Mergerstat control premium study 2019

Finance Assignment Due In 12hrs. Need Very Very Good Expert

Value Index 2Q 2019

MULTIPLES FALL IN 1Q 2019

EBITDA multiples across all industries were highest over a five-year period in the third quarter of 2017, at 4.8x. In the second quarter of 2018, these multiples fell to 3.1x—the lowest levels since the third quarter of 2013. After rising in the third and fourth quarters of 2018, these multiples once again fell to near recent lows (3.2x) in the first quarter of 2019. Nevertheless, the trailing three-month average for multiples has increased over the past three quarters. The relatively smooth trailing three-month average trend line from the third quarter of 2014 through the first half of 2017 gave no clear indication that large fluctuations in multiples paid would ensue in the quarters ahead.

The DealStats Value Index summarizes valuation multiples and profit margins for private companies that were sold over the past several quarters. Business Valuation Resources (BVR) captures this private company transaction data in its DealStats platform. Most BVR deals are not otherwise publicly available. The DealStats Value Index is updated quarterly and, as a result, past figures may change in future issues as new data are reported.

3.5

3.1 3.2

4.1

3.9

3.6

4.0

3.9

3.6

3.9 4.0

3.5

3.6

4.1

4.4

3.7 3.6

4.8

3.9

3.2 3.1

4.4

4.6

3.2

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

Q2 2013

Q3 2013

Q4 2013

Q1 2014

Q2 2014

Q3 2014

Q4 2014

Q1 2015

Q2 2015

Q3 2015

Q4 2015

Q1 2016

Q2 2016

Q3 2016

Q4 2016

Q1 2017

Q2 2017

Q3 2017

Q4 2017

Q1 2018

Q2 2018

Q3 2018

Q4 2018

Q1 2019

Se lli

ng P

ric e/

EB IT

DA

Selling Price/EBITDA Trailing 3-month average

EXHIBIT 1. MEDIAN SELLING PRICE/EBITDA WITH TRAILING THREE-MONTH AVERAGE

This digital edition was created exclusively for the use of Joel Morse of University of Baltimore. For licensing options, please contact Business Valuation Resources at sales@bvresources.com.

https://www.bvresources.com/learn/dealstats
2 DEALSTATS VALUE INDEX | 2Q 2019bvresources.com/dealstats

EBITDA MARGINS ON THE RISE

EBITDA, as a percentage of revenue, has trended upwards in the most recent two quarters, tying a five-year high in the first quarter of 2019, at 15%. After reporting at the lowest level (3.1x) in the second quarter of 2018, the selling price-to-EBITDA multiple steadily rose through the fourth quarter of 2018, to 4.6x, before falling near a five-year low to 3.2x in the first quarter of 2019. The peaks and valleys of the EBITDA multiple moved opposite to that of the EBITDA margins. DealStats is tracking the trend to see whether it continues through the rest of 2019.

EXHIBIT 2. MEDIAN SELLING PRICE/EBITDA WITH EBITDA MARGINS

2.0

2.3

2.6

2.9

3.2

3.5

3.8

4.1

4.4

4.7

5.0

Q2 2013

Q3 2013

Q4 2013

Q1 2014

Q2 2014

Q3 2014

Q4 2014

Q1 2015

Q2 2015

Q3 2015

Q4 2015

Q1 2016

Q2 2016

Q3 2016

Q4 2016

Q1 2017

Q2 2017

Q3 2017

Q4 2017

Q1 2018

Q2 2018

Q3 2018

Q4 2018

Q1 2019

6%

7%

8%

9%

10%

11%

12%

13%

14%

15%

16%

Se lli

ng P

ric e/

EB IT

DA

EB IT

DA P

er ce

nt ag

e

EBITDA Margin

Selling Price/EBITDA

SELLING PRICE/EBITDA MEDIAN IS 4.4X

EBITDA multiples are highest for the information sector (11.1x) and the mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction sector (8.4x). Meanwhile, the lowest EBITDA multiples are in the accommodation and food services (2.6x) and the other services sectors (3.0x). The median across all industry sectors is 4.4x.

