commitment to all the tasks that get. In addition, it is not difficult for them
to set challenging goals are even fulfill them. They sustain and heighten their
efforts in the failure’s face. Even if they face failures, they are able to
quickly recover this efficacy. Failure is attributed by them to deficient
knowledge and insufficient efforts which are acquirable. Personal
accomplishments are produced by such an efficacious outlook while lowering
vulnerability to a feeling of depression and reducing stress (Bandura, 2010).
Maddux
(2016) says that people who doubt their abilities back away from all tough
tasks which they come to perceive as personal threats. They have a weak
commitment and low aspirations to the objectives which they set. When they are
faced with tough tasks, they think about their personal deficiencies and other
obstacles rather than believing in themselves. It makes them give up on the
tasks very quickly (Maddux, 2016). They are quite slow in recovering
their sense of self-efficacy when they fail to achieve what they wanted. Since
they perceive insufficient performance as a deficient aptitude, it doesn’t need
many failures for them to be disappointed and lose their faith in their
abilities. In addition, they are also subjected to depression and stress
easily.
Emotional Intelligence and leadership
Self-Efficacy
Self-management
in terms of emotions has a significant part in leadership. Schwarzer (2014)
notes that managing emotions is quite difficult. Self-management, for leaders,
encompasses several competencies which involved self-control. It refers to the
ability to stay clear-headed and calm during the periods of crisis and high
stress. It is significant for leaders to create ways of managing their emotions
and disruptive emotions, particularly in intercultural situations (Schwarzer, 2014).
Initiative
and adaptability are required by self-efficacy. Adaptability is the skills of
juggling multiple demands, adapting to the new issues, and adjusting to the
changes. It enables a person to deal effectively with cultural ambiguities.
An initiative of a person might be to seize all the issues and turn them into
better opportunities (Petrides, 2011).
Learning
to create a positive perspective will assist in improving self-efficacy and it
will improve the capability of being resilient to issues as explained by Mortan, Ripoll, Carvalho, and Bernal (2014). This is
how a person begins to see what makes other people best and how the
future outcomes will be positive (Mortan, Ripoll, Carvalho, & Bernal, 2014).
Lee
and Song (2010) indicate that choosing an attitude can change the perspective
of a person and also create a new possibility. Their thinking on
this matter has actually been instrumental in creating new opportunities of thinking
about the capability of humans to not only survive but find meaning in life. Self-efficacy allows a person to be
quite capable and successfully overcome the challenges that he faces in both
organizational and emotional context (Lee & Song, 2010).
Fitzgerald and
Schutte
(2010) suggest that little research has been carried out on the relation of
self-efficacy and emotional intelligence in the organizational context of Saudi
Arabia. There are numerous studies that can be found alone on the influence of
emotional intelligence on the success of a leader but there are not many
studies available with the focus on organizations in Saudi Arabia. With the
rise of EI influencing styles of leadership, it has been explained that almost
ninety percent of the competencies distinguishing incredible leaders from the
average ones are associated with emotional intelligence (Fitzgerald & Schutte, 2010). Perceived
capabilities or self-efficacy affect the development of strategies of
functional leadership, skillful execution of different plans, and influence
behavioral and cognitive functions which are important for regulating group
processes. It has actually been determined with individuals with a high EI
seemed to have a high sense of self-efficacy.
Programs and organizations supporting
workers can enhance both self-efficacy and emotional intelligence through
awareness and training (Ramchunder & Martins, 2014).
Perception
of Power and Emotional Intelligence
Meisler
and Vigoda Gadot (2014) testify that success in both the organizational context
and political context is based on the consistent calculation of the power of an
individual. In other words, a person who recognizes his power to its actual
level is capable of achieving success (Meisler & Vigoda-Gadot, 2014).
However,
it is significant to note that in the organizational context, the perception of
power is not recognized sufficiently. There is a significant lack of studies
available on the concept of emotional intelligence and perception of power. The
perception of power is significant for two reasons (Collins & Cooper, 2014). First, in any
interaction that involves power usage, people rarely have perfect information
regarding how capable they really are and how well they can perform. With a
proper perception of power, objectives can be effectively achieved.
Ashkanasy,
Zerbe, and Hartel, (2016) suggested in their book that person could assume the
capabilities of power by managing the powers’ impressions and the extract
adversary’s concessions which predicted from the capabilities of objective
power becomes greater (Ashkanasy, Zerbe, & Hartel, 2016).
By
suggesting the power’s cognitive aspect in social interaction can be
manipulated, the research on the perception of power may help us to understand
such management of impression. Second, the cognitive relevance can be assessed
by the research on power perception, and the concepts of phenomenological
validity of power by determined the thought variables to govern the form of
objective power estimates the power subjective.
Many
emotional intelligence definitions have been proposed by the researchers,
scholars, and managers with the increasing usage of emotional intelligence;
however, the equal of both cognition and emotion appears on only one of them.
