Data Mining
Cluster Analysis: Basic Concepts
and Algorithms
Lecture Notes for Chapter 8
Introduction to Data Mining
by
Tan, Steinbach, Kumar
© Tan,Steinbach, Kumar Introduction to Data Mining 4/18/2004 *
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
What is Cluster Analysis?
Finding groups of objects such that the objects in a group will be similar (or related) to one another and different from (or unrelated to) the objects in other groups
Inter-cluster distances are maximized
Intra-cluster distances are minimized
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Applications of Cluster Analysis
Understanding
Group related documents for browsing, group genes and proteins that have similar functionality, or group stocks with similar price fluctuations
Summarization
Reduce the size of large data sets
Clustering precipitation in Australia
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Discovered Clusters
Industry Group
1
Applied-Matl-DOWN,Bay-Network-Down,3-COM-DOWN,
Cabletron-Sys-DOWN,CISCO-DOWN,HP-DOWN,
DSC-Comm-DOWN,INTEL-DOWN,LSI-Logic-DOWN,
Micron-Tech-DOWN,Texas-Inst-Down,Tellabs-Inc-Down,
Natl-Semiconduct-DOWN,Oracl-DOWN,SGI-DOWN,
Sun-DOWN
Technology1-DOWN
2
Apple-Comp-DOWN,Autodesk-DOWN,DEC-DOWN,
ADV-Micro-Device-DOWN,Andrew-Corp-DOWN,
Computer-Assoc-DOWN,Circuit-City-DOWN,
Compaq-DOWN, EMC-Corp-DOWN, Gen-Inst-DOWN,
Motorola-DOWN,Microsoft-DOWN,Scientific-Atl-DOWN
Technology2-DOWN
3
Fannie-Mae-DOWN,Fed-Home-Loan-DOWN,
MBNA-Corp-DOWN,Morgan-Stanley-DOWN
Financial-DOWN
4
Baker-Hughes-UP,Dresser-Inds-UP,Halliburton-HLD-UP,
Louisiana-Land-UP,Phillips-Petro-UP,Unocal-UP,
Schlumberger-UP
Oil-UP
What is not Cluster Analysis?
Supervised classification
Have class label information
Simple segmentation
Dividing students into different registration groups alphabetically, by last name
Results of a query
Groupings are a result of an external specification
Graph partitioning
Some mutual relevance and synergy, but areas are not identical
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Notion of a Cluster can be Ambiguous
How many clusters?
Four Clusters
Two Clusters
Six Clusters
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Types of Clusterings
A clustering is a set of clusters
Important distinction between hierarchical and partitional sets of clusters
Partitional Clustering
A division data objects into non-overlapping subsets (clusters) such that each data object is in exactly one subset
Hierarchical clustering
A set of nested clusters organized as a hierarchical tree
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Partitional Clustering
Original Points
A Partitional Clustering
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Hierarchical Clustering
Traditional Hierarchical Clustering
Non-traditional Hierarchical Clustering
Non-traditional Dendrogram
Traditional Dendrogram
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Other Distinctions Between Sets of Clusters
Exclusive versus non-exclusive
In non-exclusive clusterings, points may belong to multiple clusters.
Can represent multiple classes or ‘border’ points
Fuzzy versus non-fuzzy
In fuzzy clustering, a point belongs to every cluster with some weight between 0 and 1
Weights must sum to 1
Probabilistic clustering has similar characteristics
Partial versus complete
In some cases, we only want to cluster some of the data
Heterogeneous versus homogeneous
Cluster of widely different sizes, shapes, and densities
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Types of Clusters
Well-separated clusters
Center-based clusters
Contiguous clusters
Density-based clusters
Property or Conceptual
Described by an Objective Function
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Types of Clusters: Well-Separated
Well-Separated Clusters:
A cluster is a set of points such that any point in a cluster is closer (or more similar) to every other point in the cluster than to any point not in the cluster.
3 well-separated clusters
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Types of Clusters: Center-Based
Center-based
A cluster is a set of objects such that an object in a cluster is closer (more similar) to the “center” of a cluster, than to the center of any other cluster
The center of a cluster is often a centroid, the average of all the points in the cluster, or a medoid, the most “representative” point of a cluster
4 center-based clusters
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Types of Clusters: Contiguity-Based
Contiguous Cluster (Nearest neighbor or Transitive)
A cluster is a set of points such that a point in a cluster is closer (or more similar) to one or more other points in the cluster than to any point not in the cluster.
