Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Pledge of allegiance words under god

20/11/2021 Client: muhammad11 Deadline: 2 Day

Critical Thinking

Why the Pledge of Allegiance Should be Revised

By: Gwen Wilde

(This essay was written for a composition course at Tufts University.)

All Americans are familiar with the Pledge of Allegiance, even if they cannot always recite it perfectly, but probably relatively few know that the original Pledge did not include the words “under God.” The original Pledge of Allegiance, published in the September 8, 1892, issue of the Youth’s Companion, ran thus:

I pledge allegiance to my flag, and to the Republic for which it stands: one Nation indivisible, with Liberty and justice for all. (Djupe 329)

In 1923, at the first National Flag Conference in Washington, DC, it was argued that immigrants might be confused by the words “my Flag,” and it was proposed that the words be changed to “the Flag of the United States.” The following year it was changed again, to “the Flag of the United States of America,” and the wording became the official—or, rather, unofficial—wording, unofficial because no wording had ever been nationally adopted (Djupe 329).

In 1942, the United States Congress included the Pledge in the United States Flag Code (4 USC 4, 2006), thus for the first time officially sanctioning the Pledge. In 1954, President Dwight D. Eisenhower approved adding the words “under God.” Thus, since 1954 the Pledge reads:

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands: one nation under God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all. (Djupe 329)

In my view, the addition of the words “under God” is inappropriate, and they are needlessly divisive—an odd addition indeed to a Nation that is said to be “indivisible.”

Very simply put, the Pledge in its latest from requires all Americans to say something that some Americans do not believe. I say “requires” because although the courts have ruled that students may not be compelled to recite the Pledge, in effect peer pressure does compel all but the bravest to join in the recitation. When President Eisenhower authorized the change, he said,

In this way we are reaffirming the transcendence of religious faith in America’s heritage and future; in this way we shall constantly strengthen those spiritual weapons which forever will be our country’s most powerful resource in peace and war. (Sterner)

Exactly what did Eisenhower mean when he spoke of “the transcendence of faith in America’s heritage,” and when he spoke of “spiritual weapons”? I am not sure what “the transcendence of faith in America’s heritage” means. Of course many Americans have been and are deeply religious—no one doubts it—but the phrase certainly goes far beyond saying that many Americans have been devout. In any case, many Americans have not been devout, and many Americans have not believed in “spiritual weapons,” but they have nevertheless been patriotic Americans. Some of them have fought and died to keep America free.

In short, the words “under God” cannot be uttered in good faith by many Americans. True, something like 70 or even 80% of Americans say they are affiliated with some form of Christianity, and approximately another 3% say they are Jewish. I don’t have the figures for persons of other faiths, but in any case we can surely all agree that although a majority of Americans say they have a religious affiliation, nevertheless several million Americans do not believe in God.

If one remains silent while others are reciting the Pledge, or even if one remains silent only while others are speaking the words “under God,” one is open to the change that one is unpatriotic, is “unwilling to recite the Pledge of Allegiance.” In the Pledge, patriotism is connected with religious belief, and it is this connection that makes it divisive and (to be blunt) un-American. Admittedly the belief is not very specific: one is not required to say that one believes in the divinity of Jesus, or in the power of Jehovah, but the fact remains, one is required to express belief in a divine power, and if one doesn’t express this belief one is—according to the Pledge—somehow not fully an American, maybe even un-American.

Please notice that I am not arguing that the Pledge is unconstitutional. I understand that the First Amendment to the Constitution says that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. “I am not arguing that the words “under God” in the Pledge add up to the “establishment of religion,” but they certainly do assert a religious doctrine. Like the words “In God we trust,” found on all American money, and the words “under God” express an idea that many Americans do not hold, and there is no reason why these Americans—loyal people who may be called upon to defend the country with their lives—should be required to say that America is a nation “under God.”

It has been argued, even by members of the Supreme Court, that the words “under God” are not to be taken terribly seriously, not to be taken to say what they seem to say. For instance, Chief Justice Rehnquist wrote,

To give the parent of such a child a sort of “heckler’s veto” over a patriotic ceremony willingly participated in by other students, simply because the Pledge of Allegiance contains the descriptive phrase “under God,” is an unwarranted extension of the establishment clause, an extension which would have the unfortunate effect of prohibiting a commendable patriotic observance. (qtd. In Mears)

Chief Justice Rehnquist here calls “under God” a “descriptive phrase,” but descriptive of what? If a phrase is a “descriptive phrase,” it describes something, real or imagined. For many Americans, this phrase does not describe a reality. These Americans may perhaps be mistaken—if so, they may learn of their error at Judgment Day—but the fact is, millions of intelligent Americans do not believe in God.