According to Mayer and Salovey (1997), ability or a single trait is not
reflected by the emotional intelligence, but, rather, the abilities of distinct
emotional reasoning composition; regulating emotions, understanding, and
perceiving (Wong, Wong, & Peng, 2010).
Eileen
Grafton, Brigid Gillespie, and Henderson (2010) assumed that recognizing and
interpreting the emotional states variation meaning are involved in perceiving
emotions, as well as the experiences of other sensory relationship. The
comprehension on how the complex emotions are the blended form of basic
emotions involved in understanding emotions, how events surrounding experiences
could affect emotions, and whether the reactions of various emotional are in
the given social settings likely (Grafton, Gillespie, & Henderson, 2010).
The
emotions control in others and in oneself encompassed in regulating emotions.
How he or she perceives, understands, and regulates emotions indicates an
emotional intelligence of the individual. Emotional intelligence in sum is an
intelligence form that involves “the monitoring ability of one’s own and the
emotions and feelings of others, to discriminate between them, and guide the
actions and thinking of one by using this information.
Ashkanasy,
Neal M.; Zerbe, Wilfred J.; Hartel, Charmine EJ (2016) suggested in their book
that person could assume the capabilities of power by managing the powers’
impressions and the extract adversary’s concessions which predicted from the
capabilities of objective power becomes greater.
By
suggesting the power’s cognitive aspect in social interaction can be
manipulated, the research on the perception of power may help us to understand
such management of impression. Second, the cognitive relevance can be assessed
by the research on power perception, and the concepts of phenomenological
validity of objective power by determined the thought variables to govern the
form of objective power estimates the power subjective. The unimportant of
studying objective power does not imply from such reasons for studying the
perceptions of power, but warranted seems like the only attention that greater
to the power’s subjective aspect.
Many
emotional intelligence definitions have been proposed by the researchers,
scholars, and managers with the increasing usage of emotional intelligence;
however, the equal of both cognition and emotion appears on only one of them.
According to Mayer and Salovey (1997), ability or a single trait is not
reflected by the emotional intelligence, but, rather, the abilities of distinct
emotional reasoning composition; regulating emotions, understanding, and
perceiving.
Recognizing
and interpreting the emotional states variation meaning are the consisted of
perceiving emotions, as well as the experiences of other sensory relationship.
The comprehension on how the complex emotions are the blended form of basic
emotions involved in understanding emotions, how events surrounding experiences
could affect emotions, and whether the reactions of various emotional are in
the given social settings likely.
The
emotions control in others and oneself encompassed in regulating emotions. How
he or she perceives, understands, and regulates emotions indicates the
emotional intelligence of an individual. Emotional intelligence in sum is an
intelligence form that involves “the monitoring ability of one’s own and the
emotions and feelings of others, to discriminate between them, and guide the
actions and thinking of one by using this information.
Importance
of Job Performance of leadership
How
well the duties performed by employees might be the assumption of job
performance by an entrepreneur. However, there are various factors involved in
job performance. For example, a particular employee might be expected to your
company substantial added-value because of a high-level task of performed in
his task with his capability. But “contextual performance” and “task
performance” involved in “job performance.” For example, a task of shoe
salesperson is to evaluate how many sandals, sneakers, or work boots sold by
her on a daily average, week, or month. How the customers and co-workers could
get along with her, how the affected problem of the team or company solved
effectively by her, and how during the slow periods she keeps busy rated on her
contextual performance.
To
make a strong job performance imperative, the success of business mainly rests
on its employees’ shoulders since they are one of its greatest significant
assets.
Striving
to meet or exceed your goals are understood by the topnotch performers.
The
interest of stakeholders and on board helped to keep by the overall performance
of a good job.
Motowidlo
and Kell (2012) mentioned in their book that how well the duties performed by
employees might be the assumption of job performance by an entrepreneur.
However, there are various factors involved in job performance. For example, a
particular employee might be expected to your company substantial added-value
because of a high-level task of performance in his task with his capability.
But “contextual performance” and “task performance” involved in “job
performance.” For example, a task of shoe salesperson is to evaluate how many
sandals, sneakers or work boots sold by her on a daily average, week or month.
How the customers and co-workers could get along with her, how the affected
problem of the team or company solved effectively by her, and how during the
slow periods she keeps busy rated on her contextual performance (Motowidlo & Kell, 2012).
To
make a strong job performance imperative, the success of business mainly rests
on its employees’ shoulders since they are one of its greatest significant
assets.
Striving
to meet or exceed your goals are understood by the topnotch performers. The
interest of stakeholders and on board helped to keep the overall performance of
a good job. The examples are such as work ethics, communication, interpersonal
skills and performance of job on all level displayed healthily is essential to
the long-term success.
Conclusion on the perspective of
Emotional Intelligence
Overall, leadership, leadership
styles, emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, and the relationship between
self-efficacy and emotional intelligence have been explained in this chapter.
