Research Paper
In the paper please highlight critical issues such as promotion, organizational needs, and equity and the representativeness of public workforce.
Introduction: This is a narrative of about 1 to 1.5 pages in length. It should explain the topic under investigation and why it deserves analysis. Place your topic within the general context of public administration. Then move to the more specific issues of interest to you. This section also includes an explicit statement of your research question and should heighten the reader’s attention and desire to read the paper.
Body of Paper: This section includes the Literature Review and Conclusion.
Literature Review: This section includes a discussion of each source (A MINIMUM OF 5, PEER REVIEWED RESOURCES) that you select to use to support your paper. The discussions should focus on the relevance of the source to your research question and the evidence it provides. The instructor values the use of scholarly books and journal articles.
Conclusion: in this section you will briefly summarize, in an integrated form, what you have learned from the entire literature review. The challenge is to blend the sources identified in the literature review into a coherent discussion of how the evidence relates to the research question. You want to present the material in a logical and understandable manner. One way to approach this task is to identify themes from the Literature Review and then build your summary/conclusions around these themes. The themes you select must extend logically from the material you have collected.
The required length of the paper is 10 – 12 pages, excluding title page and references. The paper must be written in the APA template that is provided by the instructor. The cover page should contain the following information: Title of Proposal, Course Name and Number, Student Name, and Date of Submission. The paper must be written in narrative form, use appropriate major and minor headings to divide the major sections of the paper, and all sources used in the paper must be cited whether you use direct quotes or summaries.
A Look at Public Service Motivation and its Effect on Organizational Commitment 1
Should I Stay or Should I Go?
A Look at Public Service Motivation and its Effect on Organizational Commitment
Neida E. Rodriguez
Orange County Sheriff’s Office
A Look at Public Service Motivation and its Effect on Organizational Commitment 2
Abstract
Effective leadership in public safety requires the ability to motivate individuals on a
different level than is expected in the private or corporate worlds. Oftentimes, much of the
motivation that comes from those who work in this field is entirely intrinsic, coming from the
innate need of a person to help one another, to add to the common good, and to do what they feel
is best inside. As leaders in public safety, it should also be recognized that not all employees we
come across will have a high intrinsic need to perform at their very best at all times, and it is
imperative that other methods of motivation be utilized to make sure job performance is at an
optimal level. This paper will discuss leaders in public safety and what they can do to increase
motivation among their subordinates. It will include discussions regarding intrinsic and extrinsic
motivation, public service motivation, emotional intelligence, and what leaders can do to utilize
these qualities to combat high turnover rates that many public safety organizations are prone to.
A Look at Public Service Motivation and its Effect on Organizational Commitment 3
Should I Stay or Should I Go?
A Look at Public Service Motivation and its Effect on Organizational Commitment
Introduction
Public safety organizations are experiencing turnover rates that are not only difficult to keep
up with, but difficult to correct due to the nature of the work public safety professionals are
involved in. Although the type of work that comes with public safety is often mentally and
physically taxing, there are some people who naturally gravitate to these careers, harboring an
innate need to do work that serves others simple for the sake of doing so. This gravitation can be
attributed to a variety of things, some of which being the type of motivation these individuals
possess. Their motivation can range from extrinsic to intrinsic or it can possibly fall under the
specific umbrella of Public Service Motivation. Either way, leaders in public safety need to
become familiar with all of these concepts, and understand that they can in fact have a hand in
developing these employees in a manner that causes their organizational commitment to grow.
This paper will discuss the concepts of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and Public
Service Motivation (PSM). It will delve into emotional intelligence and its importance in the role
of leadership. It will also conclude in some conceptual recommendations for public safety
leaders in general with regards to how they may improve morale and motivation among their
employees so that they may possibly improve their turnover rates.
A Look at Public Service Motivation and its Effect on Organizational Commitment 4
Literature Review
Intrinsic/Extrinsic Motivation
Simply stated, motivation is the desire an individual may have to accomplish any certain goal
or objective. People experience motivation on different levels on a daily basis, and motivation
can be triggered within them by a variety of stimuli. The stimuli that activate motivation within
individuals can indicate what type of motivation that person is experiencing. The type of
motivation a person can experience can fall anywhere on a continuum ranging from extrinsic
motivation to intrinsic motivation. While these types are described as opposite ends of a
spectrum, it is very possible that a person can fluctuate between both ends or even experience
both simultaneously. Kuvaas et. al (2017) describe the two extremes as follows: “Intrinsic
motivation is defined as the desire to perform an activity for its own sake, so as to experience the
pleasure and satisfaction inherent in the activity. Extrinsic motivation, in contrast, is typically
defined as the desire to perform an activity with the intention to attain positive consequences
such as an incentive, or to avoid negative consequences such as a punishment” (p. 245).
When considering the public safety workplace environment, intrinsic and extrinsic motivators
can present themselves in some unorthodox ways. Traditionally, some examples of extrinsic
motivators can be pay increases, awards, bonuses, or the avoidance of any sort of discipline or
punishment. In the public safety world, depending on your specific discipline, extrinsic
motivators can take the more traditional form, or they can present themselves as some more
extreme versions. For example, police officers may be extrinsically motivated by the desire to
survive, to avoid injury or death in the line of duty, and this can prove to be an extremely
powerful motivator for many in this field. Intrinsic motivators, on the other hand, reflect the
“extent to which people find enjoyment in the work that they do such that they would be
A Look at Public Service Motivation and its Effect on Organizational Commitment 5
motivated to exert more efforts without rewards” (Potipiroon & Ford, 2017, p. 212). Generally
speaking, intrinsic motivation comes from within and has proven to be a deeper and stronger
force of motivation than extrinsic motivation. It may reflect the same overall goal both
traditionally and in the public safety field, with the difference being that many in the public
safety field work towards specifically providing safety and security for their communities as a
whole to aid in their ‘greater good.’ This more specific type of intrinsic motivation has been
designated as its own category, conceptually separate from intrinsic motivation.