EXHIBIT 3. SELLING PRICE/EBITDA BY SECTOR

7.7 8.4

6.4

4.0

6.6

5.5

3.8 3.8

11.1

7.5

3.7

6.6

3.6 3.6

6.3

3.7

2.6 3.0

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

Se lli

ng P

ric e/

EB IT

DA

Median for All Sectors

Agriculture, Forestry,

Fishing, and Hunting

Construction

Manufacturing

Wholesale Trade

Retail Trade

Transportation and

Warehousing

Information

Finance and

Insurance

Real Estate,

Rental and Leasing

Professional, Scientific,

and Technical Services

Administrative, Support,

Waste Mgmt., and

Remediation Svcs.

Educational Services

Health Care and

Social Assistance

Arts, Entertainment,

and Recreation

Accommodation and

Food Service

Other Services

Mining, Quarrying,

and Oil and Gas Extraction

Utilities

4.4

This digital edition was created exclusively for the use of Joel Morse of University of Baltimore. For licensing options, please contact Business Valuation Resources at sales@bvresources.com.

https://www.bvresources.com/learn/dealstats
3 DEALSTATS VALUE INDEX | 2Q 2019bvresources.com/dealstats

EXHIBIT 4. 2018 INDUSTRY SECTOR VOLUME CHANGE FROM PRIOR YEAR

ACQUISITIONS SLOW IN 11 OF 15 INDUSTRY SECTORS IN 2018

The pace of private-company acquisitions slowed in 11 of the 15 industry sectors from 2017 to 2018. The number of acquisitions in the transportation and warehousing sector had the biggest decline, 48.7%, while acquisitions in the educational services sector saw the largest increase, 68.4%.

8.4%

-20.7% -14.5% -18.5%

-48.7% -34.8%

-20.9%

0.0%

-38.5%

-18.7%

68.4%

-30.4%

-13.5%

3.2%

-30.0%

-60.0%

-40.0%

-20.0%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Pe rc

en ta

ge C

ha ng

e Fr

om P

rio r Y

ea r

20 18

V ol

um e

by In

du st

ry S

ec to

r

2018 Volume Percentage Change From Prior Year

Construction

Manufacturing

Wholesale Trade

Retail Trade

Transportation and

Warehousing

Information

Finance and

Insurance

Real Estate,

Rental and Leasing

Professional, Scientific,

and Technical Services

Administrative, Support,

Waste Mgmt., and

Remediation Svcs.

Educational Services

Health Care and

Social Assistance

Arts, Entertainment,

and Recreation

Accommodation and

Food Service

Other Services

Note: Each data point in this chart is based on a minimum of 10 transactions of private targets. If an industry sector does not meet this criterion, it is not included in the chart.

The DealStats Value Index (ISSN 1937-9021) is published quarterly and exclusively for subscribers of DealStats by Business Valuation Resources, LLC, 111 SW Columbia Street, Suite 750, Portland, OR 97201-5814. Contact info@ bvresources.com for more information or visit our website at bvresources.com.

Although the information in this publication has been obtained from sources that BVR believes to be reliable, we do not guarantee its accuracy, and such information may be condensed or incomplete. This publication is intended for information purposes only, and it is not intended as financial, investment, legal, or consulting advice.

Copyright 2019, Business Valuation Resources, LLC (BVR). All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced without express written consent from BVR. Please direct requests to permissions@bvresources.com.

Kenneth Woo Economic and Data Editor

David Foster CEO

Lucretia Lyons President

Sarah Andersen Publisher

This digital edition was created exclusively for the use of Joel Morse of University of Baltimore. For licensing options, please contact Business Valuation Resources at sales@bvresources.com.

https://www.bvresources.com/learn/dealstats
mailto:info%40bvresources.com?subject=
mailto:info%40bvresources.com?subject=
http://www.bvresources.com
mailto:permissions%40bvresources.com?subject=
4 DEALSTATS VALUE INDEX | 2Q 2019bvresources.com/dealstats

EXHIBIT 5A. MEDIAN SELLING PRICE/NET SALES BY NET SALES RANGE (PRIVATE TARGETS)

PRICING MULTIPLES AND PROFIT MARGINS ON THE MOVE

As shown in the legend for Exhibits 5A to 5C and Exhibits 6A to 6C, pricing multiples for private target acquisitions are displayed across four selling price ranges. Exhibit 5A shows the nets sales multiple for transactions greater than $10 million reached peak levels in 2017 and 2018, at 1.58x and 1.97x, respectively. Multiples for acquisitions between $5 million and $10 million trended downward from 2014 through 2017, but saw a modest rise in 2018. Net sales multiples for transactions between $1 million and $5 million had been relatively smooth, but rose from 0.44x in 2018 to 0.64x through the first quarter of 2019.