8 contiguous clusters
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Types of Clusters: Density-Based
Density-based
A cluster is a dense region of points, which is separated by low-density regions, from other regions of high density.
Used when the clusters are irregular or intertwined, and when noise and outliers are present.
6 density-based clusters
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Types of Clusters: Conceptual Clusters
Shared Property or Conceptual Clusters
Finds clusters that share some common property or represent a particular concept.
.
2 Overlapping Circles
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Types of Clusters: Objective Function
Clusters Defined by an Objective Function
Finds clusters that minimize or maximize an objective function.
Enumerate all possible ways of dividing the points into clusters and evaluate the `goodness' of each potential set of clusters by using the given objective function. (NP Hard)
Can have global or local objectives.
Hierarchical clustering algorithms typically have local objectives
Partitional algorithms typically have global objectives
A variation of the global objective function approach is to fit the data to a parameterized model.
Parameters for the model are determined from the data.
Mixture models assume that the data is a ‘mixture' of a number of statistical distributions.
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Types of Clusters: Objective Function …
Map the clustering problem to a different domain and solve a related problem in that domain
Proximity matrix defines a weighted graph, where the nodes are the points being clustered, and the weighted edges represent the proximities between points
Clustering is equivalent to breaking the graph into connected components, one for each cluster.
Want to minimize the edge weight between clusters and maximize the edge weight within clusters
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Characteristics of the Input Data Are Important
Type of proximity or density measure
This is a derived measure, but central to clustering
Sparseness
Dictates type of similarity
Adds to efficiency
Attribute type
Dictates type of similarity
Type of Data
Dictates type of similarity
Other characteristics, e.g., autocorrelation
Dimensionality
Noise and Outliers
Type of Distribution
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Clustering Algorithms
K-means and its variants
Hierarchical clustering
Density-based clustering
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
K-means Clustering
Partitional clustering approach
Each cluster is associated with a centroid (center point)
Each point is assigned to the cluster with the closest centroid
Number of clusters, K, must be specified
The basic algorithm is very simple
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
K-means Clustering – Details
Initial centroids are often chosen randomly.
Clusters produced vary from one run to another.
The centroid is (typically) the mean of the points in the cluster.
‘Closeness’ is measured by Euclidean distance, cosine similarity, correlation, etc.
K-means will converge for common similarity measures mentioned above.
Most of the convergence happens in the first few iterations.
Often the stopping condition is changed to ‘Until relatively few points change clusters’
Complexity is O( n * K * I * d )
n = number of points, K = number of clusters,
I = number of iterations, d = number of attributes
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Two different K-means Clusterings
Original Points
Sub-optimal Clustering
Optimal Clustering
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Importance of Choosing Initial Centroids
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Importance of Choosing Initial Centroids
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Evaluating K-means Clusters
Most common measure is Sum of Squared Error (SSE)
For each point, the error is the distance to the nearest cluster
To get SSE, we square these errors and sum them.
x is a data point in cluster Ci and mi is the representative point for cluster Ci
can show that mi corresponds to the center (mean) of the cluster
Given two clusters, we can choose the one with the smallest error
One easy way to reduce SSE is to increase K, the number of clusters
A good clustering with smaller K can have a lower SSE than a poor clustering with higher K
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Importance of Choosing Initial Centroids …
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Importance of Choosing Initial Centroids …
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Problems with Selecting Initial Points
If there are K ‘real’ clusters then the chance of selecting one centroid from each cluster is small.
Chance is relatively small when K is large
If clusters are the same size, n, then
For example, if K = 10, then probability = 10!/1010 = 0.00036
Sometimes the initial centroids will readjust themselves in ‘right’ way, and sometimes they don’t
Consider an example of five pairs of clusters
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
10 Clusters Example
Starting with two initial centroids in one cluster of each pair of clusters
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
10 Clusters Example
Starting with two initial centroids in one cluster of each pair of clusters
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
10 Clusters Example
Starting with some pairs of clusters having three initial centroids, while other have only one.
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
10 Clusters Example
Starting with some pairs of clusters having three initial centroids, while other have only one.
