Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Amenable to scientific study

26/03/2021 Client: saad24vbs Deadline: 2 Day

PLEASE ANSWER AND REBUTTAL THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS OR POST STATEMENTS. MUST BE 150 WORDS. (PLEASE), WRITE IN 1st PERSON.PLEASE MAKE SURE TO USE SCHOLARLY PEER REVIEWED ARTICLES AND PLACE EACH REFERENCE USED UNDER EACH ANSWER.

DQ1

There are hallmarks that are necessary in addressing a research problem. In a quantitative approach, this concept includes making the research topic amenable to scientific study. Hence, in framing the problem, researchers must ensure that a scholarly, systematic method of inquiry can be applied to the study (Walden, 2015). I addition, a researcher must maintain scholarly objectivity to mitigate against reliability and validity issues. In this context, reliability denotes a consistency in result from a research instrument, strategy, or approach (Burkholder, Cox, & Crawford, 2016). Overall, a research design must allow for multiple possible conclusions and mitigates against other threats.

Threats to Validity

Validity is a significant aspect of a research design. As it relates to quantitative study, validity denotes the best existing estimation to the truth regarding a proposition (Cook & Campbell, 1979, as cited by (Burkholder, et al., 2016). Therefore, the quality of a research is primarily dependent on the validity of its findings. This approach includes the type of data collected and how that data is used to answer the research question (Burkholder, et al., 2016). In the context of causal mechanism, there are threats that undermines the validity framework—internal and external.

Internal Validity

Quantitative research needs to address the internal validity of the target research question(s). Internal validity questions the truthfulness of a given proposition, regarding how a change in one variable causes a change in the outcome (Burkholder, et al., 2016). When there is causal inference, there are also competing explanations—threats to a statement’s validity. In the context of quantitative research, one of the threats to internal validity is selection. This concept refers to the process of selecting participants—self-selection or researcher sampling and assignment procedures (Shadish, Cook, & Campbell, 2002). The problem occurs when “cause and effect” is disputable, because of systematic differences across conditions.

External Validity

A quantitative approach in research also involve addressing external validity. In this context, the primary issue with external validity is ensuring that research findings hold true across contexts (Burkholder, et al., 2016). However, as with internal validity, there are also threats to external validity. Relative to quantitative research, one of the threats to external validity is the interactions of the observed causal relationship with sample units (Burkholder, et al., 2016). In this case, the results of one particular sample in a research, may not hold across other samples.

Strategies to Mitigate Threats

The quality of a quantitative research necessitates the mitigation of threats—internal and external. A fundamental quality indicator for research addressing causality is the presence of a control condition (Shadish, et al., 2002). This approach is especially significant, for causal inferences. Regarding selection, one approach to mitigating threats to validity is the use of random assignment—coin flips, computer algorithms, etc. (Burkholder, et al., 2016). Mitigating threats to external validity is equally important. Hence, the interactions of the observed causal relationship with sample units can be addressed by strategically incorporating a relevant design and methodology. One approach denotes including a qualitative case study analysis that would elucidate the degree to which these findings might generalize to other contexts (Burkholder, et al., 2016). Hence, mitigating threats to validity impacts research design and is reliant on the strategic incorporation of various methodologies.

Potential Ethical Issues

Potential ethical issues in social science often influence design decisions. Most of these ethical issues involves the methodologies employed (Babbie, 2017). Relative to quantitative research, it is not unusual to select participants—human subjects—for a particular study. The Belmont Report asserts three key principles—Resect for persons, beneficence, and justice—that must be considered (Babbie, 2017). Regardless, there will always be some risks to someone, when conducting research. Nevertheless, some designs are more feasible in mitigating risks than others (Babbie, 2017). Thus, researchers should consider a design that will best safeguard against these risks. One approach, regarding design decisions is to structure the research in a manner that guarantees anonymity.

References:

Babbie, E. (2017). The basics of social research (7th. Ed). Boston, MA: Cengage.

Burkholder, G.J., Cox, K.A., & Crawford, L.M. (2016). The Scholar-Practitioner’s Guide to Research Design, 1st Edition.

[MBS Direct]. Retrieved from https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781624580314/

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal

inference. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.

DQ2

Developing quantitative research studies that can stand the test of validity is a complicated and nuanced practice. Burkholder (2016) touched upon the experimental design validity framework of Shadish and colleagues that focuses on validity in the context of experimental designs. The framework outlines four components of validity in experimental design research; internal, external, statistical conclusion, and construct validity (Ch 2, Validity Considerations). Focusing upon internal and external validity it is important to note the threats and disparities of each in developing and conducting quantitative research.