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

M ul

tip le

$0-$1M $1M-$5M $5M-$10M >$10M

EXHIBIT 5B. MEDIAN SELLING PRICE/SDE BY NET SALES RANGE (PRIVATE TARGETS)

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

M ul

tip le

$0-$1M $1M-$5M $5M-$10M >$10M

Note: Each data point in these charts is based on a minimum number of transactions of private targets. If a sales range does not meet this criterion, it is not included in the chart.

This digital edition was created exclusively for the use of Joel Morse of University of Baltimore. For licensing options, please contact Business Valuation Resources at sales@bvresources.com.

https://www.bvresources.com/learn/dealstats
5 DEALSTATS VALUE INDEX | 2Q 2019bvresources.com/dealstats

EXHIBIT 6A. GROSS PROFIT MARGIN BY NET SALES RANGE (PRIVATE TARGETS)

EXHIBIT 5C. MEDIAN SELLING PRICE/EBITDA BY NET SALES RANGE (PRIVATE TARGETS)

1.0

3.0

5.0

7.0

9.0

11.0

13.0

15.0

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

M ul

tip le

$0-$1M $1M-$5M $5M-$10M >$10M

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

M ar

gi n

$0-$1M $1M-$5M $5M-$10M >$10M

After a decline in the seller’s discretionary earnings (SDE) multiple from 2012 to 2016, multiples for transactions priced greater than $10 million increased in 2017 before falling to nearly an eight-year low in 2018, at 3.9x. Multiples for transactions priced between $5 million and $10 million fell to the lowest level in 2018, at 2.6x (see Exhibit 5B).

EBITDA multiples by net sales range have increased since 2016 for transactions greater than $10 million, peaking in 2018, at 12.9x. Conversely, multiples for transactions between $5 million and $10 million have declined since 2014, falling to the lowest level in 2018, at 3.8x (see Exhibit 5C). EBITDA multiples for transactions between $1 million and $5 million fell to their lowest levels through the first quarter of 2019, to 3.1x.

Note: Each data point in these charts is based on a minimum number of transactions of private targets. If a sales range does not meet this criterion, it is not included in the chart.

This digital edition was created exclusively for the use of Joel Morse of University of Baltimore. For licensing options, please contact Business Valuation Resources at sales@bvresources.com.

https://www.bvresources.com/learn/dealstats
6 DEALSTATS VALUE INDEX | 2Q 2019bvresources.com/dealstats

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

M ar

gi n

$0-$1M $1M-$5M $5M-$10M >$10M

EXHIBIT 6C. NET PROFIT MARGIN BY NET SALES RANGE (PRIVATE TARGETS)

EXHIBIT 6B. OPERATING PROFIT MARGIN BY NET SALES RANGE (PRIVATE TARGETS)

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

M ar

gi n

$0-$1M $1M-$5M $5M-$10M >$10M

Profit margins for transactions priced up to $1 million are considerably higher among all other transaction sizes for gross profit margin, operating profit margin, and net profit margin (see Exhibits 6A, 6B, and 6C). Transactions priced between $1 million and $5 million have seen their profit margins rise to their highest levels through the first quarter of 2019.

Note: Each data point in these charts is based on a minimum number of transactions of private targets. If a sales range does not meet this criterion, it is not included in the chart.