Leadership is actually a process in which several individuals are influenced by
a person for achieving a common objective. And the transformational leadership
style has proven to be more effective in increasing employee satisfaction
because it offers them equal attention. Meanwhile, self-efficacy refers to the
recognition of one’s own capabilities and how a person can act in a certain
situation. It has been determined that with high emotional intelligence, a
person can be an effective leader. Still, the lack of research on the described
concepts significantly limited the potential of research and even hindered the
way to precise results. However, this gap can be filled in the future.
Chapter 3
Emotional intelligence and job
performance
Employee
performance vs emotional intelligence
Emotional
intelligence
The
literature review considers the impact of emotional intelligence employee performance
in the various organization. The review considers the evaluation of emotional
intelligence on the basis of the various theories that are required for enhancing
the performance of the employees in the organization. The role of emotional
intelligence and effective leadership is considered from the perspective of
human services and comprehensive studies of emotional intelligence (Boyatzis, et al., 2000). The review includes
studies of competence employee performance and how it affects the success of the
organizations. The theories of modern organizations consider emotional
intelligence as a competitive tool to help the organization about the
development of vision (Ugoani, 2016).
The
organizational leaders are often enthusiastically committed with the vision of
the organization and enable the co-workers to work effectively. A number of
models are designed in the organizations for the clarification of thinking and
identification of simplicity regarding the performance. A number of researches
are carried out to explore the relationship between employee performance and
emotional intelligence (Ugoani, 2016). The emotional intelligence induces a
positive impact on the leadership in the organizations. In the private or
public organization, leaders find benefits by using the behavior attributed to
emotional intelligence. The development of the non-profit organization depends
on the ability of managers to have access to decisions and consequences of the
decisions (Hess & Bacigalupo, 2013).
In
previous research, Boyatzis et al (2000) and Goleman’s (2001) proposed four
important elements for the emotional intelligence that are mainly associated
with the twenty competencies of behavior (Boyatzis, et al., 2000). The emotional
intelligence skills are developed in the leadership for the growth of the
non-profit organization (Goleman, et al., 2000). The research was
based on brain research and leadership styles. The scientific evidence used in
the research shows the enormous impact of leadership on the growth of the
organizations. There are four dimensions of emotional intelligence including
self-awareness, relationship management, social awareness, and self-management (Boyatzis,
et al., 2000; Goleman, et al., 2000).
According to (Boyatzis, et al., 2000) emotional
intelligence is the personal competence of a leader that enables the person to
use the emotions in the management of workers and workplace environment. The
theory for the implementation of emotional intelligence emphasizes the
importance of clustering and predicting performance methods. As a convenient phrase,
emotional intelligence considers the human talent and complex personal
capability to explore different areas of social intelligence (Boyatzis, et al., 2000; Goleman, et al., 2000).
The first expression of emotional
intelligence was used by Salovey and Mayer in 1990 that described four domains
including knowing, handling of the personal and co-worker emotions. The concept
of emotional intelligence is further categorized in practical intelligence and
successful intelligence. Emotional intelligence is based on cognitive
abilities, effective measures, and competency approach (Boyatzis, et al., 2000). In non-profit
organizations, leaders function as managers to create solutions to complex
problems on the basis of changing circumstances. The ability of organizations
improves by the implementation of quality decisions that are independent of
intrinsic as well as extrinsic factors (Hess & Bacigalupo, 2013).
Emotional
intelligence is emerging as a subject of significant importance. The
emotionally intelligent organization identifies new terms and conditions for
the development of organization on different bases and values. In western societies,
nonprofit organizations are increasing the employment rate and delivering
services to a population and are known as a third sector (Boyatzis & Sala, 2004). The growth of the
nonprofit organization depends on the quality of directive leadership. In a
previous research Lane and Wallis competitive advantages of a nonprofit
organization for the leadership functioning and handling processes (Hess & Bacigalupo, 2013).
The
leaders of nonprofit organizations are responsible to deliver the best possible
quality of the services. Researchers
have been focused on identifying the role of human emotions in the
decision-making processes and Leadership processes (Ugoani, 2016). The artist believes that decision-making
processes can be improved by emotional thinking about logical and rational
considerations. A linear model is predicted by researchers for the
decision-making processes on the basis of emotional learning (Boyatzis & Sala, 2004). The research
suggests that human beings take a better decision when cognitive functions are
transformed into the emotion-free microprocessor. Instance IBM has developed a
new cognitive Computing processor that identifies a pattern of human
thinking. This computerized platform is
capable to identify six different types of emotions such as anger, fear, Joy,
disgust, surprise, and sadness (Hess & Bacigalupo, 2013).