Internal validity refers to the ability to test selected variables to an extent that allows the researcher to develop a causal inference. The ability to show that a selected variable had a change directly impacted by or caused by an independent variable absent of another plausible rival explanation (Burkholder, Ch 2, Internal Validity). Internal validity means that a study design enabled the researcher to account for all possible intervening variables related to the focus of the research. Internal validity in a way is the elimination of competing variables to explain a given phenomenon. For example, a study examining student retention and tuition affordability would have to account academic variables (among others) in order to isolate the focus upon economic driven negative retention rates. A researcher would have to control for students (or eliminate) from a study those where negative retention was the result of poor academic performance in order to show a valid relationship between retention (dependent) and affordability (independent). Failure to do so would result in the study failing to meet the standard of internal validity. Diminishing any correlation based upon non-controlled variables that could be used as plausible explanations for the dependent variable

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Engineering Solutions
Academic Mentor
ECFX Market
Financial Solutions Provider
Coursework Help Online
Accounting & Finance Specialist
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Engineering Solutions

ONLINE

Engineering Solutions

Give me a chance, i will do this with my best efforts

$65 Chat With Writer
Academic Mentor

ONLINE

Academic Mentor

You can award me any time as I am ready to start your project curiously. Waiting for your positive response. Thank you!

$84 Chat With Writer
ECFX Market

ONLINE

ECFX Market

Give me a chance, i will do this with my best efforts

$101 Chat With Writer
Financial Solutions Provider

ONLINE

Financial Solutions Provider

I have read and understood all your initial requirements, and I am very professional in this task.

$20 Chat With Writer
Coursework Help Online

ONLINE

Coursework Help Online

You can award me any time as I am ready to start your project curiously. Waiting for your positive response. Thank you!

$41 Chat With Writer
Accounting & Finance Specialist

ONLINE

Accounting & Finance Specialist

Give me a chance, i will do this with my best efforts

$20 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

Who was the murderer in gattaca - Nmol l to ng ml converter - Best cost strategy advantages - Stoke mandeville hospital ophthalmology - Testing for biomolecules lab answers - Homework Question - Exemplification essay - 13th documentary questions - 3 - Engaging Stakeholders - Optical properties of minerals ppt - Project 2 - Warthog nozzle rebuild kit - English - Homework 4 - Balanced and unbalanced force - Brilliant 20w frontier smart led twin flood light with sensor - Title of the organization - Hcs 235 week 2 health care services worksheet - Case study analysis - Essay on imagine you are a tree - Does prospero free caliban - Magnetic field along the axis of a circular coil experiment - What is safe harbor nursing texas - Stages of lightening dark hair - Crypto Week 10 discussion - Week Research paper - Jinx episode 3 escape from area 52 - Part 3: BRD - How to write a script in mla format - Initiating the Project-3 - Bargo public school nsw - Dicussion ( Principle of Economics) SJ Week 8 - MG375 Unit 8 Assignment - Is bread halal or haram - What clinical findings correlate with mk s chronic bronchitis - A4-70 stainless steel bolt torque - Panera bread company case study answers - Comprehensive women's health soap note - Panera bread closest rivals - Joanna briggs levels of evidence - What is the hardest truth you ever learned? - Notre dame university fremantle - Dna model kit instructions - Powerpoint module 2 sam exam - Techniques used in the book thief - Which of the following statements is true regarding self-managed work teams? - Timber frame fire regulations - Tanzania food composition table - Is photosynthesis endergonic or exergonic - 02.03 the anti-federalists: assessment - Philosphy - Cloud Computing Discussion 4 - Brand identity prism of bmw - According to your textbook the skilled extemporaneous speaker - American chip corporation's fiscal year end is december 31 - Difference between brazing and braze welding - Change Management Plan - Xs l7t spark plug - Assignment help - Toa vm 2240 price - Www quickmba com strategy porter shtml - What is idea evaluation - State and prove schwarz theorem - What are the seven characteristics of an agile mis infrastructure - Types of ssrs reports in ax 2012 - The cruelest sport exploring the text answers - Fixed asset officer job description - Knowledge Gaps in Applying Evidence to Practice - A gringo in the lettuce fields main idea - 2012 vcaa physics exam - Case formulation and treatment plan example - Severn trent water map - BHS380 Module 1 Case - How to write off bad debt in sage - Future trends in public health - Discussion online - Calorimetry specific heat capacity of metals lab report - Per ardua ad alta - Resonus corporation case study solutions - Ecosystem in a bottle experiment - Excel module 4 sam exam - 1.31 inches to fraction - Articulating your philosophy of nursing - Assignment 2 block business letter - Water can kill exploring effects of osmosis answer key - What are the characteristics of chemical equilibrium - Grief in indian culture - Part 1 and Part 2 - Easa part 145 approval - Research Paper - Week 1 Assignment: Journal - Briefly describe the four phases of the immune response - Ward 7d royal north shore hospital - WORK CITED PAGE - Khan academy ancient china - Evaluating the twelve tables of early roman law answer key - HUMAN RESOURCES - What is the range rule of thumb - Module 04 Course Project - Part 1 - In a red dress and alone meaning