Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Newly revised strong interest inventory

17/03/2021 Client: saad24vbs Deadline: 3 days

Leierer, S. J., Blackwell, T. L., Strohmer, D. C., Thompson, R. C., & Donnay, D. C. (2008). The Newly Revised Strong Interest Inventory: A Profile Interpretation for Rehabilitation Counselors. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 51(2), 76-84

The Newly Revised Strong Interest Inventory: A Profile Interpretation for Rehabilitation Counselors

This peer reviewed scholarly journal article seeks to examine the interest patterns that are predictive of success and satisfaction as a rehabilitation counselor using the Strong Interests Inventory. The strength of the SII lies in the variety of which is useful in counseling and provide information that is usually not found with other interest inventories. Interpreting the SII profile begins by looking at the individual's GOT scores. The data and ideas from this interpretation can be used to improve the selection and recruitment of rehabilitation counselors. These findings can help career counselors predict which students and workers will be interested in a particular field.

Abstract from the author:

Using aggregate scores from 281 female and 133 male rehabilitation counselors, the researchers developed prototypical "Strong Interest Inventory" (SII) profiles. They used these profiles to explore the interests, preferences, and professional identity of rehabilitation counselors. Using the General Occupational Themes (GOTs), Basic Interest Scales (BISs), Occupational Scales (OSs), and Personal Style Scales (PSSs), which make up the newly revised SII, the authors obtained empirically defined prototypical profiles for female and male rehabilitation counselors. The Social-Artistic Holland-code dyad was a reoccurring theme across the each profile. Although there are differences in each of the SII scales across genders, the authors found congruence not only within the scales of a particular gender but also across genders. Consistencies and inconsistencies among the GOTs, BISs, OSs, and PSSs are discussed. Implications for counselor recruitment and practice are also discussed.

Day, M. A., & Luzzo, D. A. (1997). Effects of Strong Interest Inventory Feedback on Career Beliefs.

Effects of Strong Interest Inventory Feedback on Career Beliefs

This scholarly article explored the most frequently used career interest inventory SSI. The purpose of the investigation was to evaluate the effects of SII completion and participation an feedback and interpretation on the social cognitive career beliefs of first-year college students. Application of self-efficacy theory to the career decision- tasks and behaviors, whereas high levels of CDMSE lead to increased participation in career decision-making activities. The use of a group interpretation strategy that incorporated sources of performance accomplishments and verbal persuasion as means of providing SI feedback increased participants' CDMSE.

Abstract from the author:

A study evaluated the effects of Strong Interest Inventory (SII) completion and participation in a theoretically based model of SII feedback/interpretation on the social cognitive career beliefs of 99 first-year students at a southwestern university. The Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale--Short Form (CDMSES-SF) measured each participant's degree of belief that he or she can successfully complete tasks necessary for making effective career decisions. Career beliefs of participants were measured by the Career Beliefs Inventory. Participants completed both instruments and were randomly assigned to either the SII feedback condition, control, or SII completion-only group. Students who completed the SII and participated in the feedback session were more likely to believe that they are personally responsible for career decision making than were students who completed the SII without feedback. Students who completed the SII with or without feedback were more likely to believe that career success and satisfaction were the result of hard work and effort than were the control group. There were no significant differences in a sense of control over career decision making among the three groups. (Appendixes include 37 references and 2 tables.) (YLB)

Lindley, L. D., & Borgen, F. H. (1997). Validity of the Strong Interest Inventory: Gender and Personal Styles.

Validity of the Strong Interest Inventory: Gender and Personal Styles.

The scholarly article evaluated the validity of the four Personal Style Scales separately for men and women, using the Adjective Check List. Examining the validity of the Personal Style Scales separately by gender offered insight into the differences and similarities regarding the manner in which men and women interpret these items. It is interpreted that men and women who score similarly on a particular Personal Style Scale poses different personality characteristics in some domains like extroverted. The implications of this study suggests hat men and women may view certain broad styles of living in slightly different ways, giving them different meaning and connotation in relation to the way they think of themselves as individual

Abstract from the author:

The gender validity of the Strong Interest Inventory's Personal Style Scales (Work Style, Learning Environment, Leadership Style, and Risk Taking/Adventure) was examined through a study of 458 female and 282 male college students at Iowa State University. The students completed the Personal Style Scales and the Adjective Check List (ACL), which is a standardized 300-adjective list used for research and personality assessment purposes. The adjectives of the ACL were used as criterion variables to validate each of the Personal Style Scales. The students' responses were subjected to correlational and regression analyses. Significant gender differences were discovered on the mean scores on three scales: Work Style, Leadership Style, and Risk Taking/Adventure. Gender differences in frequency of selection of many of the adjectives on the ACL were also discovered. In general, women endorsed more adjectives than men did. Many adjectives proved substantially correlated in the same direction for both genders with a given Personal Style Scale, thus indicating similar relationships for both genders. The study also revealed adjectives for each of the four scales that were strong predictors for one gender and not the other, as well as adjectives that exhibited opposite relationships for males and females. (MN)

Case, J. C., & Blackwell, T. L. (2008). Review of Strong Interest Inventory®, Revised Edition. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 51(2), 122-126. doi:10.1177/0034355207311350

Review of Strong Interest Inventory®, Revised Edition

The scholarly article explores revision made to the Strong Interest Inventory as a B- Level instrument designed to aid in decision making, structure the career assessment and counseling process, stimulate client self-exploration, assist in personnel hiring and staffing decisions, and explains reasons for job dissatisfaction. The goals for the revision were to innovate, maintain quality, and bring the assessment up to date while streamlining the interpretive process, and encourage learning. This measure is distinguished within its field as a standard of excellence because of its psychometrics characteristics and quality of features. This information relates to my assignment because it offers relevant insight on current psychometrics used to assess career interests.