The
phrase of the emotional intelligence focuses on the components of human Talent,
the earliest psychologist explored a concept of social intelligence that
defines multiple capabilities of the human leaders (Boyatzis & Sala, 2004). The concept of
emotional intelligence is related to the functioning of neural endocrine,
neural circuitry, job outcomes and lifestyles, and human personality and
behavior. The psychological construct of
emotional intelligence shows convergent and discriminant validity (Boyatzis & Sala, 2004). The theory of emotional intelligence is
related to the functioning of neural endocrine functioning. The multiple components of emotional
intelligence are different pathways. Some integrated concepts of emotional
theories provide a convenient framework for the human dispositions, job
performance, the theory of action, and capabilities of outstanding performance (Boyatzis, et al., 2000).
According to Boyatzis in 1982, emotional
intelligence is basically the ability of a leader to understand, recognize and
emotionally consider the effective and Superior performance. A simple
definition describes emotional intelligence as the intelligent use of emotions
in the workplace. Davies and Stankov in 1998 described emotional intelligence
as a focal point that allows the leader to do use abilities, competitors, and
emphatically resolve the issues in the workplace. Ackerman and Heggestad in
1997, describe emotional intelligence as a confusing point that is more related
to the cognitive ability of the leader (Boyatzis & Sala, 2004; Boyatzis, et al., 2000).
Employee
performance in all services sectors
In all services sectors, the job performance
is the most essentials elements that cannot be ignored on any cost. The
concepts of the execution of the job can take place by the precise meaning of
the performance. Accomplishment and attainment are also included in employee performance.
There are the series of the objectives that are based upon the concepts of the
employee performance that are set by the mission of the organization and its
future strategy.
Furthermore, there are multidimensional
aspects of the concepts of the job performance that are required presenting the
procedure’s task-performing. The practical resources, concertation of efficiency
and skills creativity also includes ibn this employee performance. Thus, there
are two9 basic forms of the job performance is usually recognized from which
the first one contains on the creating job meanwhile the other one component
required to reflecting the particular behavior of the jobs along with the technical
capacities which are limited with few careers. All kinds of the jobs area also
include in the second kind of the job performance and this performance can be
explained as the individual's actions in which are the actions of the outcomes
is not includes (Armstrong, 2014).
According
to Muhammad Munira, (2017) the achievements
of the goals also resulted as the employee’s performance in efficient and
effective manners. It is also referred to as the variables of the individual
level that can contribute to the performance of the organization significantly.
There are two distinct dimensions in which the employee performance is divided particularly.
These dimensions are the extra role and in role performance. The complimenting
obligatory job task needs a formal job for the in-role performance. Meanwhile,
the behaviors of the organizational citizenship include in the extra-role
performance that can positively contribute for attaining the goals of the
organization by creating the positive impact on the psychological conditions of
the organization (Muhammad Munira, 2017).
At
the work paces the intellectual abilities related to the work and motivation
that are affected by the performance behaviors of the individuals. The major
attention is paid towards the contributions of the emotional intelligence for performance
and social behaviors of the individuals and their personal lives. At the
workplaces, the integral role of emotional intelligence has been observed. It
has been observed by the several studies that by increasing the emotional
intelligence the outcome of the work also increase. It also includes the high
performance of the job and measures of the careers.
Relationship
between employee performance and emotional intelligence
The
exploration of the association between the performance of the job and emotional
intelligence are the aims of this study. The determined individual life and
organizational success is the consideration of emotional intelligence. However,
how important to study emotional intelligence and its effectiveness on
performance improvement among the academic administrator still become a gap
regarding insufficient understanding. The organizations’ strategic competence
is a major role in it. The performance led directly from the emotional
intelligence is the assumption of the study (Cartwright, 2008).
According to Cartwright &
Pappas, to efficiently act and as their profession’s part, it was more likely
that the identification of high emotional human resources’ high emotional
intelligence to the feelings expressed. The general performance of occupations
could be predicted by emotional intelligence as shown by a meta-analysis.
Conversely, the outcome factor was not predicted or indicated strongly and
adequately by the emotional intelligence that was a real display of the
capacity of one to achieve success with the required skills. In contrast, some
revealed evidence presents a weak relationship with a performance that sighted
by emotion (Al Ali, 2012)..
Cote and Miners (2006) examined the
relationships between the emotional intelligence, process satisfaction, process
behaviors, and performance of a team among two partners consisted of 81 teams.
The related significant of the performance of the team and emotional
intelligence revealed by the findings. Nevertheless, a weak significant
relationship between emotional intelligence and performance of organization
reported by (Maryam Mahdinezhad, 2017,).
Rexhepi & Berisha suggested that
the performance of employees in almost all jobs types has a direct association
with emotional intelligence. Dulewicz and Higgs (2000) found a direct
contribution from a key success of emotional intelligence more than Intelligent
Quotient (IQ) and managerial intelligence in the performance of employees.
