Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

The investment detective case 17

08/10/2021 Client: muhammad11 Deadline: 2 Day

Case Study: The Investment Detective

1. Can you rank the projects simply by inspecting the cash flows?
2. What criteria might you use to rank the projects? Which quantitative ranking methods are better? Why?
3. What is the ranking you found by using quantitative methods? Does this ranking differ from the ranking obtained by simple inspection of the cash flows?
4. What kinds of real investment projects have cash flows similar to those in Exhibit 1?

The investment Detective

Answer Q1:

We can rank the projects by simply inspecting the cash flows (mention bellow), yet it’s not a good measure to rank them.

We can’t rank the projects by only simple inspection of the cash flows because of the time value of money and cost of capital of companies. We use capital budgeting tools to measure financial performance of projects.

The Ranking by simply inspecting the cash flows:

Rank

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

5th

6th

7th

8th

Projects

3

5

8

4

1

7

6

2

Cash Flows

$10,000

$4,200

$4,150

$3,561

$3,310

$2,560

$2,200

$2,165

Answer Q2:

In order to rank these projects, in a purely quantitative manner, we used the following for the 8 projects:

A. Net Present Value (NPV)

B. Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

C. Payback Period (PP)

D. Profitability Index (PI)

A. Net Present Value (NPV)

Year

Project 1

Project 2

Project 3

Project 4

Project 5

Project 6

Project 7

Project 8

0

($2,000)

($2,000)

($2,000)

($2,000)

($2,000)

($2,000)

($2,000)

($2,000)

1

300.00

1,514.55

-

145.45

254.55

2,000.00

1,090.91

(318.18 )

2

272.73

276.03

-

165.29

231.40

-

743.80

(49.59)

3

247.93

123.97

-

262.96

210.37

-

225.39

45.08

4

225.39

-

-

269.79

191.24

-

61.47

239.05

5

204.90

-

-

268.24

173.86

-

43.46

434.64

6

186.28

-

-

248.37

158.05

-

-

677.37

7

169.34

-

-

226.82

143.68

-

-

1,154.61

8

466.51

-

-

207.13

130.62

-

-

-

9

-

-

-

189.15

118.75

-

-

-

10

-

-

-

172.72

107.95

-

-

-

11

-

-

-

157.72

98.14

-

-

-

12

-

-

-

143.70

89.22

-

-

-

13

-

-

-

130.64

81.11

-

-

-

14

-

-

-

119.03

73.73

-

-

-

15

-

-

-

-

67.03

-

-

-

S PV(CF)

2,073.086

1,914.545

2,393.920

2,228.222

2,129.702

2,000

2,165.041

2,182.984

NPV

73.086

(85.455)

393.920

228.222

129.702

0

165.041

182.984

Rank

6th

8th

1st

2nd

5th

7th

4th

3rd

B. Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

Projects

Project 1

Project 2

Project 3

Project 4

Project 5

Project 6

Project 7

Project 8

IRR

10.87%

6.31%

11.33%

12.33%

11.12%

10.00%

15.26%

11.41%

Rank

6th

8th

4th

2nd

5th

7th

1st

3rd

All of these projects are accepted except Project 2 because its cost of capital has higher percentage than the percentage project internal rate of return. Moreover, Project 6 will be a subject of be in different because the cost of capital equal to internal rate of return, which lead to break even project.

COC = 10%

C. Payback Period (PP)

In Payback Period there are two method, non-discounted cash flow and discounted cash flow. Drawback of non-discounted cash flow does not consider TVM and the rate of return, and the discounted cash flow does not examine all the cash flows.

Projects

Project 1

Project 2

Project 3

Project 4

Project 5

Project 6

Project 7

Project 8

Payback Year

7

2

15

6

8

1

2

7

Payback

2,310

2,000

10,000

1,977

2,240

2,200

2,100

4,150

Discounted Payback

1,606.58

1,790.58

2,393.92

1,360.10

1,493.78

2,000

1,834.71

2,182.98

Decision (DPP)

Reject

Reject

Accept

Reject

Reject

Be in different

Reject

Accept

Rank

6th

5th

1st

8th

7th

3rd

4th

2nd

D. Profitability Index (PI)

Projects

Project 1

Project 2

Project 3

Project 4

Project 5

Project 6

Project 7

Project 8

PI

1.037

0.957

1.197

1.092

1.065

1.000

1.083

1.0773

Rank

6th

8th

1st

2nd

5th

7th

3rd

4th

All the projects will be undertaken except for project 8 since it is mutually exclusive with project 7, and project 6 and 2 will not be undertaken since they have IRR that is less than the 10%, the discount rate. Project 1 also might not be taken since “certain officers of the company have recently asserted that the discount rate should be much higher.”

Rank

1st

2nd

Project

8

7

IRR

11.41%

15.26%

NPV

182.98

165.04

Since these two projects are mutually exclusive and have the IRR above 10%, Project 8 will be chosen because it has higher NPV.

Rank

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

5th

6th

7th

8th

Project

3

4

8

7

5

1

6

2

PI

1.197

1.092

1.083

1.0773

1.065

1.037

1.000

0.957

All the projects will be undertaken except for project 7 since it is mutually exclusive with project 8, and project 6 and 2 will not be undertaken since they have PI’s equal to 1 and 0.957, because they are not greater than 1.

Selected Projects as per the quantitative methods as follow:

Rank

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

Projects

Projects 3

Projects 4

Projects 8

Projects 5

• Comparing the quantitative methods, we noticed that project 3 scored 1st four times using simple inspections of cash flows, NPV, PP, and PI. Project 7 however, scored 1st only through using the IRR method. Looking on the last ranked projects, project 2 has scored last 4 times using simple inspections of cash flows, NPV, IRR, and PI.