Notice, too, that Chief Justice Rehnquist goes on to say that reciting the Pledge is “a commendable patriotic observance.” Exactly. That is my point. It is a patriotic observance, and it should not be connected with religion. When we announce that we respect the flag—that we are loyal Americans—we should not also have to announce that we hold a particular religious belief, in this case a belief in monotheism, a belief that there is a God and that God rules.

One other argument defending the words “under God” is often heard: the words “In God We Trust” appear on our money. It is claimed that these words on American money are analogous to the words “under God” in the Pledge. But the situation really is very different. When we hand some coins over, or some paper money, we are concentrating on the business transaction, and we are not making any affirmation about God or our country. But when we recite the Pledge—even if we remain silent at the point when we are supposed to say “under God”—we are very conscious that we are supposed to make this affirmation, an affirmation that many Americans cannot in good faith make, even though they certainly can unthinkingly hand over (or accept) money with the words “In God We Trust.”

Because I believe that reciting the Pledge is to be taken seriously, with a full awareness of the words that is quite different from when we hand over some money, I cannot understand the recent comment of Supreme Court Justice Souter, who in a case said that the phrase “under God” is “so tepid, so diluted, so far from compulsory prayer, that it should, in effect, be beneath the constitutional radar” (qtd. in “Guide”). I don’t know his reasoning that the phrase should be “beneath the constitutional radar,” but in any case I am willing to put aside the issue of constitutionality. I am willing to grant that this phase does not in any significant sense signify the “establishment of religion” (prohibited by the First Amendment) in the United States. I insist, nevertheless, that the phrase is neither “tepid” nor “diluted.” It means what it says—it must and should mean what it says, to everyone who utters it—and, since millions of loyal Americans cannot say it, it should not be included in the statement in which Americans affirm their loyalty to our great country.

In short, the Pledge, which ought to unite all of us, is divisive; it includes a phrase that many patriotic Americans cannot bring themselves to utter. Yes, they can remain silent when others recite these two words, but again, why should they have to remain silent? The Pledge of Allegiance should be something that everyone can say, say out loud, and say with pride. We hear much talk of returning to the ideas of the Founding Fathers. The Founding Fathers did not create the Pledge of Allegiance, but we do know that they never mentioned God in the Constitution. Indeed the only reference to religion, in the so-called establishment clause of the First Amendment, says, again, that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” Those who wish to exercise religion are indeed free to do so but the place to do so is not in a pledge that is required of all school-children and of all new citizens.

Words Cited

Djupe, Paul A. “Pledge of Allegiance.” Encyclopedia of American Religion and Politics.

Ed. Paul A. Djupe and Laura R. Olson. New York: Facts on File, 2003.

“Guide to Covering ‘Under God’ Pledge Decision.” ReligionLink. Religion

Newswriters Foundation, 17 Sept. 2005. Web. 9 Feb. 2007.

Mears, Bill. “Court Dismisses Pledge Case.” CNN.com. Cable News Network 15 June

2004. We. 9 Feb. 2007.

Sterner, Doug. “The Pledge of Allegiance.” Home of Heroes. N.p., n.d. Web. 9 Feb.

2007.

Topics for Critical Thinking and Writing

1. Analyze the sources used in this essay. What is each source? Which source has an editor? Which source lacks an author? Are the sources varied, scholarly, and recent? Do they enhance the credibility of the author or diminish it?

2. Summarize the essay in a single paragraph.

3. Does the background material about the history of the pledge serve a useful purpose? Should it be deleted? Why, or why not?

4. What arguments does the writer offer in support of her position? List each point of evidence and determine what type of support each point of evidence demonstrates.

5. List the acknowledgements of any counterarguments the author makes. Is this adequate, or does the writer appear blinded by his or her own perspective? Why, or why not?

6. Which is the writer’s strongest argument? Is any argument notably weak, and, if so, how could it be strengthened?

7. What assumptions—tacit or explicit—does the author make? Do you agree or disagree with them? Please explain.

8. Chief Justice Rehnquist wrote that the words “under God” are a “descriptive phrase.” What do you think he meant by this?

9. What is the purpose of the Pledge of Allegiance? Does the phrase “under God” promote or defeat that purpose? Explain your answer.

10. What do you think about substituting “with religious freedom” for “under God”? Set forth your response, supporting your reasons.

