The anthropocentric viewpoint implies that

Future Generations

Environmental ethics

Environmental ethics is the subject of thinking that examines the moral association of human beings to the environment, their significance, and moral standing, against that of the human status. There are many key concepts related to environmental ethics (Keller, 2010). They tend to correlate the character of human beings to their immediate environment.

Anthropocentrism

Anthropocentrism is a view that believes that human beings are the most significant beings in the universe and construes or views the world in terms of human standards and experiences. The anthropocentric distinction, therefore, tends to explain human behavior individualistically of environmental attitudes assessed with a standard mindset scale.

Ecocentrism

Ecocentrism is a viewpoint that assigns a value to all living things and their natural environment, regardless of their supposed value or significance to human beings. This makes ecocentrics contend that the natural world must be revered for its processes and products and that low bearing technology and self-sufficiency is more advantageous than technological manipulation of nature. They, therefore, lack faith in modern technology making them more nature centered rather than human-centered.

Zoocentrism

Zoocentrismis a theory that focuses on animals giving them moral standing. This has made advancements to be made so as to form foundations to protect the rights of the animals since they are also regarded as part of nature.

Biocentrism

Biocentrism encompasses a modification in the understanding of scientific knowledge that may well bring about a new interpretation of problems that range from philosophical to the physical. A good example is a free will whereby living organisms are able to make uninhibited choices in a world that has almost all types of qualities making it become a paradox.

Environmental justice

Environmental justice is the just treatment and meaningful participation of all persons apart from race, color, national origin, or income concerning the advancement, execution, and administration of environmental laws, regulations and policies (Sandler, 2009). This key aspect tends to protect the environmental health hazards thus giving a chance to the equal policymaking procedure to have a wholesome environment to reside, study, and work within (Radcliffe, J. 2000). This implies that the environment needs to be conserved and activities such as mining that destroy the natural scenery must be stopped.

References:

Keller, D. R. (2010). Environmental Ethics: The big questions. John Wiley & Sons.

Radcliffe, J. (2000). Chapter 4 – The need for an environmental ethic. In Green Politics. New York, NY: Pelgrave Publishers. Retrieved from the ebrary database.

Sandler, R. L. (2009). Character and Environment: A virtue-oriented approach to environmental ethics. Columbia University Press.