• Net Present Value is considered the best approach since it:

i. Uses Cash Flows.

ii. Uses all the Cash Flows of the project.

iii. And discounts the Cash Flows properly.

And through using the NPV approach, Project 3 got the highest NPV, 393.92, and then comes 4, 8, 5 and 1.

Answer 3:

Selected Projects as per the quantitative methods as follow:

Rank

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

Projects

Projects 3

Projects 4

Projects 8

Projects 5

The above table showing that it is absolutely the rank will be differ from the ranking obtain by simple inception of the cash flow

Answer 4:

Project 1 Bonds

Project 2 Equipment Depreciation

Project 3 Land or real assets investments

Project 4 Diary factory that incur agricultural costs

Project 5 Car Loan

Project 6 Stock

Project 7 Trucks Depreciation

Project 8 Construction projects

0.10865030333732562 6.3088234267993482E-2 0.11326357684480115 0.12328333077501186 0.11121604343002223 0.10000000000000009 0.15257139008454979 0.1140642023834566

IRR

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Financial Solutions Provider
Smart Homework Helper
Top Quality Assignments
Coursework Help Online
High Quality Assignments
Assignments Hut
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Financial Solutions Provider

ONLINE

Financial Solutions Provider

I am known as Unrivaled Quality, Written to Standard, providing Plagiarism-free woork, and Always on Time

$42 Chat With Writer
Smart Homework Helper

ONLINE

Smart Homework Helper

I am known as Unrivaled Quality, Written to Standard, providing Plagiarism-free woork, and Always on Time

$24 Chat With Writer
Top Quality Assignments

ONLINE

Top Quality Assignments

I have read your project details. I can do this within your deadline.

$40 Chat With Writer
Coursework Help Online

ONLINE

Coursework Help Online

Hello, I an ranked top 10 freelancers in academic and contents writing. I can write and updated your personal statement with great quality and free of plagiarism

$36 Chat With Writer
High Quality Assignments

ONLINE

High Quality Assignments

You can award me any time as I am ready to start your project curiously. Waiting for your positive response. Thank you!

$45 Chat With Writer
Assignments Hut

ONLINE

Assignments Hut

I have read and understood all your initial requirements, and I am very professional in this task.

$22 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

EH 7 - Http www imdb com title tt1488555 - 【HumsafaR--World Famous】+91-9924492424 Love Problem Solution Specialist Baba Ji - 16 characteristics of critical thinkers - Christchurch to poole bus - Animal farm chapter 7 quiz - Problems facing domino's pizza - Sweetness and power chapter 4 summary - The soleus muscle shares an insertion with the __________ - Homework - The use of mobile phones must be allowed in school - Q tech fire suppression - Borgwarner it services europe gmbh - Compare two presentation programs - Benzene reacts with propene and sulfuric acid - Team rocket kekeke pokemon go - The story of the human body by daniel lieberman - How have economic forecasts for this country evolved - Tarasoff v regents university of california - Http www studygs net attmot4 htm - Mat 144 major assignment 1 - Organizational theory design and development pdf - W5 prompt 4 - Two eigenvalues of a 3x3 matrix - An aptitude for a job implies a - Cfliving com - What does the jabberwocky look like - Deprag d 92224 amberg manual - Independent variable in zimbardo's experiment - Eco 550 assignment 1 - Six sigma in software engineering ppt - Discussion question - Css 202 exam 2 - Company's positive experience with implementing erp - Scattergories board game rules - Capstone Change Project Outcomes - Data mining application domains are mcq - Can you feel the love tonight - Legally ours nicole french read online - Business Plan - Lync online web app - Unsw business school scholarships - Demolition control precinct map - Make your own historical marker online - What are some of the changes that ann cooper made - Mathematical methods and models for economists pdf - Construct an amortization schedule for a - Revelations perfume and cosmetics inc. v. prince rogers nelson - Applying Performance Improvement Tools - Managment - Aon pert - MBA 599 - UNITEDHEALTH GROUP PROJECT - Threats of substitutes in the airline industry - Geez software for pc - Vendor Management - HSA 501 Management in Healthcare - Programmable logic array questions - Brain based learning jensen pdf - The biggest challenge to managing a virtual project team is - Alien periodic table worksheet - Monsanto syngenta mega merger would drive more deals real m&a - Fisk corporation is trying to improve its inventory control system - Learner assessment submission and declaration - Average hotel rate in new york city - How to critique a speech - Pavel tsatsouline height weight - Unit 1 Discussion - Pros and cons of relativism - Cost estimation methods in management accounting - Zappos com developing a supply chain to deliver wow - Records are anything papers memos presentations reports books maps emails - Grievance - Dia carry on luggage size - Isolated storage windows phone - Cultural Diversity - English - Irish land law notes - Fortune 50 companies in charlotte nc - Adapting counseling skills for multicultural and diverse clients - AMERICA HISTORY (H101) - Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation - Hersey blanchard situational leadership model - Week 5 - Shapes in a tangram - Equilibrium data for ethanol and water at 1 atm - WP7 - Southwestern university's food service case study - Mayton wood recycling centre - 555 spur st pope valley ca 94567 - What do romeo and benvolio decide to do - Watts volts x amps - Word memo - Floormaster loc laminate flooring - Onion cell light microscope - Summary on Chapter 2 of Christianity: An introduction (The Christian Bible - What is unified fabric - P4s3 ionic or covalent - Deer park football club players - Sc permit test quizlet - NUR340asignmentweek6