Moreover, according to Bagshaw (2000), there is a positive contribution of
emotional intelligence in the overall success of business and performance of
organizations. Therefore, Cadman & Brewer (2011) suggested that employees
with emotional intelligence’s high-level started hired by employers. According to Karimi (2014), besides the jobs
types, such association directed in various industries and service founded in a
wide range of recent studies. The industries mentioned are marketing, hotel
industry, retailing, hospital/health services, and education (Zeidner, 2017).
Hence, we believe that the positive
outcomes, especially the performance of employees resulted in the enhancement
level of emotional intelligence. The scholars and practitioners’ attention
caught by this direct relationship to discover indirect construct aspects,
emotional intelligence’s effects and context (it is learnable as well) and,
consequently, the performance of employees enhancement.
Therefore, the skills of emotional
intelligence which believed by researchers that through the interventions of
training and coaching, it could be learned and enhanced. The emotional
intelligence’s level enhancement would contribute an outcome positively toward
the employee performance enhancement (Rexhepi, 2017).
According to a book titled
“Emotional Intelligence in the workplace” by Dalip Singh (2003), the
competitive advantages of a person given by emotional intelligence. And he also
mentioned that in the establishment of renowned business, where the training
made to make everyone be smart and productive managers are the persons who have
emotional intelligence’s strong rate. He also argues that you may become a
legal scholar or a brilliant fiscal analyst with being endowed with abilities
of great intellectual. But what will make you a CEO candidate, a successful
politician, a powerful bureaucrat, or a brilliant trial lawyer is emotional
intelligence that developed highly (Besar Berisha, 2017).
Emotional intelligence is
referred as the ability of the individual that is required for successfully and
appropriately responding towards the wide variety of the emotional incentive
that can be easily elicited by the immediate environment as well as inner self.
There is a major three psychological dimension by which the emotional
intelligence which emotional intelligence can be established. These dimensions
are; emotional competency, emotional, maturity and emotional sensitivity by
which an individual can be motivated towards the recognition of the truthfully
for handling the tactfully and interpreting the honestly of the dynamics of behavior
of humans.
As indicated by the
study of the Cote, (2006). Those people who
are at the high levels of the emotional intelligence they experience more
success in their carrier such kind of the several arguments are given by the various
researchers. There are several authors who agree with the argumentation of the emotional
intelligence for enhancing the performance of the organization. It has been
observed in the various research studies if the employers will ensure the
security of the jobs to the employees than the emotional intelligence of the
employees will enhance effectively. Those people who have a high level of emotional
intelligence can lead more effectively to their team and they are also more
adapt6able for the team performance and team leadership (Cote, 2006).
It has been argued by
the studies of the number of Elfenbein, (2016) there is a number of theoretical contributions that had been presented
in the research. These studies are also used to examining the distinction among
the other focused emotional intelligence dimensions and self-awareness. It also
explains the uncertain links between job performance and emotional
intelligence. In emotional intelligence, the distinctions of the self-others
also have been mentioned in the literature review of the study. In a systematic way, it also can be sparsely. In
another case, the mixtures of the other focused and self-focused dimension of
the emotional intelligence are examined for measuring the use of the isolation
of emotional intelligence. At the third
time, the dairy choice can be approached to allow us to differentiate among the
actual display of the emotional intelligence and general potential of the people
for displaying. Emotional intelligence
at person level can be measured along with the one time survey that is needed
for the common level of emotional intelligence (Keri A.
Pekaar, 2017).
The meta-analysis
related to the emotional intelligence that is explained earlier in this paper,
it has been used for the measures of emotional intelligence. It has been
observed that there is a positive significant relationship between emotional
intelligence and employee performance. It has been traveled by the
meta-analysis that there is quite a moderate relation among the interpersonal
contact performance relationship at the job.
At the workplaces, the performance of the emotional intelligence is much
stronger than the high level of the interpersonal contact such as; counseling
jobs and sales (Elfenbein,
2016).
Basic fundamentals of emotional
intelligence
Generally, emotional intelligence
can be referred to as the emotions that are not necessarily against the thinkings
of the individuals. But there are different means of thinking related to
various types of problems which can exist in the world of the business. In
another case, the emotions can be referred to as the very valuable tools that are
required for guiding for our decision making and choices. Another word, the
positive emotions, just like as joy can indicate us about the situation that is
considered as the good for survival. Joy is considered as the emotion which can
motivate you for looking towards more things (Goleman D. B., 2013).
This
also referred to as the basic analysis and it cannot understanding and explaining
the complexities of the emotional world along with the social world. It also provides us an idea for various
emotions that are required for guiding our behaviors in various ways. Emotional
intelligence is related to them being more aware of our emotions and it also allows
the signaling for us (Şenyuva, 2014).
Self-Awareness and major key of the emotional intelligence
The self-awareness is
referred to as the main indicators and major key of the emotional intelligence
and it is the first pillar which is related to paying attention towards your
own emotions. According to these points emotions can be come up with the two
major parts; these parts are contained on the psychological and physical parts
of the emotional intelligence.
