Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Golafshani n 2003 understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research

26/11/2021 Client: muhammad11 Deadline: 2 Day

Discussion: Designing Qualitative Research

As you recall from earlier weeks, various philosophical orientations hold unique epistemological and ontological assumptions. These assumptions return to the forefront of attention when considering how to evaluate the rigor or quality of various qualitative research designs.
Typically, when speaking of validity, qualitative researchers are referring to research that is credible and trustworthy, i.e., the extent to which one can have confidence in the study’s findings (Lincoln & Guba, 1985). Generalizability, a marker of reliability, is typically not a main purpose of qualitative research because the researcher rarely selects a random sample with a goal to generalize to a population or to other settings and groups. Rather, a qualitative researcher’s goal is often to understand a unique event or a purposively selected group of individuals. Therefore, when speaking of reliability, qualitative researchers are typically referring to research that is consistent or dependable (Lincoln & Guba, 1985), i.e., the extent to which the findings of the study are consistent with the data that was collected.

References
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
For this Discussion, you will explain criteria for evaluating the quality of qualitative research and consider the connection of such criteria to philosophical orientations. You will also consider the ethical implications of designing qualitative research.

With these thoughts in mind:

ASSIGNMENT:
Post an explanation of two criteria for evaluating the quality of qualitative research designs. Next, explain how these criteria are tied to epistemological and ontological assumptions underlying philosophical orientations and the standards of your discipline. Then, identify a potential ethical issue in qualitative research and explain how it might influence design decisions. Finally, explain what it means for a research topic to be amenable to scientific study using a qualitative approach.

Be sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.

RESOURCES:

Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597–606. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol8/iss4/6
Burkholder, G. J., Cox, K. A., Crawford, L. M., & Hitchcock, J. H. (Eds.). (2020). Research designs and methods: An applied guide for the scholar-practitioner. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Chapter 12, “Quality Considerations”
Chapter 13, "Ethical Considerations"
Smith, J. K. (1984). The problem of criteria for judging interpretive inquiry. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6(4), 379–391.
​The problem of criteria for judging interpretive inquiry by Smith, J. K. in Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 6(4), 379-391. Copyright 1984 by Sage Publications-Journals. Used with permission of Sage Publications-Journals via the Copyright Clearance Center.

Research Theory, Design, and Methods Walden University

© 2016 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 1 of 3

Trustworthiness (Lincoln & Guba, 1985)

Trustworthiness is 1. The extent to which one can have confidence in the study’s findings 2. Parallel of reliability, validity, and objectivity in traditional “quantitative”

research Trustworthiness Criteria Credibility

Findings and interpretations are plausible to the “researched” (the participants) Do findings accurately reflect reality as seen by participants?

Transferability

Applicability of findings based on comparability of contexts Are conditions similar enough to make findings applicable?

Dependability

Account for factors of instability and change within the natural context Document naturally occurring phenomena (stability and change)

Confirmability

Capacity to authenticate the internal coherence of data, findings, interpretations, and recommendations Document “researcher as instrument” and potential sources of bias

Research Theory, Design, and Methods Walden University

© 2016 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 2 of 3

Insuring Trustworthiness Action Description Insures Prolonged engagement

Investing sufficient time to learn the culture, build trust with stakeholders, understand the scope of target phenomena, and test for misinformation/misinterpretation due to distortion by the researcher or informant

Credibility (internal validity)

Persistent observation

Continuing data collection process to permit identification and assessment of salient factors, and investigation in sufficient detail to separate relevant (typical) from irrelevant (atypical)

Credibility (internal validity)

Triangulation

Data collection and analysis interpretation based on multiple sources, methods, investigators, and theories

Credibility (internal validity)

Peer debriefing

Engage in analytic discussions with neutral peer (e.g., colleague not involved in the project)

Credibility (internal validity)

Member checks

Test veracity of the data, analytic categories (e.g., codes), interpretations, and conclusions with stakeholders to ensure accurate representation of emic perspectives

Credibility (internal validity)

Thick description

Describe procedures, context, and participants in sufficient detail to permit judgment by others of the similarity to potential application sites; specify minimum elements necessary to “recreate” findings

Transferability (external validity)

Audit trail

Records that include raw data; documentation of process and products of data reduction, analysis, and synthesis; methodological process notes; reflexive notes; and instrument development/piloting techniques

Dependability Confirmability (reliability and objectivity)

Negative case analysis

Investigate “disconfirming” instance or outlier; continue investigation until all known cases are accounted for so that data reflects range of variation (vs. normative portrayal)

Credibility (internal validity)

Research Theory, Design, and Methods Walden University

© 2016 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 3 of 3

Action Description Insures Reflexive journal

Researcher’s personal notes; documentation of researcher’s thinking throughout the research process

Credibility (internal validity) Transferability (external validity) Dependability Confirmability (reliability and objectivity)

Referential adequacy

Archiving of a portion of the raw data for subsequent analysis and interpretation, for verification of initial findings and conclusions

Credibility (internal validity)

References Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA:

Sage.