This digital edition was created exclusively for the use of Joel Morse of University of Baltimore. For licensing options, please contact Business Valuation Resources at sales@bvresources.com.

https://www.bvresources.com/learn/dealstats
7 DEALSTATS VALUE INDEX | 2Q 2019bvresources.com/dealstats

INTERQUARTILE RANGES ARE FAIRLY CONSISTENT

Exhibits 7A through 7D display the interquartile range of the selling price-to-net sales and selling price- to-EBITDA multiples by major industry sector and by year for private targets. In addition to showing the median multiples by sector and year, the interquartile range provides a measure of dispersion. Interquartile range is the difference between the 25th and 75th percentiles (also called the first and third quartiles), so the interquartile range describes the middle 50% of observations. The top of the gray bar indicates the 75th percentile, the bottom of the brown bar indicates the 25th percentile, and the line where the two meet represents the median. A large interquartile range indicates that the middle 50% of observations are spaced wide apart, and, if the interquartile range is narrow, the middle 50% of observations are spaced close together.

As shown in Exhibits 7A and 7B, the information industry has the greatest selling price-to-net sales multiple and selling price-to-EBITDA multiple. When looking at the data by year (Exhibits 7C and 7D), the median selling price-to-net sales multiple is consistently around 0.5, while the selling price-to-EBITDA multiple is generally between 3.0 and 4.0.

INFORMATION SECTOR MULTIPLES ARE VOLITILE

Exhibits 8 through 13 display median multiples paid for private targets as well as median profit margins and are split out by industry sector. Notably, multiples in the information sector have shown the greatest volatility over time.

Median net sales multiples declined in 10 of 15 industry sectors in 2018. The median multiple for all sectors reached its lowest level over the last nine years in 2018, at 0.49x. Bucking this trend, the information sector reached a peak in its net sales multiples in 2018, at 4.31x. See Exhibit 8.

Median seller’s discretionary earnings (SDE) multiples declined in 11 of the 15 industry sectors in 2018. The median for all sectors combined peaked at 2.6x from 2014 to 2016 but has steadily declined over the past two years, reporting at 2.4x in 2018. The retail trade sector has seen a gradual decline in the SDE multiple since 2015, falling to 2.3x in 2018. See Exhibit 9.

Median EBITDA multiples have declined in 11 of 15 industry sectors in 2018. The median for all sectors reported at its highest levels from 2014 through 2017, but fell to 3.5x in 2018. EBITDA multiples in the information sector have seen large changes, both upward and downward, across all nine years, and settled at seven-year lows in 2018, at 7.0x. See Exhibit 10.

Neither median gross profit margins nor median operating profit margins, as displayed by industry sectors, show any clear trend in the “all sectors” category over the past nine years. Gross profit margins have ranged from 64% to 67% over this period (see Exhibit 11), and operating margins have ranged from 10% to 13% (see Exhibit 12). Likewise, median net profit margins, as displayed by industry sectors, show no clear trend in the “all sectors category” and have ranged from 9% to 12% over time (see Exhibit 13).

This digital edition was created exclusively for the use of Joel Morse of University of Baltimore. For licensing options, please contact Business Valuation Resources at sales@bvresources.com.

https://www.bvresources.com/learn/dealstats
8 DEALSTATS VALUE INDEX | 2Q 2019bvresources.com/dealstats

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

M ul tip le

Agriculture, Forestry,

Fishing, and Hunting

Construction

Manufacturing

Wholesale Trade

Retail Trade

Transportation and

Warehousing

Information

Finance and

Insurance

Real Estate,

Rental and Leasing

Professional, Scientific,

and Technical Services

Administrative, Support,

Waste Mgmt., and

Remediation Svcs.

Educational Services

Health Care and

Social Assistance

Arts, Entertainment,

and Recreation

Accommodation and

Food Service

Other Services

EXHIBIT 7A. SELLING PRICE/NET SALES INTERQUARTILE RANGE BY INDUSTRY SECTOR (PRIVATE TARGETS)

EXHIBIT 7B: SELLING PRICE/EBITDA INTERQUARTILE RANGE BY INDUSTRY SECTOR (PRIVATE TARGETS)

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

M ul tip le

Agriculture, Forestry,

Fishing, and Hunting

Construction

Manufacturing

Wholesale Trade

Retail Trade

Transportation and

Warehousing

Information

Finance and

Insurance

Real Estate,

Rental and Leasing

Professional, Scientific,

and Technical Services

Administrative, Support,

Waste Mgmt., and

Remediation Svcs.

