Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Newly revised strong interest inventory

17/03/2021 Client: saad24vbs Deadline: 3 days

Leierer, S. J., Blackwell, T. L., Strohmer, D. C., Thompson, R. C., & Donnay, D. C. (2008). The Newly Revised Strong Interest Inventory: A Profile Interpretation for Rehabilitation Counselors. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 51(2), 76-84

The Newly Revised Strong Interest Inventory: A Profile Interpretation for Rehabilitation Counselors

This peer reviewed scholarly journal article seeks to examine the interest patterns that are predictive of success and satisfaction as a rehabilitation counselor using the Strong Interests Inventory. The strength of the SII lies in the variety of which is useful in counseling and provide information that is usually not found with other interest inventories. Interpreting the SII profile begins by looking at the individual's GOT scores. The data and ideas from this interpretation can be used to improve the selection and recruitment of rehabilitation counselors. These findings can help career counselors predict which students and workers will be interested in a particular field.

Abstract from the author:

Using aggregate scores from 281 female and 133 male rehabilitation counselors, the researchers developed prototypical "Strong Interest Inventory" (SII) profiles. They used these profiles to explore the interests, preferences, and professional identity of rehabilitation counselors. Using the General Occupational Themes (GOTs), Basic Interest Scales (BISs), Occupational Scales (OSs), and Personal Style Scales (PSSs), which make up the newly revised SII, the authors obtained empirically defined prototypical profiles for female and male rehabilitation counselors. The Social-Artistic Holland-code dyad was a reoccurring theme across the each profile. Although there are differences in each of the SII scales across genders, the authors found congruence not only within the scales of a particular gender but also across genders. Consistencies and inconsistencies among the GOTs, BISs, OSs, and PSSs are discussed. Implications for counselor recruitment and practice are also discussed.

Day, M. A., & Luzzo, D. A. (1997). Effects of Strong Interest Inventory Feedback on Career Beliefs.

Effects of Strong Interest Inventory Feedback on Career Beliefs

This scholarly article explored the most frequently used career interest inventory SSI. The purpose of the investigation was to evaluate the effects of SII completion and participation an feedback and interpretation on the social cognitive career beliefs of first-year college students. Application of self-efficacy theory to the career decision- tasks and behaviors, whereas high levels of CDMSE lead to increased participation in career decision-making activities. The use of a group interpretation strategy that incorporated sources of performance accomplishments and verbal persuasion as means of providing SI feedback increased participants' CDMSE.

Abstract from the author:

A study evaluated the effects of Strong Interest Inventory (SII) completion and participation in a theoretically based model of SII feedback/interpretation on the social cognitive career beliefs of 99 first-year students at a southwestern university. The Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale--Short Form (CDMSES-SF) measured each participant's degree of belief that he or she can successfully complete tasks necessary for making effective career decisions. Career beliefs of participants were measured by the Career Beliefs Inventory. Participants completed both instruments and were randomly assigned to either the SII feedback condition, control, or SII completion-only group. Students who completed the SII and participated in the feedback session were more likely to believe that they are personally responsible for career decision making than were students who completed the SII without feedback. Students who completed the SII with or without feedback were more likely to believe that career success and satisfaction were the result of hard work and effort than were the control group. There were no significant differences in a sense of control over career decision making among the three groups. (Appendixes include 37 references and 2 tables.) (YLB)

Lindley, L. D., & Borgen, F. H. (1997). Validity of the Strong Interest Inventory: Gender and Personal Styles.

Validity of the Strong Interest Inventory: Gender and Personal Styles.

The scholarly article evaluated the validity of the four Personal Style Scales separately for men and women, using the Adjective Check List. Examining the validity of the Personal Style Scales separately by gender offered insight into the differences and similarities regarding the manner in which men and women interpret these items. It is interpreted that men and women who score similarly on a particular Personal Style Scale poses different personality characteristics in some domains like extroverted. The implications of this study suggests hat men and women may view certain broad styles of living in slightly different ways, giving them different meaning and connotation in relation to the way they think of themselves as individual

Abstract from the author:

The gender validity of the Strong Interest Inventory's Personal Style Scales (Work Style, Learning Environment, Leadership Style, and Risk Taking/Adventure) was examined through a study of 458 female and 282 male college students at Iowa State University. The students completed the Personal Style Scales and the Adjective Check List (ACL), which is a standardized 300-adjective list used for research and personality assessment purposes. The adjectives of the ACL were used as criterion variables to validate each of the Personal Style Scales. The students' responses were subjected to correlational and regression analyses. Significant gender differences were discovered on the mean scores on three scales: Work Style, Leadership Style, and Risk Taking/Adventure. Gender differences in frequency of selection of many of the adjectives on the ACL were also discovered. In general, women endorsed more adjectives than men did. Many adjectives proved substantially correlated in the same direction for both genders with a given Personal Style Scale, thus indicating similar relationships for both genders. The study also revealed adjectives for each of the four scales that were strong predictors for one gender and not the other, as well as adjectives that exhibited opposite relationships for males and females. (MN)

Case, J. C., & Blackwell, T. L. (2008). Review of Strong Interest Inventory®, Revised Edition. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 51(2), 122-126. doi:10.1177/0034355207311350

Review of Strong Interest Inventory®, Revised Edition

The scholarly article explores revision made to the Strong Interest Inventory as a B- Level instrument designed to aid in decision making, structure the career assessment and counseling process, stimulate client self-exploration, assist in personnel hiring and staffing decisions, and explains reasons for job dissatisfaction. The goals for the revision were to innovate, maintain quality, and bring the assessment up to date while streamlining the interpretive process, and encourage learning. This measure is distinguished within its field as a standard of excellence because of its psychometrics characteristics and quality of features. This information relates to my assignment because it offers relevant insight on current psychometrics used to assess career interests.