Abstract from the author

Reviews the Strong Interest Inventory®, Revised Edition (Strong) by E. K. Strong, Jr., D. A. C. Donnay, M. L. Morris, N. A. Schaubhut, & R. C. Thompson, which has become a well-established instrument for measuring a person's career interests. The newly revised Strong contains 291 items that measure an individual's interests in six areas: Occupations (107 items), Subject Areas (46 items), Activities (85 items), Leisure Activities (28 items), People (16 items), and Your Characteristics (9 items). The first 282 items are answered by strongly like, like, indifferent, dislike, or strongly dislike. The remaining 9 items in the Your Characteristics section are answered as strongly like me, like me, don't know, unlike me, or strongly unlike me. The Strong is designed for use with high school students, college students, and adults and typically requires between 30 and 45 minutes to complete. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

Rowell, R. K. (1999). The Influence of Career Indecision on the Strong Interest Inventory and the Self-Directed Search: A Pilot Study.

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Top Grade Tutor
Custom Coursework Service
Engineering Guru
Quick Mentor
Helping Engineer
Financial Assignments
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Top Grade Tutor

ONLINE

Top Grade Tutor

Hello, I an ranked top 10 freelancers in academic and contents writing. I can write and updated your personal statement with great quality and free of plagiarism

$15 Chat With Writer
Custom Coursework Service

ONLINE

Custom Coursework Service

I have read your project details. I can do this within your deadline.

$48 Chat With Writer
Engineering Guru

ONLINE

Engineering Guru

Hello, I an ranked top 10 freelancers in academic and contents writing. I can write and updated your personal statement with great quality and free of plagiarism

$54 Chat With Writer
Quick Mentor

ONLINE

Quick Mentor

I am known as Unrivaled Quality, Written to Standard, providing Plagiarism-free woork, and Always on Time

$59 Chat With Writer
Helping Engineer

ONLINE

Helping Engineer

Give me a chance, i will do this with my best efforts

$53 Chat With Writer
Financial Assignments

ONLINE

Financial Assignments

I will cover all the points which you have mentioned in your project details.

$38 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

Mystery and melancholy of a street 1914 - Amazon fire phone target market - Energy stored in magnetic field of inductor - Rolls wood group wellheads - Health Care Delivery 2 - What is 12 o clock in 24 hour time - Coding subtest wisc v - The devil and tom walker review and assess answers - Topic 1 DQ1 - Rhetorical analysis of a music video - STock Exchange - The things they carried style - What does whmis stand for in science - Find equation of perpendicular bisector with two points - Dolch 100 word list - Cover page unsw engineering - Aat org uk login - What does yellow balloons mean - Fidelis capital markets coimbatore - Special education newsletter - Boiling and condensation point of water - 2015 chemistry marking scheme - 200 words and a visio diagram( Urgent need it done by tonight 8:00 pm EST) - How to calculate age in python - Phase 3 - Manager's pocket guide to emotional intelligence pdf - Cotton on garden city wa - Film Action / sci- fi - Concept development practice page 33 2 key - Debrecen university entrance exam - Microbiology a systems approach 5th edition access code - GC MGT605 Week 2 Assignent - Hendrick hudson v rowley case brief - Job instruction sheet for counter person - Essentials4work - Paper certificate of title victoria - 56 cyprus street north ipswich - Deta 6193b wiring diagram - Business finance - As nzs 3003 2003 - O2 arena vehicle management system - Loanhead primary school website - Read The Case of Plant Relocation and complete the questions at the end of the case study. - Cable laying procedure ppt - Experiment 1 neutralization of acids and bases data tables - Skyjack scissor lift service manual - 2/49 amherst street cammeray - Sensitivity report excel - Objective and interpretive communication theories - Another word for leach - Ashford university quiz answers - Stairway to heaven lyrics meaning - Disability liaison unit monash - Q tech fire suppression - Hello frank walker from national tiles remix - Ch that has only primary hydrogen atoms - The language of trust maslansky pdf - Which component of the arrhenius equation is equivalent to y - Is graphite an element compound or mixture - Design of buck converter in matlab - Qub ac uk qol - Marks origins of the modern world - NURS-6050N-66/NURS-6050C-66-Policy & Advocacy - Esb apprenticeship aptitude test - Fast food restaurant organizational chart - Consumer Behavior - Criminal Law - Drugs across cultures mq - Midland energy resources excel - Jesus and the spiral of violence - Grasslin mechanical timer instructions manual - Rhetorical self essay - Codeblocks 16.01 mingw setup exe download - Song of myself questions and answers - Which css property configures the font typeface - European humanities - The Final Case Analysis: Organizational Ethical Dilemmas Final Paper - Organisation theory and behaviour book pdf - 2645 atlantic ave brooklyn ny 11207 9997 - Soccer and the fashion world case study - EMERGING WEEK 2 DQ - An investor buys three shares of xyz at the beginning - HR Project Management Final Team Report - They say i say chapter 11 he says contends summary - Office 365 sign in ucl - Detroit power cool plus prediluted 50 50 - Seed lab sql injection solution - 01.09 macbeth plot analysis quiz - International economics answer key - Research - What are the side effects of diabex - Dr gagandeep kaur bathurst - ENglish Research Paper - Liabilities of a company are owed to - Physics - Qnt 351 quantitative analysis for business - Lesson 6.1 practice b use similar polygons answers - Ben and jerry's homemade case study solution - Need Help with Anatomy and Physiology - What does the great gatsby say about the american dream