Educational Services

Health Care and

Social Assistance

Arts, Entertainment,

and Recreation

Accommodation and

Food Service

Other Services

Mining, Quarrying, and

Oil and Gas Extraction

Note: Each data point in this chart is based on a minimum of 10 transactions of private targets. If an industry sector does not meet this criterion, it is not included in the chart.

Note: Each data point in this chart is based on a minimum of 10 transactions of private targets. If an industry sector does not meet this criterion, it is not included in the chart.

This digital edition was created exclusively for the use of Joel Morse of University of Baltimore. For licensing options, please contact Business Valuation Resources at sales@bvresources.com.

https://www.bvresources.com/learn/dealstats
9 DEALSTATS VALUE INDEX | 2Q 2019bvresources.com/dealstats

EXHIBIT 7C: SELLING PRICE/NET SALES INTERQUARTILE RANGE BY YEAR (PRIVATE TARGETS)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

M ul tip le

EXHIBIT 7D: SELLING PRICE/EBITDA INTERQUARTILE RANGE BY YEAR (PRIVATE TARGETS)

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

M ul tip le

This digital edition was created exclusively for the use of Joel Morse of University of Baltimore. For licensing options, please contact Business Valuation Resources at sales@bvresources.com.

https://www.bvresources.com/learn/dealstats
10 DEALSTATS VALUE INDEX | 2Q 2019bvresources.com/dealstats

EXHIBIT 8. MEDIAN SELLING PRICE/NET SALES BY SECTOR (PRIVATE TARGETS)

EXHIBIT 9. MEDIAN SELLING PRICE/SELLER’S DISCRETIONARY EARNINGS BY SECTOR (PRIVATE TARGETS)

NAICS NAICS Industry Sector 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

23 Construction 0.43 0.38 0.47 0.45 0.42 0.46 0.46 0.42 0.39 31-33 Manufacturing 0.81 0.87 0.74 0.81 0.66 0.70 0.62 0.67 0.65

42 Wholesale Trade 0.52 0.53 0.52 0.46 0.51 0.47 0.46 0.52 0.38 44-45 Retail Trade 0.35 0.34 0.36 0.39 0.36 0.37 0.39 0.38 0.38 48-49 Transportation and Warehousing 0.60 0.59 0.58 0.66 0.58 0.77 0.73 0.72 0.60

51 Information 1.40 2.38 1.36 2.17 2.17 1.80 2.05 2.51 4.31 52 Finance and Insurance 1.58 1.29 1.19 1.58 1.87 1.59 1.80 2.00 1.95 53 Real Estate, Rental, and Leasing 0.78 0.78 0.81 0.61 0.80 0.72 0.72 0.68 0.63 54 Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 0.74 0.95 0.81 0.74 0.89 0.86 0.90 0.82 0.79

56 Administrative, Support, Waste Mgmt., and Remediation Svcs. 0.59 0.60 0.58 0.63 0.59 0.52 0.59 0.64 0.61

61 Educational Services 0.66 0.53 0.61 0.34 0.60 0.37 0.66 0.62 0.45 62 Health Care and Social Assistance 0.56 0.50 0.55 0.58 0.56 0.51 0.55 0.54 0.56 71 Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 0.40 0.49 0.51 0.72 0.62 0.67 0.76 0.51 0.46 72 Accommodation and Food Services 0.33 0.32 0.30 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.34 0.32 0.33 81 Other Services 0.42 0.52 0.43 0.40 0.47 0.42 0.44 0.43 0.48

All Sectors 0.50 0.53 0.50 0.50 0.54 0.50 0.52 0.52 0.49 Note: Each data point in this chart is based on a minimum of 10 transactions of private targets. If an industry sector does not meet this criterion, it is not included in the chart.