Trustworthiness
Trustworthiness is
Trustworthiness Criteria
Insuring Trustworthiness
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Financial Assignments
WRITING LAND
Smart Tutor
A+GRADE HELPER
Study Master
24/7 Assignment Help
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Financial Assignments

ONLINE

Financial Assignments

I have read your project details and I can provide you QUALITY WORK within your given timeline and budget.

$17 Chat With Writer
WRITING LAND

ONLINE

WRITING LAND

I reckon that I can perfectly carry this project for you! I am a research writer and have been writing academic papers, business reports, plans, literature review, reports and others for the past 1 decade.

$39 Chat With Writer
Smart Tutor

ONLINE

Smart Tutor

I am an experienced researcher here with master education. After reading your posting, I feel, you need an expert research writer to complete your project.Thank You

$24 Chat With Writer
A+GRADE HELPER

ONLINE

A+GRADE HELPER

I have assisted scholars, business persons, startups, entrepreneurs, marketers, managers etc in their, pitches, presentations, market research, business plans etc.

$49 Chat With Writer
Study Master

ONLINE

Study Master

I have read your project description carefully and you will get plagiarism free writing according to your requirements. Thank You

$50 Chat With Writer
24/7 Assignment Help

ONLINE

24/7 Assignment Help

I have done dissertations, thesis, reports related to these topics, and I cover all the CHAPTERS accordingly and provide proper updates on the project.

$37 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

Kelo v.new london oyez - Compare and contrast assertiveness arrogance and passivity - Social impact of technology assignment 8 - Meadow green primary school - Individual training record template - Is context a language feature - Reality therapy and self evaluation the key to client change - Data driven decision making in education ppt - Rabbits eat lettuce festival - How to harvard reference the eyfs - In the lais of marie de france, guigemar is a knight who shows no interest in what activity? - Does technology make us more alone persuasive essay - University of worcester sustainability - Department of biostatistics vanderbilt - What od interventions would you suggest in this case - You may need to modify the data set you created for the Week 1 Discussion. You will need to have two quantitative variables that - Python coding help - Aha patient bill of rights - General ledger reconciliation template - Cloud Computing - Arroz con pollo café con leche cereales espárragos huevos refresco sándwich de jamón entremeses - Bloomberg businessweek b school connection program - Respiratory Case Study - Hashimoto's Thyroiditis - What are the indices for the directions indicated - Eli lilly harvard case study - Nursing - Trinity college topic form - Sherman alexie at navajo monument valley tribal school analysis - Maxwell software inc has the following mutually exclusive projects - Https xlitemprod pearsoncmg com api v1 print math - BUS CONT DQ 6# - Leeds clearing house clinical psychology - Prepare a diagram 0 dfd for new century - 6 regions of south carolina - Controlled load 1 usage - Wrongful conviction - Unplugged the myth of computers in the classroom essay - Critical thinking - Forming and naming ionic compounds lab - Starchy luau tuber crossword clue - Presentation on output devices - The inclusion of nurses in the systems development life cycle - Part 61 manual of standards - A merchandiser's purchases are equivalent to a manufacturer's - Wigton wind farm prospectus - ESSAY AND POWERPOINT PROOF IN TURNITUIN - Mimic pro best keywords - Discussion 2: Genes and Personality - Skills approach to leadership northouse - Value line publishing home depot lowes - Socy - Aws welding symbols on drawings - Research project - Stamped concrete driveway cost - Analytics Capstone Project - Israel private tours moti kaufer - Celta language related assignment - Lrt kelana jaya fare - Map of the great wall of china - Chapter 5 infection control principles and practices word scramble - Weather station diagram - The crusades the crescent and the cross answers - Case Study 2 - BitGold - Perform a Bowtie analysis - Creative thinking and problem solving assignment - Igbt based rectifier circuit - Section 129 conveyancing act 1919 - Autopsy of a data breach the target case analysis - Eureka ca seismic station sp interval - Assertiveness skills for managers and supervisors - Igcse french past papers 2009 - Extensive property and intensive property difference - Musical fountain in china with audio of bhagavad gita - Living the sweet life - Page Design - Management style - Researching wan technologies - Does more oxygen make you taller - Venus at her mirror rubens - Thin layer chromatography explanation - Tm 9 1015 260 10 pdf - What is an allusion - Zinn chapter 1 study questions answers - Cornwall college staff intranet - Evan company reports net income of - Calculating cell size worksheet - Where were morality plays performed - Week 7 - Guide dogs uk dogalogue - Methods for estimating project times and costs - SC5 - Math homework - Where to buy ultra thin keto - Celf observational rating scale - Kestrel communicator software download - Assessment - How to disable mcafee endpoint encryption for removable media - Heart valves and pumps experiment - Feasibility Study Paper - Glass menagerie test questions