The beliefs, attitudes,
and thoughts that are underlying in most of our emotions are included in the psychological
components. The sensation of the body
that is required for stating the various emotions are included in eth physical components (Ciarrochi, 2013). Such as the peoples
are involved in the feeling of the various emotions as they feel they are
getting pain their stomach but they can explain it. You become weaker to
control your emotions and sometimes you cannot. But the most accurate and
honest reflection of the emotions can be sued to helping and understanding
yourself is much better than explaining yourselves to others (Pradhan,
2016).
Self-Regulation
The
self-regulation is related to how the person can control his self for actions
of the other and if the person becomes more aware towards your emotions the
most next pillar of the emotional intelligence is related to responding in a good
way. But it depends on the various situations that there are various policies that
can be used for the better for regulating our emotions. Few of these strategies
are;
·
To control your emotion in innovation
effective and constructive manners for example painting, writing and exercising
and various other activities.
·
Avoiding the triggers is another strategy
that can be sued for emotional intelligence just like, environments. Peoples
and situations which is most similar to creating negative emotion.
·
To
looking for positive experiences for the reverse negative ruts just like as; to
watch the comedy movie can be considered as the good ways to positive emotions.
·
To
change your emotions by performing opposite to your choices.
·
Being
a passive observer to watch out your emotions as compared to acting them impulsively.
·
These
policies are used to assist us in regulating our emotions on a daily basis in
good ways (Moshe Zeidner, 2012).
·
By considering the kind of tool kit the
emotional intelligence. There serval various ways that are required for
responding the specific emotions.
·
It doesn’t require all of the tools for measuring
it in effective manners.
Empathy/
Social awareness is the third pillar of emotional intelligence
Social awareness is the third pillar of emotional intelligence. By recognizing
and interpreting the emotional states variation meaning are involved in
perceiving emotions, as well as the experiences of other sensory relationship.
The comprehension on how the complex emotions are the blended form of basic
emotions involved in understanding emotions, how events surrounding experiences
could affect emotions, and whether the reactions of various emotional are in
the given social settings likely (Jean Greaves, 2002).
The
emotions control in others and in oneself encompassed in regulating emotions.
How he or she perceives, understands, and regulates emotions indicates an
emotional intelligence of the individual. Emotional intelligence in sum is an
intelligence form that involves “the monitoring ability of one’s own and the
emotions and feelings of others, to discriminate between them, and guide the
actions and thinking of one by using this information.
Ashkanasy,
Neal M.; Zerbe, Wilfred J.; Hartel, Charmine EJ (2016) suggested in their book
that person could assume the capabilities of power by managing the powers’
impressions and the extract adversary’s concessions which predicted from the
capabilities of objective power becomes greater.
By suggesting the power’s cognitive aspect in social interaction
can be manipulated, the research on the perception of power may help us to
understand such management of impression (John Hurley,
2018).
Social
Skills are the fourth pillar of the emotional intelligence
Social skills are the fourth pillar of the emotional
intelligence and itis the most important component of the emotional
intelligence that is defined about the social skills that an individual have to
deal with others in good manners (Zeki
Yüksekbilgili, 2015).
It
has been demonstrated the emotional intelligence skills of the leaders for all
the individual workers is different and for non-profit leaders, the emotional
intelligence can be further categorized in self-awareness, interaction with the
others, self-management, relationship management, and the social awareness (Hess &
Bacigalupo, 2013).
In
the absence of emotional intelligence, the leaders of the non-profit
organization, board, and CEO fails to identify the importance of the decisions.
The leader of a non-profit organization gains moral authority and trust. The
trust is an important factor while taking decisions and establishing emotional
control.
The
concept of emotional intelligence is further categorized in practical intelligence
and successful intelligence. Emotional intelligence is based on cognitive
abilities, effective measures, and competency approach (Boyatzis, et al.,
2000).
In non-profit organizations, leaders function as managers to create solutions to
complex problems on the basis of changing circumstances. The ability of
organizations improves by the implementation of quality decisions that are
independent of intrinsic as well as extrinsic factors (Hess & Bacigalupo,
2013).
The best example of relationship management can be viewed by observing the
emotional intelligence in the no-profit organization.
The
leaders behaving as a developer in a non-profit organization exercises new
judgments consider the responsibility of the organization for the development
and takes initiative for the growth of the non-profit organization. The role of
a leader in the organization is significant that is linked with the emotional
growth of the workers. The relation between the leaders and the workers in the
organization affects the activity of the participants in the work (Boyatzis,
et al., 2000).
In a
non-profit organization, the leaders play there a role in the decision making
process and judgments of the work that is often expected by the stakeholders.
The leadership styles in the non-profit organization are managing and balancing
the interests on the basis of emotional intelligence. The leader as change
agent confronts a number of challenges regarding the sustainability of
organizational growth and development. The changes in the non-profit
organization are forced by technological changes, economic and regulatory
variation for effective leadership (Goleman, et al., 2000).