NAICS NAICS Industry Sector 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

23 Construction 2.5 2.3 2.9 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.3 2.4 2.1 31-33 Manufacturing 2.8 3.0 3.6 3.5 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9

42 Wholesale Trade 3.1 3.4 2.7 3.5 3.7 3.2 3.2 3.7 2.6 44-45 Retail Trade 2.3 2.5 2.9 2.6 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.5 2.3 48-49 Transportation and Warehousing 2.6 2.2 2.7 3.7 2.7 3.2 3.2 2.1 2.5

51 Information 2.1 1.5 2.8 2.4 3.5 3.3 3.4 4.3 2.9 52 Finance and Insurance 3.0 2.6 4.3 3.6 3.2 3.4 5.1 4.1 3.8 53 Real Estate, Rental, and Leasing 2.2 2.5 2.9 2.2 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.9 2.5 54 Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 2.5 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2

56 Administrative, Support, Waste Mgmt., and Remediation Svcs. 1.8 2.2 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.2

61 Educational Services 2.1 2.1 2.4 1.8 2.9 2.0 2.2 1.8 2.0 62 Health Care and Social Assistance 1.5 2.3 1.5 1.7 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 71 Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 1.8 2.0 2.9 2.4 3.0 2.8 2.7 3.0 2.7 72 Accommodation and Food Services 1.7 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 81 Other Services 1.7 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.4 2.2 2.5 2.3

All Sectors 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.4 Note: Each data point in this chart is based on a minimum of 10 transactions of private targets. If an industry sector does not meet this criterion, it is not included in the chart.

This digital edition was created exclusively for the use of Joel Morse of University of Baltimore. For licensing options, please contact Business Valuation Resources at sales@bvresources.com.

https://www.bvresources.com/learn/dealstats
11 DEALSTATS VALUE INDEX | 2Q 2019bvresources.com/dealstats

EXHIBIT 11. MEDIAN GROSS PROFIT MARGINS BY SECTOR (PRIVATE TARGETS)

NAICS NAICS Industry Sector 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

23 Construction 2.8 3.1 4.1 4.0 3.3 3.7 3.3 3.7 3.9 31-33 Manufacturing 5.0 6.5 6.6 7.2 5.8 6.1 6.5 5.3 5.9

42 Wholesale Trade 3.9 4.7 4.8 4.8 6.2 6.9 6.3 5.3 4.0 44-45 Retail Trade 2.9 3.3 2.9 3.1 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.4 48-49 Transportation and Warehousing 3.1 2.9 2.6 3.2 3.2 3.5 4.2 3.7 3.0

51 Information 6.4 10.1 7.0 8.6 10.0 7.2 10.7 13.6 7.0 52 Finance and Insurance 6.2 3.2 4.5 3.8 6.3 7.8 9.6 12.6 9.6 53 Real Estate, Rental, and Leasing 2.6 2.8 3.1 2.3 4.3 2.9 3.8 4.2 4.2 54 Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 5.2 8.5 4.2 4.6 5.5 8.0 5.2 5.7 3.3

56 Administrative, Support, Waste Mgmt., and Remediation Svcs. 2.5 2.7 3.2 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.8 3.4 3.3

61 Educational Services 2.6 2.8 4.5 2.7 3.2 3.6 4.1 3.1 4.3 62 Health Care and Social Assistance 4.3 5.4 2.6 4.5 4.2 3.5 4.2 3.8 3.4 71 Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 2.1 2.2 2.5 3.1 3.9 3.3 4.6 2.8 2.5 72 Accommodation and Food Services 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.5 81 Other Services 2.2 2.6 2.4 2.6 2.4 2.8 2.6 3.1 2.7

All Sectors 2.9 3.5 3.0 3.3 3.9 3.8 3.8 4.0 3.5 Note: Each data point in this chart is based on a minimum of 10 transactions of private targets. If an industry sector does not meet this criterion, it is not included in the chart.