Abstract from the author

Reviews the Strong Interest Inventory®, Revised Edition (Strong) by E. K. Strong, Jr., D. A. C. Donnay, M. L. Morris, N. A. Schaubhut, & R. C. Thompson, which has become a well-established instrument for measuring a person's career interests. The newly revised Strong contains 291 items that measure an individual's interests in six areas: Occupations (107 items), Subject Areas (46 items), Activities (85 items), Leisure Activities (28 items), People (16 items), and Your Characteristics (9 items). The first 282 items are answered by strongly like, like, indifferent, dislike, or strongly dislike. The remaining 9 items in the Your Characteristics section are answered as strongly like me, like me, don't know, unlike me, or strongly unlike me. The Strong is designed for use with high school students, college students, and adults and typically requires between 30 and 45 minutes to complete. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

Rowell, R. K. (1999). The Influence of Career Indecision on the Strong Interest Inventory and the Self-Directed Search: A Pilot Study.

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Top Grade Tutor
Custom Coursework Service
Engineering Guru
Quick Mentor
Helping Engineer
Financial Assignments
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Top Grade Tutor

ONLINE

Top Grade Tutor

Hello, I an ranked top 10 freelancers in academic and contents writing. I can write and updated your personal statement with great quality and free of plagiarism

$15 Chat With Writer
Custom Coursework Service

ONLINE

Custom Coursework Service

I have read your project details. I can do this within your deadline.

$48 Chat With Writer
Engineering Guru

ONLINE

Engineering Guru

Hello, I an ranked top 10 freelancers in academic and contents writing. I can write and updated your personal statement with great quality and free of plagiarism

$54 Chat With Writer
Quick Mentor

ONLINE

Quick Mentor

I am known as Unrivaled Quality, Written to Standard, providing Plagiarism-free woork, and Always on Time

$59 Chat With Writer
Helping Engineer

ONLINE

Helping Engineer

Give me a chance, i will do this with my best efforts

$53 Chat With Writer
Financial Assignments

ONLINE

Financial Assignments

I will cover all the points which you have mentioned in your project details.

$38 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

Philosophy of leadership the power of authority - Braun and clarke thematic analysis - The rational theologies of the early 1800s emphasized - 300 cola street pittsburgh pa - Writing assignment 5 - Which variable goes on which axis - Chain dimensioning in engineering drawing - Install hp insight manager - Jeannette walls the glass castle quotes - Palexia ir 50 dosage - Discussion - Round robin algorithm in data structure - Journal of nutrition and dietetics abbreviation - 60 second radio commercial examples - The beatles font microsoft word - 13x 2y 10x 7y - Nexus program la trobe - A pediatrician uses the model above - Anzca part 2 course - Responses - 0.12 hours in minutes - 1 response due in 18 hours - School age child observation examples - City of everett washington v mitchell - The good funeral guide - Marketing communication and brand strategy mkt 571 - Request email for username and password - With it ness according to kounin - Angle of elevation and depression - Wollongong council clean up - "Ending Spousal Relationships" - Cambridge it skills diploma - Ethics 2 - Pauls online math notes - Introduction to history - Emic 2 text to speech - Mcgraw hill accounting chapter 9 answers - Packet tracer 6.3 1.10 answers - Calculating the cost of credit card purchases worksheet answers - Watt converter to amp - Dr axe dong quai - Difference between cbt and rebt - Articles on role transition from rn to bsn - Chris gardner ex wife - The house on mango street pdf - Flowchart to java code - Yeast two hybrid library - Bye bye bus driver - 2.2 Group Discussion: Participation Invitation - A 55 kg box is being pushed - Article Review - 509-F - Module 05 Lab 03 - Equilibrium Simulation - Eye doctor - Martin seligman authentic happiness questionnaire - Sc1040 week 1 assignment worksheet - Anterior compartment of forearm mnemonic - English paper on Nicotine use for Teens - School of electrical engineering and telecommunications - Biometrics characteristics - NEED DONE ASAP - Deed of partition nsw - COMPLIANCE - Philosophical reflection paper example - Papa student workbook answers session 2 - Are order effects an extraneous variable - PPT on develop compensation and benefits package that you would like to be offered from your organization - Plagiarism Free - 36 lynhurst dr greenville sc 29611 - SPC - How to delete recent textbook solutions in chegg - Memento anterograde amnesia - Testing ecm inputs and outputs - Bus 599 peregrine exam - Tax return project solutions - Week-6-Business process redesign - Discussion / Read chapters 1,2,3 / about 300 words / answer and then comment / need within 6 hours - Lakes and ponds temperature - Research Paper: Server Virtualization and Cloud Computing - Solar geometry calculator - Quality and safety in nursing wgu - Beowulf battle with grendel mother text - 5.89 km in miles - What is the participial phrase in the following sentence - Sam patch the famous jumper summary of chapters - Deakin basketball court hire - Wave on a string simulation answers - Logitech case study analysis - Hgt - Thesis - Elections and campaigns in Texas assignment - A carnival game offers cash prize - Romeo and juliet facebook page - Byron bay cookie factory tour - Week 6 - Focus questions for to kill a mockingbird - Aes uses a feistel structure - Form 11a magistrates court - A woman's hands poem by eva bezwoda analysis - Week 5 Tort Questions - The self unseeing analysis