References of The perspective of
Emotional Intelligence
Al Ali, O. G. (2012). An Exploration of the
Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Job Performance in Police
Organizations. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 27(1), 1–8.
Anand, R., & UdayaSuriyan, G.
(2010). Emotional intelligence and its relationship with leadership practices. International
Journal of Business and Management, 5(2).
Armstrong. (2014). Handbook of
Human Resource Management Practice (13th ed). Kogan Page Ltd.
Ashkanasy, N. M., Zerbe, W. J., &
Hartel, C. E. (2016). Managing emotions in the workplace. Routledge.
Bandura, A. (2010). Self‐efficacy. The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology, 1-3.
Batool, B. F. (2013). Emotional
intelligence and effective leadership. Journal of Business Studies
Quarterly, 4(3).
Besar Berisha, G. R. (2017). The
effects of emotional intelligence in employees Performance. International
Journal of Business and Globalisation, 18(4).
Boyatzis, R. E., & Sala, F.
(2004). Assessing Emotional Intelligence Competencies . Assessing EI
Competencies , 01(01), 01-20.
Boyatzis, R. E., Goleman, D., &
Rhee, K. (2000). Clustering competence in emotional intelligence: Insights from
the Emotional Competence Inventory (ECI). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: Handbook
of emotional intelligence.
Cartwright, S. &. (2008).
Emotional intelligence, its measurement, and implications for the workplace. International
Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 149–171.
Cavazotte, F., Moreno, V., &
Hickmann, M. (2012). Effects of leader intelligence, personality and emotional
intelligence on transformational leadership and managerial performance. The
Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 443-455.
Chaudhry, A. Q., & Javed, H.
(2012). Impact of transactional and laissez-faire leadership style on
motivation. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(7).
Ciarrochi, J. &. (2013). Applying
emotional intelligence: A practitioner's guide. Psychology Press.
Clarke, N. (2010). Emotional
intelligence and its relationship to transformational leadership and key
project manager competences. Project Management Journal, 41(2), 5-20.
Collins, C. S., & Cooper, J. E.
(2014). Emotional intelligence and the qualitative researcher. International
Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13(1), 88-103.
Corona, M. A. (2010). The
Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Transformational Leadership: A
Hispanic American Examination. Business Journal of Hispanic Research, 4(1).
Cote, S. &. (2006). Emotional
intelligence, cognitive intelligence, and job performance. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 51(1), 1-28.
Elfenbein, H. A. (2016). Emotional
division-of-labor: A theoretical account. Research in Organizational
Behavior, 1–26.
Fitzgerald, S., & Schutte, N. S.
(2010). Increasing transformational leadership by enhancing self-efficacy. Journal
of Management Development, 29(5), 495-505.
Føllesdal, H., & Hagtvet, K.
(2013). Does emotional intelligence as an ability to predict transformational
leadership? A multilevel approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 5, 747-762.
Giltinane, C. L. (2013). Leadership
styles and theories. Nursing Standard, 27(41).
Goleman, D. ( 2012). Emotional
Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. Random House Publishing
Group,
Goleman, D. (2009). Working with
Emotional Intelligence. A&C Black.
Goleman, D. B. (2013). Primal
leadership: Unleashing the power of emotional intelligence. Harvard
Business Press.
Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R. E., &
McKee, A. (2013). Primal leadership: Unleashing the power of emotional
intelligence. Harvard Business Press.
Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., &
McKee, A. (2000). Primal Leadership: Learning to Lead with Emotional
Intelligence. Retrieved 01 19, 2019, from https://keithdwalker.ca/wp-content/summaries/m-p/Merry.Primal%20Leadership.Goleman%2C%20Boyatzis%20%26%20McKee.EBS.pdf
Grafton, E., Gillespie, B., &
Henderson, S. (2010). Resilience: the power within. Oncology nursing forum,
37(6).
Grint, K., Jones, O. S., & Holt,
C. (2016). What is Leadership? The Routledge Companion to Leadership.
Harms, P. D., & Credé, M. (2010).
Emotional intelligence and transformational and transactional leadership: A
meta-analysis. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17(1),
5-17.
Hess, J. D., & Bacigalupo, A. C.
(2013). Applying Emotional Intelligence Skills to Leadership and Decision
Making in Non-Profit Organizations. Adm. Sci., 3(01), 202-220.
Hur, Y., Berg, P. T., & Wilderom,
C. P. (2011). Transformational leadership as a mediator between emotional
intelligence and team outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(4),
591-603.
Jean Greaves, T. B. ( 2002). Emotional
Intelligence Appraisal: Me Edition. TalentSmart, Incorporated,
Jogulu, U. D. (2010). Culturally-linked
leadership styles. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(8),
705-719.
John Hurley, P. L. (2018). Emotional
Intelligence in Health and Social Care: A Guide for Improving Human
Relationships. Taylor & Francis.