11. Devise an AP Analysis Essay question related to this essay.

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Professional Coursework Help
Top Class Engineers
Coursework Help Online
Maths Master
Quality Assignments
Essay Writing Help
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Professional Coursework Help

ONLINE

Professional Coursework Help

I have read your project description carefully and you will get plagiarism free writing according to your requirements. Thank You

$38 Chat With Writer
Top Class Engineers

ONLINE

Top Class Engineers

I can assist you in plagiarism free writing as I have already done several related projects of writing. I have a master qualification with 5 years’ experience in; Essay Writing, Case Study Writing, Report Writing.

$39 Chat With Writer
Coursework Help Online

ONLINE

Coursework Help Online

I reckon that I can perfectly carry this project for you! I am a research writer and have been writing academic papers, business reports, plans, literature review, reports and others for the past 1 decade.

$17 Chat With Writer
Maths Master

ONLINE

Maths Master

I have worked on wide variety of research papers including; Analytical research paper, Argumentative research paper, Interpretative research, experimental research etc.

$19 Chat With Writer
Quality Assignments

ONLINE

Quality Assignments

I have written research reports, assignments, thesis, research proposals, and dissertations for different level students and on different subjects.

$40 Chat With Writer
Essay Writing Help

ONLINE

Essay Writing Help

I have done dissertations, thesis, reports related to these topics, and I cover all the CHAPTERS accordingly and provide proper updates on the project.

$41 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

Extinction in operant conditioning involves - Experiment 1 heart valves and pumps - Philip guerin family therapy - Sandra cisneros woman hollering creek summary - Rosewill rca 220 bl - Shadow health chest pain answers - In the northern hemisphere, the coriolis effect shifts objects ________ their straight-line paths. - Question 6 - How is professional writing different from other writing - 6.5 turbo diesel cdr valve bypass - Facial recognition software its reliability effectiveness and admissibility - The __________ is the first segment of the small intestine. - 2 3 4 tree visualisation - Discussion Topic - Organisational features functional skills - Dictionary of herpetology harvey b lillywhite - Scattergories board game rules - What happens in hamlet john dover wilson pdf - What is the fattest state in america supersize me - Atomic radius of vanadium in nm - Bill nye static electricity worksheet - Single phase full bridge inverter operation - Intake manifold runner control circuit - Ids 100 project 2 kwl chart special education - Rey paz contreras sculptures - The a992 steel shaft has a diameter - Introduction for maths project - Cua esaver reward account - Henri nestle net worth - Kerosene safety data sheet - Yellow belt training material ppt - Malware domain list txt - Scribblz preschool & long day care centre - Accomplishments that prepare a graduate student for an advanced nursing role - Torbay council car parks - Unlv hospitality internship requirements - Anthony thomas candies atc reported - Homework: Strategy Decisions, Alignment, and Change (250 words) - Lord of the flies discussion - Niagara 4 certification cost - My big fat greek wedding movie reflection questions answers - Australian unity claim form - Avalanche facts national geographic - Forms of energy assignment - Qatar university mechanical engineering - Populist Revolt Discussion - 7.2 3.7 lab troubleshooting advanced eigrp - Economies of scale in managerial economics - Itt tech admission requirements - Convert regular expression to dfa - Brooklyn cop norman maccaig - Why is foopets not free anymore - Alternative Energy Systems - Poem where i m from - Finally September 2020 - Nissan maxima starting issues - Jen buys sesame bagels and plain bagels - Essex ferrari owners club - Az lyrics katy perry firework - Simon quotes lord of the flies chapter 3 - Topic 6 DQ1 &2 - The fun they had short story - Apple compensation plan - Asalamalakim meaning - Sizzling start examples year 6 - I ever seen the rain - Brian herbert net worth - Carrefour case study international business - How to make a decision tree in rapidminer - Prepare a business case for the global treps project - Mgco3 mgo co2 type of reaction - Anatomical directional terms and body planes quiz - Problem Solver - Aldi green action eucalyptus oil multi-purpose cleaner - Cisco business edition 6000 installation guide - Savings plan formula excel - Disadvantages of on demand business aviation - Case study 2 collaboration systems at isuzu australia limited - Projecto o Dossier - Prominent fluid controls pty ltd - Willis corporation manufactures industrial size gas furnaces and uses - History - Uncle pudgy's pizza west seneca menu - Temptation island season 2 episode 9 reddit - Biome activity high school - Nmc revalidation completed templates - Cascade control loop example - Agingwithdignity org forms 5wishes pdf - Coventry university solar portal - Jim houghton northwestern mutual - 67m2 to sq ft - Answer any one of the questions below: - Newspaper articles with descriptive statistics - 75 egans road oakdale - Words with im prefix - Focus on what non-executives need to know regarding technology. - Cultural Differences Paper - Industry vs inferiority erik erikson - How to read literature like a professor chapter 24 summary - List the four possible subshells in the quantum-mechanical model.