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Solutions to Initial Centroids Problem
Multiple runs
Helps, but probability is not on your side
Sample and use hierarchical clustering to determine initial centroids
Select more than k initial centroids and then select among these initial centroids
Select most widely separated
Postprocessing
Bisecting K-means
Not as susceptible to initialization issues
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Handling Empty Clusters
Basic K-means algorithm can yield empty clusters
Several strategies
Choose the point that contributes most to SSE
Choose a point from the cluster with the highest SSE
If there are several empty clusters, the above can be repeated several times.
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Updating Centers Incrementally
In the basic K-means algorithm, centroids are updated after all points are assigned to a centroid
An alternative is to update the centroids after each assignment (incremental approach)
Each assignment updates zero or two centroids
More expensive
Introduces an order dependency
Never get an empty cluster
Can use “weights” to change the impact
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Pre-processing and Post-processing
Pre-processing
Normalize the data
Eliminate outliers
Post-processing
Eliminate small clusters that may represent outliers
Split ‘loose’ clusters, i.e., clusters with relatively high SSE
Merge clusters that are ‘close’ and that have relatively low SSE
Can use these steps during the clustering process
ISODATA
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Bisecting K-means
Bisecting K-means algorithm
Variant of K-means that can produce a partitional or a hierarchical clustering
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Bisecting K-means Example
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Limitations of K-means
K-means has problems when clusters are of differing
Sizes
Densities
Non-globular shapes
K-means has problems when the data contains outliers.
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Limitations of K-means: Differing Sizes
Original Points
K-means (3 Clusters)
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Limitations of K-means: Differing Density
Original Points
K-means (3 Clusters)
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Limitations of K-means: Non-globular Shapes
Original Points
K-means (2 Clusters)
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Overcoming K-means Limitations
Original Points K-means Clusters
One solution is to use many clusters.
Find parts of clusters, but need to put together.
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Overcoming K-means Limitations
Original Points K-means Clusters
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Overcoming K-means Limitations
Original Points K-means Clusters
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Hierarchical Clustering
Produces a set of nested clusters organized as a hierarchical tree
Can be visualized as a dendrogram
A tree like diagram that records the sequences of merges or splits
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Strengths of Hierarchical Clustering
Do not have to assume any particular number of clusters
Any desired number of clusters can be obtained by ‘cutting’ the dendogram at the proper level
They may correspond to meaningful taxonomies
Example in biological sciences (e.g., animal kingdom, phylogeny reconstruction, …)
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Hierarchical Clustering
Two main types of hierarchical clustering
Agglomerative:
Start with the points as individual clusters
At each step, merge the closest pair of clusters until only one cluster (or k clusters) left
Divisive:
Start with one, all-inclusive cluster
At each step, split a cluster until each cluster contains a point (or there are k clusters)
Traditional hierarchical algorithms use a similarity or distance matrix
Merge or split one cluster at a time
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Agglomerative Clustering Algorithm
More popular hierarchical clustering technique
Basic algorithm is straightforward
Compute the proximity matrix
Let each data point be a cluster
Repeat
Merge the two closest clusters
Update the proximity matrix
Until only a single cluster remains
Key operation is the computation of the proximity of two clusters
Different approaches to defining the distance between clusters distinguish the different algorithms
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Starting Situation
Start with clusters of individual points and a proximity matrix
Proximity Matrix
p1
p3
p5
p4
p2
p1
p2
p3
p4
p5
. . .
.
.
.
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
...�
p1�
p2�
p3�
p4�
p9�
p10�
p11�
p12�
Intermediate Situation
After some merging steps, we have some clusters
C1
C4
C2
C5
C3
Proximity Matrix
C2
C1
C1
C3
C5
C4
C2
C3
C4
C5
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
...�
p1�
p2�
p3�
p4�
p9�
p10�
p11�
p12�
Intermediate Situation
We want to merge the two closest clusters (C2 and C5) and update the proximity matrix.
C1
C4
C2
C5
C3
Proximity Matrix
C2
C1
C1
C3
C5
C4
C2
C3
C4
C5
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
...�
p1�
p2�
p3�
p4�
p9�
p10�
p11�
p12�
After Merging
The question is “How do we update the proximity matrix?”
C1
C4
C2 U C5
C3
? ? ? ?