Keri A. Pekaar, D. v. (2017).
Emotional intelligence and job performance: The role of enactment and focus on
others’ emotions. Journal of Human Performance, 30(1), 2-3.
Kruse, K. (2013). What is
leadership? Forbes magazine.
Lee, K.-H., & Song, J.-S. (2010).
The effect of emotional intelligence on self-efficacy and job stress of
nurses-mediating role of self-efficacy. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
Administration, 16(1), 17-25.
Maddux, J. E. (2016). Self-efficacy. Interpersonal
and intrapersonal expectancies, 41-46.
Maryam Mahdinezhad, M. S. ( 2017,).
Emotional Intelligence and Job Performance: A Study among Malaysian
Administrators. International Journal ofAcademic Research in Business and
SocialSciences.
Mathew, M., & Gupta, K. S.
(2015). Transformational leadership: Emotional intelligence. SCMS Journal of
Indian Management, 12(2).
McCleskey, J. A. (2014). Situational,
transformational, and transactional leadership and leadership development. Journal
of Business Studies Quarterly, 5(4).
Meisler, G., & Vigoda-Gadot, E.
(2014). Perceived organizational politics, emotional intelligence, and work
outcomes: an empirical exploration of directand indirect effects. Personnel
Review, 43(1), 116-135.
Mortan, R. A., Ripoll, P., Carvalho,
C., & Bernal, M. C. (2014). Effects of emotional intelligence on
entrepreneurial intention and self-efficacy. Revista de Psicología del
Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 30(3).
Moshe Zeidner, G. M. (2012). What
We Know about Emotional Intelligence: How It Affects Learning, Work,
Relationships, and Our Mental Health. MIT Press.
Motowidlo, S. J., & Kell, H. J.
(2012). Job performance. Handbook of Psychology, 12.
Muhammad Munira, R. I. (2017).
Emotional Intelligence and Employee Performance: An Intervention Based
Experimental Study. Journal of Business & Economics, 9(2), 1-19.
Nohria, N., & Khurana, R. (2010).
Handbook of leadership theory and practice. Harvard Business Press.
Odumeru, J. A., & Ogbonna, I. G.
(2013). Transformational vs. transactional leadership theories: Evidence in
literature. International Review of Management and Business Research, 2(2).
Petrides, K. V. (2011). Ability and
trait emotional intelligence.
Porter, M., & Nohria, N. (2010).
What is leadership? The CEO's role in large, complex organizations. N.
Nohria, R. Khurana, eds. Handbook of Leadership: Theory and Practice. Harvard
Business Press, Cambridge, MA, 433-473.
Pradhan, R. K. (2016). Impact of
psychological capital on organizational citizenship behavior: Moderating role
of emotional intelligence. Cogent Business & Management, 3(1).
Ramchunder, Y., & Martins, N.
(2014). The role of self-efficacy, emotional intelligence and leadership style
as attributes of leadership effectiveness. SA Journal of Industrial
Psychology, 40(1), 01-11.
Rexhepi, G. &. (2017). The
effects of emotional intelligence in employees performance. International
Journal of Business and Globalization, 18(4), 467-479.
Sadeghi, A., & Pihie, Z. A.
(2012). Transformational leadership and its predictive effects on leadership
effectiveness. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(7).
Sadri, G. (2012). Emotional
intelligence and leadership development. Public Personnel Management, 41(3),
535-548.
Schwarzer, R. (2014). Self-efficacy:
Thought control of the action. Taylor & Francis.
Şenyuva, E. K. (2014). Relationship
between self‐compassion and emotional intelligence in nursing students. International
journal of nursing practice, 20(6), 588-596.
Silva, A. (2016). What is Leadership?
Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 8(1).
Ugoani, J. N. (2016). EMOTIONAL
INTELLIGENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS: MANAGEMENT MODEL APPROACH. INDEPENDENT
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT &PRODUCTION, 07(03), 2236-269.
Ulrich, D., & Smallwood, N.
(2012). What is leadership? Advances in global leadership.
Wong, C.-S., Wong, P.-M., & Peng,
K. Z. (2010). Effect of middle-level leader and teacher emotional intelligence
on school teachers’ job satisfaction: The case of Hong Kong. Educational
Management Administration & Leadership, 38(1), 59-70.
Wong, S. I., & Giessner, S. R.
(2018). The thin line between empowering and laissez-faire leadership: An
expectancy-match perspective. Journal of Management, 44(2), 757-783.
Yang, I. (2015). Positive effects of
laissez-faire leadership: conceptual exploration. Journal of Management
Development, 34(10), 1246-1261.
Zeidner, M. &. (2017). Emotional
intelligence in gifted students. Gifted Education. International journal of
business, 33(2), 163-182.
Zeki Yüksekbilgili, Z. H. (2015).
Research about Emotional Intelligence on Generations. International Journal
of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Review, 3(4), 124 - 133.