Public Service Motivation
Public Service Motivation (PSM) is somewhat of an extension of intrinsic motivation. It refers
to the idea that individuals who are strongly inclined “to do good and benefit the welfare of other
people” (Potipiroon & Ford, 2017) are more likely to work for and remain in public service
organizations that can help them fulfill this need. Potipiroon & Ford (2017) explain that
individuals who have higher levels of PSM are also more likely to develop an emotional
attachment to their public service organization, causing their opinions of their organization to be
swayed by the organization’s ability to satisfy their needs. This means that if the individual has a
high level of PSM, their attitude is greatly affected by whether they feel their organization is
allowing them to satisfy the need to help others or not.
Public Service Motivation can be cultivated and geared toward an even more positive and
productive force if the individuals who obtain high levels of it are being influenced by ethical
leadership. Potipiroon & Ford (2017) conducted a study in which the idea that PSM always
increases the likelihood of organizational commitment was challenged, and found that while this
is a possible outcome, if the individuals who obtain the high levels of PSM are not satisfied with
A Look at Public Service Motivation and its Effect on Organizational Commitment 6
their organization’s mission and/or values, their opinion of the organization can change
drastically causing them to become less committed to that organization. This point is one that if
gone abandoned, can produce a host of employees in public safety that are not utilizing their full
potential. Public safety leaders should take note of this possibility and know that quality, ethical,
and intelligent leadership can combat this negative outcome greatly.
Emotional Intelligence
Another important concept that is imperative to understand regarding motivation and its effect
on organizational commitment is emotional intelligence. Emotional intelligence refers “to the
ability to be aware of and intelligent about emotions, use emotional information to assist in
thinking” (Levitats & Vigoda-Gadot, 2017, p. 760). Public safety is a field in which unique and
intense situations cross the paths of employees on a daily basis causing stress and complicated
‘side effects’ in the employees who experience them frequently. Not only do employees need to
have emotional intelligence when handling situations or dealing with the communities they
serve, but more importantly, leaders in public safety need to have it when dealing with their
subordinates and peers. “Research over the decades has confirmed that there were performance
gaps between socially intelligent and socially unintelligent leaders and there is much evidence to
indicate that tests of cognitive ability are strong predictors of job performance in virtually every
job studied” (Adetula, 2016, p. 150). Being an effective leader in the realm of public safety is a
complex and critical task, and having the emotional intelligence to aid in reasoning through
challenges with employees can prove to be invaluable in the effort to retain employees for a
longer period of time (Sienkiewicz-Malyjurek, 2016).
A Look at Public Service Motivation and its Effect on Organizational Commitment 7
Conclusion
Leaders in public safety must take these basic concepts into account when managing and
leading their respective units within their agencies. High turnover rates and low morale are
challenges that organizations within the public safety field experience consistently, and they are
challenges that have the potential to damage the effectiveness of the agency greatly if gone
unaddressed. Taking the extrinsic and intrinsic motivation that exists within employees and
cultivating it in a manner that promotes positivity can help in improving the morale within an
agency. Additionally, the public service motivation that exists in many public safety employees
can be utilized to increase organizational commitment, if the employees who obtain it are
exposed to ethical and quality leadership. Research has indicated that while there are many
individuals drawn to careers in public safety because of their natural need to provide a service to
others, this kind of motivation does not immediately mean they are committed to the mission of
their organization. Studies indicate that if these individuals do not feel that their need to serve
others is being adequately satisfied by the organization and its goals, their opinion towards the
organization can change drastically and has the potential to become a negative force instead of a
positive one. Leaders who possess strong emotional intelligence, ethical fortitude, and integrity
towards the mission of the organization can aid greatly in instilling confidence in these
employees, motivating them to remain steadfast in their efforts and stay loyal to their
organization, combatting the high turnover rates organizations would otherwise face.
A Look at Public Service Motivation and its Effect on Organizational Commitment 8
References
Adetula, G. A. (2016). Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Intelligence as Predictors of Job
Performance Among Law Enforcement Agency Personnel. Journal of Applied Security
Research, 11(2), 149-165.
Kuvaas, B., Buch, R., Weibel, A., Dysvik, A., & Nerstad, C. G. (2017, May). Do intrinsic and
extrinsic motivation relate differently to employee outcomes? Journal of Economic
Psychology, 61, 244-258.
Levitats, Z., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2017). Yours emotionally: How emotional intelligence infuses
public service motivation and affects the job outcomes of public personnel. Public
Administration, 95, 759-775.
Potipiroon, W., & Ford, M. T. (2017). Does Public Service Motivation Always Lead to
Organizational Commitment? Examining the Moderating Roles of Intrinsic Motivation
and Ethical Leadership. Public Personnel Management, 46(3), 211-238.
Sienkiewicz-Malyjurek, K. (2016). Determinants and attributes of leadership in the public safety
management system. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, 115-121.