?
?
?
C2 U C5
C1
C1
C3
C4
C2 U C5
C3
C4
Proximity Matrix
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
...�
p1�
p2�
p3�
p4�
p9�
p10�
p11�
p12�
How to Define Inter-Cluster Similarity
Similarity?
MIN
MAX
Group Average
Distance Between Centroids
Other methods driven by an objective function
Ward’s Method uses squared error
Proximity Matrix
p1
p3
p5
p4
p2
p1
p2
p3
p4
p5
. . .
.
.
.
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
How to Define Inter-Cluster Similarity
Proximity Matrix
MIN
MAX
Group Average
Distance Between Centroids
Other methods driven by an objective function
Ward’s Method uses squared error
p1
p3
p5
p4
p2
p1
p2
p3
p4
p5
. . .
.
.
.
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
How to Define Inter-Cluster Similarity
Proximity Matrix
MIN
MAX
Group Average
Distance Between Centroids
Other methods driven by an objective function
Ward’s Method uses squared error
p1
p3
p5
p4
p2
p1
p2
p3
p4
p5
. . .
.
.
.
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
How to Define Inter-Cluster Similarity
Proximity Matrix
MIN
MAX
Group Average
Distance Between Centroids
Other methods driven by an objective function
Ward’s Method uses squared error
p1
p3
p5
p4
p2
p1
p2
p3
p4
p5
. . .
.
.
.
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
How to Define Inter-Cluster Similarity
Proximity Matrix
MIN
MAX
Group Average
Distance Between Centroids
Other methods driven by an objective function
Ward’s Method uses squared error
p1
p3
p5
p4
p2
p1
p2
p3
p4
p5
. . .
.
.
.
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Cluster Similarity: MIN or Single Link
Similarity of two clusters is based on the two most similar (closest) points in the different clusters
Determined by one pair of points, i.e., by one link in the proximity graph.
1
2
3
4
5
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Sheet1
I1 I2 I3 I4 I5
I1 1.00 0.90 0.10 0.65 0.20
I2 0.90 1.00 0.70 0.60 0.50
I3 0.10 0.70 1.00 0.40 0.30
I4 0.65 0.60 0.40 1.00 0.80
I5 0.20 0.50 0.30 0.80 1.00
Sheet2
Sheet3
Hierarchical Clustering: MIN
Nested Clusters
Dendrogram
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Strength of MIN
Original Points
Can handle non-elliptical shapes
Two Clusters
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Limitations of MIN
Original Points
Sensitive to noise and outliers
Two Clusters
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Cluster Similarity: MAX or Complete Linkage
Similarity of two clusters is based on the two least similar (most distant) points in the different clusters
Determined by all pairs of points in the two clusters
1
2
3
4
5
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Sheet1
I1 I2 I3 I4 I5
I1 1.00 0.90 0.10 0.65 0.20
I2 0.90 1.00 0.70 0.60 0.50
I3 0.10 0.70 1.00 0.40 0.30
I4 0.65 0.60 0.40 1.00 0.80
I5 0.20 0.50 0.30 0.80 1.00
Sheet2
Sheet3
Hierarchical Clustering: MAX
Nested Clusters
Dendrogram
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
5
3
4
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Strength of MAX
Original Points
Less susceptible to noise and outliers
Two Clusters
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Limitations of MAX
Original Points
Tends to break large clusters
Biased towards globular clusters
Two Clusters
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Cluster Similarity: Group Average
Proximity of two clusters is the average of pairwise proximity between points in the two clusters.
Need to use average connectivity for scalability since total proximity favors large clusters
1
2
3
4
5
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Sheet1
I1 I2 I3 I4 I5
I1 1.00 0.90 0.10 0.65 0.20
I2 0.90 1.00 0.70 0.60 0.50
I3 0.10 0.70 1.00 0.40 0.30
I4 0.65 0.60 0.40 1.00 0.80
I5 0.20 0.50 0.30 0.80 1.00
Sheet2
Sheet3
Hierarchical Clustering: Group Average
Nested Clusters
Dendrogram
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
5
3
4
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Hierarchical Clustering: Group Average
Compromise between Single and Complete Link
Strengths
Less susceptible to noise and outliers
Limitations
Biased towards globular clusters
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Cluster Similarity: Ward’s Method
Similarity of two clusters is based on the increase in squared error when two clusters are merged
Similar to group average if distance between points is distance squared
Less susceptible to noise and outliers
Biased towards globular clusters
Hierarchical analogue of K-means
Can be used to initialize K-means
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Hierarchical Clustering: Comparison
Group Average
Ward’s Method
MIN
MAX
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
5
3
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
5
3
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
5
3
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Hierarchical Clustering: Time and Space requirements
O(N2) space since it uses the proximity matrix.