NAICS NAICS Industry Sector 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

23 Construction 46% 42% 43% 46% 53% 49% 53% 45% 47% 31-33 Manufacturing 48% 47% 47% 44% 46% 44% 46% 48% 49%

42 Wholesale Trade 41% 39% 36% 45% 36% 38% 35% 40% 38% 44-45 Retail Trade 47% 44% 44% 42% 46% 44% 45% 45% 46% 48-49 Transportation and Warehousing 59% 86% 89% 96% 68% 86% 77% 98% 91%

51 Information 70% 66% 72% 67% 71% 68% 46% 71% 74% 52 Finance and Insurance 100% 100% 100% 94% 93% 96% 90% 98% 97% 53 Real Estate, Rental, and Leasing 91% 89% 89% 91% 87% 93% 86% 78% 76% 54 Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 67% 68% 74% 85% 67% 74% 76% 88% 89%

56 Administrative, Support, Waste Mgmt., and Remediation Svcs. 81% 86% 79% 84% 79% 76% 71% 81% 83%

61 Educational Services 90% 89% 100% 99% 98% 89% 100% 91% 100% 62 Health Care and Social Assistance 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 89% 71 Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 100% 80% 90% 92% 99% 89% 95% 98% 91% 72 Accommodation and Food Services 67% 68% 68% 68% 66% 66% 68% 67% 68% 81 Other Services 85% 90% 82% 84% 84% 75% 79% 76% 86%

All Sectors 65% 65% 65% 67% 65% 65% 64% 64% 65% Note: Each data point in this chart is based on a minimum of 10 transactions of private targets. If an industry sector does not meet this criterion, it is not included in the chart.

EXHIBIT 10. MEDIAN SELLING PRICE/EBITDA BY SECTOR (PRIVATE TARGETS)

This digital edition was created exclusively for the use of Joel Morse of University of Baltimore. For licensing options, please contact Business Valuation Resources at sales@bvresources.com.

https://www.bvresources.com/learn/dealstats
12 DEALSTATS VALUE INDEX | 2Q 2019bvresources.com/dealstats

EXHIBIT 12. MEDIAN OPERATING PROFIT MARGINS BY SECTOR (PRIVATE TARGETS)

EXHIBIT 13. MEDIAN NET PROFIT MARGINS BY SECTOR (PRIVATE TARGETS)

NAICS NAICS Industry Sector 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

23 Construction 7% 7% 11% 10% 12% 11% 13% 9% 10% 31-33 Manufacturing 10% 10% 10% 8% 10% 9% 7% 10% 10%

42 Wholesale Trade 10% 10% 11% 6% 8% 6% 9% 8% 7% 44-45 Retail Trade 11% 8% 9% 10% 9% 8% 10% 9% 8% 48-49 Transportation and Warehousing 10% 15% 19% 16% 13% 18% 18% 19% 14%

51 Information 1% 6% 10% 0% 5% 6% 1% 6% 7% 52 Finance and Insurance 18% 22% 15% 27% 21% 18% 22% 25% 29% 53 Real Estate, Rental, and Leasing 23% 20% 18% 26% 18% 16% 17% 15% 14% 54 Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 11% 4% 13% 10% 9% 8% 14% 13% 18%

56 Administrative, Support, Waste Mgmt., and Remediation Svcs. 17% 16% 14% 18% 19% 15% 15% 17% 16%

61 Educational Services 23% 8% 6% 10% 15% 9% 16% 19% 16% 62 Health Care and Social Assistance 12% 7% 12% 11% 12% 13% 11% 11% 13% 71 Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 15% 17% 18% 19% 18% 10% 12% 19% 8% 72 Accommodation and Food Services 15% 12% 14% 15% 13% 12% 14% 13% 13% 81 Other Services 18% 16% 18% 13% 15% 13% 15% 13% 15%

All Sectors 13% 11% 12% 12% 11% 10% 12% 12% 12% Note: Each data point in this chart is based on a minimum of 10 transactions of private targets. If an industry sector does not meet this criterion, it is not included in the chart.

NAICS NAICS Industry Sector 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

23 Construction 6% 7% 10% 9% 11% 11% 12% 9% 10% 31-33 Manufacturing 7% 7% 8% 6% 8% 7% 6% 8% 9%

42 Wholesale Trade 9% 10% 11% 6% 8% 5% 7% 8% 8% 44-45 Retail Trade 11% 6% 9% 10% 8% 7% 10% 9% 8% 48-49 Transportation and Warehousing 9% 11% 20% 14% 12% 16% 17% 19% 15%

