N3325 Holistic Care of Older Adults
image1.jpg
Submit by 2359 Saturday of Week 4.
Name:
Date:
Overview: Life Review Analysis
For this assignment, you will reflect on your interview with the older adult, introduce the individual to the reader, and respond to guiding questions to prepare an analysis paper.
DO NOT INTERVIEW A FAMILY MEMBER UNLESS YOU OBTAIN COACH’S WRITTEN APPROVAL PRIOR TO INTERVIEW
Your paper should include the following sections:
1. Introduction of Older Adult – This is the overall context of your interview but should not include the entire interview itself.
2. Analysis of the Life Review Interview – This includes description of the goals and benefits of life review, your differentiation between a Life Review and ordinary remembering and your analysis of the degree of ego integrity reached by the older adult.
3. Student’s Reflections – This describes your personal experience during the process, any impact it will have on your clinical practice, and a projection of your own legacy.
4. References – This is a list of resources you used during your interview and analysis recorded in APA format. Use at least 3 in-text citations of your sources.
Use APA format throughout paper and references as appropriate. The paper should be no longer than 6 pages (not counting Pages 1-3 of this document and your page of references). If you have questions, please discuss them with your Academic Coach.
You must also scan, upload, and submit your Interview Consent Form in the appropriate assignment portal. This form counts toward up to 15 points of your Life Review Analysis score.
Details about each section are given later in this document.
Performance Objectives:
· Apply gerontologic nursing principles and standards in nursing practice across the continuum of elder care.
· Use current evidence and theories in care of older adults.
· Conduct a personal interview with an older adult for the purpose of documenting Life Review.
Rubric
Use this rubric to guide your work on the assignment, “Life Review Analysis.”
Task
Accomplished
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Interview Consent Form
(Total 15 points)
Submitted on time (5 points)
Complete, with signatures or participant is under age 70 or a relative of the student and student does not have written consent of Coach or Faculty for exception(10 points)
Submitted late or not at all (0-3 points)
Missing information or signature(s) (0 points)
Introduction of Older Adult
Confidentiality
Selection process/criteria
Biography
Significant events
Relationships
Work and home
Summary statements
Organization/quality
(Total 10 points)
Older adult identified with initials only (2 points)
Key information present
(7 points)
Well-organized/brief (maximum 1 page)
(1 point)
Sketchy, missing some information
(5 points)
Older adult’s name used
(0 points)
Missing critical information
(2 points)
Lacks continuity or is too wordy/long
(0 points)
Analysis of Life Review Goal and benefits of Life Review
Similarity to remembering
Difference from remembering
Erikson Developmental Stage
Description of client
Ego integrity rating (1-10)
Rationale for rating
Citations regarding Erikson’s theory
(Total 45 points)
4+ benefits
(10 points)
Comparison with 2+ examples (10 points)
Contrast with 2+ examples (6 points)
Theory with 2 specific examples (10 points)
Rating present and plausible (3 points)
Rationale clear from example (3 points)
1+ reference in text (3 points)
2-3 benefits
(7 points)
Comparison with 1 example (5 points)
Contrast with 1 example (3 points)
Theory with 1 specific example (8 points)
0-1 benefits
(0-2 points)
Comparison without examples (3 points)
No comparison (0 points)
Contrast without examples or no contrast (0 points)
Loose connection between theory and client (3 points);
Missing description of theory or no connection (0 points)
Rating missing or implausible (0 points)
Rationale unclear or example missing (0 points)
No references in text (0 points)
Reflections
Value and reason
Most significant point of interview
Difficult/anguishing part
Impact on clinical practice
Personal legacy
(Total 14 points)
Statement(s) with 1+ reason(s) (3 points)
Example(s) with 1+ reason(s) (3 points)
Example(s) with 1+ reason(s) or statement of none (3 points)
Example(s) with 1+ reason(s) (3 points)
Definition, personal legacy (2 points)
Statement(s) with no reasons (1 point)
Example(s) with no reasons (1 point)
Example(s) with no reason (1 point) Example(s) with no reason (1 point)
Definition OR personal legacy (1 point)
No statement of personal value (0 points)
No statement of significant point (0 points)
No statement of regarding difficulty(0 points)
No statement of regarding impact (0 points)
No statement regarding legacy (0 points)
APA Forrmats List of references (end)
References in body text
(Total 10 points)
APA format, 3+ references (5 points)
APA format, 3 in-text references (5 points)
APA format, 1-2 references (3 points)
APA format, 1-2 in-)
Incorrect APA format or no list of references (0 points)
Incorrect APA format; no body text references (0 points)
Spelling/Punctuation/Grammar (Total 5 points)
No errors
(5 points)
1-2 errors
(3 points)
More than 2 errors
(0 points)
Scope
(Total 1 point)
Within maximum of 6 pages (1 point)
Over 6 pages (0 points)
Total Points 100
-5% IF FAMILY MEMBER IS INTERVIEWED WITHOUT PRIOR COACH APPROVAL
A. Interview Consent Form
Upload and submit your Interview Consent Form (with elder’s signature) in the appropriate Week 4 assignment portal. This is due 2359 Saturday of Week 4 along with your Life Review Analysis.
B. Introduction of Older Adult
Do not submit the entire interview.
· Describe how and why you selected this older adult (use only older adult’s initials).
· Include a brief biography of your elder. For example:
C.R. is an 84-year-old white male living with his wife of 60 years in Arlington, Texas. He was born in Madison, Wisconsin, the oldest of four children. During his childhood, he lived on a farm, graduated high school and moved to Chicago, IL. He graduated with a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from the University of Chicago…..etc., etc.
The brief biography should be at maximum one page in length Do not rewrite your interview, only summarize it. Since the instructor was not present at your interview, this section of the paper provides the context of your interview.
C. Analysis of the Life Review Interview
· Compare and contrast the elements of a Life Review with those of ordinary remembering. Give two supporting examples from your interview. How are they similar, and how are they different?
· Describe 4 goals and benefits of life review. Give references and citations to support them.
· Based on your interview, describe the degree on a scale of 0 to 10 of Erikson’s ego integrity reached by the elder. Give a rationale for your assessment that includes at least one example from the interview.
· Include the reference(s) for your supporting citations (APA style).
· Organize your analysis so that it is complete and concise. Your total paper (beginning with Page 4 of this document) should be 6 pages maximum in length, not counting your page of references.
D. Student’s Reflections
· This interview experience was/was not an enlightening experience. Why?
· Describe the most significant point of the interview to you, and explain why.
· Describe a difficult/anguishing part of the interview, if any, and explain why.
· In what way might you change your general approach to elders in your clinical practice after this experience, if any?
· Define “legacy” in your own terms. Discuss what you would like your legacy to be; what would you like to leave for others?
E. References
List your references for this assignment using APA format.
Week 4 – Assignment: Life Review Analysis
©2009 UTA School of Nursing
Applied Sciences
Architecture and Design
Biology
Business & Finance
Chemistry
Computer Science
Geography
Geology
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental science
Spanish
Government
History
Human Resource Management
Information Systems
Law
Literature
Mathematics
Nursing
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Reading
Science
Social Science
Home
Blog
Archive
Contact
google+twitterfacebook
Copyright © 2019 HomeworkMarket.com