N is the number of points.
O(N3) time in many cases
There are N steps and at each step the size, N2, proximity matrix must be updated and searched
Complexity can be reduced to O(N2 log(N) ) time for some approaches
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Hierarchical Clustering: Problems and Limitations
Once a decision is made to combine two clusters, it cannot be undone
No objective function is directly minimized
Different schemes have problems with one or more of the following:
Sensitivity to noise and outliers
Difficulty handling different sized clusters and convex shapes
Breaking large clusters
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
MST: Divisive Hierarchical Clustering
Build MST (Minimum Spanning Tree)
Start with a tree that consists of any point
In successive steps, look for the closest pair of points (p, q) such that one point (p) is in the current tree but the other (q) is not
Add q to the tree and put an edge between p and q
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
MST: Divisive Hierarchical Clustering
Use MST for constructing hierarchy of clusters
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
DBSCAN
DBSCAN is a density-based algorithm.
Density = number of points within a specified radius (Eps)
A point is a core point if it has more than a specified number of points (MinPts) within Eps
These are points that are at the interior of a cluster
A border point has fewer than MinPts within Eps, but is in the neighborhood of a core point
A noise point is any point that is not a core point or a border point.
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
DBSCAN: Core, Border, and Noise Points
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
DBSCAN Algorithm
Eliminate noise points
Perform clustering on the remaining points
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
DBSCAN: Core, Border and Noise Points
Original Points
Point types: core, border and noise
Eps = 10, MinPts = 4
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
When DBSCAN Works Well
Original Points
Resistant to Noise
Can handle clusters of different shapes and sizes
Clusters
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
When DBSCAN Does NOT Work Well
Original Points
(MinPts=4, Eps=9.75).
(MinPts=4, Eps=9.92)
Varying densities
High-dimensional data
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
2955.bin
2956.bin
DBSCAN: Determining EPS and MinPts
Idea is that for points in a cluster, their kth nearest neighbors are at roughly the same distance
Noise points have the kth nearest neighbor at farther distance
So, plot sorted distance of every point to its kth nearest neighbor
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Cluster Validity
For supervised classification we have a variety of measures to evaluate how good our model is
Accuracy, precision, recall
For cluster analysis, the analogous question is how to evaluate the “goodness” of the resulting clusters?
But “clusters are in the eye of the beholder”!
Then why do we want to evaluate them?
To avoid finding patterns in noise
To compare clustering algorithms
To compare two sets of clusters
To compare two clusters
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Clusters found in Random Data
Random Points
K-means
DBSCAN
Complete Link
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Different Aspects of Cluster Validation
Determining the clustering tendency of a set of data, i.e., distinguishing whether non-random structure actually exists in the data.
Comparing the results of a cluster analysis to externally known results, e.g., to externally given class labels.
Evaluating how well the results of a cluster analysis fit the data without reference to external information.
- Use only the data
Comparing the results of two different sets of cluster analyses to determine which is better.
Determining the ‘correct’ number of clusters.
For 2, 3, and 4, we can further distinguish whether we want to evaluate the entire clustering or just individual clusters.
(C) Vipin Kumar, Parallel Issues in Data Mining, VECPAR 2002
Measures of Cluster Validity
Numerical measures that are applied to judge various aspects of cluster validity, are classified into the following three types.
External Index: Used to measure the extent to which cluster labels match externally supplied class labels.
Entropy
Internal Index: Used to measure the goodness of a clustering structure without respect to external information.
Sum of Squared Error (SSE)
Relative Index: Used to compare two different clusterings or clusters.
Often an external or internal index is used for this function, e.g., SSE or entropy
Sometimes these are referred to as criteria instead of indices
However, sometimes criterion is the general strategy and index is the numerical measure that implements the criterion.