51 Information -3% 4% 9% -1% 5% 5% -2% 2% 1% 52 Finance and Insurance 14% 18% 12% 24% 19% 14% 17% 15% 27% 53 Real Estate, Rental, and Leasing 19% 19% 18% 26% 18% 15% 17% 14% 14% 54 Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 11% 4% 12% 7% 8% 6% 15% 12% 19%

56 Administrative, Support, Waste Mgmt., and Remediation Svcs. 17% 15% 14% 18% 14% 13% 15% 17% 16%

61 Educational Services 23% 8% 5% 9% 12% 8% 16% 19% 13% 62 Health Care and Social Assistance 10% 5% 12% 10% 10% 11% 10% 10% 13% 71 Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 12% 15% 15% 19% 18% 12% 13% 19% 7% 72 Accommodation and Food Services 14% 12% 13% 15% 10% 10% 13% 12% 13% 81 Other Services 18% 16% 17% 13% 13% 13% 14% 12% 15%

All Sectors 11% 10% 12% 11% 10% 9% 11% 11% 12% Note: Each data point in this chart is based on a minimum of 10 transactions of private targets. If an industry sector does not meet this criterion, it is not included in the chart.

This digital edition was created exclusively for the use of Joel Morse of University of Baltimore. For licensing options, please contact Business Valuation Resources at sales@bvresources.com.

https://www.bvresources.com/learn/dealstats
13 DEALSTATS VALUE INDEX | 2Q 2019bvresources.com/dealstats

PUBLIC BUYERS PAY HIGHER MULTIPLES FOR PRIVATE TARGETS

Exhibits 14 and 15 compare the median valuation multiples private buyers paid (those transactions business intermediaries brokered) to what public-company buyers paid based on major industry sector groups.

In general, public buyers paid higher multiples for private targets than private buyers paid. This may partially reflect synergies between the public buyer and the private target. Also, the typical acquisition public buyers made was larger than those private buyers made, so it is possible to conclude that larger companies sell for higher multiples than smaller companies.

EXHIBIT 14. SELLING PRICE/NET SALES (PRIVATE TARGETS)

EXHIBIT 15. SELLING PRICE/EBITDA (PRIVATE TARGETS)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

Public Buyer Private Buyer

Agriculture, Forestry,

Fishing, and Hunting

Construction

Manufacturing

Wholesale Trade

Retail Trade

Transportation and

Warehousing

Information

Finance and

Insurance

Real Estate,

Rental and Leasing

Professional, Scientific,

and Technical Services

Administrative, Support,

Waste Mgmt., and

Remediation Svcs.

Educational Services

Health Care and

Social Assistance

Arts, Entertainment,

and Recreation

Accommodation and

Food Service

Other Services

Mining, Quarrying,

and Oil and Gas Extraction

Utilities

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Public Buyers Private Buyers

Agriculture, Forestry,

Fishing, and Hunting

Construction

Manufacturing

Wholesale Trade

Retail Trade

Transportation and

Warehousing

Information

Finance and

Insurance

Real Estate,

Rental and Leasing

Professional, Scientific,

and Technical Services

Administrative, Support,

Waste Mgmt., and

Remediation Svcs.

Educational Services

Health Care and

Social Assistance

Arts, Entertainment,

and Recreation

Accommodation and

Food Service

Other Services

Mining, Quarrying,

and Oil and Gas Extraction

Utilities

This digital edition was created exclusively for the use of Joel Morse of University of Baltimore. For licensing options, please contact Business Valuation Resources at sales@bvresources.com.

https://www.bvresources.com/learn/dealstats
14 DEALSTATS VALUE INDEX | 2Q 2019bvresources.com/dealstats

HOW DO INDUSTRY PRICING MULIPLES AND PROFIT MARGINS COMPARE?

Exhibits 16A through 17C compare pricing multiples and profit margin ratios across 18 industry sectors. Target companies in industries with asset-heavy balance sheets clearly trade at higher revenue and earnings- based pricing multiples than companies in other industries (see Exhibits 16A to 16E). The trend for margin ratios is less evident among the 18 industry sectors, although companies in the information sector appear to operate less efficiently, with a median operating profit margin of 0.0% and a median net profit margin of -2.0% (see Exhibits 17A to 17C).