A Rose for Emily
The narrative that was is written mostly in the first-person perspective as the narrator speaks for both the men and women of the town of Jefferson. The narrative also spans three generations of Jeffersonian, which include her father’s generation, Miss Emily’s generation and the newer generation that included s—stay in present tense the children of Miss Emily’s contemporaries. From an analysis of the first two generations, it is very clear that their attitude towards Miss Emily led to her ruin. This scrutiny shone a new light on the narrative making it seem like a confessional story. This seems to be taken directly from http://www.shmoop.com/a-rose-for-emily/narrator-point-of-view.html
Nonetheless, it is clear that no one person in the town of Jefferson was completely responsible for what happened to her (Fargnoli and Golay). Though others played a much significant awkward role, all the people of the town had a play role in her downfall and eventual death. Mention the title of the story and the author in the introduction
The narrative begins with the unreal ceremony of Miss Emily Grierson, apart from her servants; no one has been to her house for over ten years. Considering the age of her house, it was one of the best in the region, but due to neglect and poor maintenance, it had deteriorated. Verb tense shift—stay in present tense Moreover, there was a special agreement between Miss Emily and the town where they stopped taxing her from 1894 (Kelly). Should be (Faulkner) However, the contemporary generation that would have included Miss Emily’s children was not happy with the agreement stating that the old arrangement was not applicable anymore, so in retaliation, she utterly refused to pay. The agreement on not paying her taxes can be dated back thirty years prior when tax collectors of the town were encountered by a strange smell that emanated from Miss Emily’s house. This smell came about after her lover recently disappeared from her life, and her father had just died two years before (Kelly). Being considerate of her misfortune, when the smell got stronger, the town authorities did not confront her but rather poured lime around her house dissipating the odor. This seems like you are just summarizing the story. How does this help support your thesis? Also, this seems very similar to http://www.shmoop.com/a-rose-for-emily/summary.html just reworded
It is clear from the action of the town’s authority that everybody in the town was remorseful on her behalf especially after her father died. She was left with no money but only the house, comma splice the reality of this did not settle well with her for three days (Kelly). One could argue that her father had stolen her youth from her, but the town did not think that she was mentally unstable, rather than she did not let go of her father’s death. From this analysis, we see how the town’s people are supportive and considerate on some matters that involved Emily, from the death of her father and Disappearance of her lover. http://www.shmoop.com/a-rose-for-emily/summary.html reworded but very similar
The second part of the narrative doubles back and tells the audience of Emily’s love life not long after her father was buried. She began dating Homer Barron, a worker on the sidewalk project. The part in which the town is believed to have played a critical part in her actions was when they disapproved of the affair (Kelly). The town went a step further and contacted Emily’s cousins to stop the relationship that was growing between her and Homer. It can be speculated this action is what drove her to do some of the unexpected. They speculated that Homer had broken off the affair and she was going to kill herself when she was spotted buying arsenic from the local drugstore. http://www.shmoop.com/a-rose-for-emily/summary.html
The gossip and stereotyping did not stop there as they assumed and spread rumors that she was going to get married to Homer when she was again seen buying men’s items. This was after Homer and Emily’s cousins left town and a few days later Homer returned to Jefferson. The last time Homer Barron was seen was when he came back and entered Emily’s house (Kelly). Emily also was rarely spotted outside her house after that day except for six years when she was taking up painting lessons. http://www.shmoop.com/a-rose-for-emily/summary.html
Over time, her hair turned gray, and she gained weight, she then dies a few years later in one of the downstairs bedrooms that had not seen the light for years (Fargnoli and Golay). The narrative at this point doubles back again to her funeral, Miss Emily’s servant Tobe lets in the town’s women into Emily’s house and exits with the back door never to be seen again. After Emily was buried, the townspeople broke down a door that had not been opened for decades, and inside they find the corpse of Homer Baron (Fargnoli and Golay). The second part of the narrative identifies that the town played an important role in the death of Homer. They interfered in a matter that did not concern them, and when Homer came back to break off the relationship with Emily, he was killed. Her life was filled with the loss after the death of her father, poverty after she was not left with any coin in her name and loneliness (Kelly). Should be (Faulkner) Emily was the icon of the town, and everyone in the town of Jefferson wanted to know about her life. Homer also played a role in his death when he went around town telling people that he had voluptuous word choice relations with Miss Emily. The Arsenic that was bought had a symbolic meaning considering it as used for killing rats and in this narrative, Homer Baron was the rat for telling the town about is relations.
This essay story was chosen because it has several messages that require in-depth analysis to understand. Moreover, it identifies the fact that actions committed by individuals have a motivator. The understanding of the play was arrived at after the protagonist of the play, Emily was analyzed as an individual and not a part of the play. The points made in the essay include the fact that the people around Emily drove her to committing the action and that Homer played a role in his own death. This information was attained after not only analyzing Emily but the main characters that included Emily’s Father, Homer Baron and the people of Jefferson. From this essay, the reader should see that the actions committed by Emily were as a result of pressure from her society, and the fact that with the right attack to a play, hidden interpretations can be discovered. I’m assuming this is your writing summation? It should be separate from the essay and should not serve as the conclusion to your essay. Your essay should have a conclusion paragraph that wraps everything up. Much of your paper seems to be taken from Shmoop, although you have taken pains to reword it. That’s not OK, and it also leads to a paper that really doesn’t do much analyzing. Please do your own work and do not use the work of others as your own. As you know, this is plagiarism. Grade: 47.83%
Works Cited
Mays, Kelly J. The Norton Introduction to Literature. 12th ed., New York, NY, W. W. Norton & Company, Inc, 2017. Not correct, see below
Faulkner, William. “A Rose for Emily.” The Norton Introduction to Literature. 12th ed. Kelly J. Mays, ed. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc, 2017. Page numbers of story. Print.
The Norton Introduction to literature is a book that offers the perfect combination of stories, poetry and plays that are used in literature courses. It was used when referring to William Faulkner’s “A rose for Emily”, it provided highly teachable work that engages the reader on multiple perspectives on a single topic. It has the advantage of exploring every work in depth making the lessons to be learned from the book easier to understand and identify. This includes coverage of insightful ideas, interpretations and arguments such as that of “A Rose for Emily.”
Fargnoli, A. Nicholas, and Michael Golay. Critical Companion To William Faulkner. 1st ed., New York, NY, Infobase Publishing, 2009. Print.
The book contains a collection of William Faulkner’s collection of short stories and plays as well as possible interpretations that the stories and plays had when the narrator created them. When it comes to the play of “A Rose for Emily”, comma goes inside it identifies some of the messages that were in the play. However, it tries to analyze the play in depth but comes short due to compression comparison? with other plays.